Recommended Posts

Aesthetically I like it, but I agree about the contrast. It's hard to tell the difference between a greyed out button and an active one. I'll need to think up something to write, and a few other things to do to be able to really form an opinion on it, and even then it'll only be on Word and Outlook, as I don't use anything else regularly.

I've been giving both Word and Outlook a proper shakedown because, like you, they are the two programs of Office I use the most. No minuses, and there are a few pluses.

1. Outlook 2013 is faster than 2010 - no matter which way you slice it.

2. Word 2013 now edits PDFs natively - in short, it treats PDFs (and likely ODF files as well) on par with Word documents. Is this why Flash is now included with Windows 8 - compensation for pilfering Adobe revenue? (This is actually understandable- which is a business - any business - more likely to have already - Acrobat or Word? And if I were in Adobe's shoes, I'd certainly want quid pro quo for all that revenue I'm no longer going to get.)

Those two reasons *alone* are plenty to keep Office 2013 around.

So, yeah, does anyone expect them to still have the different color schemes they have in 2007 and 2010? Maybe they're just giving us the default "white" which will also be the new default theme in Windows 8 for now?

So, yeah, does anyone expect them to still have the different color schemes they have in 2007 and 2010? Maybe they're just giving us the default "white" which will also be the new default theme in Windows 8 for now?

That's what I'm thinking - the default theme is *none* (therefore all that unrelieved white). There are two new themes that weren't in Office 2010 - Clouds and Circuits. (I deliberately chose Circuits.) Clouds *does* match a background choice for the Start Screen (and echoes the older *Bliss* and *Royale* themes for XP/MCE, respectively). Also, unlike Office 2010, you select your Theme choice during the install (not post-install).

That's what I'm thinking - the default theme is *none* (therefore all that unrelieved white). There are two new themes that weren't in Office 2010 - Clouds and Circuits. (I deliberately chose Circuits.) Clouds *does* match a background choice for the Start Screen (and echoes the older *Bliss* and *Royale* themes for XP/MCE, respectively). Also, unlike Office 2010, you select your Theme choice during the install (not post-install).

Right, I wonder if they're going to have it somehow match the start screen theme color so that white might be dark gray if that's what you picked for the start screen as well? If the background images are going to match I see no reason why the colors can't, and it wouldn't really be a problem with the UI to change. Though some colors will probably look worse of course.

So far I'm liking it overall - scrolling performance in Word seems to be much better - I have a 47 page Word doc filled with tables and images and styling that Word 2010 just didn't want to scroll smoothly (or fastly), and this version of Word does it delightfully smoothly and fast.

I also quite like the animation touches, this is what I've been imagining and hoping the majority of desktop apps would feel like to use interface wise for a few years, yet no one seems to wants to waste development time and money on small user experience touches, no matter how much better they make the experience feel.

Touch mode also seems to work great on my touch screen for the vast majority of things.

I will say though that although I don't think Word looks too white - Outlook does. That, and the email / contact header area ontop of each email is far too big for something I can't seem to hide And putting the "pin ribbon" button in the ribbon itself both wastes space, and makes it slightly more annoying to repin it, considering the button is now no longer always visible.

I don't agree, sharepoint has a cloud server option but the local version isn't going to go away. I also don't see how Office 2013 isn't for the desktop, the UI is still the same just a different color scheme at this point (we could and probably will see some more themes for it like we have in 2007 and 2010). I don't get how it's changed so much that you think it's not for the desktop? You can say what you will about Windows 8 but I just don't get it with Office at this point.

Apparently it's not even that touch-friendly.

I agree that there is nothing I've seen that makes 2013 more touch friendly than 2010. So as I said elsewhere, its no surprise to me that their flagship is still very mouse optimized.

So far I'm liking it for the most part. The whiteness is a bit much at times and I'm not happy about the mandatory SkyDrive Pro context menu either.

Am I missing it but I don't see a way to save to my private SharePoint vs theirs? I assume this will be in the final version (and hopefully tightly integrated with the SP2013 My Documents).

I agree that there is nothing I've seen that makes 2013 more touch friendly than 2010. So as I said elsewhere, its no surprise to me that their flagship is still very mouse optimized.

Using Office 2013, I can say that the larger, more spaced hit targets and expanded menu's are brilliant on a touch screen.

Mouse vs. Touch:

XN29R.png

05vr1.png

Though Office 2010 already had pinch to zoom and nice pan scrolling.

Using Office 2013, I can say that the larger, more spaced hit targets and expanded menu's are brilliant on a touch screen.

Haven't tried it first hand on touch yet. So from your screenshots it looks like the UI changes based on detected input method? (If so, zomgz, what a concept. ;) )

:edit: I just saw the blog. That is pretty fantastic. I was wrong that the UI hadn't changed much. It is a testament to how well they implemented the new Touch Mode UI in practice. The radial menu looks especially tasty (also a good example of a UI snippet that can be used via mouse, but would not be optimal).

