Nokia only sold 330k Lumia in the US


Recommended Posts

He is right.. European carriers have criticized Nokia and said that their phones would been easier to sell if they ran Android.

I never said he was wrong. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy of criticising somebody for not quoting a source, and then in the same paragraph making a statement of fact without a source.

He is right.. European carriers have criticized Nokia and said that their phones would been easier to sell if they ran Android.

Which is bull****, it's not about the customers, it's about the salesmen who are pushing android phones on everyone, the customer doesn't know an android phone from a X6. They buy what you tell them they need. or what the reviewers last said was the greatest. which of course doesn't take "their" needs into account at all. which ends up with tons of people buying the SIII because it has the best specs, meanwhile the inferior Xperia S runs circles around it in pretty much everything, and certainly everything that matters to the customer.

It's a shame. I think Windows Phone 7 is a better designed phone OS than Android.

Well, it was a long string of mistakes, which wasn't helped in the least by their recent "Osbourning" of all currently available phones by announcing there would be no upgrade path to WP8. I don't see any incentive to go out and buy one at the moment.

("But... WP 7.8 will look like WP8!" If it can't run WP8 apps, and it can't, it's an orphaned platform. It's all about the apps.)

  • Like 1

He is right.. European carriers have criticized Nokia and said that their phones would been easier to sell if they ran Android.

All what I could read from that article:

"Blah blah blah the biggest operator, blah blah blah, the biggest operator blah"

Have you ever considered why didn't they once name that "operator"?

Suffering from image and hardware bugs? WHAT?

Also Estonian market is full flat from Lumia's (Except the pink ones :wacko: ), it's a small market yes but that already shows you something.

I don't really see them selling anything other than WP, sure they still have a few Symbian devices hidden in the back but that's not going to get them through the next few years

But simplezz and others in the thread are claiming that Symbian would have saved them?

WP has been a hit... against a wall. If I were in Microsoft management, right now, I would be pretty scared of the "Metro UI-powered" Windows 8 launch in October....

You were spot on right up to the ellipsis. Windows Phone 7 devices have insanely high customer satisfaction ratings, so a bet on WP7 is a heck of a lot safer than a bet on Android fragmentation. The Lumia 900 was sold on one carrier in the US. If they sold it on both AT&T and Verizon those numbers would have gone up considerably. Of course that will get tested if VZW actually carries a full selection of WP8 devices instead of just a single base model like they did with WP7.

Not saved. Keeping them in business while dealing with WP.

Well fact is, Nokia was already going down with Symbian, you know the whole reason they had to do Meego? WP or Android wouldn't have made any difference.

The android market is a mess there is only Samsung who actually makes any money in that market besides Microsoft (licensing) and Google (licensing/royalties).

But simplezz and others in the thread are claiming that Symbian would have saved them?

Let's imagine you have a cruise vessel - now let's imagine two vastly different scenarios:

Scenario I: The captain announces via intercom that the ship is sinking, everyone should run for their lives or gruesome death awaits.

Scenario II: The captain announces via intercom that the ship has run into minor engine problems and they need to make repairs before moving on.

Elop was scenario numero uno.

Symbian would have kept Nokia float long enough for them to get the Meego out the door with a stable framework to publish applications on. Now it's a sinking boat where all the professionals have already left the building and have gone to form a new company - one that I personally expect much more from.

Let's imagine you have a cruise vessel - now let's imagine two vastly different scenarios:

Scenario I: The captain announces via intercom that the ship is sinking, everyone should run for their lives or gruesome death awaits.

Scenario II: The captain announces via intercom that the ship has run into minor engine problems and they need to make repairs before moving on.

Elop was scenario numero uno.

Symbian would have kept Nokia float long enough for them to get the Meego out the door with a stable framework to publish applications on. Now it's a sinking boat where all the professionals have already left the building and have gone to form a new company - one that I personally expect much more from.

Uh No

Actual Scenario: Symbian was sinking.

If you are reffering to the statscounter site you should take a closer look why.

