Recommended Posts

The taskbar isn't interactive? Window previews, jump lists, right-click on jump list shell links for other commands & properties, drag & drop to/from jump lists, progress bars, notification badges, buttons in thumbnails? I like most of the new stuff in Win8, but none of it is as cool or useful as the Win7 taskbar IMO ...

So you are saying that current Windows 7 Desktop is not interactive and personal. How do you people even come up with such statements.

Not in the sense Metro is. It's a static environment filled with icons. How interactive is that? Where's my social updates? News? Weather updates?

Not in the sense Metro is. It's a static environment filled with icons. How interactive is that? Where's my social updates? News? Weather updates?

Apparently you don't know what desktop gadgets are.

(Though personally I don't want all that annoying crap on my desktop. I didn't like it when they called it Active Desktop in Windows 98 either.)

I find it a matter of some amusement that people wish to talk smack about those of us that don't like Metro and simply believe that it has to be the best thing ever simply because it's made by Microsoft. Why the hell should I have to justify it by saying "it harms my productivity"? I hate the look, I hate the design, and I hate the fact that they have completely robbed users of their choices. Whether or not you consider those arguments to be valid, the way Windows 8 is designed has a massive impact on the usability of the OS for me, and as such I'm simply not going to use it.

Apparently you don't know what desktop gadgets are.

(Though personally I don't want all that annoying crap on my desktop. I didn't like it when they called it Active Desktop in Windows 98 either.)

Pointing and clicking is not interactive. -_- Desktop gadgets don't even come close to the level of interactivity Metro can deliver.

Pointing and clicking is not interactive. -_- Desktop gadgets don't even come close to the level of interactivity Metro can deliver.

Metro simply downloads data and displays it on a page. Something you can do just as easily by opening a web browser and clicking a couple of buttons. And what's more a browser does it without completely ruining my desktop experience.

Pointing and clicking is not interactive. -_- Desktop gadgets don't even come close to the level of interactivity Metro can deliver.

What are you talking about? You don't have to click on gadgets. They can display the weather on your desktop, RSS feeds, etc without any user interaction at all.

What are you talking about? You don't have to click on gadgets. They can display the weather on your desktop, RSS feeds, etc without any user interaction at all.

But 1. Who uses them, and 2. point me to high quality gadgets that people have made. I don't recall there ever being a Twitter or Facebook gadget, the weather app is basic at best, and doesn't come near the functionality of the weather metro app.

I seriously think MS is trollin everyone with windows 8... they were bored of windows 7 being great so they set off to do this.... they know what everyone wants and they put it together in one package... now... having everything you want at the same time isn't good either.

I mean... it's like eating steak, bacon, ice cream. salmon, spaghetty, tacos, and sauerkrout blended together and drinking it out of a cup.

But 1. Who uses them, and 2. point me to high quality gadgets that people have made. I don't recall there ever being a Twitter or Facebook gadget, the weather app is basic at best, and doesn't come near the functionality of the weather metro app.

A lot of people use them, and yes there is a Facebook and Twitter gadget available. The weather gadget gives me the current weather and the forecast for lows, highs and weather for the entire week. If I need more information than that I'll go on the web and find whatever I need.

A lot of people use them, and yes there is a Facebook and Twitter gadget available. The weather gadget gives me the current weather and the forecast for lows, highs and weather for the entire week. If I need more information than that I'll go on the web and find whatever I need.

No. Nobody significant uses them. There are no top notch gadgets to install, which is why they were discontinued, and the gallery shut down. Gadgets are dead.

I seriously think MS is trollin everyone with windows 8... they were bored of windows 7 being great so they set off to do this.... they know what everyone wants and they put it together in one package... now... having everything you want at the same time isn't good either.

I mean... it's like eating steak, bacon, ice cream. salmon, spaghetty, tacos, and sauerkrout blended together and drinking it out of a cup.

Not to be the conspiracy theorist, but having met with MS last year and showing them a timeline of why we really wouldn't need to upgrade for many EA cycles and therefore wanted a discount on our EA agreement; Microsoft knows Windows 7 is so good and stable, there's little reason to keep upgrading for the next 3-6 years given the longevity of XP. The wholesale changes they made not only to the UI but the application architecture insures an upgrade revenue stream that didn't exist before they went this route. That's just one of many reasons, some good for the users, some good for MS shareholders (mostly).

