Nokia only sold 330k Lumia in the US


Recommended Posts

So if you see no value in graphics acceleration in OS then care to explain why Android gets lower perf and battery life when running on similar hardware as WP7. Some of the early Windows Phones were consistently better in this regard.

Multitasking and background services. Windows Phone feels fast because just like the early versions of iOS it's seriously dumbed down.

"83 million mobile phones were sold during the quarter, of which 71 million were feature phones and 12 million were smartphones. Of those 12 million smartphones, 2 million of them were Windows Phones" ....

So you claim that 1 in 6 (2 in 12) smartphones sold were Windows Phones? That's not so bad. That's 17% of all smartphones.

However, Nokia claims that it sold 2 million Windows Phones itself during the first quarter of 2012. Add on top of that the sales figures of Samsung and HTC, and millions of Windows Phones were sold in the first quarter alone... so your figure for a total of 2 million Windows Phones doesn't make sense... unless you are only talking about Nokia Windows Phones.

Let's wait a couple days for Nokia to announce 2nd quarter sales. It will again be in the millions for worldwide sales.

nielsen said they wont support it that doesn't mean the stats are not true or close.. that means they are not claiming those numbers since the other data is from comscore.. How ever you see WP7 wouldnt have sold more than 500k if we consider error margin.

We're talking about Nokia, not WP7. According to Nielson, Nokia is only the third largest Windows Phone manufacturer.

That means that if Nokia sold 330,000 with 0.3% marketshare, HTC must have sold 550,000 and Samsung must have sold 550,000. That is nearly 1.5 million Windows Phones in the US alone, in the second quarter.

So when do we decide when WP has failed?

When Microsoft's OEM partners stop making WP devices. Which won't happen.

We're talking about Nokia, not WP7. According to Nielson, Nokia is only the third largest Windows Phone manufacturer.

That means that if Nokia sold 330,000 with 0.3% marketshare, HTC must have sold 550,000 and Samsung must have sold 550,000. That is nearly 1.5 million Windows Phones in the US alone, in the second quarter.

In the context I was talking it was obvious I meant Lumia 900 on US sold not more than 500K considering the margin... Its only common sense to understand..

also, the 2 million calc that Depicus made was 2 million WP7 sales by Nokia not worldwide in Q12012. which Nokia released 2 million them self.

Multitasking and background services. Windows Phone feels fast because just like the early versions of iOS it's seriously dumbed down.

Are you seriously saying that lack of UI acceleration had nothing to do with bad battery life of pre4.0 Androids? Multitasking or background services (WP has them too) isn't the only thing eating battery and shouldn't be a factor if I didn't start any apps.

So you claim that 1 in 6 (2 in 12) smartphones sold were Windows Phones? That's not so bad. That's 17% of all smartphones.

However, Nokia claims that it sold 2 million Windows Phones itself during the first quarter of 2012. Add on top of that the sales figures of Samsung and HTC, and millions of Windows Phones were sold in the first quarter alone... so your figure for a total of 2 million Windows Phones doesn't make sense... unless you are only talking about Nokia Windows Phones.

Yes those are Nokia only numbers from their Q1 report. So not so great if you consider 5 out of 6 were Symbian phones which are deader than a Norwegian Parrot :)

seems like the 330k sales is close. Nokia sold 600k phones in US which includes Lumia ,other smartphone and feature phone.

Nokia's Rolling Thunder strategy for reconquering the US smartphone market continues to struggle after only six months. In its bleak earnings report today, Nokia revealed it shipped just 600,000 handsets in North America during its latest Q2 2012, down from 1.5 million in the same period last year. The 60 percent drop year-on-year, coupled with anidentical ship rate in Q1 2012, shows that the company's risky bet on Windows Phone is still a slow starter.

