Mountain Lion = ....meh?


Recommended Posts

In this case, he was right though, or you're being dishonest.

I've had Windows 7 since it went RTM. I've used all its new features. You tell me how someone should be using Aero Peek. Because in my opinion hovering your mouse over an application tab and scanning the little window thumbnails that appear is a waste of space and time and looking up at the display as your windows cycle in and out of focus while you move your mouse over the tabs is also a waste of space. Especially if you have multiple screens like I do because if one of the windows you want is not on your main display it doesn't come in to focus on your main display, it comes in to focus on another display that may not be in your direct vision requiring you to move your head.

This isn't a problem for Expose because no matter where your windows are they correlate in the centre and fill up your entire main display making it much easier to select the window you want and in less time.

But if you think I'm using peek wrong then please enlighten me.

  • Like 1

They're sitting on $100billion in cash. They should give something back to the users that made them so damn rich.

Why?

I've had Windows 7 since it went RTM. I've used all its new features. You tell me how someone should be using Aero Peek. Because in my opinion hovering your mouse over an application tab and scanning the little window thumbnails that appear is a waste of space and time and looking up at the display as your windows cycle in and out of focus while you move your mouse over the tabs is also a waste of space. Especially if you have multiple screens like I do because if one of the windows you want is not on your main display it doesn't come in to focus on your main display, it comes in to focus on another display that may not be in your direct vision requiring you to move your head.

This isn't a problem for Expose because no matter where your windows are they correlate in the centre and fill up your entire main display making it much easier to select the window you want and in less time.

But if you think I'm using peek wrong then please enlighten me.

I use Peek on a 2-monitor setup all day and I don't have to move my head to notice that the Window is on a different screen. It may be just the way my monitors are placed. As I said, both ways are not particularly better than the other. In Apple's case, they have some ****ed up multi-monitor support and what you say might be accidental benefit than something intentional.

Why?

I use Peek on a 2-monitor setup all day and I don't have to move my head to notice that the Window is on a different screen. It may be just the way my monitors are placed. As I said, both ways are not particularly better than the other. In Apple's case, they have some ****ed up multi-monitor support and what you say might be accidental benefit than something intentional.

I have three 30" 2560x1600 displays on my desktop system. Turning ones head is kind of a requirement. Expose works great on such a setup, Aero Peek? Doesn't work well at all and is a total waste of time even trying to use it.

I actually use Microsofts intellimouse software to get Expose on Windows because Peek is so worthless even they developed a direct Expose clone.

I have three 30" 2560x1600 displays on my desktop system. Turning ones head is kind of a requirement. Expose works great on such a setup, Aero Peek? Doesn't work well at all and is a total waste of time even trying to use it.

I actually use Microsofts intellimouse software to get Expose on Windows because Peek is so worthless even they developed a direct Expose clone.

That expose thing predates Peek. IIRC it's from Vista era. I don't know why you want to get into stupid who-copie-who stuff. :/

Won't have to move your head if the Window is on another screen in the end anyway?

I will just stop at saying that Expose is not particularly better IMHO. I think I have repeated that one last time now. You can now continue with regularly scheduled program.

Yeah, that's a huge advantage with Microsoft not being hardware vendor (let's hope Asus, Lenovo, et al put out some good tablets and keep it that way). They go out of their way to support backwards compatibility, even when it's to their detriment.

Well software and hardware compatibility are two different things - when Microsoft have broken compatibility such as moving from XPDM to WDDM it was for good reason AND at the very least we've seen Intel provide WDDM 1.1 drivers for the Intel x3100 GPUs where as Apple has abandoned them entirely. *deep breath* End of the day I've enjoyed my decade with Apple but it appears that there are greener pastures with the improved direction Microsoft is heading it - and yes, I do like Windows 8 and Metro.

They're sitting on $100billion in cash. They should give something back to the users that made them so damn rich.

Or at the very least hire another 10000 programmers to fix up long standing bugs that annoy developers and end users.

I thought Word 2004 was definitely better than Word 2003, partly because it also included a lot of features of OneNote as well, while in Office 2003 they were two separate programs.

Since Word 2007 though, I haven't been able to stand 2008 or 2011 because with the mandatory menu bar at the top, there's no way to do the ribbon well, so the UI is completely disjointed.

I'm ok with the lay out - what I am annoyed with is its failure to properly read the system settings - it's a Windows application that has been ported and castrated to the point that the only redeeming feature is the reasonably good compatibility with Office for Windows.

That expose thing predates Peek. IIRC it's from Vista era. I don't know why you want to get into stupid who-copie-who stuff. :/

Won't have to move your head if the Window is on another screen in the end anyway?

