Nurse refuses student inhaler during asthma attack


Recommended Posts

Come work in healthcare for a bit, you will quickly discover that this story makes no sense at all. Media sensationalism combined with leaving out details.

Bournemouth Hospital, 2011, Critical Cardiac Care and A + E. :)

It is the school's responsibility, yes, but in failing that, why didn't she do it? I would NEVER put my kids life solely in the hands of another. That's why they have MY contact information. I would make that call if I felt it was necessary. The parent should ALWAYS be more cautious for their child than anyone else, but she didn't.

Good thing you don't have to be repsonsible anymore these days in most people eyes. /s

And as sidroc pointed out, there is more to this story.

I didn't know that you can do more than two things at the same time. I would expect the school to act appropriately - I wouldn't expect the mother to have to go to the school AND call 911 AND ensure that her child is properly being taken care of my the school.

You subconsciously put your kids life in others' hands. They act in loco parentis. They have your contact details purely for a legal reason, as the guardian. At the end of the day, they make the final decision, not you. They only have your information to inform you on the situation - that is all.

While yes she should of turned in the proper paperwork, the nurse should of called 911. This would make an interesting court battle that the school system would probably settle out of court.

Were I the parent in this instance, settling out of court would not be on the cards. I wouldn't be in it for money, I'd be making damn sure their gross negligence doesn't put some other child at risk, and the only way to ensure that is to make sure they're punished and those responsible removed from their position.

Bournemouth Hospital, 2011, Critical Cardiac Care and A + E. :)

I didn't know that you can do more than two things at the same time. I would expect the school to act appropriately - I wouldn't expect the mother to have to go to the school AND call 911 AND ensure that her child is properly being taken care of my the school.

You subconsciously put your kids life in others' hands. They act in loco parentis. They have your contact details purely for a legal reason, as the guardian. At the end of the day, they make the final decision, not you. They only have your information to inform you on the situation - that is all.

RN?

So you were shadowing a physician performing pre triage assessments or what? Also, that hospital doesn't appear to be a US hospital, but rather a UK hospital (correct me if I am wrong) let me just say you don't have the experience in healthcare especially US health care to state things like this. From what your saying, you did volunteer work and have no health care degree or training. I always disliked volunteers in critical situations. Ive seen them giving NPO patients juice and water even or the other fun one, they hear a patient needs a BP so they grab a cuff and decide to take it for us and what do ya know, they took the BP over the top of a pick line now we have a bloody mess.

You should probably look up what pre triage means.

I take it your not familiar with what it is, because I certainly am. He says he shadowed doctors, did not confirm he was an RN or anything else, and said he participated in pre triage. What does that mean, does that mean that while he was shadowing/volunteering he participated in pre triage, was responsible for pre triage? You see, hes being vague.

I take it your not familiar with what it is, because I certainly am. He says he shadowed doctors, did not confirm he was an RN or anything else, and said he participated in pre triage. What does that mean, does that mean that while he was shadowing/volunteering he participated in pre triage, was responsible for pre triage? You see, hes being vague.

yeah, but you said you arent familiar with that hospital....

yeah, but you said you arent familiar with that hospital....

Yeah, because its in the UK, but certain medical vocabulary are universal. That said, hes trying to comment on an American nurse and her job with the opinion and possibly legalities of the UK. In the united states, practically every state handles these kinds of things in the same method. But the UK is not the US and comparing regulations and rules of nursing handed down by an American BON to the UK system is erroneous.

That is just unbelievable. I can understand wanting this form signed, but in an emergency situation, aren't you supposed to address the most pressing issue first? His not breathing for example... THEN worry about the form? And do you mean to tell me that he started having an asthma attack and she then went to check to see if they had the signed form first before doing anything? This is just egregious irresponsibility. I hope the nurse and the school lose the case.

The mother should have signed the proper forms. Kids can die from aspirin if they have a certain genetic makeup, so if they are given aspirin by the school, for certain symptoms that would suggest they needed aspirin, but they die, you are saying the school shouldn't be held accountable? I just use that one example as there are so many to consider.

It has nothing to do with being PC and everything to do with people taking responsibility for their kids and their safety and not expecting the school to make life decisions without parent's consent and written permission.

The simple fact is that the kid is still alive.

True, but you don't need a damn release form to call 911. Locking the door and watching through the window? What is that nurse, some kind of sadist who gets off on watching kids suffer?

That is just unbelievable. I can understand wanting this form signed, but in an emergency situation, aren't you supposed to address the most pressing issue first? His not breathing for example... THEN worry about the form? And do you mean to tell me that he started having an asthma attack and she then went to check to see if they had the signed form first before doing anything? This is just egregious irresponsibility. I hope the nurse and the school lose the case.

I don't think you are familiar with a handy little device known as a O2 SAT. I am willing to bet she was in no hurry, because he pulled about 90% O2, Their is also a chance she had him use a spirometer. Also, since the school didn't fire her and defended her I can practically guarantee the above.

oxygen_saturation.jpg

im sure his doctor wrote him a perscription that would kill him.

i didn't mean it like that, but you can still die from an asthma attack even when using your inhaler. I had asthma from age 8-18 then it just faded away. I still get it if i am around A LOT of cats/dogs or if I am doing something physically demanding in cold weather.

i didn't mean it like that, but you can still die from an asthma attack even when using your inhaler. I had asthma from age 8-18 then it just faded away. I still get it if i am around A LOT of cats/dogs or if I am doing something physically demanding in cold weather.

dogs and cats would be allergies...

