Recommended Posts

After the rumors of Microsoft buying RIM just settled down, now there is a new report that RIM may tie-up with Microsoft for upcoming smartphone devices. According to sources of Reuters, RIM may abandon its own BB10 OS and adopt Microsoft?s upcoming Windows Phone 8 for its Blackberry devices. They also reported that Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer had approached RIM in recent months, discussing a partnership similar to the one the Microsoft has with Nokia. If it happens, Microsoft will be able to fund marketing expenses and ensure financial position for RIM.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/29/us-rim-options-idUSBRE85S04J20120629

Bwahahah.

I don't think RIM will have the balls to make the extremely difficult decision that Nokia made. It's not easy to turn around and say 'our software is crap'. It hasn't yet pulled Nokia out of the fire. And for a company founded by engineers, I don't think they'll be able to do it at RIM. Would be very interesting though.

Lol. What an insanely huge mistake that would be. Just my opinion of course. If anything, Android would be a much better fit for Blackberry. Ultimately though, they need to stick to BB10 and quit ****ing around. If they spent half as much time actually working to save themselves as they did getting rid of people and shifting blame, they might actually have gotten themselves out of this mess.

  • Like 2

Lol. What an insanely huge mistake that would be. Just my opinion of course. If anything, Android would be a much better fit for Blackberry. Ultimately though, they need to stick to BB10 and quit ****ing around. If they spent half as much time actually working to save themselves as they did getting rid of people and shifting blame, they might actually have gotten themselves out of this mess.

The problem with Android is its success. It's on so many devices of so many form factors that it would be extremely difficult for RIM to differentiate. A WP8 powered BlackBerry with BBM would absolutely murder the enterprise market, and do a cracking job in the consumer space.

  • Like 2

The problem with Android is its success. It's on so many devices of so many form factors that it would be extremely difficult for RIM to differentiate. A WP8 powered BlackBerry with BBM would absolutely murder the enterprise market, and do a cracking job in the consumer space.

That's right, take WP8 and it's new enterprise abilities, bolt on native and exclusive BBM support and RIM should have a winner on it's hands. Delaying BB10 isn't helping, it should have been out by now and time is ticking away. They could still do both though, nothing wrong with testing out a WP8 device to see how it goes. You don't have to go all in like Nokia. Besides, on the Android side everyone not named Samsung is getting their butt kicked. HTC isn't looking so hot, I expect a 3rd straight quarter of profit losses over there.

You guys raise some very valid points. The problem is, RIM is distinct from WP, Android and Apple right now. With a good team, customization of Android would be better suited. They would have the ability to modify Android OS to the point that it's still distinct from the rest of the market, all the while backing itself with an enormous market of apps.

That being said, looking at it from your perspectives it does have a certain appeal.

They would have the ability to modify Android OS to the point that it's still distinct from the rest of the market, all the while backing itself with an enormous market of apps.

Yes, but how long would that take? They don't have time to play around like that. I'd still suggest a dual Android+Windows Phone approach, with a heavy emphasis on Windows Phone. Windows 8 + Windows Phone 8 + Blackberry's enterprise ties (BBM)... killer ecosystem.

You guys raise some very valid points. The problem is, RIM is distinct from WP, Android and Apple right now. With a good team, customization of Android would be better suited. They would have the ability to modify Android OS to the point that it's still distinct from the rest of the market, all the while backing itself with an enormous market of apps.

That being said, looking at it from your perspectives it does have a certain appeal.

Sure, that's fine, but when people think blackberry they think the hardware and not so much the OS I think. Right now RIMs options seem to be, drop BB10 and use something else, the reason this article brings up MS is because a MS partnership like the one Nokia has gives RIM a lifeline and some cash in the process. Going with Android is still RIM on it's own and say they do take it and just skin it and make it look like BBOS, that's not a guarantee that it'll work.

The other option for RIM is to split the company in two, the hardware side and the software/services side. IF they do split it, then the hardware side could use any OS they want really, while the software side can use it's patents and BBM service to make money. Like licensing BBM out to other phone makers etc. Sorta what MS does with EAS/ActiveSync which even Google is licensing right now.

Either way, any of the two they pick, RIM is going to be a fraction of what it was at it's height, and there's nothing they can really do about it.

WP8 is the only choice. Going with Android in my humble opinion (I'm a massive Android fan too) would be a huge mistake. We don't need another flavour of Android to deal with, it's fragmented enough as it is thank you very much. Not to mention they'd need to skin it and add their own features/tweaks (obviously they don't have too, but they'll want to if they don't want to be "just another Android device") and then there is the whole updating business, which to be honest is a fiasco at the best of times in Androidland. PLUS they need to compete in an already saturated market of zillions* of other Android OEMs.

Going the same path as Nokia is a good choice, means basically let MS handle most of the OS updates (they'll need to do their own tweaks for their hardware of cause, but nothing to the extreme they'd need to do for Android) and bolt on some exclusive features/apps and maybe even assist in the areas MS is lacking in the core OS. Would be one hell of a team I reckon. Anyway, that is my humble opinion so take with a grain of salt...

* = Yes, I might of over embellished it a *little* bit :p but I think you get my point....I hope.

I just don't see this happening, not after all the effort they're putting into overhauling their OS. Unless they're planning to be on 2 OS's at the same time like Nokia still ships Symbian devices.

bb10 is android, it is based on android...so they are in the android camp.

