Nokia only sold 330k Lumia in the US


Recommended Posts

So if you see no value in graphics acceleration in OS then care to explain why Android gets lower perf and battery life when running on similar hardware as WP7. Some of the early Windows Phones were consistently better in this regard.

Multitasking and background services. Windows Phone feels fast because just like the early versions of iOS it's seriously dumbed down.

"83 million mobile phones were sold during the quarter, of which 71 million were feature phones and 12 million were smartphones. Of those 12 million smartphones, 2 million of them were Windows Phones" ....

So you claim that 1 in 6 (2 in 12) smartphones sold were Windows Phones? That's not so bad. That's 17% of all smartphones.

However, Nokia claims that it sold 2 million Windows Phones itself during the first quarter of 2012. Add on top of that the sales figures of Samsung and HTC, and millions of Windows Phones were sold in the first quarter alone... so your figure for a total of 2 million Windows Phones doesn't make sense... unless you are only talking about Nokia Windows Phones.

Let's wait a couple days for Nokia to announce 2nd quarter sales. It will again be in the millions for worldwide sales.

nielsen said they wont support it that doesn't mean the stats are not true or close.. that means they are not claiming those numbers since the other data is from comscore.. How ever you see WP7 wouldnt have sold more than 500k if we consider error margin.

We're talking about Nokia, not WP7. According to Nielson, Nokia is only the third largest Windows Phone manufacturer.

That means that if Nokia sold 330,000 with 0.3% marketshare, HTC must have sold 550,000 and Samsung must have sold 550,000. That is nearly 1.5 million Windows Phones in the US alone, in the second quarter.

So when do we decide when WP has failed?

When Microsoft's OEM partners stop making WP devices. Which won't happen.

We're talking about Nokia, not WP7. According to Nielson, Nokia is only the third largest Windows Phone manufacturer.

That means that if Nokia sold 330,000 with 0.3% marketshare, HTC must have sold 550,000 and Samsung must have sold 550,000. That is nearly 1.5 million Windows Phones in the US alone, in the second quarter.

In the context I was talking it was obvious I meant Lumia 900 on US sold not more than 500K considering the margin... Its only common sense to understand..

also, the 2 million calc that Depicus made was 2 million WP7 sales by Nokia not worldwide in Q12012. which Nokia released 2 million them self.

Multitasking and background services. Windows Phone feels fast because just like the early versions of iOS it's seriously dumbed down.

Are you seriously saying that lack of UI acceleration had nothing to do with bad battery life of pre4.0 Androids? Multitasking or background services (WP has them too) isn't the only thing eating battery and shouldn't be a factor if I didn't start any apps.

So you claim that 1 in 6 (2 in 12) smartphones sold were Windows Phones? That's not so bad. That's 17% of all smartphones.

However, Nokia claims that it sold 2 million Windows Phones itself during the first quarter of 2012. Add on top of that the sales figures of Samsung and HTC, and millions of Windows Phones were sold in the first quarter alone... so your figure for a total of 2 million Windows Phones doesn't make sense... unless you are only talking about Nokia Windows Phones.

Yes those are Nokia only numbers from their Q1 report. So not so great if you consider 5 out of 6 were Symbian phones which are deader than a Norwegian Parrot :)

seems like the 330k sales is close. Nokia sold 600k phones in US which includes Lumia ,other smartphone and feature phone.

Nokia's Rolling Thunder strategy for reconquering the US smartphone market continues to struggle after only six months. In its bleak earnings report today, Nokia revealed it shipped just 600,000 handsets in North America during its latest Q2 2012, down from 1.5 million in the same period last year. The 60 percent drop year-on-year, coupled with anidentical ship rate in Q1 2012, shows that the company's risky bet on Windows Phone is still a slow starter.

