Zoo Keeper Licks Monkey Butt to Save Life

By Hum
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

Wuhan Zoo Monkey caretaker Zhang Bangsheng unbelievably used his tongue to lick a small monkey?s butt! :|

50-year-old Zhang Bangsheng used warm water to clean a small Francois? Leaf Monkey?s buttocks, then began using his mouth to lick it, not stopping for over an hour, until the little monkey defecated a single peanut. Only after the peanut was defecated did Zhang Bangsheng laugh with satisfaction.

As it is understood, this small Francois? langur is only 3 months old, and is the first Francois? Leaf Monkey to be born in nearly 10 years at this animal park. The Francois? langur is a rare primate from Guangxi and Guizhou and is amongst the nation?s most protected animals. Because it is so precious, the zoo gave it to model worker and high-level expert Zhang Bangsheng to care for and raise.

On the first day of the ?May 1st? short holiday, Zhang Bangsheng let the small Francois langur enter the monkey exhibit for the first time to meet visitors so it can see more of the world. The next day, Old Zhang discovered that the little monkey had indigestion and difficulty defecating, and immediately became worried. Seeing peanut shells on the ground, Old Zhang immediately understood that visitors had definitely tossed peanuts to the small monkey, and the toothless monkey swallowed the peanut whole. If it does not quickly defecate it, it would endanger the little monkey?s life.

Because the monkey is too small, it wasn?t suitable to use medicine to let it defecate. The only way was to lick its butt, to prompt it to defecate the peanut, and so the scene at the start of this article occurred.

source

Proficient

srbeen

Posted
Posted

Yea right, difference between a warm wet finger/cloth and his tongue is what ?

Fetish gone wild :laugh:

He WAS the expert.. and the monkey is still alive... So he wasn't wrong in his methodology. Maybe he hadn't heard of a washcloth or a dental dam.

On the same topic - can anyone explain this?

the very last narration sentence is the deal-sealer.

Proficient

srbeen

Posted
Posted

:s

From the title I gathered he was licking to save his own life, until I read further

This was like when the cops called me to say they got complaints of my dogs chasing people on bikes. What a liar he was! My dogs haven't even got the tricycle down yet.

  • Charisma, green_link and Jose_49
  • Like 3
Grand Master

Original Poster

Posted
Posted

ok, the dude did not need to lick its buttocks.... I have nursed animals who needed such treatment and all I did was use a cloth which resembled the roughness of the species covered in HOT water (as it cooled rather quickly, also the warmer it is the more the muscles relax) or a cotton bud with hot water (once again cooled down extremely quickly before the animal was touched ) had to do this every 2-4 hours .... did not use my tongue once..I aint rimming no animals boy.

Grand Master

*RedBull*

Posted
Posted

He WAS the expert.. and the monkey is still alive... So he wasn't wrong in his methodology. Maybe he hadn't heard of a washcloth or a dental dam.

On the same topic - can anyone explain this?

the very last narration sentence is the deal-sealer.

Ok, for the record the boy was licking a female animals genitalia for what reason I don't know exactly unless from the latter video he wanted to be cooled down by the gush of her orgasmic wash???? Maybe it was a small water buffalo? LOL

Grand Master

tiagosilva29

Posted
Posted
ok, the dude did not need to lick its buttocks.... I have nursed animals who needed such treatment and all I did was use a cloth which resembled the roughness of the species covered in HOT water (as it cooled rather quickly, also the warmer it is the more the muscles relax) or a cotton bud with hot water (once again cooled down extremely quickly before the animal was touched ) had to do this every 2-4 hours .... did not use my tongue once..I aint rimming no animals boy.

Maybe they don't have clothes in China.

Grand Master

SirEvan

Posted
Posted

Maybe they don't have clothes in China.

I'm pretty sure Chinese people have clothes...What, do you think they're some primitive african tribe or something, running around naked? I mean come on, most clothes are made in China now.

I believe the word you were looking for was "Cloths"

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By +Edouard · Posted

      Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By WaltC · Posted

      Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By +Edouard · Posted

      By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By WaltC · Posted

      (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!