Recommended Posts

Monika de Montgazon was convicted in 2005 of setting fire to the house in Berlin where she, her partner and her 76-year-old father were living, with the intention of killing the old man for his insurance payout.

But she challenged the conviction from jail ? and after 888 days behind bars, she had assembled enough evidence to show the fire had been an accident, started by a cigarette left burning in her father's bed, the Tagesspiegel newspaper said on Thursday.

The now 56-year-old was freed in March 2006 having served nearly two and a half years of a life sentence.

But she is still fighting for appropriate compensation after rejecting an initial offer of ?11 for each day she spent in prison.

Now the justice system has given her another "slap in the face" de Montgazon told journalists on Wednesday. It has told her it would only cover ?86,000 of the costs of her appeal, leaving her with a ?32,000 bill.

The Berlin state supreme court decided de Montgazon's appeal had cost too much ? paying experts up to ?125 an hour of work, as opposed to the ?84 it considered reasonable.

De Montgazon had "not plausibly argued" why the costs were so high, said the court.

Ulrich Schnellenberg, head of the Berlin lawyers' association said this was ridiculous. "How is someone sentenced to life in prison and fighting for their freedom supposed to negotiate a rate in line with market prices with experts?" he said.

Schnellenberg is demanding that Berlin Justice Senator Thomas Heilmann intervene to "find a non-bureaucratic solution to averting this injury as soon as possible."

Montgazon will meanwhile be waiting on a ruling by the Federal Constitutional Court, to which she has submitted a complaint.

Previously a doctor's assistant, de Montgazon now runs a disco in Berlin's Neuk?lln district. "This just goes on and on," she told the paper on Thursday. "But I'll keep fighting."

source

Ulrich Schnellenberg, head of the Berlin lawyers' association said this was ridiculous. "How is someone sentenced to life in prison and fighting for their freedom supposed to negotiate a rate in line with market prices with experts?" he said.

I agree. I hope justice is done before this is done.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!