Recommended Posts

Open Task Manager and select to view all processes and tell me if those numbers are still correct. I used to think MSE didn't use much RAM till I showed all processes and discovered a third MSE service consuming 50Mb of RAM.

Do you want to explain why WSA is so bad? Maybe is better SpyBot? Or maybe Emsisoft? Or even better MSE? lol.

@sanctified.

Try Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus. This is WSA installed on 4 gb of ram:

Ztd9K.png

Mar-Apr/2012 AV-Test results:

http://www.av-test.o...testreports_pi1[report_no]=121361

Not overkill at all, personally I don't need all the stuff from the 'Complete' version. PM me - I can send you a link with 50% off - only $39.95 for WSA Complete instead of $79.95.

Awesome. PM sent.

Now it is a link from Softpedia, not sure if that's a terrible thing.

http://download1us.s...hrome-win32.zip

I would like a more trusted site.

Softpedia sometimes carry questionable apps. I would like a developer page that keep pushing builds and give direct support.

I'm not familiar with nor do I have any experience with Webroot, but, I've been using Eset Nod32 for years and it has never failed me. It is also one of the few AV's that is light on resources.

  • Like 2

Just downloaded the latest mini installer. Will try it for the rest of the week. It imported my srw iron profile on the fly. So good so far.

Open Task Manager and select to view all processes and tell me if those numbers are still correct. I used to think MSE didn't use much RAM till I showed all processes and discovered a third MSE service consuming 50Mb of RAM.

No task manager noob here, WSA Antivirus has only 2 processes:

579OF.png

Gotta say. You dont even notice Webroot is running in the background. Very light on resources and the computer scan was amazingly fast (Also, detected extra malware hiding in the appdata folder).

Now a summary:

Replaced MSE with Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete

Followed all the advises found in J_R_G's amazing guide here: http://bulletproof-w...ws.blogspot.mx/

Installed precompiled Chromium that I will test for a week.

This along all the points I described in the first point (Forgot to say that Im using Windows 7 64bits)

Can I say now that my system is above average secure?

First off if you care about security, you would look at SRWare Iron. Second, the amount of memory used by your protection package is only part of the picture. As a security person the only thing that i trust on my personal machines is VIPRE. I have been using it for years, and in CEH class, we eacg tried our own software to scan a directory (read only) with thousands of samples of known and some zero day virus and a few we created. VIPRE out did ever one tested. Even the instructor changed his person use between classes.

VIPRE is was one of the first to be the lowest in resource usage and also the leader in multi-core technology.

This CEH v7 only uses VIPRE personally and recommends it to everyone.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

http://www.pandasecu...ads/usbvaccine/

VIPRE is GREAT but is NOT the lowest in resource usage.

My last week installs (XP Pro SP3, 2 GB of ram)

- Panda Cloud AV 6/10

- ESET AV 7/10

- Unthreat AV 3/10

- VIPRE 6/10

- Symantec AV 7/10

score: Ram usage - lower is better.

http://www.pandasecu...ads/usbvaccine/

VIPRE is GREAT but is NOT the lowest in resource usage.

My last week installs (XP Pro SP3, 2 GB of ram)

- Panda Cloud AV 6/10

- ESET AV 7/10

- Unthreat AV 3/10

- VIPRE 6/10

- Symantec AV 7/10

score: Ram usage - lower is better.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

First of all, thanks for the suggestion.

It's not that all we care is performance. However some of us use heavy software and every cycle or ram amount we can save counts.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

Let's get GData Antivirus - it offeres 10/10 protection in every single test I've seen. My question for you: have you ever tried to install GData ? If not do it on a system with 2 gb of ram and please post here the results. I care more of my security but I can't have installed Malware Defender, Kaspersky AV, Emsisoft Mamutu, No Script andf MalwareBytes running in background all the time like I see everyday in some security boards just to watch stupid YouTube videos or to buy a pair of discounted shoes from time to time. That's insane and I'm not NASA or FBI. And let's get real, if someone want to penetrate your (or mine) ''great'' $39.99 security softwares it can do it anytime, even if your PC is full with security suites, hips protection, antikeyloggers and so on....It happened to NASA, Amazon, FBI, Symantec, Microsoft and others. Spending hundreds of dollars on security software and dreaming to the perfect ''security combo'' is just stupid.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

I hate to tell you this but I doubt if anything will help you permanently if you have to do that. Other than swab in Linux.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

Wouldn't it be better to have a separate laptop for looking at strange USBs?

Wouldn't it be a good idea to change your card number too ?

I've been told (Never said I believed mind you) that creating a folder called "autorun.inf" and placing it on your thumb drive will stop any attempt by an autorun virus to infect your flash drive. Supposedly, they can't overwrite the folder with a real autorun.inf. My personal belief is that its B.S.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Promoting is fine - advertising, informing, whatever.  But interrupting your PAID OS experience is not.
    • Why does a PDF software need an audio player inside it. What is this bloat.
    • Sadly, that is the state of things. It's basically considered acceptable for any random app running on your computer to use 1+ GB of RAM, and install space, lol, no one even seems to consider that.
    • EU Commission explains why Siri AI isn't launching in the EU, and Apple is to blame by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple This week at Apple’s 2026 developers conference, the iPhone maker unveiled the upgraded Siri after more than a year of delays. The new Siri is now called Siri AI, and it's powered by Google Gemini models. While Siri AI is preparing to roll out to Apple users worldwide, the company’s EU customers might need to wait much longer before getting their hands on the new assistant. Shortly after announcing iOS 27, Apple said in a blog post that Siri AI is not coming to the EU anytime soon due to hurdles posed by the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and other regulatory requirements. To comply with the DMA in the EU, Apple apparently needs to open Siri AI to rival assistants on iOS 27 and iPadOS 27. Apple has refused to do so, which has resulted in Siri AI being delayed for its EU users. The company argues that such a move would put users’ privacy at risk. In a statement to Neowin, a European Commission spokesperson provided more details about why Siri AI will not be rolled out to Apple customers in the region. The statement first noted that the DMA does not prohibit Apple from launching its services in the EU and that the company is simply required to comply with the law. The European Commission spokesperson added that, since Apple is considered a gatekeeper under the DMA, it is “obliged to give third parties access to equivalent features as they give to its own products. Because the DMA is precisely about giving users the choice to use the product they find best suits their needs.” Moreover, the spokesperson said the Commission has been in contact with Apple, though the company “did not develop proposals for DMA compliant interoperability solutions.” The statement also clarified that companies designated as gatekeepers cannot leverage their status and products, such as operating systems, to favor their own AI services. The first public beta of iOS 27 will roll out next month, while the stable version is expected to launch this fall following the release of the iPhone 18 series. It remains unclear when Apple will be able to resolve its DMA-related compliance issues with the European Commission and bring Siri AI to its European customers.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      X-No-file earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      johnjacobb40 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      214
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      145
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!