Recommended Posts

Everyone bitching is making not one iota of sense. Blizzard+Launch= A COMPLETE frickin' disaster. Always will. They got you and they don't give a crap. They know you'll bitch but you'll still fork over your $$$ anyway.

Unfortunately I would have to agree with you. But it is about damn time that customers stand up and fight back against poor customer experiences across the board. While I am hopeful that Diablo III will turn out to be a quality game in the end, it is completely unfair to customers to have to put up with this crap to begin with.

Isolated issues don't represent everyone. Remember that the QQ on the forums is much louder than those who are actually stuck in game having fun. Of course, they're never on the forums to tell everyone, "YO DAWG, HAVIN FUN M8! K BYE"

Also, maybe this is your first launch because there have been plenty worse. Not that it justifies it in any way, but not everything is foreseeable with the varying equipment people use from one PC to the next or what have you.

Lastly, if these kinds of things annoy you, I'd recommend not purchasing any sort of technology on release day. This is just the nature of the beast with just about... everything!

Wow, just wow.. two emergency server maintenance sessions in the first 12 hours. And this is primarily a single player game. There should not be any issues.

Wow, just wow.. two emergency server maintenance sessions in the first 12 hours. And this is primarily a single player game. There should not be any issues.

The first two may have been primarily single player, however as shown with the design and community backend.. they are really pushing for multi-player.

I could be wrong here, but the last time I checked Blizzard were quite good with their customers. The actual message you want Blizzard to hear is, "Guys, how about some better preparation when launching future products?"

Considering that's the message you want to send, it would be worth pointing out that Blizzard isn't the only group to have launch issues. All games have launch issues, especially looking at the multiplayer aspects.

That wouldn't be the actual message I would want Blizzard to hear. Blizzard are not newbs, they knew what they were getting into, and they ****ed it up anyway. I think anybody who is seriously ****ed about this has every right to be. Requiring you to be logged in at all times is just absolutely ridiculous, they should have had an offline single player option.

Except that betas usually have 1/10 of what the entire final version game base will be. You can run the algorithms as to what you need, but you won't always be prepared for everything (esp. a mass rush to login at the same time). How is it possible to prepare for that while saving money? Too few servers...angry customer base....Add too many extra servers to process requests = spend way more money and upset shareholders.

They have past experiences to go by. Blizzard is not new to this by any stretch. WoW and Starcraft II also put massive stresses on their systems upon launch. Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not stand up for what is right are merely pawns for those who do wrong. We could even expand this to software in general as there have been many substandard products thrust upon consumers and we have little to no legal recourse. It has to stop! Software companies need to be held responsible for their mistakes just as manufacturers of tangible goods are. Laws need to be changed to prevent them from hiding behind their EULAs and using them as blanket "its never our fault" policy. They must start taking responsibility for what they do/neglect to do.

The first two may have been primarily single player, however as shown with the design and community backend.. they are really pushing for multi-player.

Doesn't change the fact that a lot, maybe even most will play it as a pure single player game.

It appears that Blizzard has stooped to Apple's level. Some posts on Battle.net forums detailing users grievances with logon issues are being censored. Seems like they are trying to shut us up but are having a hard time keeping pace with our fury. Keep on fighting the good fight and let your voices be heard.

It appears that Blizzard has stooped to Apple's level. Some posts on Battle.net forums detailing users grievances with logon issues are being censored.

They've done that for a long, long time. I didn't buy Diablo 3 for that and many more reasons. I only want it for single person play, I don't want the security risks included with having it attached to a battle.net account, and I don't want to have to be online, so they really have forced me to not purchase the game and help develop the D3 Server emulators.

Money talks. You don't like the way Blizzard does things; don't buy their next release!

Starcraft and Diablo II were great games, made Blizzard millions and were not plagued with the problem of people not being able to play period. Maybe for online play but not for single player or LAN. The problem not only lies with Blizzard, but with all major game publishers as many have adopted similar systems in an attempt to reduce piracy. Again I fully understand that their intent is to protect their investment and maximize profits, but providing a quality playable product to paying customers should not take a back seat to that immediate $$$. Customer service 101 - Treat ALL prospective and current customers with dignity and respect, even if it doesn't give you an immediate reward. Customers always remember poor service. It is rather unfortunate that there is little true competition between game publishers these days. There are few small studios left as most of them have been bought out by EA and Activision/Blizzard. Since the rampant acquisition of smaller game studios started, quality and variety of games has drastically diminished.

Wow- $14.99 a month x how many users? 10+ years to develop an upgrade to a VERY popular game at the time x $60.00 for the game. You can't tell me that Blizzard is not responsible for a ridiculous mess with WoW as well as Diablo III. This should not be happening in this day and age. And that is the reason you have failed. ;)

Money talks. You don't like the way Blizzard does things; don't buy their next release!

LOL I didn't buy this one (or StarCraft II, either, but for a different reason: since they decided to split it into 3 games I'm just going to wait until all 3 are released and packaged as a box set in a few years; even though I like the story, it's not really my kind of game and I still haven't beaten the original StarCraft or even played the Brood War expansion, so I might wanna get through that, first--maybe).

