Nokia only sold 330k Lumia in the US


Recommended Posts

Lumia's might not have the latest multi-core processors but they generally outperform anything running Android

Except that they don't. Just take a look at any benchmark. What you're talking about is perceived speed, which by its very nature, has nothing to do with actual performance, and everything to do with hiding delays with animations, and maintaining a consistent frame rate, which I should mention is what project butter does.

The reason WP7's UI appears to run smoothly and consistently is down to silverlight running vsynced to the refresh rate of the display. I don't know the details of silverlight et al, but the combination of constant framerate and subtle delays hidden by transitions/animations gives the appearance of smoothness, at least to the human eye anyway. Again, that has nothing to do with actual performance. It's all slight of hand.

and don't suffer from the woeful performance issues that that OS exhibits.

See above. They aren't actual performance issues, just the visible differences in frame rates. Running at a constant framerate like JB does, the UI appears smoother to the naked eye, but it's purely superficial.

Also, I can only speak for the Lumia 800 but it's an extremely well made phone using cutting edge materials and manufacturing processes.

As the UK carriers/operators noted, the Lumia line of phones are 2012 priced for 2009 hardware. Some might be fooled into investing in that kind of outdated hardware, but not me.

Benchmarks are meaningless when it's obvious to anyone using them that Android phones struggle to perform the most basic tasks smoothly and without lag even though it's running on multicore processors. WP7, on the other hand, runs rings around Android in real-world usage with a fraction of the resources at its disposal.

Benchmarks are meaningless when it's obvious to anyone using them that Android phones struggle to perform the most basic tasks smoothly and without lag even though it's running on multicore processors. WP7, on the other hand, runs rings around Android in real-world usage with a fraction of the resources at its disposal.

The UI smoothness has nothing to do with how many processor cores it has. It's all about running the compositor at a constant framerate on the GPU vsynced to the refresh rate of the display.

Jellybean's project butter does that for Android, hence why the UI is perceivably smoother. It is only superficial though, and has nothing to do with real performance and benchmarks. There's not a single WP device on the market that even comes close to the slowest Android one in terms of actual performance - javascript execution, graphic throughput, multitasking (well I suppose that one's not fair because WP7 doesn't even have symmetrical multitasking).

Benchmarks are meaningless when it's obvious to anyone using them that Android phones struggle to perform the most basic tasks smoothly and without lag even though it's running on multicore processors. WP7, on the other hand, runs rings around Android in real-world usage with a fraction of the resources at its disposal.

Now that's the kind of statement that simply isn't true. I don't know if you were being sarcastic or just plain blinkered but only the most ardent fanboy could ever say that with a straight face, or you simply haven't seen an Android phone.

Except that they don't. Just take a look at any benchmark.

Heavily edited post :)

Neowin is just starting to become the new Tomshardware, "I NEEDZ MOAAAAR CORES!" Time to find a new site I guess.

Go be happy with your multi-core which lasts for a day on battery weise and just shut the hell up about things you clearly don't understand.

Maybe I have a dud Lumia 710 then as my battery barely lasts a day.

Well Nokia was once described my Microsoft as the enemy they wanted to destroy http://www.economist.com/node/1454300

?We want to fend off Microsoft?we don't want to go the way of the PC business?

And Microsoft don't have a great background in partner relationships http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/01/06/microsofts_masterplan_to_screw_phone/

What does that have to do with it. It's not a trojan horse when he was specifically hired to change the company to WP by the board. For him to have been a trojan horse, they must not have known he used to work for MS, and they must have hired him to do something else.

Except that they don't. Just take a look at any benchmark. What you're talking about is perceived speed, which by its very nature, has nothing to do with actual performance, and everything to do with hiding delays with animations, and maintaining a consistent frame rate, which I should mention is what project butter does.

The reason WP7's UI appears to run smoothly and consistently is down to silverlight running vsynced to the refresh rate of the display. I don't know the details of silverlight et al, but the combination of constant framerate and subtle delays hidden by transitions/animations gives the appearance of smoothness, at least to the human eye anyway. Again, that has nothing to do with actual performance. It's all slight of hand.

Impressive sleight of hand then, as it has shorter and faster as well as smoother animations than android, with quicker and better transitions. So strop talking FUD and BS. it also scrolls far smoother on far lesser hardware. So I guess Android has those same magic non existent delays then, except it still lags and chugs a lot more.

Benchmarks are meaningless when it's obvious to anyone using them that Android phones struggle to perform the most basic tasks smoothly and without lag even though it's running on multicore processors. WP7, on the other hand, runs rings around Android in real-world usage with a fraction of the resources at its disposal.

Android doesn't struggle to perform tasks smoothly, it sometimes just doesn't (at least until JB, which I havent' tried yet so I can't comment on it) show smooth UI animations, which have nothing to do with the tasks per se.

If it was a matter of struggling with processing you wouldn't be able to play games like ShadowGun smoothly, and you wouldn't be able to record smooth 1080p video.

By the way, can WP phones record 1080p video? No, right? And don't you think that might have something to do with what the benchmark results are showing?

And then you are also paying the same for your phone as other people are paying for phones with newer and faster hardware that support more features.