Nokia's 600,000 figure encapsulates phones in general, rather than the specific smartphone segment, but it does show that analyst estimations of 330,000 Lumia sales in the US over a period of around four months may be accurate. The firm revealed four million Lumia sales in Q2 2012, double the previous quarter ? but with the lack of phone sales growth and break down of individual device sales it's hard to say whether the Lumia 900 has had much impact in boosting Windows Phone's market share in the US. One thing that is clear from today's results is that, try as it might, the majority of Lumia sales are still outside the US ? an important market that Nokia needs to succeed in.

http://www.theverge....rolling-thunder

seems like the 330k sales is close. Nokia sold 600k phones in US which includes Lumia ,other smartphone and feature phone.

http://www.theverge....rolling-thunder

Yes those numbers are not good, and I suspect they may get worse for Q3 but to be fair to Nokia they managed quite well not selling in the USA before, what's more worrying is sales in Asia and China which are transitioning very slowly from dumb to smart but Nokia seem to be on free fall sales wise.

As Nokia has stated already, they do have a backup plan if WP fails (which it hasn't - only has for Android fanbois.) At least thats good news for them and for the stockholders :shiftyninja:

How do we know if it's "good news" if we don't know what the "Backup Plan" is? The only backup plan I see is Nokia selling itself to Microsoft for peanuts. ? good deal for Microsoft to be sure, but for shareholders? No so much.

How do we know if it's "good news" if we don't know what the "Backup Plan" is? The only backup plan I see is Nokia selling itself to Microsoft for peanuts. ? good deal for Microsoft to be sure, but for shareholders? No so much.

Anyone who says Nokia will sell itself to Microsoft has really hit their head hard. Why should they? In every post like this people keep forgetting that Nokia is bigger than just mobile phones/smart phones. Their patents are well more worth than the net cash they have now, Nokia-Siemens is doing better than expected at this point.

Nokia sold 600k windows phones. Double this 300k BS.

http://wmpoweruser.c...duction-of-wp8/

Close if you think 50% accuracy is good :rolleyes:

Do you both not realize that the original 330k number was just the Lumia specifically? And that 600k is the TOTAL amount of phones sold, which is including but not just limited to the Lumia.

So the 330k of LUMIA sales is probably in fact a pretty accurate number

Nokia's 600,000 figure encapsulates phones in general, rather than the specific smartphone segment, but it does show that analyst estimations of 330,000 Lumia sales in the US over a period of around four months may be accurate.

People are so quick to jump all over other people without stopping and actually thinking first and reading the actual numbers being reported.

Do you both not realize that the original 330k number was just the Lumia specifically? And that 600k is the TOTAL amount of phones sold, which is including but not just limited to the Lumia.

So the 330k of LUMIA sales is probably in fact a pretty accurate number

People are so quick to jump all over other people without stopping and actually thinking first and reading the actual numbers being reported.

Fair enough although my comment was based on the way this was reported at WMPowerUser:

Nokia?s Windows Phone shipments have doubled both in USA and overall, going from 300,000 to 600,000 in USA and 2.2 to 4 million worldwide.

Regardless, your Verge quote only guesses that the 300,000 figure may be close.

Fair enough although my comment was based on the way this was reported at WMPowerUser:

They've misreported it then. I'm assuming that the 600k figure has been quoted from "Devices & Services Mobile Device Volumes by geographical area" in Nokia's report (http://www.results.nokia.com/results/Nokia_results2012Q2e.pdf).

Nokia sold 600k windows phones. Double this 300k BS.

http://wmpoweruser.c...duction-of-wp8/

ha... Nokia sold 600 Nokia phone which included Lumia and other smart phones.

so the 330k seems right...

just for the comparision Nokia sold 1.5 million phones(ALL Phones) Q1 2012

This Q its only 600k(Again All Phones, not just lumia)

Close if you think 50% accuracy is good :rolleyes:

you have 0% accuracy in understanding the number. like i said before its all phone sold and not just lumia...

so lumia 330k is accurate give or take

From wmpoweruser.com. To all those who pointed out wmpoweruser. they now accept the 600k was in fact wrong

Nielsen was right ? only 330,000 Nokia Lumia?s shipped to North America in the last 4 months

We posted earlier that Nokia shipped 600,000 Lumias to North America in Q2 2012. Now it has become clear that in fact they shipped 600,000 Nokia phones to North America, and of those only 330,000 were Lumia handsets.

