Nokia only sold 330k Lumia in the US


Recommended Posts

7.8 Says they're not abandoning them. they shoudl have just named it WP8 and avoided the crap as that's what it is, WP8 for older phones, just like older iphones get limited new iOS versions.

Except apps released targeting Windows Phone 8 won't run on Windows Phone 7.8 devices while Apps written for iOS 6 will run on the 3GS, iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S.

So expect the market place to become very fragmented as developers make the decision of whether to use the newer API's present in Windows Phone 8 or target the older Windows Phone 7 ecosystem and limit what their apps can do.

The original article it links to use two 3rd part number to come up with <300k number and it might not be accurate. also it was reported a week ago.

This new estimate is based off Nokia's own official number. so it's more accurate.

T-Mobile selling well could just mean 30k like you said. T-mobile didn't publish any sales number so its hard to interpret selling well.

So out of the 600K, if they sold only 330K Windows Phones then what about the balance 270K? Or did they somehow magically shipped 200K N9s? or People suddenly bought 270K of those dirt cheap prepaid Nokias?

Except apps released targeting Windows Phone 8 won't run on Windows Phone 7.8 devices while Apps written for iOS 6 will run on the 3GS, iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S.

So expect the market place to become very fragmented as developers make the decision of whether to use the newer API's present in Windows Phone 8 or target the older Windows Phone 7 ecosystem and limit what their apps can do.

So Apps targeting iOS6 APIs will magically work on older releases? The phones you list are the phone being sold today and possibly when iOS6 ships. Not entirely direct comparison.

So Apps targeting iOS6 APIs will magically work on older releases?

iOS 6 is being released for the iPhone 3GS. That is a phone that came out several years ago. So if you write an app for iOS 6 it will run on the 3GS. And you can also write an app that will launch and run on iOS5 and iOS6 at the same time. One binary, two different target OS versions and you can choose to include extra API's that will only be used when utilised under an iOS 6 device. But again 3GS, came out in June 2009, still gets iOS 6.

Lumia 900 bought today - Doesn't get Windows Phone 8.

iOS 6 is being released for the iPhone 3GS. That is a phone that came out several years ago. So if you write an app for iOS 6 it will run on the 3GS. And you can also write an app that will launch and run on iOS5 and iOS6 at the same time. One binary, two different target OS versions and you can choose to include extra API's that will only be used when utilised under an iOS 6 device. But again 3GS, came out in June 2009, still gets iOS 6.

Lumia 900 bought today - Doesn't get Windows Phone 8.

So? If Apps target 7.8 APIs, they will work on Lumia bought tomorrow. What's different? At least Microsoft has decency to play fair unlike Apple (3G and iOS 5 were a disaster).

Edit: I don't want to defend Microsoft on 7.8 and I think they should have ported WP8 down to at least the second generation Windows Phones. All I am saying that what they are doing is not very different than similar crap that Apple does (3G & iOS5 or 4 & Siri) or Google continues to do with Android.

Edited by BajiRav

So? If Apps target 7.8 APIs, they will work on Lumia bought tomorrow. What's different? At least Microsoft has decency to play fair unlike Apple (3G and iOS 5 were a disaster).

I loved my 3GS and it ran iOS 5.0 brilliantly. I think you really need to stop reading this stuff online that people moan about because people only moan when there's a problem and those people who have issues with iOS 5 in combination with the 3GS are doing something wrong or have a faulty device.

And the real problem I have with Microsoft is their abandonment of their devices sold today, even devices sold in the future. Pretty much any phone sold right up until Windows Phone 8 launches has been abandoned and once developers begin to target Windows Phone 8 you won't be able to get those new apps for the old devices but with the iPhone, even the iPhone 3G with iOS 4 or the iPhone 3GS with iOS 5 you can still use the App store and get the latest apps.

Would you buy a new Windows Phone today knowing Windows Phone 8 is coming? I wouldn't. But I know people buying iPhone 4S's today knowing iOS 6 is coming.

I loved my 3GS and it ran iOS 5.0 brilliantly. I think you really need to stop reading this stuff online that people moan about because people only moan when there's a problem and those people who have issues with iOS 5 in combination with the 3GS are doing something wrong or have a faulty device.

