Ask the Hotmail team anything [and we'll reply via video]


Recommended Posts

Not a question per say, but I wish hotmail had icons again. Sometimes using the browser version (which is rare) I find myself looking for the reply, forward and delete button. I guess I don't use the desktop version enough to remember email control placements.

  • Like 1

Why doesn't the Hotmail app for Android 4.0 not work? It displays your account with a red triangle, then afterwards when you try to open it again, it tries to do so then closes, an uninstall and re install doesn't work.

Let me take this one: The "Hotmail" app made by "Microsoft + SEVEN" and various other developers is an obvious fake and likely a password stealing app. If it isn't by "Microsoft Corporation" (like OneNote Mobile) then it isn't a microsoft app.

Hey on that note I have one question thus far! What does the Hotmail team plan to do about these fake apps?

Thank you for creating one of the best web email service in the world. I still don't know why they are people out there that have not realized the improvements made to the service. I only dream of more integration of all MS assets under one portal. I still see the major effects that the government leaches had on MS. I enjoy SkyDrive access on my mobile phone as I tend to work on both the desktop apps and save them to the Sky for access anywhere.

Now what will I get for free for all the a** kissing. :)

How will you address the issues concerning the multiple handles on Microsoft web sites. I have lost count on the number that I have as those only pop-up when I'm logged into my Hotmail account in a browser.

You pioneered cloud storage before it was known as cloud storage (e.g. Online photo & video storage under "MSN Explorer" days. My issue is I lost all my digital photos of my daughter, nieces, nephews and other relatives who leave abroad (I was never able to recover some of those memories) when you discontinued the service back in 2002 or 03. How can I trust upload my precious collection onto SkyDrive now?

  • Like 1

1. Why doesn't Hotmail offer 2-step verification (one time use code sent to phone) like competitors? It would virtually eliminate account highjacks unless the hacker also cloned the victims phone.

2. How about adding a login history (Dates, times and IP addresses) to Hotmail so I can easily verify my account isn't being accessed by others

I'd rather choose gmail because it's lighter and faster than hotmail. Does Microsoft have any plans to remove all the clutter/other services on hotmail because when most of us want to consult our email, we just want to consult our email. It's also not easy on the eyes. The font gets annoying and most of the email I get on my hotmail account is unfiltered spam, something gmail filters way better than hotmail. Thanks for reading.

Let me take this one: The "Hotmail" app made by "Microsoft + SEVEN" and various other developers is an obvious fake and likely a password stealing app. If it isn't by "Microsoft Corporation" (like OneNote Mobile) then it isn't a microsoft app.

well, I think you SHOULD NOT answer questions if you dont know the answer... the app made by "Microsoft + SEVEN" is the official app from microsoft.

Click on the Android link on this link http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/hotmail/mobile?T1=t1

Let me take this one: The "Hotmail" app made by "Microsoft + SEVEN" and various other developers is an obvious fake and likely a password stealing app. If it isn't by "Microsoft Corporation" (like OneNote Mobile) then it isn't a microsoft app.

Hey on that note I have one question thus far! What does the Hotmail team plan to do about these fake apps?

If I could, I'd buy you guys a beer for asking that for me! THAT TOO, Microsoft....where's our official...REAL...droid app? I can't believe I didn't ask it myself...... :argh:

well, I think you SHOULD NOT answer questions if you dont know the answer... the app made by "Microsoft + SEVEN" is the official app from microsoft.

Click on the Android link on this link http://windows.micro...il/mobile?T1=t1

that may be true...but I still don't trust it, I mean, I use it, because of what the developer's name is and all, but I have problems changing, from say, my inbox to my junkmail folder with it...so it makes me wonder who is actually the developer....I mean, I could call myself a tomato all day long, but I'm still a human....I need some concrete-ness (just made that one up)

- i would love to see new UI with metro design google took Metro and added to gmail this should be done by Microsoft on hotmail not google with gmail

- Ok since skydrive part of windows live i would like to see one location not two for uploaded files through browser or or live mesh app or the future skydrive app

- yesterday i uploaded large excel sheet to skydrive and i can scroll and view it fast on IE9 but on firefox or opera its slow and cells are not organized correctly

good luck

I'd rather choose gmail because it's lighter and faster than hotmail. Does Microsoft have any plans to remove all the clutter/other services on hotmail because when most of us want to consult our email, we just want to consult our email. It's also not easy on the eyes. The font gets annoying and most of the email I get on my hotmail account is unfiltered spam, something gmail filters way better than hotmail. Thanks for reading.

