Arpaio Obama Probe Finds 'national security threat'


Recommended Posts

LOL Here's a funny conspiracy for ya's.

Arpaio told WND he intends to move the investigation and the new information to a higher authority within the federal government because of what he calls an imminent threat to national security and U.S. immigration laws. The threat is posed by a flaw in Hawaii?s law discovered by his investigators that allows a foreigner to obtain a Hawaii birth certificate.

?Although I am having a difficult time deciding who to forward this information to given the fact that the obvious choices report directly to the president, I cannot stand by and hold on to information that threatens to weaken national security,? Arpaio said.

Arpaio said he intends on keeping a case file open if more information surfaces or if federal authorities decide to ignore the case.

Zullo explained that along with new information discovered regarding the birth certificate since the posse?s March 1 press conference, his team has discovered Hawaii provides easy access to a birth certificate, even if the child wasn?t born in the state.

Under Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8, a person only has to be an established resident of Hawaii, not necessarily a U.S. citizen, and pay taxes there for one year to be able to register an out-of-state or foreign-born person with an official Hawaii birth certificate.

?If a nation?s security is only as strong as its weakest link, then America may be in serious trouble,? Arpaio said in a statement. ?Hawaii may be our weakest link and could have a serious impact on our nation?s immigration policy.?

Among the new findings presented by lead Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo:

  • The sheriff?s investigators have learned of a birth certificate coding system that indicates the White House document has been altered.

  • An interview with the Hawaii official who allegedly signed the Obama document in 1961, Verna K.L. Lee, provided further confirmation of the coding anomalies.

  • Investigators were troubled to find key information missing on the verification document Hawaii provided to Arizona?s secretary of state in May.

  • Hawaii?s deputy attorney general, Jill T. Nagamine, confirm the state has a birth document on file for Obama. But she would not confirm on the record that the White House document matched what was on file with the Hawaii Department of Health.

  • The sheriff?s investigators interviewed three persons of interest who have provided additional information in the case.

In prepared opening remarks, Arpaio chastised the media for the way it has handled the investigation.

?You have demeaned this investigation at every turn as silly and wasteful,? he said. ?Your contempt about the subject and me for pursuing it has been duly noted.?

He urged media members to listen to Zullo?s presentation of the new evidence.

?Keep an open mind if you can,? he said. ?Put away all you pre conceived ideas. Keep your eye on the ball.?

Arpaio?s investigation was initiated last October when 250 Maricopa County citizens approached him for help because they believed the electronic document presented by the White House to the American public was a forgery. Arpaio said he went ahead with the probe with the intent of being able to clear the president and put the matter to rest. But he explained the investigation found too many inconsistencies on the birth certificate.

?We also looked into the president?s selective service registration card and found that it, too, appeared to be fraudulent,? Arpaio said.

Investigators since then have traveled to Hawaii and have interviewed more witnesses, the sheriff said.

Addressing the coding issue, Zullo explained that the Hawaii Department of Health, which categorized vital information issued at the time of the president?s birth, used specific number codes that were written in pencil to transfer information from a paper birth certificate to a database file.

The codes seen on the document issued by the White House are not consistent with the information entered into the various fields, indicating the document has been altered or amended.

In the coding system, the number 9 indicates the information is not stated, meaning there should not be any information in the box in which the number is written.

However, the number 9 can be seen written in pencil next to the fields for ?Usual Occupation,? ?Kind of Business or Industry? and ?Race of Father? on Obama?s document. Each of those fields are filled with information.

?This proves the document has been tampered with and information has been placed on it,? Zullo said.

Sheriff?s investigators tracked down the registrar who allegedly signed the White House?s birth document, U.K. Lee, who is now 95. She provided information that posed further inconsistencies with the story of Obama?s birth at the Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital in 1961.

The investigators also analyzed the Hawaii Department of Health?s response to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett?s request that Obama?s birth information be verified.

They interviewed in person the Hawaii assistant attorney general to verify that the document presented by the White House was the same document on file with the Department of Health.

Investigators said they were troubled to find key information missing on the verification document, including the president?s date of birth.

They said they were equally troubled that the deputy attorney general would not confirm on record that the White House document matched what was on file with the health department.

The national security concerns raised by the investigation are based on Hawaii Revised Statute 338.17.8. which states:

338-17.8 Certificates for children born out of state.

Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.

Arpaio and his investigators said they have deep concerns that the Hawaii Revised Statute is a loophole that makes it possible for foreign born children to illegally establish U.S. citizenship.