And the real problem I have with Microsoft is their abandonment of their devices sold today, even devices sold in the future. Pretty much any phone sold right up until Windows Phone 8 launches has been abandoned and once developers begin to target Windows Phone 8 you won't be able to get those new apps for the old devices but with the iPhone, even the iPhone 3G with iOS 4 or the iPhone 3GS with iOS 5 you can still use the App store and get the latest apps.

Would you buy a new Windows Phone today knowing Windows Phone 8 is coming? I wouldn't. But I know people buying iPhone 4S's today knowing iOS 6 is coming.

3G, not 3GS. I edited my previous post. I might be jumbling version numbers but I think the last update to my 3G made it next to unusable.

So out of the 600K, if they sold only 330K Windows Phones then what about the balance 270K? Or did they somehow magically shipped 200K N9s? or People suddenly bought 270K of those dirt cheap prepaid Nokias?

Nokia didnt suddenly or magically sold 270k devices.. It has always sold other phones in US but not so much

Nokia sold 1.5 million phones last year during the same period(when Lumia was not even released in US)...

their other phone sales has been reducing in the US market... check the earning sheet its clearly mentioned.

On a related note, Microsoft has again ran away from posting actual numbers but at least they say WP units have doubled Q/Q as per slides on MSFT's earnings call.

Look at Slide #12 here

http://www.microsoft.com/global/investor/RenderingAssets/Downloads/FY12/Q4/SlidesFY12Q4.pptx

(I found the snapshot on techcrunch linked from theverge but since I didn't want to link to techcrunch, I took pains to find this :p )

side note: what a horrible PPT theme.

On a related note, Microsoft has again ran away from posting actual numbers but at least they say WP units have doubled Q/Q as per slides on MSFT's earnings call.

Rough calculations, IDC said Microsoft shipped 3.3 million WP7 devices in Q1 so if sales doubled then they shipped 6.6 million in this quarter, with about 70-80% of the sales from Nokia.

And the real problem I have with Microsoft is their abandonment of their devices sold today, even devices sold in the future. Pretty much any phone sold right up until Windows Phone 8 launches has been abandoned and once developers begin to target Windows Phone 8 you won't be able to get those new apps for the old devices but with the iPhone, even the iPhone 3G with iOS 4 or the iPhone 3GS with iOS 5 you can still use the App store and get the latest apps.

Would you buy a new Windows Phone today knowing Windows Phone 8 is coming? I wouldn't. But I know people buying iPhone 4S's today knowing iOS 6 is coming.

Eh developers that need specific WP8 hardware features can use the 8 SDK, if you don't need those specific features use the 7.8 SDK and your app will work on both. It's pretty much just a drop down box you choose when you're about to compile your app.

And lets be honest, Apple majorly screwed over iPhone 4 owners when they made Siri 4S only even though it was a simple piece of software that connects to Apple's servers. So they aren't exactly saints ;)

7.8 Says they're not abandoning them. they shoudl have just named it WP8 and avoided the crap as that's what it is, WP8 for older phones, just like older iphones get limited new iOS versions.

This is quite frankly the stupidest idea I've heard, and what's surprising is that it even gets repeated so often. Version numbers are there for a reason. When developers see a version number, they know that they can expect a standardized kernel, APIs, and software stack across the board (even if hardware specs might differ across devices). The version number isn't there to appease end users, it's a traditionally important piece of information for developers. The reason that Apple can call iOS 6 for the 3GS as iOS6 is that, even though it lacks Siri, it still shares the same APIs and stacks as iOS 6 on the iPhone 4S and 5, and if any incompatibilities do arise it's going to be due to hardware, not software. Microsoft calling WP7.8 as WP8 when it in fact uses a completely different kernel and APIs is just going to royally **** developers off. It means that they can't effectively target their code for WP8 anymore. It means that you have to write your app twice for the "same" platform, it means that when users report bugs and say they're running WP8 you're going to have to ask them if they're running the real WP8 or the fake one, it means that the SDK and the development process is basically going to be a pile of crap.

It means that you have to write your app twice for the "same" platform, it means that when users report bugs and say they're running WP8 you're going to ask them if they're running the real WP8 or the fake one, it means that the SDK and the development process is basically going to be a pile of crap.

No you don't have to.

