Recommended Posts

Welcome to Neowin' official PC Hardware buying guide. For those who don't have time to keep track of the latest news and don't want to go through the hassle of reviewing every new product that comes out, we have build a comprehensive guide, specifically for you. You can trust this guide with all your money. We have developed it, taking into consideration, all the reviews from various technology sites, throughout the internet.

Budget - Everyday work, with casual gaming

Intel Pentium G860 ? LGA1155 - $74.99

GIGABYTE GA-H61M-DS2 - $49.99 or Asus H61-M LE LGA1155 - $59.99

AMD Radeon 6670 1024MB DDR3 1280x800 to 1440x900 - $54.99 or AMD Radeon 7750 1024MB GDDR5 1600x900 - $99.99

G.Skill Ripjaws DDR3 4GB 1333MHz - $23.45

Antec BP430 430W - $48.80 or Xigmatek NRP-PC 402 400W - $5742

With components on the left: 253 USD

With components on the right: 317 USD

Budget - For Gaming

Intel Core i3-3220 - LGA1155 - $124.99

ASRock B75M-ITX LGA 1155 - $89.99

NVIDIA GeForce 7750 1680x1050 - $79.99 or AMD Radeon 7770 1024MB GDDR5 1680x1050 - $134.99

G.Skill DDR3 4GB 1333MHz - $23.45 or G.Skill DDR3 2x4GB 1333MHz - $53.99

Antec EarthWatts EA-500D Green 500W - $71.24

With components on the left: 391 USD

With components on the right: 463 USD

Budget - For Multi-threaded apps, and casual gaming

AMD FX 4100 - $108.99

GIGABYTE GA-970A-D3 - $94.24

AMD Radeon 7770 1024MB GDDR5 1680x1050 - $134.99

G.Skill DDR3 2x4GB 1333MHz - $53.99

Antec EarthWatts EA-500D Green 500W - $71.24

465 USD

Mainstream

Intel Core-i5 3470 ? LGA1155 - $179.99

ASRock Z68 Extreme4Gen3 LGA1155 - $132.99

AMD Radeon HD 7850 1 GB 1680x1050 to 1920x1080 - $228.99

G.Skill RipjawsX Series DDR3 2x4GB 1600MHz - $46.99

OCZ Agility 3 AGT3-25SAT3-120G 120GB - $117.99

CORSAIR Builder Series CX600 V2 600W - $72.99

780 USD

High End

Intel Core i7 3770K - LGA1155 - $309.99

GIGABYTE GA-Z77X-UP5-TH LGA 1155 - $244.99

AMD Radeon HD 7970 Boost - $379

G.Skill RipjawsX Series DDR3 2x4GB 1600MHz - $46.99

Crucial M4 CT256M4SSD2 256GB - $179.99

CORSAIR Enthusiast Series TX650 V2 650W - $79.99

1242 USD

Extreme Performance

Intel Core i7 3930K - LGA2011 - $569.99

ASUS P9X79 PRO LGA 2011 - $309.99

2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 SuperClocked in SLI 2560x1600 - $878.99

CORSAIR DOMINATOR 16GB (4 x 4GB) 1866 MHz - $119.99

Crucial M4 CT512M4SSD1 512GB - $384.99

CORSAIR TX750 V2 850W - $104.99

2369 USD

Edited by Anaron
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1070547-pc-hardware-buying-guide-q1-2013/
Share on other sites

Not everyday. Not necessarily

Once in a month only :p

More like once a week, at least. Every week at least 1 thing better than what is posted comes out. Thats why threads like this cannot exist. The PC building industry is too fast.

Another thing, all your parts are from Newegg. There are better and cheaper parts than from Newegg. Besides that, Newegg does not ship everywhere.

for "Budget - Everyday work, with casual gaming" a celeron g530/40 offers pretty good performance for about 40euros.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/celeron-g540-g440_5.html#sect0

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/celeron-g540-g440_6.html#sect0

h61 chipset is ok for ultra low budget but rather then the 2nd listed Asus H61-M LE, an extra $9 with the Asrock H67 board brings more features like hdmi, usb3, 2 x SATA 6Gb/s, optical out

The Extreme Build is odd 32GB RAM, SLI/Crossfire and a large RAID 0 for storage of games would make more sense. Why a 512GB SSD? SSDs arent exactly THAT cheap yet.

pretty sure an SSD will outperform a RAID 0 easily. Don't need 512 gigs of it though.

and 32 gigs is overkill when most games can't use a fraction of that.

surprised no AMD APU A-series get in the list specially in the budget area. They sound good to me, future proof cheap to buy and run, and gonna save you the GPU!!!

I had them in my mind, but when reviewing some benchmarks, on average the Pentiums gave better performance. APUs were a bit ahead in gaming, but a bit behind in other tasks, where Pentiums excelled

I had them in my mind, but when reviewing some benchmarks, on average the Pentiums gave better performance. APUs were a bit ahead in gaming, but a bit behind in other tasks, where Pentiums excelled

Pentiums faster.. lets see :p

Pentium G850 (?66.88) vs AMD A6-3670K (?83.99)

On paper:

G850

Dual Core

2.9 GHz

2 x 256KB L2 Cache

3MB L3 Cache

Intregated Intel HD Graphics 2000

A6-3670K

Quad Core

2.7 GHz

4MB L2 Cache

Integrated AMD Radeon HD 6530D

G850 has an L3 Cache and is clocked higher. However, the APU is a quad core (better for non-gaming tasks, and some games such as GTA4 which require a quad core to run smoothly.) and it has a better integrated GPU.

