The direction Microsoft took with Windows 8  

855 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the direction Microsoft took with Windows 8?

    • Yes I love it, i'll be upgrading
    • No I hate it, i'll stick with Windows 7
    • It doesn't bother me
    • I will use Windows 8 with a start menu hack program


Recommended Posts

In the real world its going to be a lot more hated. If you think Vista flopped just wait until Windows 8 shows up on the market.

Sorry , but I disagree with you on this ... it may not go down too well with power-users who multitask a lot , but I think the general public will get on just fine!

I've installed it on my MBP using Boot Camp and it runs like a dream! I'm really enjoying using it. I find myself missing some of the features when I log back into OS X Lion. The social features are really cool.

  • Like 2

I'm all in, absolutely love it.

I tried the DP, didn't seem polished enough, but since the CP and now RP I have zero inclination to ever run Windows 7 again.

I really like moving forward, Windows 7 just seems boring now.

  • Like 3

The problem is that people aren't given the choice to adapt. They are forced to adapt. What you said would be true if there was an option to turn Metro off; but there isn't.

Windows has always been about freedom and control of the OS, but 8 has completely taken that away by forcing this alien interface on everybody. The Windows UI has been generally the same since Win 95, and most people still barely have learned to navigate around it since then. Throwing that all away and making people start fresh isn't going to go over well. People generally don't like change, especially when it is forced on them.

That is usually because, given their druthers, folks won't change.

That five year lag between XP and Vista was not Microsoft-driven; it was driven by three different sets of forces, all of which would have rather not changed anything.

1. OEMs/IHVs - seriously, how much did the hardware/peripheral community (with the surprising exceptions of ATI and Microsoft's own Hardware and Devices Group) do in terms of initial Vista driver development? (While I had no issues with my Sound Blaster X-Fi, from the posts on Creative's own forums, I was the exception - not the rule.)

2. Enterprise/corporate/government customers - they were afraid of upgrading due to scarcity of training dollars - and this was during an economic boom. Now the economy is still poor; how willing would they be to spend training dollars on a far bigger change than Vista was over XP?

3. Despite the initial derision over XP's "toy" UI (Luna), underneath the skin, it actually differed little from Windows 2000 Professional - once folks realized that (which should not have been news to anyone), the love-fest with XP took off in earnest. However, once it went on, it has practically taken a jackhammer to get it off corporate PCs - how many PCs scattered over IT Planet are, in fact, still running it?

Waiting for users to demand change is like waiting for Godot - Godot never shows.

Works out of the box for me with the current correct drivers for Dell L702X's Nvidia Optimus solution - something Dell can't even do with their OEM Windows 7 SP1 WIM.

Speed is fantastic with a SSD - power button is Off and On, not On -> to the kettle for a brew!

Zune's WiFi sync is still broken but that's to be expected.

I don't like the fact that it appears to be more oriented towards touch devices, with the desktop user experience seemingly tacked on at the last minute.

Do I hate it? No. Do I like it? Certainly not. Would I use it with various tweaks put in? If the tweaks made it more of a desktop experience that I've become used to, probably.

My thoughts exactly.

I don't particularly like it, but I can understand why they did it... the standalone desktop PC is dying, it's all about tablets and push button small screens now. I can adapt to it, once they flesh out the freezing, the lackluster internet explorer 10, among other things.

I voted "It doesn't bother me".... because the other choices didn't really make sense. I am ok with the metro interface, although I'm kind of annoyed that it's not "metro only"....

Here's why: bouncing between the old classic windows desktop style with the taskbar, widgets, and such... It's stupid. They need to figure out a way for windows to automatically "metro-tize" any running application, so that it essentially makes the need for "old windows" to go away. The transition from "new" back to "old" when a non-metro app is running looks..... Moronic. It's like windows is saying "oh ****, this doesn't run in metro... Time to start "fake desktop gui app" and run it in there"..... Really Microsoft? That's your best solution?

They can do better to maintain the metro interface regardless of what program is running.

There doesn't appear to be an option for me, in the poll, because I would say it does bother me (in both a positive and negative way), yet I don't love or hate it. I definitely like Windows 8 (which answers the poll's question), but I'm not yet sure whether I love it or whether I will end up preferring it to OS X.

I love certain features (e.g. the app contracts and the charms?I think both of those ideas are brilliant and they work really well in the Release Preview), but I'm not entirely sure whether I enjoy how apps that follow the Metro design philosophy look, especially considering very few websites seem to follow that design philosophy. When using a Facebook app in Windows 8, I'd be enjoying the consistent, unified experience Microsoft are attempting to provide; however, if I use the Facebook website in the WinRT version of Internet Explorer, I won't be enjoying that consistent, unified experience. That idea turns me off, slightly. For some reason, using the Facebook website on OS X is an idea that doesn't bother me. Perhaps this is because the design of OS X and its apps don't follow one particular philosophy; I don't mind using websites that look completely different because not as much is the same in OS X as it is in Windows 8. My view regarding that could change, and I hope it does, because Windows 8 is great. In fact, I hope that enough decent apps will be created to the point where I don't ever have to use Internet Explorer to access features I'm after. I should be able to use an app for everything nowadays, and WinRT makes that possible; developers just have to care.

Another similar gripe of mine is that we are still directed to the Desktop for too many things. I'd rather never have to visit the Desktop, but I'm aware that Microsoft can't yet make that possible; however, considering how often I use pornography, having to switch to the desktop just because the WinRT version of Internet Explorer can't play those videos, daily, is going to be very irritating.

the standalone desktop PC is dying evolving.