This number is of course the same as estimated by multiplying Comscore and Nielsen?s numbers, despite Nielsen claiming this results only in inaccurate results.

http://wmpoweruser.c...-last-4-months/

From wmpoweruser.com. To all those who pointed out wmpoweruser. they now accept the 600k was in fact wrong

Nielsen was right ? only 330,000 Nokia Lumia?s shipped to North America in the last 4 months

http://wmpoweruser.c...-last-4-months/

ouch. not good. Which is to bad. Was hoping WP would be doing much better by now.

From wmpoweruser.com. To all those who pointed out wmpoweruser. they now accept the 600k was in fact wrong

Nielsen was right ? only 330,000 Nokia Lumia?s shipped to North America in the last 4 months

http://wmpoweruser.c...-last-4-months/

I have a hard time believing that because look at the original article that it links to.

Nielsen: Nokia only sold less than 300,000 Nokia Lumia 900 in USA

http://wmpoweruser.com/nielsen-nokia-only-sold-less-than-300000-nokia-lumia-900-in-usa/

Where is the Lumia 710 which, according to T-Mobile, has been selling extremely well since it was released in Jan 2012? Unless by very well they meant 30k devices.

So when do we decide when WP has failed?

I'd say it has already. The fact that Microsoft is willing to abandon Windows Phone 7 owners when they launch Windows Phone 8 clearly shows that their install base for Windows Phone 7's install base is minuscule. No OEM who had millions of customers (Apple for example with the iPhone) would just abandon all those people with their next OS release unless the amount of users on that older ecosystem is teeny-tiny. So insignificantly small that they don't even care to make their next operating system release compatible.

I have a hard time believing that because look at the original article that it links to.

Nielsen: Nokia only sold less than 300,000 Nokia Lumia 900 in USA

http://wmpoweruser.c...mia-900-in-usa/

Where is the Lumia 710 which, according to T-Mobile, has been selling extremely well since it was released in Jan 2012? Unless by very well they meant 30k devices.

The original article it links to use two 3rd part number to come up with <300k number and it might not be accurate. also it was reported a week ago.

This new estimate is based off Nokia's own official number. so it's more accurate.

T-Mobile selling well could just mean 30k like you said. T-mobile didn't publish any sales number so its hard to interpret selling well.

I'd say it has already. The fact that Microsoft is willing to abandon Windows Phone 7 owners when they launch Windows Phone 8 clearly shows that their install base for Windows Phone 7's install base is minuscule. No OEM who had millions of customers (Apple for example with the iPhone) would just abandon all those people with their next OS release unless the amount of users on that older ecosystem is teeny-tiny. So insignificantly small that they don't even care to make their next operating system release compatible.

Well, I can say Android to some extent has done that. I am not a fan of non-Nexus devices, just for this reason. Unless your device has a huge following, you likely won't get updates due to your manufacturer and cell phone carrier. With WP7, MS shot themselves in the foot with the hardware requirements, because the requirements are strict enough to limit the software. Now, it's almost like you need a hardware upgrade just to run WP8. It is nice they're releasing WP7.8 for the older devices. Even if they did let WP8 run on the 1st generation of WP7 devices, they'd be missing so many features that it's not worth it - like NFC, higher resolution. If only you could evolve your phone through software upgrades :laugh:

From wmpoweruser.com. To all those who pointed out wmpoweruser. they now accept the 600k was in fact wrong

Nielsen was right ? only 330,000 Nokia Lumia?s shipped to North America in the last 4 months

http://wmpoweruser.c...-last-4-months/

Well we don't know that for sure, the only fact we do know is Nokia sold 600,000 in total to the USA but there is no concrete evidence to say how many were WP phones. It could have been 500k it could have been 200k.

I'd say it has already. The fact that Microsoft is willing to abandon Windows Phone 7 owners when they launch Windows Phone 8 clearly shows that their install base for Windows Phone 7's install base is minuscule. No OEM who had millions of customers (Apple for example with the iPhone) would just abandon all those people with their next OS release unless the amount of users on that older ecosystem is teeny-tiny. So insignificantly small that they don't even care to make their next operating system release compatible.

7.8 Says they're not abandoning them. they shoudl have just named it WP8 and avoided the crap as that's what it is, WP8 for older phones, just like older iphones get limited new iOS versions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!