Recommended Posts

So, I'm one of those weird guys that actually like Windows 8. I love Metro, how fast it is, the new functionality...

But still, why not do this instead (MS Paint baby!):

cuXyw.jpg

It would fix lots of the critiscim Windows 8 gets, and I honestly can't think of any disadvantages. So, why not?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1083091-why-didnt-microsoft-do-this-instead/
Share on other sites

But still, why not do this instead (MS Paint baby!):

It would fix lots of the critiscim Windows 8 gets, and I honestly can't think of any disadvantages. So, why not?

Simple. Microsoft can't get anybody to use their Phone or Tablet software on their own merits so they're exploiting their existing desktop monopoly to do it. Microsoft's hoping by forcing everyone to use the same Metro/Tiles/Start Screen interface, they can create a demand and expand the same monopoly to mobile devices.

Will it work? Who knows. It's possible I suppose. But if you compare Windows Mobile to the desktop, it had a lot of similarities, yet it couldn't dominate the market like the desktop version does. This leads me to believe this time around won't be any different.

  • Like 2

Simple. Microsoft can't get anybody to use their Phone or Tablet software on their own merits so they're exploiting their existing desktop monopoly to do it. Microsoft's hoping by forcing everyone to use the same Metro/Tiles/Start Screen interface, they can create a demand and expand the same monopoly to mobile devices.

:sleep:

I think your tinfoil hat might be cutting off your circulation.

So really like this?

It's an interesting idea.

Personally, I wouldn't have minded a mix of the old and the new, at least on the desktop, touch devices are fine as is. Know on the Windows 7 start menu where you have your pinned applications on the left side? Replace that area with smaller tiles that can scroll in that given area, kinda sorta like WP7. Keep them live and dynamic as that's actually a pretty spiffy feature to have, have the jumplists still available on the right. But you've still got the known method of accessing the menu, still got the various sub-menus as before, etc.. hit "All programs" and the tiles get replaced by the traditional collapsible tree. Best of both. I'd doodle up something to make it clearer but my drawing skills are non-existent.

Foan -- purty; Rainmeter?

Putting tiles on the desktop doesn't help much because your windows will be over them anyways, blocking them and the info they can give. I'm all for having an option to snap the start screen though. I think it'd be better that way instead of trying to merge it into the desktop area like the above pictures. Honestly if I could have it snapped to the left of the desktop and then scroll it or have it somehow shrink the tiles a bit so that I can see most of them that way that it could be pretty interesting. It would almost be like having the WP start screen snapped to the left for example.

This has been asked over, and over, and over again. This design opens up severe usability issues with the desktop - accidental clicking, open windows hiding information, etc.

  • Like 3

Having the superbar at the top of the start screen like that would be largely redundant given that the start screen already functions as an application launcher. It's a compromise that wouldn't really help anyone in my opinion.

  • Like 1

So really like this?

post-447111-0-64650500-1339263267_thumb.

Exactly. The whole point of the taskbar is to allow you to quickly change between open applications and it was unnecessary for Microsoft to remove it, especially on desktops which have dramatically more screen space and typically have higher resolutions. I can understand the advantage of running in fullscreen on a tablet - especially when there are touch gestures to very quickly move between open applications - but it is incredibly inconvenient when using a desktop with mouse and keyboard. The task switcher in Windows 8 simply isn't fit for purpose, as it is hidden from view and doesn't individually identify programs running on the desktop (they're simply grouped under 'Desktop').

Microsoft was too busy trying to obsolesce the desktop environment that it failed to address the significant usability issues with mouse and keyboard. Just look at the change to the All Apps button on the desktop, which was changed in the RP. It used to be on the left - which was logical, even if it was hidden behind a mouse click - but Microsoft decided to move it to the right. That means you have to click the bottom left corner to bring up start, right-click, then move the mouse to the very right of the screen, click the button, then scroll all the way back to the left to launch an app. Such a change shows complete contempt for mouse users. Same with the new hot-corners - try dragging a desktop app to a corner and rather than snapping to the side it will maximise; do the same with a Metro app and it will snap. And try maximising a side-snapped Metro app by dragging it to the top... yup, it doesn't work; instead you have to drag the divider bar. The gestures are completely schizophrenic and show absolutely no consistency. The RP was actually a backwards step in terms of usability in many respects. It's clear that Microsoft is rushing through changes without properly testing them.

Having the superbar at the top of the start screen like that would be largely redundant given that the start screen already functions as an application launcher. It's a compromise that wouldn't really help anyone in my opinion.

Sigh. It's not about the 'launcher' aspect of the taskbar, it's about the task switching aspect. For me, having an overview of what Windows are opened at all times is essential to using my computer.

I'd be fine with Windows 8 if it'd just have an option to disable launching of any Metro environment apps. Aka opening anything from the start screen kicking you back to the desktop with regular Windows. That'd be a good compromise, and I sincerely hope I can disable all Metro applications by uninstalling them or blocking them with Group Policies.

I still don't get how Microsoft can't see that the vast, vast majority of users will still be running Windows 8 on a desktop with mouse and keyboard or laptop with touchpad and keyboard. It'll be a horrible, horrible experience.

Sigh. It's not about the 'launcher' aspect of the taskbar, it's about the task switching aspect. For me, having an overview of what Windows are opened at all times is essential to using my computer.

I'd be fine with Windows 8 if it'd just have an option to disable launching of any Metro environment apps. Aka opening anything from the start screen kicking you back to the desktop with regular Windows. That'd be a good compromise, and I sincerely hope I can disable all Metro applications by uninstalling them or blocking them with Group Policies.

I hope someone somewhere will find a way to hack it out but I'm starting to wonder.

I still don't get how Microsoft can't see that the vast, vast majority of users will still be running Windows 8 on a desktop with mouse and keyboard or laptop with touchpad and keyboard. It'll be a horrible, horrible experience.

And, Windows 8 works just well with these devices. I've been using the previews on nothing but.

I still don't get how Microsoft can't see that the vast, vast majority of users will still be running Windows 8 on a desktop with mouse and keyboard or laptop with touchpad and keyboard. It'll be a horrible, horrible experience.

umm, why is it a horrible experience ?

the start screen works great with a mouse and keyboard. I have instant access to 100+ pinned favorites, that's far faster access to far more apps than any method the start menu ever offered, and I still have my most used apps on the superbar that can fit 30 or so on my 1080 screen.

I'm not seeing why I'm having a horrible experience, could you explain to my why I'm supposed to have a horrible experience ?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • Is it still super slow or has it improved on that area?
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      213
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!