Lead Android developer thinks a 5 month wait for an update is 'very rea


Recommended Posts

Lead Android developer thinks a five-month wait for an update is 'very reasonable'

Jean-Baptiste Queru, technical lead on the Android Open Source Project (AOSP), has revealed his opinion on the current state of the project and the lengthy waits users face for updates. In a Google+ post, Queru congratulates Sony on its Android 4.0 update for the Tablet S and describes the Japanese company as being the biggest contributor to Android, leaving everyone else playing catch-up. By contributing code to the project, Sony should be able to ensure timely updates for its own devices as well as helping out the community at large. So why the long wait for Android 4.0?

Queru actually thinks the five months it took Sony to update the tablet from 3.0 Honeycomb to 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich is "very reasonable," as the two Android versions are "quite different" under the hood. He also adds that the differences between Gingerbread and Ice Cream Sandwich are huge, and so phone upgrades are likely to take longer. When asked why Asus updated its tablet much faster than Sony, Queru states that Asus worked together with Nvidia. Given the Transformer Prime's status as the flagship Tegra 3 tablet, it comes as no surprise that both parties would throw as many resources as they can at the tablet to ensure a timely update.

What really bothers Queru is that some Google-engineered devices still don't have the latest version of its own OS, thanks to delays in the carrier approval process. He's very glad that Google is back to selling devices directly, and will be "even happier" when he sees the program expanded to more countries.

Source: The Verge

If he agrees that Asus and Nvidia churned out update very fast for Transformer Prime, why the F*** others take so long? Does he know that he is contradicting himself?

nVidia and Asus worked together a lot, most development was parallel. Most other manufacturers don't get access to all needed drivers and HAL-stuff from their SoC-source that fast, and then it obviously takes a while to port all the included apps. That, and most companies (looking at you, Samsung) are just lazy.

Sony and Sony Mobile/Sony Ericsson), as it has been said, contribute a lot of their work to the Android source code, and they have very good developers. They improved memory management on ICS over the "standard" edition, and their software is rock solid. Good job Sony!

Sony Mobile is also the only manufacturer to date that actually completely reskinned their Android interface to match the ICS guidelines. With the 4.0 update (and on the Xperia S) all icons and almost all interface graphics got a major overhaul to fit Holo.

(For the record, Sony tablets are made by the Sony VAIO team, Sony Mobile (/Ericsson) Xperia smartphones are made by the SEMC (Sony (Ericsson) Mobile Communications) team. They work completely independent, but both of them contribute a lot of code to Android. They are slowly merging some development in common areas (mostly media-related such as Bravia Engine, Music Player, ...), but all of that is in a very early stage.)

If he agrees that Asus and Nvidia churned out update very fast for Transformer Prime, why the F*** others take so long? Does he know that he is contradicting himself?

I assume it's because ASUS goes about Android the proper way. They are putting a few apps and widget that are theirs but their Android installation is pretty much stock which makes them updated it very fast. I just got an upgrade on ASUS Transformer 1 to the latest ICS only few days ago. They are super fast.

  • 1 month later...

oh really when's the last time you had a blackberry or Symbian update???

Last month. In fact, at this point my BlackBerry Torch 9860 received more updates than my HTC Legend ever did.

I still loathe BlackBerry OS 7.1 though.

I assume it's because ASUS goes about Android the proper way. They are putting a few apps and widget that are theirs but their Android installation is pretty much stock which makes them updated it very fast. I just got an upgrade on ASUS Transformer 1 to the latest ICS only few days ago. They are super fast.

ASUS just mash together anything and send it out, they released 3 consecutive ICS builds for the TF101 to fix a major random reboot and sleep of death bug present since ICS day 1 and each update made things worse, one of them killed the volume and all of them made the bugs happen more frequently

They obviously either don't test their releases or they couldn't care less and send out useless crap anyway

They got together LOADS of (2) beta testers out of the 40+ that asked to be testers on XDA and then completely ignored them when they reported that the beta update did not fix the bugs, and sent them out to everyone anyway, three times.

