Recommended Posts

It looks like Microsoft are trying to put things right https://twitter.com/...283190654021632

From the tweet:

Hey @sahaskatta , @Microsoftstore & I want to make things right. So I've got a laptop & phone (& apology) for you. Email me!

Looks like the guy was telling the truth all along after all. I hope those of you that called him a liar feel bad.

  • Like 3

Looks like the guy was telling the truth all along after all. I'm hope those of you that called him a liar feel bad.

shhhhh. talking random **** about a situation/person they know nothing about helps their next to no self esteem... how dare you reign on their parade!

I dislike the lack of skepticism when it comes to this story. Everywhere it's being reposted, everyone is immediately jumping in on this guy's side, despite that fact that losers almost always retell a story with a spin in their favor, and this guy's narration sounds especially bitter, so I think it's a pretty safe bet he is, at the VERY LEAST, not telling the whole story.

But these days, a lot of people online get a boner whenever there's a chance to feel like a corporation wronged a little guy, so there's probably no hope for the same healthy skepticism these same people herald in almost any other conversation.

Actually, it just seems like you like taking the other side of the story "just because" (heh), it has nothing to do with the story and everything to do with the fact that a lot of people are siding with him, you don't like that, do you ?

how do you avoid accidental touches?

Is that not what shutting the screen off prevents? Which clearly based on this (Having to hit the power button). The screen was off. If accidental touches were the case, the guy could of swiped the screen and won without needing to hit the power button.

Actually, it just seems like you like taking the other side of the story "just because" (heh), it has nothing to do with the story and everything to do with the fact that a lot of people are siding with him, you don't like that, do you ?

That or he's a MS fanboy.

It still requires you to press the power button, then as long as you don't press anything it will just go back to sleep. (in your pocket it shouldn't press anything)

The fabric of my pockets in my jeans are thin enough that my leg can activate the capacitive screen if I'm sitting down. It obviously boils down to personal preference, but I'm fine with taking a second to unlock my phone (both for security and to prevent accidental actions).

Good job: Setting up his Android, beating the WP7 guy, and showing who is the fastest. Great he now has $1000 dollars in his walle.........

Oh wait, Microsoft got all bunched up like a bitch and ran away. I said it in several threads and in comments: With proper setup, a Android can beat a Windows Phone 7 device. Tell her to SSH; She wont even know.

Marketing 101.

Of course the situation was rectified after Microsoft got lots of bad PR over this. How typical.

These types of competitions are stupid to begin with, they're clearly rigged, as has been pointed out.

His phone was jail broken and modded to hell and back only to be fast at this ONE task. It proves nothing except you can mod your phone to make it a weather station able to show weather a fraction faster than a multi purpose phone.

Call me when he can do it faster on a OOB phone.

He was running plain, unaltered Android 4.0.

Of course the situation was rectified after Microsoft got lots of bad PR over this. How typical.

These types of competitions are stupid to begin with, they're clearly rigged, as has been pointed out.

It's a marketing event to show off the phone and give out free ones. Everyone that participates gets a free phone. Also, if you watched the videos of Ben at CES they did show that he let at least one guy make up the scenario.

It's a marketing event to show off the phone and give out free ones. Everyone that participates gets a free phone. Also, if you watched the videos of Ben at CES they did show that he let at least one guy make up the scenario.

They only give you a Windows Phone if you trade in your current Phone. So it's not really free is it? I mean sure you could try it with a cheap phone and get a better one but you could also trade in an iPhone 4S 64GB which costs a lot more etc

If everyone got a free one they would let you keep your current phone in the process. This is more like a trade.

The fabric of my pockets in my jeans are thin enough that my leg can activate the capacitive screen if I'm sitting down. It obviously boils down to personal preference, but I'm fine with taking a second to unlock my phone (both for security and to prevent accidental actions).