Nokia's 600,000 figure encapsulates phones in general, rather than the specific smartphone segment, but it does show that analyst estimations of 330,000 Lumia sales in the US over a period of around four months may be accurate. The firm revealed four million Lumia sales in Q2 2012, double the previous quarter ? but with the lack of phone sales growth and break down of individual device sales it's hard to say whether the Lumia 900 has had much impact in boosting Windows Phone's market share in the US. One thing that is clear from today's results is that, try as it might, the majority of Lumia sales are still outside the US ? an important market that Nokia needs to succeed in.

http://www.theverge....rolling-thunder

seems like the 330k sales is close. Nokia sold 600k phones in US which includes Lumia ,other smartphone and feature phone.

http://www.theverge....rolling-thunder

Yes those numbers are not good, and I suspect they may get worse for Q3 but to be fair to Nokia they managed quite well not selling in the USA before, what's more worrying is sales in Asia and China which are transitioning very slowly from dumb to smart but Nokia seem to be on free fall sales wise.

As Nokia has stated already, they do have a backup plan if WP fails (which it hasn't - only has for Android fanbois.) At least thats good news for them and for the stockholders :shiftyninja:

How do we know if it's "good news" if we don't know what the "Backup Plan" is? The only backup plan I see is Nokia selling itself to Microsoft for peanuts. ? good deal for Microsoft to be sure, but for shareholders? No so much.

How do we know if it's "good news" if we don't know what the "Backup Plan" is? The only backup plan I see is Nokia selling itself to Microsoft for peanuts. ? good deal for Microsoft to be sure, but for shareholders? No so much.

Anyone who says Nokia will sell itself to Microsoft has really hit their head hard. Why should they? In every post like this people keep forgetting that Nokia is bigger than just mobile phones/smart phones. Their patents are well more worth than the net cash they have now, Nokia-Siemens is doing better than expected at this point.

Nokia sold 600k windows phones. Double this 300k BS.

http://wmpoweruser.c...duction-of-wp8/

Close if you think 50% accuracy is good :rolleyes:

Do you both not realize that the original 330k number was just the Lumia specifically? And that 600k is the TOTAL amount of phones sold, which is including but not just limited to the Lumia.

So the 330k of LUMIA sales is probably in fact a pretty accurate number

Nokia's 600,000 figure encapsulates phones in general, rather than the specific smartphone segment, but it does show that analyst estimations of 330,000 Lumia sales in the US over a period of around four months may be accurate.

People are so quick to jump all over other people without stopping and actually thinking first and reading the actual numbers being reported.

Do you both not realize that the original 330k number was just the Lumia specifically? And that 600k is the TOTAL amount of phones sold, which is including but not just limited to the Lumia.

So the 330k of LUMIA sales is probably in fact a pretty accurate number

People are so quick to jump all over other people without stopping and actually thinking first and reading the actual numbers being reported.

Fair enough although my comment was based on the way this was reported at WMPowerUser:

Nokia?s Windows Phone shipments have doubled both in USA and overall, going from 300,000 to 600,000 in USA and 2.2 to 4 million worldwide.

Regardless, your Verge quote only guesses that the 300,000 figure may be close.

Fair enough although my comment was based on the way this was reported at WMPowerUser:

They've misreported it then. I'm assuming that the 600k figure has been quoted from "Devices & Services Mobile Device Volumes by geographical area" in Nokia's report (http://www.results.nokia.com/results/Nokia_results2012Q2e.pdf).

Nokia sold 600k windows phones. Double this 300k BS.

http://wmpoweruser.c...duction-of-wp8/

ha... Nokia sold 600 Nokia phone which included Lumia and other smart phones.

so the 330k seems right...

just for the comparision Nokia sold 1.5 million phones(ALL Phones) Q1 2012

This Q its only 600k(Again All Phones, not just lumia)

Close if you think 50% accuracy is good :rolleyes:

you have 0% accuracy in understanding the number. like i said before its all phone sold and not just lumia...

so lumia 330k is accurate give or take

From wmpoweruser.com. To all those who pointed out wmpoweruser. they now accept the 600k was in fact wrong

Nielsen was right ? only 330,000 Nokia Lumia?s shipped to North America in the last 4 months

We posted earlier that Nokia shipped 600,000 Lumias to North America in Q2 2012. Now it has become clear that in fact they shipped 600,000 Nokia phones to North America, and of those only 330,000 were Lumia handsets.