No. Nobody significant uses them. There are no top notch gadgets to install, which is why they were discontinued, and the gallery shut down. Gadgets are dead.

So let's see, Active Desktop was a huge failure on Windows 98, the sidebar failed on Vista and now you are saying that Gadgets were a miserable failure. But oh boy, everyone is going to love this same tired feature on Metro! Woo-hoo, this is the year of push technology! :rolleyes:

Funny though you keep changing your complaints about gadgets. First you say they could not do what Metro does and when told they in fact do then you complained that certain gadgets weren't available and when told they are now you say no one uses gadgets and they are dead.

Just get a motel room, go make love to Metro and get it over with.

No. Nobody significant uses them. There are no top notch gadgets to install, which is why they were discontinued, and the gallery shut down. Gadgets are dead.

As much as it pains me to agree, you come up with some way over the top theoretical nirvana for Metro sometimes, but I do. I don't know if "that's" why it shutdown, it was dead long before it shutdown. But there were few quality gadgets. I have one of the better weather and calendar gadgets but most of the cool gadgets designers chose the Mac platform or alternative widget platforms.

I think at some point MS closed down gadgets because they don't want anyone making any more. Gadgets, since they can live on the desktop where you work, are superior to live tiles "on a desktop pc" IMO. They can have all and actually more functionality than live tiles when expanded. But, they just never caught on and not many people used them. Many don't use them for the same reason they won't use live tiles on a PC much. Why look at a gadget/tile while "sitting at a pc" when you can just open facebook or mail, or have notification on taskbar or popup while doing other more meaningful things without being taken away from those things to a Start Page.

It is only on the desktop PC that I question the value of Live Tiles. My personal thought is except for the most newb (the soccer mom in the kitchen of which there are lots) anyone sitting at a PC constantly looking at live tiles doesn't need a PC. Get off your butt and go do something becuase if you're sitting at a PC constantly glancing at the start page you are not doing jack #%^ on your PC. Get a tablet or Windows Phone and glance at that.

So let's see, Active Desktop was a huge failure on Windows 98, the sidebar failed on Vista and now you are saying that Gadgets were a miserable failure. But oh boy, everyone is going to love this same tired feature on Metro! Woo-hoo, this is the year of push technology! :rolleyes:

Funny though you keep changing your complaints about gadgets. First you say they could not do what Metro does and when told they in fact do then you complained that certain gadgets weren't available and when told they are now you say no one uses gadgets and they are dead.

Just get a motel room, go make love to Metro and get it over with.

Ya know, if you hate Metro so much, then don't use the apps. Simple. I'm tired of having my words turned inside and out by every single person here. But simply put, the 9x paradigm is tired, rotten, and dead. There are new and upcoming technologies that just won't work with it, and we need a UI that'll allow us to interact with computers in new ways. Computers (yes, that includes desktops too) are heading in a new directions that is forcing us to change out habits, whether you like it or not. Consumers want simple, easy to use devices that'll connect them to the things that matter, and quickly. Fumbling around an overly complex desktop, pointing and clicking on icons, isn't doing that, and neither are those desktop gadgets of yours. Metro will allow them to do just that. I'm sorry you feel cheated or your ego threatened or whatever, but this isn't the 90's anymore. Things have changed.

So if you don't mind, I'm going to keep using Windows 8 and brace myself for the future of computing. If you wish to remain behind, that's your prerogative, but don't expect me to show any compassion for when you're still clinging to XP or whatever and crying that no one is showing you any love.

Click on my sig if you *really* want to see what interactive looks like. You won't get that with Windows XP or Windows 7.

Ya know, if you hate Metro so much, then don't use the apps.

Oh believe me I won't. I just think your arguments about the live tiles are ridiculous when the are absolutely nothing new. On one hand you say that Gadgets failed and are dead, then you somehow claim that live tiles are going to be wonderful. It's been done to death, remember the Pointcast Network? Most people really don't care about having "live content" on their desktop and Metro isn't going to change that.

Click on my sig if you *really* want to see what interactive looks like. You won't get that with Windows XP or Windows 7.

Again with this "interactive" nonsense. Every OS is interactive. As for Metro, sorry but I think it is an ugly mess. I'm glad I won't get that with Windows 7, that's why I'm sticking with it.

Most people really don't care about having "live content" on their desktop and Metro isn't going to change that.