Evolving is a pretty strong word, as it still assumes the death of the old and and its total replacement by the 'new'. While the market at large (and the dumber and dumber end users that purchase them) may be trending in this direction, that won't remove the need for high performance workstations. My niche is safe and we will continue to laugh at your decision to put mobility ahead of usability, for generally no good reason.

Evolving is a pretty strong word, as it still assumes the death of the old and and its total replacement by the 'new'. While the market at large (and the dumber and dumber end users that purchase them) may be trending in this direction, that won't remove the need for high performance workstations. My niche is safe and we will continue to laugh at your decision to put mobility ahead of usability, for generally no good reason.

No, it doesn't. Just as in nature, two different evolutionary paths can exist at the same time. However, historically the one that doesn't adapt to change, eventually dies out. The consumer market wants mobility, but that does not have to mean usability dies, but it will change. That's a given.

Users of the future will be looking back on us and go, "What is a mouse?"

You didn't say that though. You said the desktop was evolving into something else, not that the mobility/slate/smartphone segment has evolved to the point that its finally a blip on the radar compared to desktop/laptop level sales/installation. They can't be the same species and competing species at the same time.

Did you just say that there is no trade-off between mobility and usability too? Whats next, security doesn't invoke a penalty on usability either? Teh funny.

Back to the mouse is dead argument huh, even though MS has been clear even in their crazy touch-future world that at best, touch will augment the mouse, not replace it when both are available. The death of the mouse may accompany the death of the desktop but not a second sooner. Which still leads back to the question, does Metro2 have the DNA to kill the desktop. For the foreseeable future, the answer is no.

You didn't say that though. You said the desktop was evolving into something else, not that the mobility/slate/smartphone segment has evolved to the point that its finally a blip on the radar compared to desktop/laptop level sales/installation. They can't be the same species and competing species at the same time.

Did you just say that there is no trade-off between mobility and usability too? Whats next, security doesn't invoke a penalty on usability either? Teh funny.

Back to the mouse is dead argument huh, even though MS has been clear even in their crazy touch-future world that at best, touch will augment the mouse, not replace it when both are available. The death of the mouse may accompany the death of the desktop but not a second sooner. Which still leads back to the question, does Metro2 have the DNA to kill the desktop. For the foreseeable future, the answer is no.

The desktop is evolving, hence the pictures of old and new PCs.

I love how you only give Love and Hate options. This isn't a black and white argument you know.

That said, I find it interesting that despite all the "most people will hate it" arguments that have been flying around this and other forums, that 48.57% of people surveyed by this poll will be using Windows 8, with only 34.64% "hating" it, with a further 16.79% that aren't really bothered one way or another who will probably end up getting it anyway when they replace their PC next time around.

I really like Windows 8 and will be upgrading when I buy an new tablet/laptop by the end of the year.

The Metro side of windows has potential, but the apps at the moment are still lacking a lot of functionality, specially the ones from Ms themselves which is disappointing.

I hope we see a lot of updates on those apps between now and RTM.

No, it doesn't. Just as in nature, two different evolutionary paths can exist at the same time. However, historically the one that doesn't adapt to change, eventually dies out. The consumer market wants mobility, but that does not have to mean usability dies, but it will change. That's a given.

Users of the future will be looking back on us and go, "What is a mouse?"

Your grand prophecies and crystal ball preaching of your deeply flawed gospel of windows 8 are quite humorous if not worthy of a strong belly laugh at times, the mouse will not be leaving us any time soon and the ones "that doesn't adapt to change" will not "eventually" die out as you have predicted, not at all, at least not until every last typical desktop pc is gone from the earth and replaced with touch screen devices which will be a very long time from now.

The average consumer who uses a typical pc will most likely just stay with 7 as their OS of choice, just as people stayed with XP when vista was released, or at the very least many people "upgraded" to XP when they bought a new pc with vista.

Regardless of the mass exodus to XP from vista (and rightfully so) microsoft still clung to their OEM sales numbers in a blatantly dishonest move to try and save face and show that vista was a success despite the proved fact that vista was a miserable failure from beginning to end.

Microsoft will do this again when "8" is released, we will see this a lot when the OS completely bombs on the desktop just as vista did, the real stats however will not lie, 7 and to a certain degree XP, will both dominate the desktop market for a long time to come, this much is certain.

I also predict that this time around microsoft will not allow an upgrade to 7 from "8" on new pc's that are sold with "8" pre-installed, they were embarrassed and humiliated the last time that happened, their grossly overblown egos in regards to "8" will try and avoid any egg on face this time around, even though the egg is already on their face and will prove difficult if not impossible to remove after all is said and done regarding "8".

You can have your crystal ball back Dot Matrix as I am finished with it, I cleaned it off really good and buffed it to a shine before I used it, that thing was filthy dirty, maybe this time when you use it your 'visions' will be a lot more clear and focused and not so cloudy and faltering as they once were.

That said, I find it interesting that despite all the "most people will hate it" arguments that have been flying around this and other forums, that 48.57% of people surveyed by this poll will be using Windows 8, with only 34.64% "hating" it, with a further 16.79% that aren't really bothered one way or another who will probably end up getting it anyway when they replace their PC next time around.

This pretty much spells out the doom of "8" before it is even released, if you put up a poll like that in a Microsoft fanboy dominated forum such as this one and less than half of the users say they will be using "8" then something is terribly wrong with the product.

In a fanboy dominated forum the poll should show at MINIMUM an 80% of voters saying they will be using "8", or an absolute minimum of 75% to even have any hope for "8", 48.57% is really bad, "8" is completely doomed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!