Actually, this thread has got me questioning why I use a lock screen. Honestly, it's nearly impossible for me to accidently press the power button on my phone, between the power button being so flush to the phone it doesn't get an accidental push, and my case on top of that, I think it would be nearly impossible for me to accidently turn on my phone in my pocket. On the other hand, accidental touches because you forgot to turn off the screen before you put it away would be no more likely regardless of what lock screen you have because it isn't locked until it turns off either way. I don't use a password on my phone, even if I should, so I think I'm gonna try turning off my lock screen and see how it feels. One less pointless swipe.

Actually, this thread has got me questioning why I use a lock screen. Honestly, it's nearly impossible for me to accidently press the power button on my phone, between the power button being so flush to the phone it doesn't get an accidental push, and my case on top of that, I think it would be nearly impossible for me to accidently turn on my phone in my pocket. On the other hand, accidental touches because you forgot to turn off the screen before you put it away would be no more likely regardless of what lock screen you have because it isn't locked until it turns off either way. I don't use a password on my phone, even if I should, so I think I'm gonna try turning off my lock screen and see how it feels. One less pointless swipe.

Very simple - security. If my phone gets lost, I know there is less of a chance that someone is using my phone, looking at my contacts, emails, text messages, etc. Same reason why you password protect your email account, your car/house has doors & locks, etc...
Very simple - security. If my phone gets lost, I know there is less of a chance that someone is using my phone, looking at my contacts, emails, text messages, etc. Same reason why you password protect your email account, your car/house has doors & locks, etc...

I just said in the post you quoted in yours that I don't use a password on my lock screen, so that wouldn't affect me. Perhaps I should, but I don't because I don't often have issue leaving my phone somewhere where someone could steal it, and would be very quick to lock it down if someone did. That's an entirely different discussion though.

It's a marketing event to show off the phone and give out free ones. Everyone that participates gets a free phone. Also, if you watched the videos of Ben at CES they did show that he let at least one guy make up the scenario.

Its an event rigged to get people who don't know any better to buy a certain product. People are going to take the MS vids at face value and think, hey...WP really is faster and must be the better phone. Good stunt to increase sales/market share but will only last for so long.

He was faster to show the information if you read the story. He did not have a lock screen on his phone and thus he won by getting to the information first.

The rules had no stipulations about lock screens it was a fair fight and Microsoft made the rules themselves. By their own rule set he won. And even if it wasn't the amount of stages needed, if he did it first (swiped to unlock faster) he still could have won.

It's a dumb PR stunt that backfired on Microsoft. They come out with rules that suits them trying to portrait how Windows Phone "smokes" Android and they get their asses whooped and then don't want to honor the $1000 giveaway computer prize when they lost.

Not to mention they have a list of challenges they don't accept in the competition because they know they would get smoked by Android. It's hilarious.

Microsoft, stupid as always.

Actually, it just seems like you like taking the other side of the story "just because" (heh), it has nothing to do with the story and everything to do with the fact that a lot of people are siding with him, you don't like that, do you ?

Actually, you could take that same attitude against anyone being skeptical of anything that other people are eating up. What you're saying sounds like a cop-out. Are you saying people SHOULD believe the guy just because he said so? Are you saying that's a healthy way for people to behave? Is skepticism only a good thing when most people are being skeptical? Or is skepticism most useful when NOBODY is asking questions?

I like how nobody bothered to read the update that says he was contacted by Ben and given his phone and laptop, and that he is eBaying them for charity.

http://skattertech.com/2012/03/i-got-my-laptop-a-windows-phone-both-are-up-for-auction-100-of-proceeds-go-to-charity/

I like how nobody bothered to read the update that says he was contacted by Ben and given his phone and laptop, and that he is eBaying them for charity.

http://skattertech.c...-go-to-charity/

:laugh:

Well that explains him

I like how nobody bothered to read the update that says he was contacted by Ben and given his phone and laptop, and that he is eBaying them for charity.

http://skattertech.c...-go-to-charity/

by nobody did you mean just you?? because i read it.

also, i like how people who said that he is up for free laptop and some cash has shut their mouth now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!