Nokia only sold 330k Lumia in the US


Recommended Posts

In the run up to the launch of the Nokia Lumia 900 on AT&T, there were multiple reports that the launch would see unprecedented marketing, with even AT&T saying that it would exceed the scope of the original iPhone launch. Nokia executives boldly referred to the Lumia line as the first ?real? Windows Phonedevices and at one point AT&T claimed claimed that Lumia 900 sales hadexceeded their expectations.

It?s not clear exactly how low Nokia?s expectations were, but a close analysis of the latest Nielsen and comScore numbers shows that Nokia has sold well below half a million Windows phone devices in the U.S. ? they number crunchers at Aymco peg the number at a mere 330,000. And those numbers aren?t just Lumia 900 sales, they are the total sales of all Nokia Windows Phone devices, including the value priced Lumia 710 on T-Mobile (which has been selling for "free" on contract for months) and launched back in January.

How did Asymco derive those numbers? Nielsen and comScore gave them to us: in the breakdown of hardware vendors Nielsen shows Nokia as behind Samsung and HTC?s Windows Phone offerings (despite not being ?real? WP7 devices?) as having made 0.3% of all current U.S. smartphones. Multiple that against the total number of US smartphone owners (which comScore?s recently recorded as 110 million) and you get this:

110,000,000 X 0.003 = 330,000 units.

That is an astonishingly small number, and explains why Windows Phone market share still lags behind even Windows Mobile, over a year and a half after WP7 launched. With Windows Phone 8 coming in a few more months and no upgrade path for current devices to the next version of the software, surely whatever chance at serious market disruption was available is now gone. For Nokia, who bet their company on the success of Windows Phone, WP8 surely cant? come soon enough. And if that doesn?t do the trick, their recently reported back up plan had better be ready for action.

Screen-Shot-2012-07-13-at-10.20.23-AM.png

http://www.phonearen...-the-US_id32257

Yeah, it's pretty obvious by now that nobody gives a **** about Windows Phone. At least not Windows Phone 7. Unless Microsoft/Nokia ramp up the marketing close to Windows 8's launch, it will be the same sad story all over again. Microsoft need to do something FAST.

Microsoft need to do something FAST.

They are, by taking it's hugely successful desktop OS and making it similar as the mobile platform in Windows 8. If it's a success, their desktop OS will pull mobile sales up. If it's a failure, not only will the mobile platform still be a huge antisuccess, but it will also bring down the desktop sales. If the latter happens, it will not be fun for Microsoft.

  • Like 1

Not sure I agree with the numbers 0.3 then 0.003 doesn't make sense to me.

Nokia really do produce some great hardware, simply crippled by their choice of partner. If nothing else try a few Android devices and see how you go.

At this point, they are just waiting for the Windows 8 bump and the WP8 goodies.

There was a post a few days ago saying Nokia has cut Lumia orders, they're going to jump right to WP8. Whatever they've built to date is probably it for now.

I think Nokia needs to do something fast.. like dump Microsoft and Windows Phone and go with Android if they don't want to go the path of RIM.

They definitely need to fire Elop ASAP and make a big marketing push to regain consumer confidence and make it sound like the Nokia going forward is the Nokia that existed pre-Elop and that the Elop Nokia is all just a bad dream. Switching platforms would be a great way to do it, but with the right marketing they might be able to keep Windows Phone and at least stay in business. I don't think there's anyway they recover without distancing themselves from Elop. Even if Windows Phone become a hit or they switch to Android, the combined Osbourning and Ratnering that Elop pulled has poisoned the brand as long as he is attached to it.

Not sure I agree with the numbers 0.3 then 0.003 doesn't make sense to me.

The first is a percent and the second is used in a calculation to determine the percentage so it is the percent divided by 100. For example if you were to get 1% of $100 you wouldn't multiply $100 by 1, you'd multiply it by 0.01

  • Like 1

God please no.

You would rather they just went bankrupt instead? - Nokia can't survive on this small volume of sales and their feature phones in other markets don't make anywhere near enough profit to sustain the company. Why do you think they've just announced in June that a further 10,000 employees will lose their jobs?

Windows Phone is killing them, not enough people are buying them.

The first is a percent and the second is used in a calculation to determine the percentage so it is the percent divided by 100. For example if you were to get 1% of $100 you wouldn't multiply $100 by 1, you'd multiply it by 0.01

And that is why I never became an accountant :) thanks understand it now.

They are, by taking it's hugely successful desktop OS and making it similar as the mobile platform in Windows 8. If it's a success, their desktop OS will pull mobile sales up. If it's a failure, not only will the mobile platform still be a huge antisuccess, but it will also bring down the desktop sales. If the latter happens, it will not be fun for Microsoft.

Unfortunitly I can see that happening for Microsoft...

My sister has a Lumia 710 and I love playing with that, but for the desktop, I personally think the metro interface simply doesn't work well enough for the everyday desktop user.

I think Nokia needs to do something fast.. like dump Microsoft and Windows Phone and go with Android if they don't want to go the path of RIM.

I know I'd buy in a second Nokia Lumia 900 styled Android phone.

Once Windows 8 takes off around the world, Nokia will be laughing.

Trying to enter an already over competitive Android market will bankrupt them.

Guys at Nokia should have chosen Meego instead like so many of us were advocating but instead they got in bed with Microsoft - they aren't the first company to die from association and won't be the last.

?he funny thing is, the N9 was a hit phone, yet it was killed by Nokia and Elop. They didn't even give Meego a chance. Which is a shame, because Tizen, its new form, could become the third ecosystem.

As far as the article is concerned, if those numbers are right, all I'll say is - artificially low stock to create false reports of *selling out*. ?ecause that's what happened, both with the Lumia launch and WP7 as well. Who's going to believe Microsoft or Nokia again when they say they've *sold out* ?

Europeans do. Marketshare is rising but Nokia was always more successful here.

Source? From what I hear in the UK, the Lumia is doing terrible and the operators have criticised WP7 for its inability to compete against iOS and Android.

Nokia is losing marketshare dramatically in Europe now that Symbian is a dead end.

  • Like 1

Once Windows 8 takes off around the world, Nokia will be laughing.

People said the same about WP7. The only ones laughing are those that said Nokia were making a mistake.

Trying to enter an already over competitive Android market will bankrupt them.

Subjective, based purely on opinion, not fact. Nokia can make great hardware, they just need an OS to go with it. WP has not been that OS so far.

AT&T must not be selling any phones then, considering it was the 2nd best seller at AT&T from April to June. I don't know if this is worse news for Nokia or AT&T....

Oh, and don't forget that AT&T and T-mobile are the only carriers with Lumia devices. If they were on Verizon, Sprint, and the other smaller carriers, those numbers would double or triple. Just wait til WP8.

330,000 seems awfully low.

Yea. It seems to be very low. The phone hardware is real nice looking, and I would of thought that consumers unaware of mobile platforms and want a cheap phone would have bought these. This number is what I would of come up with only for Microsoft fans.

Edit: I don't know if it is cheaper than others ....

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!