I will just stop at saying that Expose is not particularly better IMHO. I think I have repeated that one last time now. You can now continue with regularly scheduled program.

I wasn't getting in to a stupid who copied who thing. I want Windows to have Expose, Microsoft wants Windows to have Expose too that's why they added it to their Retail Mouse software package. I don't care who came up with it, I just want the best system and Expose is the best. Aero Peek is useless to anyone that does serious work on their system. It doesn't use the screens real-estate properly. You either get tiny thumbnails above the task bar that you can look at which are so tiny they are useless or you get the window you have your mouse hovered over highlighted but here is the thing, the task bar is on the centre display but your window you're highlighting may be on another display so you have to become some kind of psychic to move your mouse along thumbnails you can no longer see because your head is pointed at a completely different display looking at which active window just appeared.

The whole design is poor and Expose is much better. All the windows for your app fly out to your main display and you can quickly just click on the one you want. What could be simpler? Uses the whole screen, all the window details are easily discernible. It's so good even Microsoft wrote a version and I'm happy that they did.

  • Like 1

I wasn't getting in to a stupid who copied who thing. I want Windows to have Expose, Microsoft wants Windows to have Expose too that's why they added it to their Retail Mouse software package. I don't care who came up with it, I just want the best system and Expose is the best. Aero Peek is useless to anyone that does serious work on their system. It doesn't use the screens real-estate properly. You either get tiny thumbnails above the task bar that you can look at which are so tiny they are useless or you get the window you have your mouse hovered over highlighted but here is the thing, the task bar is on the centre display but your window you're highlighting may be on another display so you have to become some kind of psychic to move your mouse along thumbnails you can no longer see because your head is pointed at a completely different display looking at which active window just appeared.

The whole design is poor and Expose is much better. All the windows for your app fly out to your main display and you can quickly just click on the one you want. What could be simpler? Uses the whole screen, all the window details are easily discernible. It's so good even Microsoft wrote a version and I'm happy that they did.

isn't that one of the main reasons MS is finally adding multi-monitor taskbar support?

isn't that one of the main reasons MS is finally adding multi-monitor taskbar support?

If it's anything like it has been in the consumer previews then the taskbar is mirrored to all displays. Basically the task bar you have on your middle display is identical to the task bar you get on your other two displays. I don't really think that is better, in my opinion each display should have its own task bar showing only the windows that are on that display. Maybe that is how it will end up in the end when Windows 8 ships but I doubt I'll be upgrading to Win 8 anyway due to Metro. I'm quite satisfied with just having Microsofts version of Expose on Windows 7 to be honest.

If it's anything like it has been in the consumer previews then the taskbar is mirrored to all displays. Basically the task bar you have on your middle display is identical to the task bar you get on your other two displays. I don't really think that is better, in my opinion each display should have its own task bar showing only the windows that are on that display. Maybe that is how it will end up in the end when Windows 8 ships but I doubt I'll be upgrading to Win 8 anyway due to Metro. I'm quite satisfied with just having Microsofts version of Expose on Windows 7 to be honest.

not from what i've seen in the RP, they really refined the multi-monitor stuff between the CP and RP builds

i'm pretty sure each taskbar acts as its own now

If it's anything like it has been in the consumer previews then the taskbar is mirrored to all displays. Basically the task bar you have on your middle display is identical to the task bar you get on your other two displays. I don't really think that is better, in my opinion each display should have its own task bar showing only the windows that are on that display. Maybe that is how it will end up in the end when Windows 8 ships but I doubt I'll be upgrading to Win 8 anyway due to Metro. I'm quite satisfied with just having Microsofts version of Expose on Windows 7 to be honest.

You should really read up on things before jumping to conclusion...

You should really read up on things before jumping to conclusion...

I wasn't jumping to conclusions. The last version of Windows 8 that I used with multiple monitors was the Consumer Preview and it had a mirrored task bar. I clearly stated in my message Consumer Preview not Release Preview.

not from what i've seen in the RP, they really refined the multi-monitor stuff between the CP and RP builds

i'm pretty sure each taskbar acts as its own now

Thank you for reading my message and letting me know about the RP. Unlike some people (BajiRav)

To me, the original implementation of Expos? in 2003 was a revelation ? an absolute stroke of genius. I'm not fully onboard with what they did to it in Snow Leopard (make all windows be the same size) and Lion (arrange windows in groups of stacks), but both the ungrouping of windows as well as windows retaining their size relative to each other seem to be back, so that's a welcome improvement.

  • Like 1

To me, the original implementation of Expos? in 2003 was a revelation ? an absolute stroke of genius. I'm not fully onboard with what they did to it in Snow Leopard (make all windows be the same size) and Lion (arrange windows in groups of stacks), but both the ungrouping of windows as well as windows retaining their size relative to each other seem to be back, so that's a welcome improvement.