First of all, here are the pass marks cores:

G850 2731 Rank 308th

A6-3670K 3861 Rank 180th

The APU here wins in the Pass Mark benchmark by 1130 points. It is also a higher ranking than the G850.

However, I cannot find any benchmarks for the A8-3670K :(. So I am going to bump it up to the top of the range (next dearest one) A8-3870K ?101.99 and compare it against the similarly priced Intel Core i3-2120. ?94.79

Intregated Graphics

metro.png

A8-3870 is nearly double the fps, when using integrated graphics.

(The other benchmarks were a pretty similar result from that website.)

(2100 is used in below benchmarks, because the 2120 isnt used...)

Other Benchmarks

heaven-580-90.jpg

In this benchmark, the A8 gains 11FPS more than the i3 2100, along with a 560TI.

With cinebench:

A8-3870K 3.46 Points

i3-2100 3.00 Points

With WPrime:

14.350 A8-3870K

18.090 i3-2100

Lower is better

The overall score for multitasking

i3-2100 1476

A8-3870K 1082

However, overclocking (which is relatively easy) brings it to a more respectable 1264.

Plus, since there is more cores availble, multithreaded apps will gain an advantage.

GAMING BENCHMARKS http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/cpus/2012/02/06/amd-a8-3870-review/6(Internal GPU)

Crossfiring, the APU with a cheap 6670 is where this APU gains an advantage over the i3. This is a lot cheaper (the motherboards are also cheaper). I am going to post benchmarks, but this is getting to be a very long thread, so Im going to leave it as it is at the moment.

Bout time someone made a topic like this.

Pentiums faster.. lets see :p

Pentium G850 (?66.88) vs AMD A6-3670K (?83.99)

Recommendation from Tom?s Hardware is to go Intel.

Averages.png

I would compare the G860 to the G850 and the A6-3670K to the A8-3870K.

Also, all these builds have dedicated graphics, so the performance of integrated graphics is moot.

EDIT: Muhammad Farrukh, you should consider adding in case recommendations, that?s actually something I spent some time finding while I was doing my build.

Also, I wouldn?t recommend a 512GB SSD. That?s going to be way too overpriced. A 256GB SSD and a traditional hard drive for storage would be my recommendation.

In lower tiers you should also have traditional hard drive recommendations, but you should also probably have a warning about the increased prices due to the flooding in Thailand.

  • Like 1

[...]

I was waiting for you to show up :p

As CentralDogma, before me pointed out, from TomsHardware, AnandTech and Guru3D, I was able to conclude that overall, on average, Pentium is a better option. Sure, the APU gives a bit better gaming performance, but on average, as a whole, I think Pentium is a better option. I will review the APU from the source you have provided, and consider it in the next update.

Muhammad Farrukh, you should consider adding in case recommendations, that?s actually something I spent some time finding while I was doing my build.

I was thinking about it, but since everyone have their own taste, so it might not interest all.

Regardless, I will try to add some decent recommendations, in the update.

Also, I wouldn?t recommend a 512GB SSD. That?s going to be way too overpriced. A 256GB SSD and a traditional hard drive for storage would be my recommendation.

I initially thought of adding a 350/360 one, but couldn't found an M4 variant of it. As this is what we call the ultimate power house, so we'd expect top of the line performance, and according to benchmarks of AnandTech, M4 tops the charts.

I'll see if I can find a cheaper one next time.

In lower tiers you should also have traditional hard drive recommendations, but you should also probably have a warning about the increased prices due to the flooding in Thailand.

Here, too, I thought of adding HDDs. I will add them in the update.

Now I feel like my post was a little bossy. :p

You did a good job though; lord knows I don?t have the patience to come up with a whole bunch of builds.

Fake edit: you?ll also need a fan/heatsink in the LGA2011, Intel doesn?t include a stock cooler with those CPUs.

It all depends what you want. The APU's are good for budget gaming, as they have the nicer integrated GPU. I think you should have left side be Intel, and right side be AMD CPU's (except after High End - where AMD just gets destroyed).

snapback.pngSite Lab, on 16 April 2012 - 16:32, said:

[...]

I was waiting for you to show up :p

As CentralDogma, before me pointed out, from TomsHardware, AnandTech and Guru3D, I was able to conclude that overall, on average, Pentium is a better option. Sure, the APU gives a bit better gaming performance, but on average, as a whole, I think Pentium is a better option. I will review the APU from the source you have provided, and consider it in the next update.

Heehee, I have to put AMD into the argument. A good idea, would be like tsupersonic said is left hand side Intel, right hand side AMD. Then have an APU build. Therefore if someone wants an APU they can see the best option for that, and if someone wants to go AMD then they can as well. You could also do with a UK prices bit. (Newegg + Aria (www.aria.co.uk) is a good one.)

and for budget builds, AMD is better bang for you buck...

No, no no we cannot be having this. The dual core i3 obviously beats all of the quad/hexa/eight core processors :p. It is also so much cheaper (even though the motherboards are more expenisve). *sarcasam*

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!