Recommended Posts

The update isn't very hot in my eyes. Actually, the Maps app will most likely lose features and get worse quality for me. The international coverage in their new maps (including satellite photography) as well as how they look is definitely a turn for the worse compared to Google Maps. Also, lost street view for everyone. And Transit support. Thankfully, Google seems to aim to get a Google Maps app submitted, but I still would have liked basic features for ~$200+ phones in 2012 integrated in the native app.

Crap, there's no Transit support in the new app?

That's a huge downfall if true.

I've used both iOS and ICS and I think as iOS/OSX users are happy with their beautiful products/environments they're perhaps a little more proficient with the systems and want to delve a little more - I hesitate to say tweak as that implies geekery somewhat, but perhaps more preferences/changeable aspects to iOS would be nice?

I do like iOS but it is kinda restrictive - and that can be great - but with time it feels a little 'simple': it's our way or no way. True, I can't really imagine what amazing features iOS 7 can really include, nor Android 5, but allowing users out of their Cupertino cr?che could be good :)

I hope they update all of the application UIs before GM. The Music and App Store apps doesn't fit in at all, for instance. Apple products used to be so... streamlined. Starting with OS X Lion, they're all a bunch of different ideas thrown together. I'm a little disappointed with them.

Crap, there's no Transit support in the new app?

I'm pretty sure there isn't, even though I'm not running iOS 6 beta. They made a point of promoting Transit apps in the Keynote from what I remember. I'm annoyed by that too. I'll either get the Google Maps app if released/accepted (likely to have better features now that Google knows that Apple aren't reliant on it) or be forced to look for some decent transit app. Frankly I'm not too excited about the updates to the Maps app as I lose the transit information (the main feature I used the default app for) and I already have a TomTom app to use as a sat nav. Now if they were to include transit information and offline maps (even if the latter were in-app purchases), that would be great.

It's not according to Redmond Pie. It's according to Apple. You can see what else your iPhone won't be getting here (look at the small print): http://www.apple.com/ios/ios6/

Hey

If it can let the home screen (and mostapple apps) spin all the way around I will be happy...this is why I can use my phone in the car without having to hold it and not using a stand, my phone fits in my car prefectly upside down.

I installed it yesterday on my iPhone 4S and I have to admit there isn't much there in the way of new features.

...

I like how they continue to refine the interface with each release. Someone on here mentioned how iOS 6 looks just like iOS 1, and I think they couldn't be any further from the truth.

On topic, like with the previous iOS announcements, I'm more excited about the upcoming announcement, and kind of like, "bored," when the actual announcement is made. Because iOS is married to the hardware, I get tickled when I see it on the new iPhone, and when the developers start leveraging the new features and APIs.

  • Like 1

only thing I like about IOS 6 so far is that the speed is incredable and my apps DO NOT CRASH

I have not had any crashes at all. But alas I do wish they would bring Siri to the 4, otherwise I'll just hold out until the 5 comes out

While I guess I lucked out and my upgrade date has always been in a year with (historically) major iPhone upgrades (i.e. 3G to 4, 4S to 5) I'm still kind of frustrated that some things like FaceTime and Siri wont be compatible. And there is no reason why Siri is neglected on iPad 2...other than Apple doing what they do.

Ah well. Looking forward to the update. Is the Music app on iPad any different? Its a freaking mess right now.

Shame the HTC Desire is a pile of crap. Which means, by default, anything it does, is done badly ;)

Better than every iPhone IMO.

http://coregeek.word...ect-dictionary/

Not perfect, but it definitely works.

Thanks for that, never thought of using that option. Good idea!

  • 1 month later...

I have a question regarding this. Do you still need Itunes to activate or has that gone away with iOS5?

No. iTunes is not required but unless you purchase all your music from iTMS it will be difficult to load music w/o jailbreaking. You can even backup to iCloud sans-iTunes, but unless you pay for extra space 5GB for a backup goes fast.

No. iTunes is not required but unless you purchase all your music from iTMS it will be difficult to load music w/o jailbreaking. You can even backup to iCloud sans-iTunes, but unless you pay for extra space 5GB for a backup goes fast.

Thanks. So I will need Itunes to add comics, ebooks, music and movies. :(

Thanks. So I will need Itunes to add comics, ebooks, music and movies. :(

Yes, unless you intend to purchase them all through your iOS device. iTunes has some pretty badass features when it comes to managing your iOS device from a computer. It beats the socks off what android has for this. So I don't know why people are so persistent in wanting an apple device but not wanting to use apple software that works with the device. iTunes for Windows is not half as bad as everyone moans and groans about. But whatever. If you are dead set on using apple products without using apple products then just Jailbreak your device and learn how to use SSH to get your content loaded from your computer.

  • Like 1

I've been using Beta 4 on my iPad and comparing it to my Nexus 7 running Android 4.1 - Even with the new feature of version 6, it still miss the ease of the multi-tasking of Android, no widgets or something like "live tile" aka WP7.

It's still just a grid of icons, nothing more. Need to check something, well, load the Apps.

It works, but it's getting old.

Oh and on the issue of maps caching, I think a fully detailed map of a whole country would be huge, even if it is vector based. I'm not against the idea of caching but I do think it's unrealistic to cache much more than a medium sized city, I doubt there's the capacity there to cache the whole of London in full detail really.

Google Maps has had this for a while on Android, so you can still use the maps without a data connection. If they do it correctly, it doesn't need to be that big in size. You just lose out on the extra functionality, such as satellite view, and things like that.

It simply works. No hick ups, no issues, no crashes and stupid 3rd party useless apps running in the background without my permission (like Android) and that's all I care about.

It's a phone people, not a laptop.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!