Under Mountain Lion it feels a lot like how it did on Panther. Definitely an improvement over the Mission Control of Lion. :)

  • Like 2

I wasn't jumping to conclusions. The last version of Windows 8 that I used with multiple monitors was the Consumer Preview and it had a mirrored task bar. I clearly stated in my message Consumer Preview not Release Preview.

Thank you for reading my message and letting me know about the RP. Unlike some people (BajiRav)

When you are criticizing something (good or bad), the onus is on you to keep updated especially for an ever changing pre-release OS. I meant you to read up on the latest changes to multi-monitor support and should have avoided the jumping part of my past though. That's my bad.

I've had Windows 7 since it went RTM. I've used all its new features. You tell me how someone should be using Aero Peek. Because in my opinion hovering your mouse over an application tab and scanning the little window thumbnails that appear is a waste of space and time and looking up at the display as your windows cycle in and out of focus while you move your mouse over the tabs is also a waste of space. Especially if you have multiple screens like I do because if one of the windows you want is not on your main display it doesn't come in to focus on your main display, it comes in to focus on another display that may not be in your direct vision requiring you to move your head.

This isn't a problem for Expose because no matter where your windows are they correlate in the centre and fill up your entire main display making it much easier to select the window you want and in less time.

But if you think I'm using peek wrong then please enlighten me.

You're a fringe case. I have no comment on using 3 screens, but most people don't have more than 1, and most people have small screens as they have netbooks and laptops. For a single screen inside 15", Peek is far more useful than Expose.

Under Mountain Lion it feels a lot like how it did on Panther. Definitely an improvement over the Mission Control of Lion. :)

That's good news. I can see some advantages to the Lion method, particularly if every app supports the full screen API, but since most apps still don't, the (Snow) Leopard system worked better. Windows 8 is going to have a similar problem until most apps people use are Metro.

You're a fringe case. I have no comment on using 3 screens, but most people don't have more than 1, and most people have small screens as they have netbooks and laptops. For a single screen inside 15", Peek is far more useful than Expose.

I disagree with that because Expose uses whatever size screen you have and it allows you to specify either all the open application windows or only windows for the app that has focus. And it again fills the whole screen so no matter what size screen you got you're going to have the expose windows larger than the little thumbnail that Aero Peek offers at the bottom of the task bar and you don't need to waste time going through all the thumbnails waiting for the window you want to appear either.

And really if you're using a teeny-tiny screen and have hundreds of windows open maybe it's time for an upgrade to a big boy computer.

I've had a 12" iBook and a 15" Powerbook and I currently have a 17" MacBook Pro. All have run Expose brilliantly and I would rather have Expose on that 12" iBook than Aero Peek.

If you've got a small screen and lots of apps open, there isn't enough screen size (particularly with only WXGA resolution) to display any meaningful differences between several text documents. I do proof-reading and editing. Expose fails miserably for that. It works well enough for other purposes, but for multiple text heavy documents on a single, small screen it's pants. And once you go to a large screen, you can have multiple documents side by side, so there's no reason to swap between windows.

If you've got a small screen and lots of apps open, there isn't enough screen size (particularly with only WXGA resolution) to display any meaningful differences between several text documents. I do proof-reading and editing. Expose fails miserably for that. It works well enough for other purposes, but for multiple text heavy documents on a single, small screen it's pants. And once you go to a large screen, you can have multiple documents side by side, so there's no reason to swap between windows.

I don't do proof reading but how does Aero Peek help? Aren't you just reading the buttons on the task bar or the text at the bottom of the thumbnails when you enact Aero Peek? - Cause App-specific Expose lists the window names below the window so you could read which text document is which if they all look the same. I don't really understand how Aero Peek would solve this issue as all those thumbnails would look similar if all your windows are just walls of text. Have you considered using a reading app with tabs like how a web browser handles pages? That might help your workflow.

They're sitting on $100billion in cash. They should give something back to the users that made them so damn rich.

They lowered the value of their software to ridiculously cheap prices. OS X, Final Cut X, Motion, Compressor, Aperture, GarageBand, iPhoto, iMovie, iDVD, iWeb? and you?re not forced to buy them together either. In my book, this is the equivalent of giving us something back.

That leaves me wonder what they?re going to do with all their money though. Can?t keep it all forever. The new Spaceship won?t be enough to waste it all.

Whether it's pirated or not doesn't change the fact that, for an end-user, there's not much to write home about. I know I'll be buying it, but only because I can't install Snow leopard on my mac, and I want the old expose back.

Agree'ed. Dont need the INTERNET POLICE in here....sigh

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      70
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!