Recommended Posts

I thoroughly enjoyed the final episode. Yes, it sucked that Andrea died. It sucked when Dale and Shane died too. Same with Amy. But with this show, this is what happens. The Governor not getting killed isn't a bad thing and helps keep the group on it's toes. Now that the group is big, they will have new challenges in terms of how to keep it safe and feed it, etc. That sounds good to me.

And I'm just spoiler tagging this because I think it is funny that people are arguing over what should and shouldn't be spoiler tagged! :D

  • Like 2

The last thing I wanted was Governer up the **** of Rick, Daryl & Co. for the whole next season. FFFUUU

Oh, and good ridiance. Andrea is gone, thank God. but they dragged it for nothing really. She should've taken at least Governer with her. Now we'll have to see more of the prison and the governer and ...

Season 3 Part 2 is up next

  • Like 2

Dunno why people are spoilering things considering the episode aired last night.

Awww poor poo poo!

Did you know that I waited to come and the read the comments in this thread until AFTER I saw the last episode? I mean for christ sake the thread title is called "The walking dead" TV show (Season 3). What the hell did you think was being discussed here, the show mad men? :p

  • Like 2

Nope Season 4 is up next

Thanks for all the clips Rappy, appreciated. I'll go Zombie huntin' with Maggie anytime!

Awww poor poo poo!

Did you know that I waited to come and the read the comments in this thread until AFTER I saw the last episode? I mean for christ sake the thread title is called "The walking dead" TV show (Season 3). What the hell did you think was being discussed here, the show mad men? :p

Actually Warwagon, I think you win this one. :)

Totally disaapointing, completely anticlimatic ending.

What the hell. Where is closure, where is excitement for next episode?

the pliers part, with dropping them the first time was so predictably boring... and is the govn'r staying for one more season? nooooo.

carl shooting the kid, too was not handled as good as i expected.

such a bad last episode, i am not sure i am interested in sticking with this show...

i dropped it ones, but i picked it up, because it truly had some great episodes.

ps. The Walking Dead game (telltale) is so much more interesting, I hope they are making more (i think they are)

Awww poor poo poo!

Did you know that I waited to come and the read the comments in this thread until AFTER I saw the last episode? I mean for christ sake the thread title is called "The walking dead" TV show (Season 3). What the hell did you think was being discussed here, the show mad men? :p

Why are you quoting me, that is pretty much what I just said?

Why are you quoting me, that is pretty much what I just said?

Huh? You said "Dunno why people are spoiling things considering the episode aired last night.". I took that as complaining that you were seeing spoilers in this thread. Then I said, if you haven't seen the episode yet don't come in the the thread.

Hilarious. Someone on tumblr posed the question why aren't they just going to island? They're not that far away from the ocean, get a boat and get away from the mainland.

If they walked from Atlanta to Charleston, SC, it would take roughly 5 days (with very minimal stops), so with a natural pace + appropriate stops, maybe 2-3 weeks and they've been in Atlanta for almost a year. Wouldn't an island be a lot easier to deal with than an entire continent of zombies?

A good sailing time from Charleston to Bermuda would take roughly 9-15 days (depending on weather conditions). Bermuda has 65,000 people living there versus 10.9 million people in the Atlanta area.

  • Like 1

Was a all right episode. Was hoping for a lot more out of it.

There seems to be a lot of talk about Carl and him shooting that other teenager. Even in the show, I think they skimped on the biggest reason why he should have done what he did. They asked the kid to lower his gun and drop it. If you rewatch the scene, he is lowering the shotgun, but it is being lowered in a fashion that starts to have it pointed right at Carls face, while the teenagers finger is still directly on the trigger. If Carl didn't shoot, he would have lost his face. It was the right move.

  • Like 1

Huh? You said "Dunno why people are spoiling things considering the episode aired last night.". I took that as complaining that you were seeing spoilers in this thread. Then I said, if you haven't seen the episode yet don't come in the the thread.

Read what I said again, I said spoilering, not spoiling, as in why are people putting spoiler tags on things.

Hilarious. Someone on tumblr posed the question why aren't they just going to island? They're not that far away from the ocean, get a boat and get away from the mainland.

If they walked from Atlanta to Charleston, SC, it would take roughly 5 days (with very minimal stops), so with a natural pace + appropriate stops, maybe 2-3 weeks and they've been in Atlanta for almost a year. Wouldn't an island be a lot easier to deal with than an entire continent of zombies?

A good sailing time from Charleston to Bermuda would take roughly 9-15 days (depending on weather conditions). Bermuda has 65,000 people living there versus 10.9 million people in the Atlanta area.

I have always thought that, I have a few Islands in mind near south GA that I would go to, but then again would that really be a show. A lot of people are tired of the prison, wouldn't an island get old

I went from not having heard of the show to salivating for the start Season 4, all in the space of less than two weeks.

The Walking Dead is the only justification for the US's gun culture - the story just wouldn't work in any other developed-world democratic country.

  • Like 1

I have always thought that, I have a few Islands in mind near south GA that I would go to, but then again would that really be a show. A lot of people are tired of the prison, wouldn't an island get old

I think the interaction of the human groups is great, but the Governor has gotten old and a little too unbelievable. The encounter with the group that had the New Yorker that Rick drew down on in the old bar was excellent. A few more encounters of that nature would have been better than the over-the-top drawn out Governor line.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My issue is I can't access the forum on mobile if the site is set to Desktop mode on Vivaldi because it can't complete the Cloud flare am I a bot check! I know this is a Vivaldi issues as it has started happening on all cloud flare check sites, it's so annoying, I've reported it but no fix yet.
    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!