They said the concern is also relevant given the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling concerning Arizona?s proposed state immigration law, SB 1070, in which the federal court ruled state laws cannot be in contradiction or in conflict with federal law.

Zullo noted that, normally, when it?s necessary to prove a person is a U.S. Citizen, the main form of documentation is a state certificate of birth.

?It appears that in the case of Hawaii law, any person can obtain a birth certificate if any adult or their parents can prove that they resided in Hawaii for one year and paid taxes,? he said. ?There is no requirement to show that the child itself was actually born in Hawaii or on U.S. soil.?

http://www.wnd.com/2...y-threat/print/

Oh man.. that racist Joe Arpaio at it again.

Edited by Colin-uk
Changed title to lowercase - please dont use all caps in a thread title, thanks.

This crap again? Obama's a Muslim, he's an Atheist, he's not a US citizen, he's a communist, he's a socialist... The latent bigotry and insanity of the right is never far from display.

so obama's parents took advantage of a revision done in 1982, when obama was born in 1961

HOLY CRAP OBAMA IS A TIME TRAVELER

*Edit - guess people will look for anything and ignore obvious things, lol

What's the difference anyway? Plenty of people who were born in America hate the country just as much as Obama does.

i dont hate america, just hate the a majority of the people in it, and most of those that run it

*edit - noticed it says Have instead of Hate

  • Like 2

This crap again? Obama's a Muslim, he's an Atheist, he's not a US citizen, he's a communist, he's a socialist... The latent bigotry and insanity of the right is never far from display.

Not really sure how much of this falls under bigotry unless you can only associate disagreement with racism. I don't know a single person that disagrees with Obama because he is black; I know that they exist, but seeing the presumptive association with disagreement as racism is a bit shortsighted. I do know that some question his religion, but that's because of his association with Jeremiah Wright and staunch weakness shown to Middle Eastern nations excluding Israel. A lot of people assume that the origins of the Birther movement originate from racists because he's the first black President; I imagine that there were quite a few racists in the original group, but he is also the first President that lived a significant portion of his life overseas where rumors existed that he even renounced (through his parents) his US Citizenship. He even makes huge points about living overseas in his two biographies.

Personally, I don't understand how any technical people can actually believe that the Birth Certificate is legitimate. It has layers that exist in locations on the PDF that are simply too convenient, not to mention his father's location is listed as a country that didn't exist when Obama was born. That doesn't necessarily mean that he's not a US Citizen born in Hawaii, but it does make it a pretty clear fake. I wouldn't be surprised if it simply had a different name listed, or perhaps something else, but something is very wrong about it.

Ignoring Obama, regarding the weak Birth Certificate issue, I should note that security cleared individuals can provide a Birth Certificate as a means for proving their US Citizenship, which means that that weakness becomes very relevant there. Not to mention the implications of paying taxes for one year to suddenly reap benefits from the rest of the social programs provided by the US government to its citizens.

The "layers" on the PDF are explained by the fact that it was scanned with a multiple pass scanner. And sorry, whether you like it or not accusing someone of not being a US citizen is a form of racism.

Regardless of the technicalities of Obama's birth certificate - though the doubt is entirely manufactured - is there really any compelling reason not to allow somebody born outside of the US to run for President? It's not like people are going to vote in a Chinese national as President. And it's not as if it's to protect the integrity of the system, as there simply isn't any when Presidential candidates are funded by an elite minority of billionaires and influential corporations.

The birther movement - like the smear campaign alleging that he's Muslim - is inherently racist and it's inconceivable that the same sort of attacks would have been used had he been white. The US is still an incredibly racist country.

This crap again? Obama's a Muslim, he's an Atheist, he's not a US citizen, he's a communist, he's a socialist... The latent bigotry and insanity of the right is never far from display.

Nice job stereotyping...

  • Like 1

Not really sure how much of this falls under bigotry unless you can only associate disagreement with racism. I don't know a single person that disagrees with Obama because he is black; I know that they exist, but seeing the presumptive association with disagreement as racism is a bit shortsighted.

Disagreement with Obama isn't racist, but there are many people who are racist and disagree with Obama. If you're not racist, but still disagree with Obama... good for you. You're not racist. Nobody is saying that everyone who disagrees with Obama is racist. You're manufacturing controversy.

I do know that some question his religion, but that's because of his association with Jeremiah Wright

So people question that Obama is a Christian because Obama went to church? I know what you're saying, but it is pretty ironic.

He even makes huge points about living overseas in his two biographies.

It's nice having a president that can look at the US from an outsiders perspective. We need to be less arrogant with our foreign policy.

not to mention his father's location is listed as a country that didn't exist when Obama was born. That doesn't necessarily mean that he's not a US Citizen born in Hawaii, but it does make it a pretty clear fake.

