Nurse refuses student inhaler during asthma attack


Recommended Posts

DELTONA, Fla. -

Volusia County School officials stand by a Deltona High School nurse's decision to refuse a student his inhaler during an asthma attack, citing a lack of a parent's signature on a medical release form.

"It's like something out of a horror film. The person just sits there and watches you die," said Michael Rudi, 17. "She sat there, looked at me and she did nothing."

He said the school dean found his inhaler during a search of his locker last Friday. The inhaler was still in its original packaging -- complete with his name and directions for its use; however, the school took it away because his mother hadn't signed the proper form for him to have it.

School leaders called Sue Rudi when her son started having trouble breathing. She rushed to the office and was taken back to the nurse's office by school administrators and they discovered the teen on the floor.

"As soon as we opened up the door, we saw my son collapsing against the wall on the floor of the nurse's office while she was standing in the window of the locked door looking down at my son, who was in full-blown asthma attack," Rudi said.

Michael Rudi said when he started to pass out from his attack, the nurse locked the door.

"I believe that when I closed my eyes I wasn't going to wake up," he said.

The Director of Student Health Services, Cheryl Selesky, said that parents must sign the medical release form each year, which allows students to carry their prescribed drugs with them in school.

This year, the district had no record of his Rudi's signature, said Selesky.

"I mean its common sense if I saw an animal on the street in distress I would probably stop to help, why wouldn't she help a child," Sue Rudi said.

But Rudi is a senior, and his mother said the district has had records of his asthma throughout his years in the school.

She thinks her son could have died because of a technicality.

"How dare you deny my son something that we all take for granted, breath," said Sue Rudi. "Why didn't someone call 911?"

Selesky said the district is looking into whether proper procedures were followed by the school, and while nurses can't give medications without the proper authorization, it is district policy to call 911 when a student cannot breath.

Selesky could not explain why 911 was never called.

"I understand if you can't give it to him call 911," Sue Rudi said. "Why did you not call 911?"

Sue Rudi said she worries about the next student caught in a similar situation, and has filed charges against the nurse with the Volusia County Sheriff's Office.

"I want to press child endangerment charges for something they did to my son," Rudi said in the 911 call.

Local 6 reached out to the school district officials for more information, but they declined to interview.

Source

it's reasons such as this why I think High Schools public schools in general are way too strict

sure they have reasons for rules/regulations such as these but it's at times like this one where that rule should be allowed to be flat out broken/dismissed as it's causing more harm then good

The politics of the district has ZERO to do with this as stupidity is running rampant in school administrations nationwide.

Speaking as an asthmatic; in just the US 438,000 of us are hospitalized every year, and 3,300 die, due to an attack. It would be a crime if one of either were a child because of the bureaucratic needs of stupid adults.

I'd fire whoever touched this decision.

  • Like 2

I don't see the logic here. He has medical treatment with his name on it yet they took it away from him?

If he had a pacemaker due to a bad heart, would they remove that because his parents hadn't signed for it?

Or what about a wheel chair? Prosteic leg? or maybe a fake eye ball? broken arm casting? How about other prescribed long term drugs, such as blood pressure tablets or diabetics.

Was this nurse simple high, stupid, or just didn't give a damn because it was 'just' an astma attack?

Surley any ownership from problems arising from the misuse/handling of his inhaler would be down to who prescribed it.

This world is going crazy over being politally correct. Is it really so hard for people to do the right thing rather then worring about what people are going to think.

And why do people over think the situations, people are just trying to help (or not in this case!).

I don't see the logic here. He has medical treatment with his name on it yet they took it away from him?

If he had a pacemaker due to a bad heart, would they remove that because his parents hadn't signed for it?

Or what about a wheel chair? Prosteic leg? or maybe a fake eye ball? broken arm casting? How about other prescribed long term drugs, such as blood pressure tablets or diabetics.

Was this nurse simple high, stupid, or just didn't give a damn because it was 'just' an astma attack?

Surley any ownership from problems arising from the misuse/handling of his inhaler would be down to who prescribed it.

This world is going crazy over being politally correct. Is it really so hard for people to do the right thing rather then worring about what people are going to think.

And why do people over think the situations, people are just trying to help (or not in this case!).

The mother should have signed the proper forms. Kids can die from aspirin if they have a certain genetic makeup, so if they are given aspirin by the school, for certain symptoms that would suggest they needed aspirin, but they die, you are saying the school shouldn't be held accountable? I just use that one example as there are so many to consider.

It has nothing to do with being PC and everything to do with people taking responsibility for their kids and their safety and not expecting the school to make life decisions without parent's consent and written permission.

The simple fact is that the kid is still alive.

Yeah, or the doctor that, you know, prescribed the medication to the kid.

That same medication that the school took away :\

This isn't asking the school to make a diagnosis and render medication. The diagnosis and medication had already been prescribed.

  • Like 2

And kids never put drugs into other packaging to hide it . . . /s

They found the inhaler during a search of his locker. He should have turned into nurse in the first place. Then no signature.

Why didn't the mother call 911 on the way to the school? It just just doesn't add up to me.

The mother should have signed the proper forms. Kids can die from aspirin if they have a certain genetic makeup, so if they are given aspirin by the school, for certain symptoms that would suggest they needed aspirin, but they die, you are saying the school shouldn't be held accountable? I just use that one example as there are so many to consider.

