Recommended Posts

Open Task Manager and select to view all processes and tell me if those numbers are still correct. I used to think MSE didn't use much RAM till I showed all processes and discovered a third MSE service consuming 50Mb of RAM.

Do you want to explain why WSA is so bad? Maybe is better SpyBot? Or maybe Emsisoft? Or even better MSE? lol.

@sanctified.

Try Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus. This is WSA installed on 4 gb of ram:

Ztd9K.png

Mar-Apr/2012 AV-Test results:

http://www.av-test.o...testreports_pi1[report_no]=121361

Not overkill at all, personally I don't need all the stuff from the 'Complete' version. PM me - I can send you a link with 50% off - only $39.95 for WSA Complete instead of $79.95.

Awesome. PM sent.

Now it is a link from Softpedia, not sure if that's a terrible thing.

http://download1us.s...hrome-win32.zip

I would like a more trusted site.

Softpedia sometimes carry questionable apps. I would like a developer page that keep pushing builds and give direct support.

I'm not familiar with nor do I have any experience with Webroot, but, I've been using Eset Nod32 for years and it has never failed me. It is also one of the few AV's that is light on resources.

  • Like 2

Just downloaded the latest mini installer. Will try it for the rest of the week. It imported my srw iron profile on the fly. So good so far.

Open Task Manager and select to view all processes and tell me if those numbers are still correct. I used to think MSE didn't use much RAM till I showed all processes and discovered a third MSE service consuming 50Mb of RAM.

No task manager noob here, WSA Antivirus has only 2 processes:

579OF.png

Gotta say. You dont even notice Webroot is running in the background. Very light on resources and the computer scan was amazingly fast (Also, detected extra malware hiding in the appdata folder).

Now a summary:

Replaced MSE with Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete

Followed all the advises found in J_R_G's amazing guide here: http://bulletproof-w...ws.blogspot.mx/

Installed precompiled Chromium that I will test for a week.

This along all the points I described in the first point (Forgot to say that Im using Windows 7 64bits)

Can I say now that my system is above average secure?

First off if you care about security, you would look at SRWare Iron. Second, the amount of memory used by your protection package is only part of the picture. As a security person the only thing that i trust on my personal machines is VIPRE. I have been using it for years, and in CEH class, we eacg tried our own software to scan a directory (read only) with thousands of samples of known and some zero day virus and a few we created. VIPRE out did ever one tested. Even the instructor changed his person use between classes.

VIPRE is was one of the first to be the lowest in resource usage and also the leader in multi-core technology.

This CEH v7 only uses VIPRE personally and recommends it to everyone.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

http://www.pandasecu...ads/usbvaccine/

VIPRE is GREAT but is NOT the lowest in resource usage.

My last week installs (XP Pro SP3, 2 GB of ram)

- Panda Cloud AV 6/10

- ESET AV 7/10

- Unthreat AV 3/10

- VIPRE 6/10

- Symantec AV 7/10

score: Ram usage - lower is better.

http://www.pandasecu...ads/usbvaccine/

VIPRE is GREAT but is NOT the lowest in resource usage.

My last week installs (XP Pro SP3, 2 GB of ram)

- Panda Cloud AV 6/10

- ESET AV 7/10

- Unthreat AV 3/10

- VIPRE 6/10

- Symantec AV 7/10

score: Ram usage - lower is better.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

First of all, thanks for the suggestion.

It's not that all we care is performance. However some of us use heavy software and every cycle or ram amount we can save counts.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

Let's get GData Antivirus - it offeres 10/10 protection in every single test I've seen. My question for you: have you ever tried to install GData ? If not do it on a system with 2 gb of ram and please post here the results. I care more of my security but I can't have installed Malware Defender, Kaspersky AV, Emsisoft Mamutu, No Script andf MalwareBytes running in background all the time like I see everyday in some security boards just to watch stupid YouTube videos or to buy a pair of discounted shoes from time to time. That's insane and I'm not NASA or FBI. And let's get real, if someone want to penetrate your (or mine) ''great'' $39.99 security softwares it can do it anytime, even if your PC is full with security suites, hips protection, antikeyloggers and so on....It happened to NASA, Amazon, FBI, Symantec, Microsoft and others. Spending hundreds of dollars on security software and dreaming to the perfect ''security combo'' is just stupid.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

I hate to tell you this but I doubt if anything will help you permanently if you have to do that. Other than swab in Linux.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

Wouldn't it be better to have a separate laptop for looking at strange USBs?

Wouldn't it be a good idea to change your card number too ?

I've been told (Never said I believed mind you) that creating a folder called "autorun.inf" and placing it on your thumb drive will stop any attempt by an autorun virus to infect your flash drive. Supposedly, they can't overwrite the folder with a real autorun.inf. My personal belief is that its B.S.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yay, a forced new tab telling everyone edge just updated with a load of advertising in it twice as often as we currently get it. That'll never be abused. 😏
    • About bloody time. I have got PRs with hundred of files and the Web UI just struggling to even load the pages.
    • I wonder if it was applying secure boot certificates/dbx files?
    • I recently tried edge. It seems a lot better. A lot of the junk in it is gone. It seems less bloated and snappy.
    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      174
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!