Recommended Posts

Open Task Manager and select to view all processes and tell me if those numbers are still correct. I used to think MSE didn't use much RAM till I showed all processes and discovered a third MSE service consuming 50Mb of RAM.

Do you want to explain why WSA is so bad? Maybe is better SpyBot? Or maybe Emsisoft? Or even better MSE? lol.

@sanctified.

Try Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus. This is WSA installed on 4 gb of ram:

Ztd9K.png

Mar-Apr/2012 AV-Test results:

http://www.av-test.o...testreports_pi1[report_no]=121361

Not overkill at all, personally I don't need all the stuff from the 'Complete' version. PM me - I can send you a link with 50% off - only $39.95 for WSA Complete instead of $79.95.

Awesome. PM sent.

Now it is a link from Softpedia, not sure if that's a terrible thing.

http://download1us.s...hrome-win32.zip

I would like a more trusted site.

Softpedia sometimes carry questionable apps. I would like a developer page that keep pushing builds and give direct support.

I'm not familiar with nor do I have any experience with Webroot, but, I've been using Eset Nod32 for years and it has never failed me. It is also one of the few AV's that is light on resources.

  • Like 2

Just downloaded the latest mini installer. Will try it for the rest of the week. It imported my srw iron profile on the fly. So good so far.

Open Task Manager and select to view all processes and tell me if those numbers are still correct. I used to think MSE didn't use much RAM till I showed all processes and discovered a third MSE service consuming 50Mb of RAM.

No task manager noob here, WSA Antivirus has only 2 processes:

579OF.png

Gotta say. You dont even notice Webroot is running in the background. Very light on resources and the computer scan was amazingly fast (Also, detected extra malware hiding in the appdata folder).

Now a summary:

Replaced MSE with Webroot SecureAnywhere Complete

Followed all the advises found in J_R_G's amazing guide here: http://bulletproof-w...ws.blogspot.mx/

Installed precompiled Chromium that I will test for a week.

This along all the points I described in the first point (Forgot to say that Im using Windows 7 64bits)

Can I say now that my system is above average secure?

First off if you care about security, you would look at SRWare Iron. Second, the amount of memory used by your protection package is only part of the picture. As a security person the only thing that i trust on my personal machines is VIPRE. I have been using it for years, and in CEH class, we eacg tried our own software to scan a directory (read only) with thousands of samples of known and some zero day virus and a few we created. VIPRE out did ever one tested. Even the instructor changed his person use between classes.

VIPRE is was one of the first to be the lowest in resource usage and also the leader in multi-core technology.

This CEH v7 only uses VIPRE personally and recommends it to everyone.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

http://www.pandasecu...ads/usbvaccine/

VIPRE is GREAT but is NOT the lowest in resource usage.

My last week installs (XP Pro SP3, 2 GB of ram)

- Panda Cloud AV 6/10

- ESET AV 7/10

- Unthreat AV 3/10

- VIPRE 6/10

- Symantec AV 7/10

score: Ram usage - lower is better.

http://www.pandasecu...ads/usbvaccine/

VIPRE is GREAT but is NOT the lowest in resource usage.

My last week installs (XP Pro SP3, 2 GB of ram)

- Panda Cloud AV 6/10

- ESET AV 7/10

- Unthreat AV 3/10

- VIPRE 6/10

- Symantec AV 7/10

score: Ram usage - lower is better.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

First of all, thanks for the suggestion.

It's not that all we care is performance. However some of us use heavy software and every cycle or ram amount we can save counts.

If that is all you care about, and don't have a real full understanding of what is involved with security products then using a single matrix is fine, it's your system.

Let's get GData Antivirus - it offeres 10/10 protection in every single test I've seen. My question for you: have you ever tried to install GData ? If not do it on a system with 2 gb of ram and please post here the results. I care more of my security but I can't have installed Malware Defender, Kaspersky AV, Emsisoft Mamutu, No Script andf MalwareBytes running in background all the time like I see everyday in some security boards just to watch stupid YouTube videos or to buy a pair of discounted shoes from time to time. That's insane and I'm not NASA or FBI. And let's get real, if someone want to penetrate your (or mine) ''great'' $39.99 security softwares it can do it anytime, even if your PC is full with security suites, hips protection, antikeyloggers and so on....It happened to NASA, Amazon, FBI, Symantec, Microsoft and others. Spending hundreds of dollars on security software and dreaming to the perfect ''security combo'' is just stupid.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

I hate to tell you this but I doubt if anything will help you permanently if you have to do that. Other than swab in Linux.

I forgot to mention that Im doing this in part because my profession. As a teacher I constantly swap usb thumbs with my students. It's unavoidable.

Wouldn't it be better to have a separate laptop for looking at strange USBs?

Wouldn't it be a good idea to change your card number too ?

I've been told (Never said I believed mind you) that creating a folder called "autorun.inf" and placing it on your thumb drive will stop any attempt by an autorun virus to infect your flash drive. Supposedly, they can't overwrite the folder with a real autorun.inf. My personal belief is that its B.S.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft wants to end printer driver headaches with Windows Ready Print by Usama Jawad A few days ago, Microsoft released Windows 11 Experimental build 26300.8553, bringing a ton of enhancements such as Start menu customization, search improvements, Taskbar polish, and other minor UI tweaks. Another relatively major enhancement snuck deep within the change log was related to upgrades to the Windows printing experience. Now, Microsoft has shared more details about these benefits. For starters, Microsoft has renamed its Modern Print Platform to Windows Ready Print. The company believes that this name highlights its shift in strategy, which now focuses on modernizing, securing, and streamlining the printing experience for Windows devices. Some of the upgrades present in Windows Ready Print have already been seeded to customers and partners. This includes ending support for third-party printer drivers via Windows Update and transitioning towards the Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) and the native Windows IPP printer driver. In line with these changes, new printer installations will default to Windows Ready Print on eligible devices starting from July 2026. However, Microsoft recognizes that not all environments will be able to migrate to this platform immediately, so it will allow users to choose between installing the printer via Windows Ready Print or the traditional OEM process. Users will be able to toggle this configuration through Settings > Bluetooth & Devices > Printers & Scanners > Printer preferences. This control applies only to new printer installations, and its functionality can also be modified via Group Policy as follows: Launch Group Policy Editor Navigate to Local Computer Policy -> Administrative Templates -> Printers Find and select 'Configure Windows Ready Print driver ranking' -> double click to open it Select 'Enabled' (if you wish to enable Windows Ready Print driver selection) or 'Disabled' (if you wish to explicitly disable Windows Ready Print driver selection). Select Apply Select OK Similarly, if you set up Windows protected print mode through the same setting in Windows 11, it will also default to using Windows Ready Print exclusively. Microsoft hopes that these improvements will help eradicate dependency on OEM-specific driver installation processes and simplify printer installations. We'll likely find out more about other tangible benefits in the coming months.
    • Hey what's about the proton vpn firefox extension ? It's not working today
    • On what though? Not Ray Tracing.
    • Agreed, but now my muscle memory immediately creates a layer for each text portion, so editing is made a little easier.
    • Happy for him, it is one of the first apps I install on a new Windows machine, been using it for years!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      137
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!