The UI smoothness has nothing to do with how many processor cores it has. It's all about running the compositor at a constant framerate on the GPU vsynced to the refresh rate of the display.

Jellybean's project butter does that for Android, hence why the UI is perceivably smoother. It is only superficial though, and has nothing to do with real performance and benchmarks. There's not a single WP device on the market that even comes close to the slowest Android one in terms of actual performance - javascript execution, graphic throughput, multitasking (well I suppose that one's not fair because WP7 doesn't even have symmetrical multitasking).

Sorry, but OS usage IS real world performance, users don't' care about benchmarks with no real world impact.

If it was a matter of struggling with processing you wouldn't be able to play games like ShadowGun smoothly, and you wouldn't be able to record smooth 1080p video.

Actually it has more to do with the fact that the optics and image processors and sensors on the phones today are crap and 1080P videos don't look any better then their 720 counterparts, they just have more noise and optical blurring. the only phone with optics capable of doing good video at that res is a Nokia, and doesn't run either OS (yet)

Android doesn't struggle to perform tasks smoothly, it sometimes just doesn't (at least until JB, which I havent' tried yet so I can't comment on it) show smooth UI animations, which have nothing to do with the tasks per se.

If it was a matter of struggling with processing you wouldn't be able to play games like ShadowGun smoothly, and you wouldn't be able to record smooth 1080p video.

Android certainly does struggle to perform tasks smoothly if the UI is struggling to keep up with the user. Also, Jelly Bean is completely irrelevant as virtually no current phone will ever get it going by Android's history of not supporting updates, and we're yet to see what a mess OEMs will make of it once they add their awful skins. Finally, I very much doubt that it will run as smoothly as WP7 does on the same hardware.

What does that have to do with it. It's not a trojan horse when he was specifically hired to change the company to WP by the board. For him to have been a trojan horse, they must not have known he used to work for MS, and they must have hired him to do something else.

Then your understanding of Greek mythology is sadly lacking. The "Trojan House" was built by the Greeks (Microsoft) and left outside the city of Troy (Nokia), the Trojans considered it a victory trophy after the Greeks built it and sailed away. Later a small force of soldiers (Elop) came out to open the gates of Troy which had been under siege for 10 years (not unlike the current 10 year Nokia - Microsoft war).

So as an analogy it stands up pretty well, you may not believe the analogy but that is for history to decide.

Elop was not hired by the board to push WP indeed Elop considered Android before making the WP switch.

Actually it has more to do with the fact that the optics and image processors and sensors on the phones today are crap and 1080P videos don't look any better then their 720 counterparts, they just have more noise and optical blurring. the only phone with optics capable of doing good video at that res is a Nokia, and doesn't run either OS (yet)

Excuses, it has to do exactly with raw processing power alone. As soon as they release WP8 devices with dual-core you'll get 1080p and you can bet those phones will have pretty much the same kind of optics you have on your current phones.

Android certainly does struggle to perform tasks smoothly if the UI is struggling to keep up with the user.

The UI sometimes feels laggy because it has no priority and no vsync, which is why UI smoothness has nothing to do with the actual speed of the running tasks.

Also, Jelly Bean is completely irrelevant as virtually no current phone will ever get it going by Android's history of not supporting updates, and we're yet to see what a mess OEMs will make of it once they add their awful skins. Finally, I very much doubt that it will run as smoothly as WP7 does on the same hardware.

Well call me selfish, but my Nexus S is getting JB and that's all I care about :D

The UI sometimes feels laggy because it has no priority and no vsync, which is why UI smoothness has nothing to do with the actual speed of the running tasks.

Yes I apprecaite that but from a user experience task execution fails regardless of the cause of the lagginess.

Well call me selfish, but my Nexus S is getting JB and that's all I care about :D

Fair enough :)

So if you see no value in graphics acceleration in OS then care to explain why Android gets lower perf and battery life when running on similar hardware as WP7. Some of the early Windows Phones were consistently better in this regard.

Based on Q1 numbers 330,000 might not be far off. Still sceptical but:

"83 million mobile phones were sold during the quarter, of which 71 million were feature phones and 12 million were smartphones. Of those 12 million smartphones, 2 million of them were Windows Phones" ....

So 2 million Windows Phones worldwide.

Then based on market N America only sold 600,000 devices in total so based on these numbers only 14,500 Windows Phones in the first quarter

Europe 15.8

Middle East & Africa 21.4

Greater China 9.2

Asia-Pacific 26.1

North America 0.6

Latin America 9.6

Now my math is crap so others may want to check I am on the right track.

Update: Nielsen has spoken up on how its figures have been used, saying it does not support multiplying its numbers with those of Comscore, as they measure subtly different elements of the market. They added that they therefore "do not feel the 300,000 number is accurate".

Update: Nielsen has spoken up on how its figures have been used, saying it does not support multiplying its numbers with those of Comscore, as they measure subtly different elements of the market. They added that they therefore "do not feel the 300,000 number is accurate".

nielsen said they wont support it that doesn't mean the stats are not true or close.. that means they are not claiming those numbers since the other data is from comscore.. How ever you see WP7 wouldnt have sold more than 500k if we consider error margin.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!