I wish I had a dog growing up. my mom always told me i was allergic to them. Im not at all :(

they are a trigger with me...

This nurses from the nursing forums I participate in said it better than me.

I apologize in advance if this posting is too long. I live in the county next to the one this occured in. I am also an elementary school nurse. The FL State Dept. of Health works with the schools in creating a clear protocol for medication administration. Students are not allowed to carry inhalers, period, unless the parent has signed an authorization for the school to administer it, and the MD has authorized it. Otherwise, the inhaler is brought to the clinic by the parent in the original box the Rx is on, and they sign a consent. The Rx is considered a doctor's order. If there is no Rx label on the box, there is no way for the nurse to know if he is truly supposed to have the med, or did he take it off Uncle Fred's dresser. And yes, that has happened. It addition, there is no route, no time, no dose, etc that every MD order must have.

Therefore the nurse can't give it. That is the law! This is made clear in the student handbooks signed by both the parent and student at the beginning of each school year. It is also clearly spelled out in each individual school's web sites. It is also explained to parents if they bother to call and ask. Students have been known, in the past, to carry inhalers, not tell anyone, but then play around with it and let their friends try it out with unintended consequences. Believe me, it has happened in my district!

I watched the news story several times. I saw it and was astonished. First, as I understand it, there were no, repeat no signs of any respiratory distress. There was none observed by the nurse, nor was it observed by any other witness in the school that was there at the time. He was sitting in the administrator's office waiting until his mother came. Does anyone seriously think that a nurse, administrator, and anyone else in the office who even thought they something wrong would not have called 911 if it was needed? Second, the school found the inhaler in his backpack during a security check. He wasn't trying to get it out and use it. It was found. The school did not know he had it. There is no order on file for it. The school called the parent, and they were on the way.

The nurse followed the protocol, the law, and the Nurse Practice Act. Is it not drilled into our heads since Day 1 in nursing school that you do not give medications to anyone without a doctor's order? And yet, the nurses name and schools name have been dragged through the mud. Now the parents plan to sue the nurse, and the school district. Of course. And their attorneys comment? "even if it was the law, the law needs to be changed". And changing the law starts at the expense of this girl's livelihood, and the school's reputation? I do not know the circumstances of what lead up to the student supposedly being locked out of the clinic. I'm sure I'll hear it and whether it's the truth or not, we'll never know.

I'll just end this by saying I am sick, sick, sick to death of parents like these. All school nurses know exactly what I mean when I say every school has them. The ones that couldn't be bothered to spend 5 minutes filling out paperwork. The ones who have no clue about what really happened, but go shooting their mouths off without knowing the facts. And the lawyers who latch on to the nuts in the name of "justice" but it's really just lining their pockets that matters. I've had kindergarteners bring in needles from Dad's supply. I've had kids bring in liquids and pills, ear drops, eye drops and insulin/syringes that their parents told them to give me. Does anybody think about what could happen if the inhaler, or pill, or syringe gets into the wrong hands? And these parents have brains?

All I can think is, this could have been me. It's just blowing my mind. This could have been me.

Another Nurse chimes in.

Parents need to take some responsibility for their children. If you know your child has a medical condition, and may require meds for it, FOLLOW THE SCHOOL PROTOCOLS! Jump through all the hoops, for the sake of your child! This could have been avoided if the parent had submitted the required info to the school. You can bet that if my child had important PRN meds ordered by their md, I'd make sure the school had whatever they needed to be able to administer it! Why wait for something like this to happen?!

If it were me in this particular situation, I'd go ahead and call 911. If the student is truly in need, I am covered. If, however, he was being dramatic to prove a point about having his inhaler taken away, so be it. (I have a sneaking suspicion that the student was angry that his inhaler was taken away, and coincidentally had this "attack". Not unlike when the kids at my school become curious about my eyewash station, and suddenly feel as if they "have something in their eye" so they need to try it...). Now his parents can deal with the unnecessary ER visit. Unfortunately, there are plenty of kids that would pull a stunt like this.

I am just happy that the school and district are backing the nurse. That is refreshing in this day and age.

Blaming the nurse is the easy and safe route and allows one to read a story like this and put no critical thought into it.

The mother should have signed the proper forms. Kids can die from aspirin if they have a certain genetic makeup, so if they are given aspirin by the school, for certain symptoms that would suggest they needed aspirin, but they die, you are saying the school shouldn't be held accountable? I just use that one example as there are so many to consider.

You are ignoring the fact that the student had the inhaler in his possession along with his name on the label. That is a very different situation than the school giving a student an over the counter medication for a headache, etc. The very fact that the school required any additional form in this case is idiotic.

yes i did and re-read it just now. It was in his locker which is IN his possession. Sounds like he wanted to make a scene by intentionally NOT using it on his own accord.

you obviously DIDN'T read the article, it says that the inhaler was taken from his locker and they wouldn't give it back to him when he had the asthma attack

yes i did and re-read it just now. It was in his locker which is IN his possession. Sounds like he wanted to make a scene by intentionally NOT using it on his own accord.

ummm

He said the school dean found his inhaler during a search of his locker last Friday. The inhaler was still in its original packaging -- complete with his name and directions for its use; however, the school took it away because his mother hadn't signed the proper form for him to have it.

yes i did and re-read it just now. It was in his locker which is IN his possession. Sounds like he wanted to make a scene by intentionally NOT using it on his own accord.

Not only did you not read the article (the school found it in his locker and took it away from him) but do you really think he would endure pain and suffering and risk of death just to make a scene? Wow... icon_facepalm-1.gif

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!