Recommended Posts

Everyone bitching is making not one iota of sense. Blizzard+Launch= A COMPLETE frickin' disaster. Always will. They got you and they don't give a crap. They know you'll bitch but you'll still fork over your $$$ anyway.

Unfortunately I would have to agree with you. But it is about damn time that customers stand up and fight back against poor customer experiences across the board. While I am hopeful that Diablo III will turn out to be a quality game in the end, it is completely unfair to customers to have to put up with this crap to begin with.

Isolated issues don't represent everyone. Remember that the QQ on the forums is much louder than those who are actually stuck in game having fun. Of course, they're never on the forums to tell everyone, "YO DAWG, HAVIN FUN M8! K BYE"

Also, maybe this is your first launch because there have been plenty worse. Not that it justifies it in any way, but not everything is foreseeable with the varying equipment people use from one PC to the next or what have you.

Lastly, if these kinds of things annoy you, I'd recommend not purchasing any sort of technology on release day. This is just the nature of the beast with just about... everything!

Wow, just wow.. two emergency server maintenance sessions in the first 12 hours. And this is primarily a single player game. There should not be any issues.

Wow, just wow.. two emergency server maintenance sessions in the first 12 hours. And this is primarily a single player game. There should not be any issues.

The first two may have been primarily single player, however as shown with the design and community backend.. they are really pushing for multi-player.

I could be wrong here, but the last time I checked Blizzard were quite good with their customers. The actual message you want Blizzard to hear is, "Guys, how about some better preparation when launching future products?"

Considering that's the message you want to send, it would be worth pointing out that Blizzard isn't the only group to have launch issues. All games have launch issues, especially looking at the multiplayer aspects.

That wouldn't be the actual message I would want Blizzard to hear. Blizzard are not newbs, they knew what they were getting into, and they ****ed it up anyway. I think anybody who is seriously ****ed about this has every right to be. Requiring you to be logged in at all times is just absolutely ridiculous, they should have had an offline single player option.

Except that betas usually have 1/10 of what the entire final version game base will be. You can run the algorithms as to what you need, but you won't always be prepared for everything (esp. a mass rush to login at the same time). How is it possible to prepare for that while saving money? Too few servers...angry customer base....Add too many extra servers to process requests = spend way more money and upset shareholders.

They have past experiences to go by. Blizzard is not new to this by any stretch. WoW and Starcraft II also put massive stresses on their systems upon launch. Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not stand up for what is right are merely pawns for those who do wrong. We could even expand this to software in general as there have been many substandard products thrust upon consumers and we have little to no legal recourse. It has to stop! Software companies need to be held responsible for their mistakes just as manufacturers of tangible goods are. Laws need to be changed to prevent them from hiding behind their EULAs and using them as blanket "its never our fault" policy. They must start taking responsibility for what they do/neglect to do.

The first two may have been primarily single player, however as shown with the design and community backend.. they are really pushing for multi-player.

Doesn't change the fact that a lot, maybe even most will play it as a pure single player game.

It appears that Blizzard has stooped to Apple's level. Some posts on Battle.net forums detailing users grievances with logon issues are being censored. Seems like they are trying to shut us up but are having a hard time keeping pace with our fury. Keep on fighting the good fight and let your voices be heard.

It appears that Blizzard has stooped to Apple's level. Some posts on Battle.net forums detailing users grievances with logon issues are being censored.

They've done that for a long, long time. I didn't buy Diablo 3 for that and many more reasons. I only want it for single person play, I don't want the security risks included with having it attached to a battle.net account, and I don't want to have to be online, so they really have forced me to not purchase the game and help develop the D3 Server emulators.

Money talks. You don't like the way Blizzard does things; don't buy their next release!

Starcraft and Diablo II were great games, made Blizzard millions and were not plagued with the problem of people not being able to play period. Maybe for online play but not for single player or LAN. The problem not only lies with Blizzard, but with all major game publishers as many have adopted similar systems in an attempt to reduce piracy. Again I fully understand that their intent is to protect their investment and maximize profits, but providing a quality playable product to paying customers should not take a back seat to that immediate $$$. Customer service 101 - Treat ALL prospective and current customers with dignity and respect, even if it doesn't give you an immediate reward. Customers always remember poor service. It is rather unfortunate that there is little true competition between game publishers these days. There are few small studios left as most of them have been bought out by EA and Activision/Blizzard. Since the rampant acquisition of smaller game studios started, quality and variety of games has drastically diminished.

Wow- $14.99 a month x how many users? 10+ years to develop an upgrade to a VERY popular game at the time x $60.00 for the game. You can't tell me that Blizzard is not responsible for a ridiculous mess with WoW as well as Diablo III. This should not be happening in this day and age. And that is the reason you have failed. ;)

Money talks. You don't like the way Blizzard does things; don't buy their next release!

LOL I didn't buy this one (or StarCraft II, either, but for a different reason: since they decided to split it into 3 games I'm just going to wait until all 3 are released and packaged as a box set in a few years; even though I like the story, it's not really my kind of game and I still haven't beaten the original StarCraft or even played the Brood War expansion, so I might wanna get through that, first--maybe).

Not too much issue with the online play. My only potential gripe would be (and I pray it never happens) if my modem were to crap out on me and I would have to wait a couple days to get a new one. I wouldn't be able to play the game offline. Again, not likely to happen, but if it did, it would suck that I couldn't play the game, even by myself.

Wow, just wow.. two emergency server maintenance sessions in the first 12 hours. And this is primarily a single player game. There should not be any issues.

Emergency server issues you say? Twice in 12 hours?! That's MADNESS! Unheard of! /s

Seriously, welcome to MMO's? I also hope you don't think that I'm defending Blizzard at all. I just have a firm belief of "lol @ early adopters" because I figure it's best to be a responsible consumer and wait to see how things pan out before I hurry off to throw my money at a company.

And my apologies if I'm coming off as a dick too. I'm just saying that all these problems with an online game are not a shocker, by any means. Yes, I get that it's a single player game. But you KNEW as a consumer (at least should have) what you were buying into, how things were going to run. (at least I really hope you did). Not much I can tell ya other than to tough it out. :ermm:

Doesn't change the fact that a lot, maybe even most will play it as a pure single player game.

I always did. :p

I cant understand why people buy into blizzard and activision cool aid

http://kotaku.com/5910480/last-nights-diablo-iii-debacle-demonstrates-the-problem-with-always+online-games

People should have some dignity and stop supporting this kind of bshit, its incredible how the industry its going to a path of self destruction.... I wont buy this and i didnt buy starcraft 2 neither.... This thing need to stop.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!