Recommended Posts

875831308t.PNG

This is a fresh install of Win 7 Home Premium. No A/V and windows firewall disabled.

That sounds about right for a fresh install, seeing as you need to enable file sharing.

You also don't specify which system is giving this error, the Win 7 one trying to access another computer, or another computer trying to access this Win 7 system

So yes, more details are required.

This error is coming from the fresh installed laptop. File sharing is enabled on both systems. The laptop in question is able to access the other computer on the network, which is really odd to me.

I have seen this before, even on my own systems - I have looked into the reason yet. Prob has to do with uac or mismatch in credentials

i just drop to cmd and net use with user name and password and works just fine after that.

so for example net use * \\computername\share /u:username password

will map next open drive letter

But as mentioned already you are missing quite a bit of info. What username and passwords are you using to access the shares, what accounts are logged in? Passwords are the same?

What permissions do you have set on the sharing and or ntfs as well?

Troubleshooting file sharing issues can take some time over threads - its much easier to just take a look. I should have some time today from work, just PM and we can setup a teamviewer and be happy to take a look.

^Thanks BudMan, I used the cmd and receive a message network name not found, system error 67. The damnest thing is I can access the computer from my computer. I am trying to login to my desktop from the laptop using my desktops user name/password.

There should be NO router between your devices. Why would there be a router between them??

I am not talking about connecting to the same AP, or you common router wireless connection.

How are they boxes connected to your network.

If you have router that you believe your using as an AP -- and your not doing it right, then yeah you can have a issue.

So can you ping your desktop IP? If you can not resolve the name, its kind of hard to access any shares ;)

Draw/Explain how these boxes are connected, and post the output of their ipconfig /all

Also - right after you ping your desktop IP from your laptop, do an arp -a, and post those listing.. What does it show for the mac of your desktop?

There is one PC connected to the router, my desktop. The other 2 computers are laptops and they access via wireless. The cable modem is plugged into the router.


Windows IP Configuration

   Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : Jon-PC
   Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . :
   Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
   IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
   WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:

   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Generic Marvell Yukon 88E8056 based Ethernet Controller
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-01-29-A7-99-8E
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.2(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 208.67.220.220
									   208.67.222.222
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

Tunnel adapter isatap.{658C4069-3C82-47DE-AA78-F601E9091A68}:

   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

Tunnel adapter Local Area Connection* 9:

   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

And can you ping this 192.168.1.2 from your laptop?

You sure you just do not have AP isolation turned on? Depending on the router -- this could block wireless from talking to other wireless, and on some models block wireless from talking to wired. But does not stop wired from talking to wireless.

What is its IPconfig /all output?

If you not going to use ipv6, why not remove that stuff so your ipconfig /all is cleaner?

A simple will remove it all

reg add hklm\system\currentcontrolset\services\tcpip6\parameters /v DisabledComponents /t REG_DWORD /d 255

The if you ever want it back like nothing happened just

reg delete hklm\system\currentcontrolset\services\tcpip6\parameters\ /v DisabledComponents /f

This will remove those other adapters your seeing your isatap and teredo, etc.

OK, from the laptop I get error 67, network name cannot be found using the net use cmd. from her account (standard)

From the admin acct: error 5, access is denied

From admin: net use shows error 53 network path not found.

Netview yields Access is denied when trying to view my system.

ipconfig /all from laptop:


Windows IP Configuration

   Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hawk-HP
   Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . :
   Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
   IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
   WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:

   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 78-E3-B5-5D-68-C8
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

Wireless LAN adapter Wireless Network Connection:

   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Ralink RT5390 802.11b/g/n WiFi Adapter
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 94-39-E5-77-ED-52
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::ce2:22a5:b0a1:d48a%11(Preferred)
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.4(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
   DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 241738692
   DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-15-81-89-C9-68-A3-C4-B3-9D-45
   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 208.67.222.222
									   208.67.220.220
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

Tunnel adapter isatap.{20919493-028B-42BC-91B3-B4AD8CEDA5F3}:

   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

Tunnel adapter isatap.{862F7A89-B602-4C88-8551-2FFE38B2DA80}:

   Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter #2
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes

Tunnel adapter Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:

   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 2001:0:4137:9e76:1c44:ad5:b395:6b1c(Preferred)
   Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::1c44:ad5:b395:6b1c%13(Preferred)
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : ::
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled

So how many time do I have to ask for a simple ping test?

you get access denied on \\computername then I would say you have share permissions wrong for access without auth, if that is what you want?