If you aren't targeting WP8 features, you compile your app for 7.8 (when it comes time to compile there's a dropdown box with the options 7.0, 7.1, 7.8, 8) and then it will work on both WP7 and 8. If you need to target a specific WP8 feature, then yeah you would have to compile your app for 8.

9ErDV.png

And if a new version comes out, you can easily update your app by changing that target OS to the later one and Visual Studio will automatically take care of adding in the new APIs and such. A good example of this is how people updated their apps from 7.0 to 7.1 (aka 7.5 mango), you just select 7.1, let visual studio do its thing and then your app supports the new features in Mango. Depending on your app you might have to do a tiny bit of extra work just to customize the background caching to your liking (live tiles or w/e) but you don't have to recode the entire thing from scratch.

Microsoft isn't calling Windows Phone 7 Windows phone 8, its calling them 7.8.

No you don't have to.

If you aren't targeting WP8 features, you compile your app for 7.8 (when it comes time to compile there's a dropdown box with the options 7.0, 7.1, Tango, 7.8, 8) and then it will work on both WP7 and 8. If you need to target a specific WP8 feature, then yeah you would have to compile your app for 8.

Microsoft isn't calling Windows Phone 7 Windows phone 8, its calling them 7.8.

Actually, that's precisely what I said. I was replying to a post that said MS should call WP7 as WP8.

This is quite frankly the stupidest idea I've heard, and what's surprising is that it even gets repeated so often. Version numbers are there for a reason. When developers see a version number, they know that they can expect a standardized kernel, APIs, and software stack across the board (even if hardware specs might differ across devices). The version number isn't there to appease end users, it's a traditionally important piece of information for developers. The reason that Apple can call iOS 6 for the 3GS as iOS6 is that, even though it lacks Siri, it still shares the same APIs and stacks as iOS 6 on the iPhone 4S and 5, and if any incompatibilities do arise it's going to be due to hardware, not software. Microsoft calling WP7.8 as WP8 when it in fact uses a completely different kernel and APIs is just going to royally **** developers off. It means that they can't effectively target their code for WP8 anymore. It means that you have to write your app twice for the "same" platform, it means that when users report bugs and say they're running WP8 you're going to have to ask them if they're running the real WP8 or the fake one, it means that the SDK and the development process is basically going to be a pile of crap.

WP 8 isn't a version number in any case, which is the important thing you fail to realize. Windows 7 is also not version number 7 (though that's for technical reasons). So they could call it WP8 as much as they want, and it would still be version number 7.8

WP 8 isn't a version number in any case, which is the important thing you fail to realize. Windows 7 is also not version number 7 (though that's for technical reasons). So they could call it WP8 as much as they want, and it would still be version number 7.8

Okay. So it'd actually be WP7.8 8. Or WP8 7.8. Or we'd have a WP8 that can't, er, run WP8 apps. Uh huh.

Have you considered the possibility that Microsoft is simply smarter than you are, and realized the obvious that trying to pull a fast one and package WP7 as WP8 is simply going to drain their credibility, both among developers AND consumers, EVEN faster than if they'd just announced that their 3-month-old flagship phone isn't really getting WP8 and be done with it?

Why are people just fixated on the low US number? Overall Nokia sold double the WP devices it did in Q1. It sold zero WP in Q1 in the US, afaik, and now they sold a few. Either case, Nokia has been selling more with each quarter since the start. MS has also said that sales have went up 50% Q/Q. So hmm, growing sales, broader carrier support for WP8 on the way (Verizon, US Cellular, probably Sprint once they get tired of getting raped by their ****ty iPhone deal). This things not over anytime soon.

Funny how people think Nokia would of been better with Android. Had Nokia decided to make Android phones instead, chances are they would of been sued off the market by now. Their current weakened state would of made them a prime target for patent infringement lawsuits (as they wouldn't be able to defend themselves). Plus MS would "bully" them into paying licensing fees to them anyway. Going with MS was their only choice and in the long term will be the best decision they ever made. This is coming from an Android fan as well. As much as I would love to see Nokia joining the fold, I honestly couldn't see them surviving long because of all the nonsense with patents going on right now.

^^ because US market is a huge market and this thread is about lumia sales in US.

Right, that's why you're fixated on it in the other nokia thread as well. Gotcha.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!