Not too much issue with the online play. My only potential gripe would be (and I pray it never happens) if my modem were to crap out on me and I would have to wait a couple days to get a new one. I wouldn't be able to play the game offline. Again, not likely to happen, but if it did, it would suck that I couldn't play the game, even by myself.

Wow, just wow.. two emergency server maintenance sessions in the first 12 hours. And this is primarily a single player game. There should not be any issues.

Emergency server issues you say? Twice in 12 hours?! That's MADNESS! Unheard of! /s

Seriously, welcome to MMO's? I also hope you don't think that I'm defending Blizzard at all. I just have a firm belief of "lol @ early adopters" because I figure it's best to be a responsible consumer and wait to see how things pan out before I hurry off to throw my money at a company.

And my apologies if I'm coming off as a dick too. I'm just saying that all these problems with an online game are not a shocker, by any means. Yes, I get that it's a single player game. But you KNEW as a consumer (at least should have) what you were buying into, how things were going to run. (at least I really hope you did). Not much I can tell ya other than to tough it out. :ermm:

Doesn't change the fact that a lot, maybe even most will play it as a pure single player game.

I always did. :p

I cant understand why people buy into blizzard and activision cool aid

http://kotaku.com/5910480/last-nights-diablo-iii-debacle-demonstrates-the-problem-with-always+online-games

People should have some dignity and stop supporting this kind of bshit, its incredible how the industry its going to a path of self destruction.... I wont buy this and i didnt buy starcraft 2 neither.... This thing need to stop.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Installed here without issue. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with easier language model discovery and in-app search by Paul Hill Microsoft has released Visual Studio Code 1.125, its latest weekly release. This week, the company has focused on discovering and installing extra language models via the Marketplace; searching the web and securely browsing over remote connections without leaving VS Code; choosing how long VS Code waits before installing extension updates; and delivering managed Copilot settings through existing device management tooling. In older versions of VS Code, extensions could contribute their own model providers, but to find these extensions, you needed the right tags to search for in the Extension view. Now, the Language Models editor gives you an Install Model Providers button that opens the Extensions view, which is filtered to extensions that contribute model providers, making it easier to find and install them. Once you install a provider, its model will appear in the model picker. If you use the integrated browser much, you can now look up information without leaving VS Code by typing a query into the integrated browser’s address bar. It will use your configured search engine, the same way a standalone browser does. You can use workbench.browser.searchEngine to pick a search engine. When the browser is opened in a remote workspace, it's now possible to proxy HTTP(S) traffic via the remote connection. This allows you to connect to any ports or services that can only be accessed from the remote machine. If you read our coverage from two weeks ago about VS Code 1.123, you might have seen that extension updates have a two-hour delay as a safety measure. In this update, Microsoft is giving you the ability to configure the time of the delay. You can find it under extensions.autoUpdateDelay. Finally, with this update, admins can deliver managed GitHub Copilot settings through native device management (MDM) channels on Windows and macOS, in addition to account-based enterprise settings files. Settings delivered via MDM appear as policy-enforced in VS Code and can’t be overridden locally. Future updates will extend the supported policy keys across Copilot surfaces. You can download the update from the Visual Studio Code website now.
    • "it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account" You already have a Microsoft account if you are using Windows 11, because you can't set it up without one.
    • This is how much iPhone 18 Pro could cost after Apple's price hike confirmed by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple Apple CEO Tim Cook confirmed in a recent interview that the company may have to raise prices on some of its products due to the ongoing memory shortage. While he did not elaborate on the scale of the price hikes, new estimates suggest that Pro iPhone models could become significantly more expensive this fall. The Wall Street Journal and research firm TechInsights have come up with an educated estimate of how much the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro could cost after its launch in September. The estimate is based on current increases in memory and storage chip prices. For starters, the iPhone 18 Pro base model is expected to feature 12GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage. According to TechInsights estimates, 12GB of DRAM for the iPhone 17 Pro cost Apple $39 last year. However, for the iPhone 18 Pro, the cost of the same amount of DRAM could soar to $145. Likewise, 256GB of flash storage that previously cost $13 could now cost around $51. Producing a base iPhone 17 Pro reportedly cost Apple around $582, but TechInsights estimates that the production cost of the iPhone 18 Pro could rise to $726. If Apple wants to maintain the roughly 47% profit margin it enjoys on the iPhone 17 Pro, the base price of the iPhone 18 Pro would need to reach $1,371. After standard pricing adjustments, customers could end up paying around $1,299 for the base model. However, that may not be the end of the story. As we previously reported, the iPhone 18 Pro is said to feature a variable-aperture lens, which could cost Apple at least 50% more than the current camera system. The estimated $1,299 price tag does not include the additional cost of this upgraded camera hardware. Once that expense is factored in, the base model could cost at least $1,399. A $1,399 price tag for the base iPhone 18 Pro would represent a significant increase over the current $1,099 starting price of the iPhone 17 Pro. If Apple wants to keep its upcoming iPhones competitive, it may need to accept lower profit margins.
    • Oh man, but what if I have the PS3 version?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      543
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      84
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      64
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!