But you should still be able to access..

verify you can PING!!!

then do

net use \\computername\ipc$ /u: username password

example

post-14624-0-47036900-1332545595.jpg

Netbios is already enabled - see from his post

Yeah its clearly a name resolution problem. And its wireless - broadcast is not working it seems. Try resetting your router.

Seen this a few times already here -- broadcast not working on over wireless. You can verify that with a sniff on both the desktop and the laptop -- see the broadcast packet go out, and then not see it on the client. If you see it on the client, then the client is not answering.

Access it via ip vs name ie do net view \\192.168.1.4

I have to look up the 67 error though, that doesn't make sense for simple can't find the name.. Should be simple error 53.

btw - post a screen shot of your share center settings for grins, your also in a home/private network not public right?

example

post-14624-0-36429500-1332587301_thumb.j

This will show current profile and if you have anything shared to everyone/anon, etc.

Dns doesn't matter where it points in this case as long as it can resolve outside names. There is no internal dns server to check on internal names so it really doesn't matter where it is pointed. Name resolution is against netbios.

Budman, for the record, I don't care what ipconfig thinks. I have had issues where that it is enabled but forcing it on fixes the issue at hand. You have to admit, crap that happens to me isn't exactly by the book....and book answers don't always fix my issues.

Well without a sniff it would be hard to say, but its clearly stated as being enabled - so that should mean its enabled ;)

What I have a few times here recently is broadcast not working over the wireless. Which I would think is more likely -- it can not hurt for sure to turn it to enabled if set for auto, etc.

As to the dns -- no there is no reason to point to his router if he doesn't want to.. I am not a fan of the soho routers dns forwarding/cache anyway -- they tend to die now and then and don't make anything any faster that is for damn sure. More of a convenience than anything else - just auto hand that out in dhcp, etc.

Now his name resolution issue would be mute if he ran an actual local dns with his machine names, etc. Now if he was dhcp I might say his router might do that - some do, but since he is static I highly doubt his router dns support dynamic updates, etc.

Just so what we are talking about jnelson, which I highly suggest you fire up wireshark so you can see this on your own network anyway.

Here is me trying to find a machine called \\testbox -- which does not exist btw.

post-14624-0-31285000-1332599125_thumb.j

Notice my box try dns first, adding my suffix local.lan - which clearly dns says sorry bud no record.

So then it broadcasts! the 192.168.1.255 address -- no response

So here is one that answers via broadcast, notice the 2 dns queries - first one is one I did directly with dig to make sure I removed it and it wouldn't answer ;) And then 2nd one is when I did the net view, then it broadcasted and got an answer

post-14624-0-86134300-1332599480_thumb.j

I think that the issue might be the desktop... when I go to Network, nothing shows up, but I can manually input the address to one laptop and it works, but when I attempt to input the address to my daughters laptop I still get a message stating that windows can not find the computer. I checked out my advanced file sharing and discovered that network discovery was turned off and will not turn on... incidentally I can access my daughter's laptop via IP address but not name. But the reverse does not work (IP of my desktop from her laptop). Now suddenly my PC shows up on the network, but still remains non accessible (same error as before) but I am able to view the laptop through name and IP now.

discovery has nothing to do with it - that's just if the browsing server is on or off

So did you try resetting your router?

Do a simple sniff to see if your broadcasting, and sniff on your other laptops to see if you see the traffic.

You sure your not just firewalling it?

Grab wireshark - and do a simple sniff while you do a net view.

But first thing I would do is RESET YOUR ROUTER!!!

Again going to network and not seeing anything is NOTHING to do with simple name resolution via broadcast.. That is the computer browser, completely different and has nothing to do with actually access your computers. Just a stupid LIST!!

arp cache has nothing to do with broadcasting for netbios name, nor does dns.