Wow, and I thought I had a unique username..........what's your arch-nemisis, 111111111111111111111111111111? LOL...j/k....rather unique, though! Props for that! :D

Here is a list of issues I've had with Hotmail. I did recently try to switch from Gmail, but unfortunately, I had to move back.

1. Hotmail is ugly. Gmail has really nice themes with full screen pictures, Hotmail's themes consist of small differences to the top portion of the page.

2. Replying to emails, while functional, isn't as good as Gmail. Why load a new page when you could just load a small editing box or at least have that option.

3. Importing my emails from Gmail worked at first, but after a few hundred emails, it stopped importing. It even stopped importing new emails that would come into the Gmail inbox.

4. Ads, they're too big and in your face.

5. No archive option. It's nice to be able to hide emails you don't care about from your inbox.

Not a question per say, but I wish hotmail had icons again. Sometimes using the browser version (which is rare) I find myself looking for the reply, forward and delete button. I guess I don't use the desktop version enough to remember email control placements.

This, a million times. Even if we don't get icons back, the UI could be more metro-y, instead of that blue gradient that I love to hate every time I log in :(

I really don't have any questions, as I use it every day without complaint. It does what I want, and doesn't get in my way. For that, thank you.

I agree with making the UI metrofied. But the main thing about the UI is responsiveness. I feel theres so much lag when trying to delete an email that I sometimes accidentally delete the next email. And there should be an undo button, like in GMail.

Hi Galileo and Nic. As someone who switched from Hotmail to Gmail, what convincing argument could you use to get me to switch back to Hotmail? Allow me to explain why I switched to Gmail:

-No IMAP support which is a deal breaker right out of the gate. It's 2012 and there's no excuse not to support when Gmail supports it right out of the box.

-Terrible UI. I'm not an interface designer so I can't suggest on how to make it better but Gmail's UI is much more simpler and easier to use.

-Gmail's spam filter is so much better. I've never gotten a single spam e-mail in my Gmail inbox whereas I get spam in my hotmail inbox. Spam that shouldn't be slipping through the filter.

-The name "Hotmail" is seen as unprofessional. I would never put a Hotmail address on a resume or on professional work.

Rebranding can go a long way at improving the reputation since the name "hotmail" has a stigma against it. Why not rebrand it as @office.com and replace the UI with Exchange 2010's Outlook Web Access UI? It would give it a big professional boost, maybe regarded even more professional than Gmail since Office is so widely used.

-There's also a matter of trust. I remember back then if you didn't log into your hotmail account for 30 days (although now it's 270 days) all of your e-mails would be deleted. This may have been more understandable back when space was more limited and expensive, but nowadays there's no reason to still have this policy around when space is much bigger and cheaper today. There's been times where I haven't logged into my Gmail for months and they never deleted any e-mails.

When Gmail first came out with a gig a storage that was absolutely mind blowing at the time. Gmail labs is one of the best things to ever come out of any web-based e-mail service. You need something that is absolutely compelling and not just playing catch up.

Why doesn't Hotmail implement conversation threading as a choice for people who like it that way in Gmail and wouldn't hop over just because of this one feature?

EDIT: Just realized there's conversation threading in Hotmail as it is not by default, and there was no clear indication that this option was available. However, replying to an email brings you to a new email page, which breaks the flow of a conversation. After sending the email, we get a notification that the email has been sent. There's no auto-redirection to the inbox or the email we were replying to.

Constructive criticism: hotmail UI feels dated and unprofessional, and I think this is one reason why people use Gmail as their "professional" email rather than hotmail. In other words, there is a connotation between hotmail and immaturity.

You can fix this by:

1) change UI to metro

2) change default theme to something simpler, maybe using two tone colours.

Personally, I like the current layout and font of hotmail, but I really don't like the immature themes. I'm yearning for a simple, two tone color that mirrors the simple color scheme of my windows phone's start screen.

Why doesn't Hotmail implement conversation threading as a choice for people who like it that way in Gmail and wouldn't hop over just because of this one feature?