This number is of course the same as estimated by multiplying Comscore and Nielsen?s numbers, despite Nielsen claiming this results only in inaccurate results.

http://wmpoweruser.c...-last-4-months/

From wmpoweruser.com. To all those who pointed out wmpoweruser. they now accept the 600k was in fact wrong

Nielsen was right ? only 330,000 Nokia Lumia?s shipped to North America in the last 4 months

http://wmpoweruser.c...-last-4-months/

ouch. not good. Which is to bad. Was hoping WP would be doing much better by now.

From wmpoweruser.com. To all those who pointed out wmpoweruser. they now accept the 600k was in fact wrong

Nielsen was right ? only 330,000 Nokia Lumia?s shipped to North America in the last 4 months

http://wmpoweruser.c...-last-4-months/

I have a hard time believing that because look at the original article that it links to.

Nielsen: Nokia only sold less than 300,000 Nokia Lumia 900 in USA

http://wmpoweruser.com/nielsen-nokia-only-sold-less-than-300000-nokia-lumia-900-in-usa/

Where is the Lumia 710 which, according to T-Mobile, has been selling extremely well since it was released in Jan 2012? Unless by very well they meant 30k devices.

So when do we decide when WP has failed?

I'd say it has already. The fact that Microsoft is willing to abandon Windows Phone 7 owners when they launch Windows Phone 8 clearly shows that their install base for Windows Phone 7's install base is minuscule. No OEM who had millions of customers (Apple for example with the iPhone) would just abandon all those people with their next OS release unless the amount of users on that older ecosystem is teeny-tiny. So insignificantly small that they don't even care to make their next operating system release compatible.

I have a hard time believing that because look at the original article that it links to.

Nielsen: Nokia only sold less than 300,000 Nokia Lumia 900 in USA

http://wmpoweruser.c...mia-900-in-usa/

Where is the Lumia 710 which, according to T-Mobile, has been selling extremely well since it was released in Jan 2012? Unless by very well they meant 30k devices.

The original article it links to use two 3rd part number to come up with <300k number and it might not be accurate. also it was reported a week ago.

This new estimate is based off Nokia's own official number. so it's more accurate.

T-Mobile selling well could just mean 30k like you said. T-mobile didn't publish any sales number so its hard to interpret selling well.

I'd say it has already. The fact that Microsoft is willing to abandon Windows Phone 7 owners when they launch Windows Phone 8 clearly shows that their install base for Windows Phone 7's install base is minuscule. No OEM who had millions of customers (Apple for example with the iPhone) would just abandon all those people with their next OS release unless the amount of users on that older ecosystem is teeny-tiny. So insignificantly small that they don't even care to make their next operating system release compatible.

Well, I can say Android to some extent has done that. I am not a fan of non-Nexus devices, just for this reason. Unless your device has a huge following, you likely won't get updates due to your manufacturer and cell phone carrier. With WP7, MS shot themselves in the foot with the hardware requirements, because the requirements are strict enough to limit the software. Now, it's almost like you need a hardware upgrade just to run WP8. It is nice they're releasing WP7.8 for the older devices. Even if they did let WP8 run on the 1st generation of WP7 devices, they'd be missing so many features that it's not worth it - like NFC, higher resolution. If only you could evolve your phone through software upgrades :laugh:

From wmpoweruser.com. To all those who pointed out wmpoweruser. they now accept the 600k was in fact wrong

Nielsen was right ? only 330,000 Nokia Lumia?s shipped to North America in the last 4 months

http://wmpoweruser.c...-last-4-months/

Well we don't know that for sure, the only fact we do know is Nokia sold 600,000 in total to the USA but there is no concrete evidence to say how many were WP phones. It could have been 500k it could have been 200k.

I'd say it has already. The fact that Microsoft is willing to abandon Windows Phone 7 owners when they launch Windows Phone 8 clearly shows that their install base for Windows Phone 7's install base is minuscule. No OEM who had millions of customers (Apple for example with the iPhone) would just abandon all those people with their next OS release unless the amount of users on that older ecosystem is teeny-tiny. So insignificantly small that they don't even care to make their next operating system release compatible.

7.8 Says they're not abandoning them. they shoudl have just named it WP8 and avoided the crap as that's what it is, WP8 for older phones, just like older iphones get limited new iOS versions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
    • Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha   No
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!