I agree I asked him to reset his router a while back, I would even go as far as saying just use NO encryption as test. Then put it back, etc.

Broadcast traffic is group key, different than unicast over wireless - so that could be the issue???

You don't really know what is happening unless he does simple sniff that would take all of like 5 minutes. Download wireshark, its FREE install -- run it on both machines and do a net view \\computername

Then we could see if seeing broadcast or not.. Until you see what is actually on the wire we are just guessing!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello mysterious lamborghiniv10, I was in Australia and... now I'm in the Netherlands. 
    • EU says Meta must restore rival chatbots' access to WhatsApp by Hamid Ganji The European Commission has ordered Meta to restore third-party AI chatbots’ access to WhatsApp after the tech giant decided to block them from operating on the popular messaging platform. After Meta banned rival AI chatbots from operating on WhatsApp, the European Commission launched an antitrust investigation to determine whether the company had abused its market dominance. As a result of Meta’s decision, third-party AI chatbots, including Microsoft’s Copilot and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, were prevented from operating on WhatsApp. At the time, Meta said it wanted to reserve the WhatsApp Business API for other types of businesses and did not allow rival chatbots to use it. This effectively prevented the WhatsApp ecosystem from being used to distribute rival chatbot services. However, the European Commission has now announced an interim measures decision requiring Meta to restore access to WhatsApp for rival general-purpose AI assistants on the same terms and conditions as before October 15, 2025. The Commission has also asked Meta to maintain that access until the antitrust investigation is concluded. The Commission argues that Meta has used its dominant market position to prevent rival AI chatbots from accessing the WhatsApp Business API. While Meta allowed rival services to return to WhatsApp by paying a fee, the European Commission still considers that arrangement to be a de facto access ban. According to EU antitrust chief Teresa Ribera, the fees introduced by Meta are so high that using WhatsApp is no longer economically sustainable for competitors. “It seems that Meta expects to leverage the vast reach and likely dominance of WhatsApp to benefit its own AI assistant and to foreclose rivals,” Ribera said. “We cannot let large digital incumbents leverage their dominance of the past to dictate who in Europe gets to compete and who gets to innovate in AI.”
    • A few years ago walmart had the 512 models on clearance for $35. I bought 3 of them. I should have purchased more.
    • I'm fine with a little reasonable promotion of Edge, but the degree which they do it right now I consider extremely unreasonable. 
    • Microsoft AI boss no longer believes that AI will replace human workers by David Uzondu Mustafa Suleyman, the head of Microsoft AI, recently took back his statements concerning white-collar jobs that he gave to the Financial Times in an interview made back in February, where he claimed that AI would replace office workers within 12 to 18 months. On Monday's episode of The Verge's Decoder, Suleyman recast the technology as more like a helpmate than a tool designed to take over your job. He explained that smaller office duties will "increasingly become digitized, automated" as people generate more digital materials. During the discussion, Suleyman emphasized a "very important distinction" between "tasks" and "jobs" to clarify his previous claims. He argued that his earlier comments only referred to individual actions that people perform at their desks. Suleyman used to work for DeepMind, the research lab he co-founded in 2010 alongside Demis Hassabis and Shane Legg, before he left in 2022 to establish Inflection AI and build an empathetic digital assistant. Microsoft hired him in March 2024 to lead its newly formed "Microsoft AI" division, placing him in charge of consumer products like Copilot, Bing, and Edge. His February comments also detailed plans for Microsoft to achieve self-sufficiency with a $140 billion infrastructure budget to train frontier models, predicting that creating a customized AI will soon feel like creating a podcast or a new blog: The 41-year-old is not the only AI executive who's softened his "AI will replace you" stance. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, last month used X to push back against employment panic by arguing that his startup builds tools to assist humans rather than build replacements. He had previously garnered backlash by suggesting that many modern office roles that AI might replace did not qualify as "real work" in the first place, at least when you compare desk jobs to physical, historical labor like farming.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!