All in all we should just wait until the 19'th to see how the Lumia has worked out for Nokia overall not just the US/UK

The Board and Elop is a team trying to save Nokia. Maybe you need to learn how these companies work before you sprout ridiculous BS

No business sets out to fail. The problem is that Nokia is burning through its cash reserves and the public response to Nokia's WP7 products has been tepid at best. Nokia has basically gone all-in on Microsoft's WP platform and it hasn't paid off yet, which isn't exactly surprising considering that the Lumia range is far from cutting edge.

Nokia went from dominating the market to playing catch-up and it's possible that their current strategy is simply too little, too late. It's not that WP7 is bad per se - it's more that the Nokia brand simply doesn't carry the same value that it used to. Despite Nokia having billions of dollars in cash reserves analysts are predicting that Nokia burn through what cash it has and will be vulnerable to a take-over bid. Nokia used to produce good products but the Lumia range just isn't particularly competitive.

Let's imagine you have a cruise vessel - now let's imagine two vastly different scenarios:

Scenario I: The captain announces via intercom that the ship is sinking, everyone should run for their lives or gruesome death awaits.

Scenario II: The captain announces via intercom that the ship has run into minor engine problems and they need to make repairs before moving on.

Elop was scenario numero uno.

Symbian would have kept Nokia float long enough for them to get the Meego out the door with a stable framework to publish applications on. Now it's a sinking boat where all the professionals have already left the building and have gone to form a new company - one that I personally expect much more from.

Except for the little fact scenario two has been what Elop has done all the time. They're still developing Symbian, they're still releasing symbian devices, heck their new camera is only symbian for now. They announced they where NOT abandoning symbian.

More importantly normal users don't even know about the power struggle. they just know nokia is nokia, and they know that every review int he last few years since Nokia started doing consumer touch phones has said to stay away from them because in 1, then 2, then 3 then 4 iteraions of their OS they are still unable to make a usable touch interface.

No business sets out to fail. The problem is that Nokia is burning through its cash reserves and the public response to Nokia's WP7 products has been tepid at best. Nokia has basically gone all-in on Microsoft's WP platform and it hasn't paid off yet, which isn't exactly surprising considering that the Lumia range is far from cutting edge.

The only ones who care baout uctting edge and specs are reviewers and geeks. heck the best Android phones aren't the cutting edge, as I have said before, Sony's lower spec phones outperform Samsung top end cutting edge SIII phone in OS performance and battery performance. and even Google recognizes that and says Sony is their best partner and the only one who bother to properly optimize the OS and software for their phone hardware.

...the Lumia range is far from cutting edge.

I'm not sure I would say that. Lumia's might not have the latest multi-core processors but they generally outperform anything running Android and don't suffer from the woeful performance issues that that OS exhibits. Also, I can only speak for the Lumia 800 but it's an extremely well made phone using cutting edge materials and manufacturing processes.

Sony's lower spec phones outperform Samsung top end cutting edge SIII phone in OS performance and battery performance. and even Google recognizes that and says Sony is their best partner and the only one who bother to properly optimize the OS and software for their phone hardware.

Source?

I don't think you know what trojan horse means.

Well Nokia was once described my Microsoft as the enemy they wanted to destroy http://www.economist.com/node/1454300

?We want to fend off Microsoft?we don't want to go the way of the PC business?

And Microsoft don't have a great background in partner relationships http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/01/06/microsofts_masterplan_to_screw_phone/

I never said he was wrong. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy of criticising somebody for not quoting a source, and then in the same paragraph making a statement of fact without a source.

I wasn't criticising him for not providing a source. I was asking for one. Big difference. And I provided you with one when you asked, the same can't be said of the person I was quoting.

That's really hard to believe, since the Lumia 900 was on top of sales chart for several weeks at Amazon. It still is in top 10 (for black only, and combined sales number would be even higher).

we dont know how much it should sell to make it to the top list in Amazon.

it could be just 1000 device a day which makes it to only 60k over a period of 2 months.

and Amazon number can be taken in to consideration since most wont go to amazon to buy phones.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!