Their amazing story they were telling everyone was "We can't replicate it"

How can you not replicate something that is happening to 99% of your customers when you own every revision of the TF101

I swore never to buy asus again after this, my TF101 was a paper weight for most of this year

oh really when's the last time you had a blackberry or Symbian update???

*chirp* * chirp*

The Belle update just came out a few months ago and Carla is due soon, so that's both your points invalidated. (mainly because you didn't bother to research them)

oh really when's the last time you had a blackberry or Symbian update???

Considering Android and Windows Phone are both playing catch up on even basic features, I wouldn't complain much about slow Symbian updates.

It's not so long ago Android people were all "Ooh myyyyy" over tethering. It made me laugh myself to tears.

I'll say it again Android would be soo much better if the adopted the iOS approach to OS updates... F*ck the carrier push it all out, that is... if the vendors get their drivers done in time....

I'll say it again Android would be soo much better if the adopted the iOS approach to OS updates... F*ck the carrier push it all out, that is... if the vendors get their drivers done in time....

That doesn't change anything about different manufacturers slapping on their custom interfaces and stuff.

Android will never be successful unless the versions can be updated quickly amongst different devices. Don't even get me started on it taking the manufacture so long to release their version because it is time consuming. If they would [***Motorola I'm singling you out for my Xyboard***] allow their devices to be unlocked and release their software in open source standards, then we'd have releases within weeks with such groups as Cyanogen.

So no, the guy is a jackass, I think a 5 month rate is very unacceptable.

Considering Android and Windows Phone are both playing catch up on even basic features, I wouldn't complain much about slow Symbian updates.

It's not so long ago Android people were all "Ooh myyyyy" over tethering. It made me laugh myself to tears.

Firstly, you do realise that had little to do with Google and a lot to do with carriers, right? And secondly, what basic features is Android missing?

I'll say it again Android would be soo much better if the adopted the iOS approach to OS updates... F*ck the carrier push it all out, that is... if the vendors get their drivers done in time....

Do you even have a clue how Android works? The code for the OS is pushed into the open source projects, and the developers build and customise it for their devices from source. Google have NO CONTROL over how updates are pushed they just provide the OS. There's no conceivable way for them to forcibly update devices they didn't manufacture.

Android will never be successful unless the versions can be updated quickly amongst different devices. Don't even get me started on it taking the manufacture so long to release their version because it is time consuming. If they would [***Motorola I'm singling you out for my Xyboard***] allow their devices to be unlocked and release their software in open source standards, then we'd have releases within weeks with such groups as Cyanogen.

So no, the guy is a jackass, I think a 5 month rate is very unacceptable.

56% of the smartphone market worldwide says otherwise

Android will never be successful unless the versions can be updated quickly amongst different devices. Don't even get me started on it taking the manufacture so long to release their version because it is time consuming. If they would [***Motorola I'm singling you out for my Xyboard***] allow their devices to be unlocked and release their software in open source standards, then we'd have releases within weeks with such groups as Cyanogen.

So no, the guy is a jackass, I think a 5 month rate is very unacceptable.

You're thinking like a geek and not like an average consumer. The average user won't give a toss about updates if the device already works well for them, most people that I know that have owned iPhones didn't even understand what the software updates were for and i'd wager the situation isn't much different for Android and BB users

It definitely lowers the value of a device.

While I never wait a single minute for an update on my iPhone, I always get all the features for the time that I own my phone. My phone is used at 100% of its potential for all the time that I own it.

On the other hand, on Android, if you?re always 4 months late, it?s like your device is used at 80% of its potential for 12 complete months in its life cycle, if your phone is good for 3 years and a new version is released yearly.

No thanks, Android. You see, deploying software updates right away on every phone is not good. It?s nothing, it?s neutral. But making users wait for updates is completely negative.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!