Good, because live tiles aren't living on the desktop. Oh, and the people tied to mobile devices, especially corporate types, and younger kids, who are always information hungry, disagree with you. Jus' saying. ;)

Good, what a cluttered mess. That's why I'm sticking with Windows 7.

Great! That means our conversation here is done. Good day, sir! The exit is in the upper right on the big red X.

^^^ Come on guys chill. Windows 8 and Metro will do just fine. And it will annoy the hell out of people that are currently in 7th Heaven using Windows 7 and love the effeciency of the Start Menu and Aero and all that.

Unfortunately, we will have to go back to customization apps, etc. to be happy again, but it'll happen, or we'll wait with the great 7 until MS fixes it in 9.

I do think the strong dissention among seasoned users is a sign MS took a path that will have negative consequences but not disastrous. It's all about the apps, and games and right now there aren't any.

I would love to see MS change the orientation of general web design from portrait to landscape. However, seeing them bundle Flash with Windows 8 after all the HTML 5 hype, I'm pretty positive they don't have enough influence to make that happen so I'm just tossing that one.

No. Nobody significant uses them. There are no top notch gadgets to install, which is why they were discontinued, and the gallery shut down. Gadgets are dead.

Well I certainly use them and have been using them since vista, but I am not "significant" since I would guess being significant must be someone like Bill Gates or that raving lunatic Balmer, I love the gadgets that I use, they are mostly system info gadgets and one for weather, they are always there showing info in real time and yet they are never in the way, unlike metro.

  • Like 2

Microsoft's visionary Office video focuses on the app. Particularly Office, and there's not much with software that can't be done today. Microsoft's designers simply don't have that much style. Apple's Keynote and Numbers come closer to that type of polish and cool productivity. Microsoft can't deliver that kind of app on Windows Phone though its quite capable today. Has nothing to do with Windows 8 or Metro.

Notably though, while content consumption can be managed by touching the screen on a mobile device in the video, the workstation had a keyboard and stylus/tablet input device. In fact, touch took place on an LCD/Screen on the keyboard. Not a workstation user reaching up touching their display all day long.

All of that is doable now (with regards to the software). I just don't think MS will ever deliver anything that slick, hopefully x86 app devs will. Somehow MS has to create tools to get more creative people designing application UIs. Microsoft can't even design nice icons so I don't know why anyone thinks they could deliver this vision themselves.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
    • Is your Apple Watch supported? Check the watchOS 27 compatibility list by Aditya Tiwari Apple kicked off WWDC 2026 with a ton of announcements, mostly centered around Apple Intelligence improvements, the Siri AI, and Liquid Glass updates. However, there is a lot of other stuff that couldn't catch the limelight. Let's talk about watchOS 27 and which models are supported by the newest operating system. According to the Cupertino giant, watchOS 27 will be supported on the following Apple Watch models when it arrives later this year: Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple Watch Series 11 Apple Watch SE 3 Apple Watch Series 10 Apple Watch Ultra 2 It's a stark contrast with last year's watchOS 26 update, which had almost a dozen Apple Watch models in its list of supported devices. Apple supported models all the way back to Apple Watch Series 6. That said, if you own one of the five models, you'll need an iPhone 11 (or later) with iOS 27 to install the latest update. Yes, Apple has shown some extra love to the iPhone 11, and it old horse supports the iOS 27 update. watchOS 27 beta 1 is now available for developers and interested power users through the Apple Developer Program. So, if you're among those who like to play with fire, you can download it to your supported Apple Watch. Otherwise, the public beta for watchOS 27 will be available next month. The freshly baked Apple Watch update comes with Siri AI - an advanced, fully conversational version of Siri powered by Apple Intelligence due for later this year. A new dynamic app grid features icons for five Siri-suggested apps. You can use a new tap gesture to open a widget in the Smart Stack, and a new Find My app finally clears the mess of Find Devices, Find Items, and Find People on Apple Watch. Workout Buddy can run without an iPhone nearby and offers new insights based on data, including your progress for pace, distance, and workout duration. Apple improved its motion tracking algorithms to measure the distance of indoor treadmill runs and walks more precisely. Speaking of other changes, the music playback on watchOS 27 starts faster and you can create custom passes for any membership or card that uses a QR code or barcode, then easily access them in the Wallet app or pin in the Smart Stack.
    • "and pull old flight details from your email during back-and-forth conversations" The Siri I've become to know and trust. I've always wanted to pull info on old flights. /s
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!