It has nothing to do with being PC and everything to do with people taking responsibility for their kids and their safety and not expecting the school to make life decisions without parent's consent and written permission.

The simple fact is that the kid is still alive.

As far as I know, kids aren't prescribed aspirin. The kid was prescribed something, probably salbutamol (blue inhaler). What's worse, a kid dying due to a technicality or a kid potentially surviving? Also, the release is for prescribed drugs, not non-prescribed drugs.

As far as I know, kids aren't prescribed aspirin. The kid was prescribed something, probably salbutamol (blue inhaler). What's worse, a kid dying due to a technicality or a kid potentially surviving? Also, the release is for prescribed drugs, not non-prescribed drugs.

If he would have turned the inhaler in to the nurse instead of sticking in locker, problem could have been solved. The mother could have called 911, and problem solved. Everyone blaming school, but the family didn't do 3 simple things that could have prevented this. Take responsibility for your lives instead of blaming everyone else. Jesus Christ.

The school was in possession of the medication. It had confiscated the medication.

That puts ALL of the liability on their shoulders.

Furthermore, the school had a record of permission in the past, but suddenly they think it's not legit? How do you justify that?

Also, there are better ways to hide drugs than to fake an asthma inhaler :\

If he would have turned the inhaler in to the nurse instead of sticking in locker, problem could have been solved. The mother could have called 911, and problem solved. Everyone blaming school, but the family didn't do 3 simple things that could have prevented this. Take responsibility for your lives instead of blaming everyone else. Jesus Christ.

If the mother had been delayed by 20 minutes, the kid could have died.

I'm glad to hear that you value a signature over someone's life.

  • Like 1

Under any law it is the responsibility of the school to make sure the well being of the kids but the policy of not allowing them to have medication prescribed to the person without that signature is wrong and contradicts with health and safety policies

How the **** are they allowed to confiscate a prescribed medicine? I don't see how anyone could be given that right besides a licensed and trained healthcare professional. Nobody without the proper training, not the school, not the police, not event the parents should have the right to confiscate life saving medicine from a 17 year old. If they believe that the prescribed drug is not what it says on the package/bottle the police should be involved and they should contact the individual who wrote the prescription to verify it. During the time the confiscated medicine is not available the person should be closely monitored at a hospital by people who can provide verified medicine and emergency healthcare in case problems appear.

I can say that I would not allow ANYONE to confiscate any legal medicine I was in possession of.

  • Like 2

The mother should have signed the proper forms. Kids can die from aspirin if they have a certain genetic makeup, so if they are given aspirin by the school, for certain symptoms that would suggest they needed aspirin, but they die, you are saying the school shouldn't be held accountable? I just use that one example as there are so many to consider.

It has nothing to do with being PC and everything to do with people taking responsibility for their kids and their safety and not expecting the school to make life decisions without parent's consent and written permission.

The simple fact is that the kid is still alive.

There could be a number of reasons for why the paper was not signed or in school possession. There isn't enough info listed to make the call on that. When your kids are in school, the school itself is responsible for the kids while they are on their grounds. The school is still to blame in this situation.

Lastly the kid is alive but the other outcome was still a possibility. You don't ignore the ignorance of the situation just because the kid is still alive.

And kids never put drugs into other packaging to hide it . . . /s

They found the inhaler during a search of his locker. He should have turned into nurse in the first place. Then no signature.

Why didn't the mother call 911 on the way to the school? It just just doesn't add up to me.

The argument isn't the the school didnt have the right to look but being an asthma sufferer myself, anyone with have a brain can tell you that an inhaler is just that, including the nurse. Again you ignore that the kid is on school grounds, 911 should have been called by them first.

The argument isn't the the school didnt have the right to look but being an asthma sufferer myself, anyone with have a brain can tell you that an inhaler is just that, including the nurse. Again you ignore that the kid is on school grounds, 911 should have been called by them first.

seriously. It isn't like its a pill. Its an inhaler. You cant put something else in it.

The argument isn't the the school didnt have the right to look but being an asthma sufferer myself, anyone with have a brain can tell you that an inhaler is just tha t, including the nurse. Again you ignore that the kid is on school grounds, 911 should have been called by them first.

seriously. It isn't like its a pill. Its an inhaler. You cant. put something else in it.

I hate this phone. Stupid double posts.

People who are completely stuck in rules and regulation annoy the hell out of me. Have read about and met so many people who have a superiour then thou attitude because they follow the rules, they see themselves as superior people. Jeez so annoying. Damn rules!

Anyone who puts rules before lives deserves to lose badly in a similar situation. It's a nice learning experience. So, yes, really.

um ok, Did HE put the rules before the students life? No. He simply said they should have followed the rules, and you wished someone close to him death, so he could learn NOT to have an opinion? Really?

The rules are there to protect the school/staff from being sued, if the inhaler had been tampered with and the nurse had given it AND the student died, or got worse or any of another ****ing things, the parents would have laywered up and sued the school for breaking their own rules and some other ****. Now, they will laywer up and sue for causing little Michael stress, since he is fine now. So, damned if you do and damned if you don't.

Never mind this all could have been avoided if they had filled out the paper work given them at the beginning of the year...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      593
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!