Two notable quotes from the blog not mentioned in the summary which I am absolutely on board with:

We believed people would continue to use Office at their desks, and type on physical keyboards at a desktop or laptop, but would also start to use tablets and hybrid laptop/tablet devices in a variety of other situations: leaning back in a chair, leaning forward on a train, bus, or plane, sitting on a couch, lying in bed, standing and holding with two hands, or walking down the hall.

The first is that we've begun to build new versions of some of our apps (OneNote and Lync) specifically tailored for the new experience in Windows 8. For these, we deliberately started from scratch to design new versions that were touch-first. The second is that we've touch-enabled the familiar desktop versions of all of the Office apps. These continue to be designed first and foremost for mouse & keyboard, and to preserve the features & layout you're used to, but now support touch throughout the experience. This dual approach allows you to immediately get the full power of Office on a touch machine with no relearning required, along with new experiences that embrace touch from the ground up and deeply integrate with the new experiences in Windows 8.

-Gray Knowlton

Now just do the same thing for Metro and I'll start making Kool-Aid.

Why is saving to SkyDrive by default a bad idea? Think about this scenario:

  • Joe User works on a document on his laptop. Saves it to SkyDrive
  • The user then sits on a plane or train without internet connection and wants to continue editing the document.
  • Much to Joe User's chagrin the file is MIA.

See the problem?

dude you can save your doc locally...im not sure what the prbem is here...

how bout the scenario (which is much more likely), im at work working on a bunch of office docs like a spreadsheet, powerpoint and word doc that i have to present in the next couple of days.

I get up from my work pc walk out the door and when i get home to continue working

the cursor is in the exact same location as it was when i left the doc

see the awsome??

stop coming up with bizzare scenarios so you can sh*t on something thats been out for like 3 minutes....

What did they do to ERD support on Visio? I can open my old files but can't edit any existing entities and the new entities that I add are just colored boxes with text fields in them, there's no interface for quickly entering multiple columns and there doesn't appear to be any support for database drivers anymore. Relationships are just lines, there's no linking them to foreign keys. At this point I might as well just use Paint.NET because all it is letting me do is draw.

I'm really liking what I'm seeing in Office 2013. I was very pleased to see all of my folders, email, and school schedule all come down the pipe without issue. I'm really loving what they're doing with OneNote MX. Once I can get my hands on the Surface, I can really see the whole suite making my college life much easier.

And I really like the UI. It doesn't blind me. The colored options in Outlook 2010 didn't seem to help the claustrophobic feeling I got when I used it. The changes they made here are a breath of fresh air and I hope they retain it.

Why is saving to SkyDrive by default a bad idea? Think about this scenario:

  • Joe User works on a document on his laptop. Saves it to SkyDrive
  • The user then sits on a plane or train without internet connection and wants to continue editing the document.
  • Much to Joe User's chagrin the file is MIA.

See the problem?

If you have the Skydrive client installed, when Skydrive syncs it will save the file locally to the computer, meaning you can still access it when offline.

After using it all day (just Outlook and Word) I can say that overall I like the direction they're going, but I do hope they tweak it some before RTM.

The Metro styling is generally nice (and I'm actually starting to get used to the white), but I'm still hoping that they add more contrast before GA. I'm all for the minimalist look, but they need to add a few varied background colors to give the eyes a little hint at where the different UI elements start and end. No drastic changes, it just needs a few touches here and there.

At the same time I'm really not noticing much difference in functionality. Outlook seems a bit snappier, but pretty much does the same job the same way. Same for Word. With a few tweaks I think Office 2013 will be a decent upgrade, but nothing Earth-shattering.

However, I don't see the big win for Office 2013 being Office itself. Microsoft's ecosystem has long been like a giant jig-saw puzzle where you can tell what picture is supposed to be, but the pieces just don't quite fit together. It looks like that's starting to change - finally the piece are coming together - and although Office 2013 is not a huge upgrade in itself, it's a very important piece to that puzzle.

I love it :D

I like the new little animations in excel, the cursor animation in word.

Most of all though, I love the new Outlook.

It feels ten times faster than Outlook 2010 with my gmail account.

I thought the Capitals in the ribbon would annoy me but I've gotten used to them already :)

Overall with a bit of tweaking, this could be the best version of Office yet :D

Considering it hasn't been available for even 24 hours yet, I don't think anyone has had enough time to give it a fair chance. First impressions aren't usually a good indicator; impressions after one has used it regularly for a certain amount of time are best to go on.

First impressions are just that, If you don't like first impressions don't read them when people say "first impression"

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!