Recommended Posts

Nothing significant for you at least. More languages for Siri it's a godsend for the rest of us in the world.

I'm sure it is, but supporting more languages should be an incremental update thing not a major highlight of a new version IMO. But I currently have no Siri, so either way for me....

I was talking about this over Twitter last night. While the updates are 'nice', it's barely even worthy of a full incremental number update, i know numbers don't really mean much these days but iOS5.5 would of been more fitting... nothing has really changed. That being said, i've not used it yet.

iOS 5.5 would have been a great name! I want my widgets/live icons! *throws temper tantrum*

I think Apple might be playing it a little too safe with iOS

While I fully agree, and as a result see them as sort of "falling behind", they have the most elegant user experience and would be damned if they messed an update up now.

Where you guys hoping for strippers and a keg? It's a mobiles OS, how exciting can it get? From what I read, I am happy about it when it comes to the masses. Siri on iPad isa something I am looking forward to very much.

You'd imagine something like that from the 'worlds most advanced mobile operating system', no?

Absolutely. The UI is extremely boring, and there is no liveliness in the device. I haven't tested iOS 6 yet, but from the looks of it, it looks like it's just as fun as watching grass grow. iOS 6 brings nothing exciting in terms of change, though I do like the new maps app (extremely overdue). Just my take on it.

I just hope that some of the features demoed will be usable in the UK for once. Siri sports searches and turn by turn nagivation are extremely suspect of being usable in the UK.

Scott Forstall said at the conference that the sports features of Siri do support the British Premier league. He didn't elaborate on other sports or leagues however.

I suspect that the driving thing will work in the UK too but that is just a hunch on my part.

Of course the iOS 6 is not going to be the big deal this time around. Apple is concentrating on the iphone 5 hardware which should be a big jump. Also I think we are reaching the point of diminishing returns in smartphone development. Even and android ics 4.0 was a bit underwhelming.

Scott Forstall said at the conference that the sports features of Siri do support the British Premier league. He didn't elaborate on other sports or leagues however.

I suspect that the driving thing will work in the UK too but that is just a hunch on my part.

I'd love it to support Formula 1

"Who has won the Monaco GP the most times?"

"That would be Ayrton Senna, with 6 wins in total."

Just as an example.

  • Like 2

It may be boring, but iOS 6 still is solid with many useful features. Gizmodo has a nice list here - The Best iOS 6 Features Nobody Is Talking About

You guys may have noticed that the status bar was blue in some areas during Apple's Keynote. It's an interesting new feature (I personally think it looks weird) - Adaptive status bar in iOS 6

I can't wait to see what Microsoft has in store for Windows Phone 8 (yeah, WP fan here).

I think I would find it less boring if I only owned iOS devices, but as my Android phones have had a lot of the new features for a number of years, there's nothing impressive for me at all. It's nice that Apple is catching up, but there's nothing that doesn't already exist on competing mobile OSes.

Where are some of the most requested features: -

1. Shortcuts to wifi, Bluetooth etc.

2. Ability to access custom user dictionary and add words rather than "train" the keyboard (having to type "rofl" 50 times to get it to stop correcting is freaking annoying and very unintuitive)

The redesign of the stores should come to the whole of iOS. The "skin" that iOS has always had is just ancient and should be changed up for once. Such as the background with the blue and white vertical lines in the settings app, etc.

Here's hoping for a UI change that is being held back for when the next iPhone is announced.

I like it. It has always been vivid IMO. So many great graphics, so many colors, so many animations, everything is crystal crisp.

For those who wanted UI changes, there there has been a lot in iOS6 so far. The Music app and the Weather app got a bunch of changes, and all other apps had a few GUI changes too (the top bar is now purple instead of black, buttons have been slightly redesigned, etc.).

I love it. Just concerned by the fact that it?s not faster on my iPhone 3GS. It may be even a little slower in some cases (Music app, texting).

Where are some of the most requested features: -

2. Ability to access custom user dictionary and add words rather than "train" the keyboard (having to type "rofl" 50 times to get it to stop correcting is freaking annoying and very unintuitive)

http://coregeek.wordpress.com/2011/10/17/add-words-to-ios-5-auto-correct-dictionary/

Not perfect, but it definitely works.

Boring. Massively underwhelming.

It took them until version SIX of ios to allow us to attach files from the compose email screen, and you can STILL only attach pictures and videos...not iWork or other documents.

Big yawn from me.

Oh and the "worlds best Facebook integration" is a lie. The htc desire, released two years ago, had better.

Shame the HTC Desire is a pile of crap. Which means, by default, anything it does, is done badly ;)

The update isn't very hot in my eyes. Actually, the Maps app will most likely lose features and get worse quality for me. The international coverage in their new maps (including satellite photography) as well as how they look is definitely a turn for the worse compared to Google Maps. Also, lost street view for everyone. And Transit support. Thankfully, Google seems to aim to get a Google Maps app submitted, but I still would have liked basic features for ~$200+ phones in 2012 integrated in the native app.

Facebook integration was nice, but as basic as the Twitter integration. It would definitely be nice if I could for example share photos in my album on Facebook/Twitter and then see replies to my photos as I browsed them in the iOS photo gallery view. iPhoto for iOS has this feature - why not the standard app? So much to do here. Integration in iOS seems to be more about letting status updates fly off your phone and less about social networks enriching your phone. The rare exception would be Facebook support in the Calendar app. Wow!

Shared Photo Albums sounded nice until I realized I already share my photos on Facebook, and these are then also available on Macs running Mountain Lion, but also on so many other systems than that... :p Well, Shared Photo Albums do support uploading to the web for "general use", but what in the world is the point? "Yes, let's share this album on a web page with no social network so there can be no feedback." Sounds like an idea worthy of 2012 to you? What's going on there. This is Web 1.0 stuff, back how it worked in pre-2000.

Finally, I doubt Passbook will see reasonable enough support in the real world to be useful, but maybe I'm a pessimist. We'll see.

OK, enough whining. There were some marginally useful ideas here for me, like posting a status update to Facebook without tapping on the Facebook app in my dock, or being able to reply with a message that I'm unavailable if someone's calling me. But these aren't huge news or improvements.

I installed it yesterday on my iPhone 4S and I have to admit there isn't much there in the way of new features.

Some things I noticed straight away:

New iPod Skin, New App Store Layout and Skin, New iTunes Store Layout and Skin. The top menu bar that shows your battery/3G/Time etc changes colour depending on the top menu of the app you're in. You can now Tweet from the Notifications Menu.

The new 3D maps look very realistic even the trees are 3D and it does at points look photo realistic. When you zoom in there is a lot of pixelation however. When you have hybrid map turned on which means you get places names, street routes + satellite maps and 3D the whole map becomes incredibly laggy. Sub 1FPS when panning and zooming. If you turn Hybrid off and turn just satellite on which means you get images + 3D then it's smooth with no lag. I think this is just a performance problem they will need to fix before release.

Everything seems quite stable I've not had any problems running it so far. I noticed inside the App Store that when you update apps it no longer asks for your iTunes password and it updates apps without ever leaving the Store. A nice feature I've wanted for ages. You can now also Launch apps straight from the App Store. I suppose this is for when you just buy an app and you want to launch it straight away.

Assortment of Pictures (Click any to view large):

2QKzdm.pngC7WAqm.jpgMqpJLm.png

gddcxm.pnginXhDm.pngnJY7um.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!