It's not at all based on Android, where did you get that idea from? It's got ZERO to do with android let alone Linux, BBOS 10 is based on QNX which RIM got back in 2010.

If anything, Android would be a much better fit for Blackberry.

Yeah, that's what the world needs... Yet another company plastering their custom interface all over the same stuff.

  • Like 3

I just don't see this happening, not after all the effort they're putting into overhauling their OS. Unless they're planning to be on 2 OS's at the same time like Nokia still ships Symbian devices.

Well, didn't Nokia do the same with MeeGo?

Yeah, that's what the world needs... Yet another company plastering their custom interface all over the same stuff.

and having wild success.. definitely the worst thing they can do /s.. Wait.. the smartest thing is to go with Windows Phone that is literally bankrupting Nokia.. Smart move! /s

I can see this happening considering how BB10 is late and RIM is bleeding cash left and right. What I'm unsure about is how the existing BlackBerry customer base would react to it. The jump from the traditional BB devices with physical keyboard to touchscreen devices running WP8 is bound to alienate a significant portion of users.

I can see this happening considering how BB10 is late and RIM is bleeding cash left and right. What I'm unsure about is how the existing BlackBerry customer base would react to it. The jump from the traditional BB devices with physical keyboard to touchscreen devices running WP8 is bound to alienate a significant portion of users.

That would happen anyways, I don't see any BB10 devices with a physical keyboard on the way. If anything RIM made a big deal out of it's new touch keyboard like it was the best thing since sliced bread.

and having wild success.. definitely the worst thing they can do /s.. Wait.. the smartest thing is to go with Windows Phone that is literally bankrupting Nokia.. Smart move! /s

No they should just stick with their own platform instead of going up in the Android masses.

That's what I said, "unless they're planning on supporting 2 OSs like Nokia".

No, what you said was Windows Phone and Symbian. MeeGo was yet another platform, Nokia's answer to iOS and Android. They released one device only to dump it for Windows Phone.

That would happen anyways, I don't see any BB10 devices with a physical keyboard on the way. If anything RIM made a big deal out of it's new touch keyboard like it was the best thing since sliced bread.

RIM said that while the first BB10 devices will be touchscreen-only, phones with a physical keyboard will follow. See also: http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/blackberry-ditches-physical-keyboard-for-first-bb10-phone-50008375/

RIM said that while the first BB10 devices will be touchscreen-only, phones with a physical keyboard will follow. See also: http://crave.cnet.co...phone-50008375/

I'm aware of their new keyboard and all that, but to what you said, and the article you linked said it as well, the first BB10 device(s) won't have one, so even on their own accord they're going to be alienating their own users until/if they get the more traditional style blackberry devices out. They've already pushed BB10 back yet again into 2013 now, so if they stick to their guns and as slow as this is taking you probably won't see any type of device like that till late in 2013 at best, if not 2014. And at this rate I doubt RIM will last till 2014 anyways.

Don't forget that WP8 now also supports a 1:1 aspect ratio resolutions. Exactly the stuff the new BB qwerty devices would use with BB10. So I guess it's likely that RIM is already prototyping a WP8 device in their labs. It would make sense for RIM to jump on the WP bandwagon whilst continuing their BB10 development and see how everything goes.

I can see this happening considering how BB10 is late and RIM is bleeding cash left and right. What I'm unsure about is how the existing BlackBerry customer base would react to it. The jump from the traditional BB devices with physical keyboard to touchscreen devices running WP8 is bound to alienate a significant portion of users.

WP devices do support physical keyboards, though none of the current devices use the same type of form factor as the standard Blackberry design (ala curve). It's funny, because they were originally planning to support a square screen resolution perfect for those sort of devices for Windows Phone 8 earlier in the year, but they dropped it. They could easily do something like the Dell Venue Pro's design, just making it thinner and less top heaver and it'll satisfy a lot of people.

Personally I think all the security features, performance and enterprise management provided in Windows Phone 8 would be a great fit for Blackberries, and they'd certainly be able to get it up and running far cheaper and quicker than if they went with Android.

Don't forget that WP8 now also supports a 1:1 aspect ratio resolutions. Exactly the stuff the new BB qwerty devices would use with BB10. So I guess it's likely that RIM is already prototyping a WP8 device in their labs. It would make sense for RIM to jump on the WP bandwagon whilst continuing their BB10 development and see how everything goes.

Unfortunately it doesn't anymore. It was meant too, but they dropped it in favour of just 16:9 and 15:9 resolutions, presumably to make life easier for developers.

That's right, take WP8 and it's new enterprise abilities, bolt on native and exclusive BBM support and RIM should have a winner on it's hands. Delaying BB10 isn't helping, it should have been out by now and time is ticking away. They could still do both though, nothing wrong with testing out a WP8 device to see how it goes. You don't have to go all in like Nokia. Besides, on the Android side everyone not named Samsung is getting their butt kicked. HTC isn't looking so hot, I expect a 3rd straight quarter of profit losses over there.

This guy knows what he's talking about.

I think RIM needs to do the switch otherwise MS is going to trample them. RIM can still market Blackberries in smaller very high security markets (US gov for one) but they are pretty much finished in every other market.

A switch to WP8 with all it's enterprise management tools is a smart decision...it also means that RIM is paying attention.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!