EDIT: Just realized there's conversation threading in Hotmail as it is not by default, and there was no clear indication that this option was available. However, replying to an email brings you to a new email page, which breaks the flow of a conversation. After sending the email, we get a notification that the email has been sent. There's no auto-redirection to the inbox or the email we were replying to.

There's an option to go straight to your inbox. It's not default yet, but it's there. I turned it on as soon as the feature was available

I agree with making the UI metrofied. But the main thing about the UI is responsiveness. I feel theres so much lag when trying to delete an email that I sometimes accidentally delete the next email. And there should be an undo button, like in GMail.

I find that hotmail is very fast now, no matter what I do. I'm a hotmail user and Gmail user, so I've compared the two UIs and performance speeds. Speed is honestly the same.

  • Like 1

Hi, I have a question for the Hotmail team

I commonly use the search feature in hotmail to find emails and to mass remove emails that fit my search criteria.

I get a lot of results when I search in my hotmail inbox and I would like to sort them but I can't. The message I when I try to sort the emails is as follows

"Right now we can only sort your search results by date."

Are there any plans to include sorting by From, Subject or Size for search results??

Thanks in advance

Kelvin Paull

Indeed, Hotmail needs IMAP in order to look halfway decent. :/

I'm a VERY happy (and even paying) GMX user, however, I care about my friends who use it and I'd like them to have a better experience. (Y)

Glassed Silver:mac

In the Windows Live Mail client there is an option in the spam filtering that rather than sending junk mail to the junk mail folder, you can just have it permanently deleted without even seeing it. I seem to recall that this was an option a while back on the web based version of Hotmail, although I could be mistaken. I think this is a great feature that I would love to see implemented in the web version. Is this a possibility. I do understand that a feature like this might require some sort of multiple step confirmation process to save users from themselves (i.e. "I'm not getting my emails!").

Anyway, you get my drift and this is something I would like to see, or is there some sort of back door way to accomplish this?

In the Windows Live Mail client there is an option in the spam filtering that rather than sending junk mail to the junk mail folder, you can just have it permanently deleted without even seeing it. I seem to recall that this was an option a while back on the web based version of Hotmail, although I could be mistaken. I think this is a great feature that I would love to see implemented in the web version. Is this a possibility. I do understand that a feature like this might require some sort of multiple step confirmation process to save users from themselves (i.e. "I'm not getting my emails!").

Anyway, you get my drift and this is something I would like to see, or is there some sort of back door way to accomplish this?

Lets give this a spin shall we,

Hotmail is the flagship for WP7 with regards to contacts and bring the link to all Social Networks,

Why has, or is Hotmail planning to, show better support for within the Hotmail COntact list to support Linking between social Networks? I find it too common when using my WP7 device etc that it does not seem to remember any linking or have any linking of its own on the website?

For example, unless the users defult email is set to their Live account etc there is no way to 'force link' the users together?

Also a lack of twitter from within Messenger but thats a diffrent department i gather :)

P.S. Love the work keep it up!

Hi Galileo & Nic,

I've been wanting to ask some very important stuff about Hotmail for a while now. However, I haven't found a support link anywhere in the UI. So here goes! :-)

Why are the SPAM Filters so bad? I keep getting mails in my inbox from random people claiming I've won lotteries, buy replica jewelry, buy replica watches, Viagra 20$ off!, etc. Doesn't Hotmail understand that its fake junkmail? I mean, I probably see one mail like that once in 2 months on Gmail, but more then 4-8 times a week on Hotmail. Also, I've tried to block out a particular domain ( ens.net.in & @enjayworld.co.in ) by repeatedly marking all emails as Junk. But they still find their way into my inbox. Please try & make the experience better. Fortunately or unfortunately, when Windows Live Domains launched about 3-4 months before Google Apps, I was quick to jump on-board for my domain's email to Hotmail as at that time, it was something that was unique! Now however, I keep wishing I'd waited until Google Apps had launched. Here's hoping that there's going to be a sea change in Hotmail!

Cheers!

Shravan

Not so much an Hotmail question but a service related one when can we expect Skydrive to work with Opera 11.6x or 12.xx Next x86/OOP x64 we're getting mighty sick of it telling us we can not upload a folder when trying to upload a single .jpg file

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!