Kenya has been known by the name Kenya [the Kenya Colony] for a very long time - long before 1961. The name Kenya wasn't invented in 1963/64. It's an old name that appears in many places. The official name is way too long to fit in that blank.

Nice job stereotyping...

Yes. I agree with his sentiment, but he's obviously exaggerating.

This is sad. As a native Arizonan, I can tell you we all wish Arpaio would just keel over from pancreatic cancer or something. This is not what Arizona is about. He's rigged elections and gotten away with it for almost 20 years. Nobody actually wants this guy around anymore.

The "layers" on the PDF are explained by the fact that it was scanned with a multiple pass scanner.

Not combined with the huge inconsistencies in the quality of the image in the areas that are layers.

And sorry, whether you like it or not accusing someone of not being a US citizen is a form of racism.

Why? Because the person happens to be black? Is it also racist to accuse a CEO of not really having a degree? What if they're white?

The need to see racism in everything is what leads to more racism.

The birther movement - like the smear campaign alleging that he's Muslim - is inherently racist and it's inconceivable that the same sort of attacks would have been used had he been white. The US is still an incredibly racist country.

I'll take this with a grain of salt coming from the person moonlighting as a racist. Both smear campaigns happened because he spent an enormous amount of time outside of the country during his youth, and a large portion of that was in a nation that is predominantly Muslim. Again, there are a bunch of racists, but you've made it quite clear that they don't only exist in the US.

Regardless of the technicalities of Obama's birth certificate - though the doubt is entirely manufactured - is there really any compelling reason not to allow somebody born outside of the US to run for President?

Yes. It's called the "Constitution."

Become an American, and then propose an amendment to change it. There was talk of this when people thought that Arnold Schwarzenegger was going to be a good politician.

It's not like people are going to vote in a Chinese national as President.

I can't help but be amused by the racism in your statement. It's quite possible that a Chinese person, whether they immigrated or were natively born here, could be a beacon of American pride and values, or an anti-American dimwit like yourself.

  • Like 1

1. obama will not allow anyone to physically see his original birth certificate.

2. the deputy attorney general is refusing to say whether it is his birth certificate.

3. the hospital name was not that name until years after obama was born.

4. "african american" was not used at that time "negro" was used.

5. the woman who signed the birth certificate said that the numbers on the birth certificate are forged, she is 95yrs old now.

6. obama has spent millions in court trying to stop states and counties from requiring him to authenticate his birth certificate.

7. the democratic party just weeks ago removed the requirement of being born in america to get the democratic nomination.

8. he took years to release his so-called birth certificate even though people had asked for it for ages.

9. his lawyer won't give his original birth certificate to arizona because he isn't the democratic nomination officially yet.

If you think all these are co-incidences then you are missing a few screws. Use logic not emotion and quit labelled anyone who disagrees with obama as racist as YOU are racist!

  • Like 1

Not combined with the huge inconsistencies in the quality of the image in the areas that are layers.

Why? Because the person happens to be black? Is it also racist to accuse a CEO of not really having a degree? What if they're white?

The need to see racism in everything is what leads to more racism.

peoples 'need to see racism' in this issue is probably because, as far as I can remember, Obama is the first president to have a large group of people question his citizenship, and since he's also the first president to be African American, it brings up some questions. If Obama were white, I sincerely doubt there would be birthers, just because nobody would even think to check.

1. obama will not allow anyone to physically see his original birth certificate.

2. the deputy attorney general is refusing to say whether it is his birth certificate.

3. the hospital name was not that name until years after obama was born.

4. "african american" was not used at that time "negro" was used.

5. the woman who signed the birth certificate said that the numbers on the birth certificate are forged, she is 95yrs old now.

6. obama has spent millions in court trying to stop states and counties from requiring him to authenticate his birth certificate.

7. the democratic party just weeks ago removed the requirement of being born in america to get the democratic nomination.

8. he took years to release his so-called birth certificate even though people had asked for it for ages.

9. his lawyer won't give his original birth certificate to arizona because he isn't the democratic nomination officially yet.

If you think all these are co-incidences then you are missing a few screws. Use logic not emotion and quit labelled anyone who disagrees with obama as racist as YOU are racist!

Not to mention that Democrats of this generation are so hard up for state handouts.Whatever happened to the old philosophy that people should work for their keep? amazing.

we are to reward the lazy with the blood, sweat and tears of those who work and earn. Besides, a philosophy of the spread of wealth is a pure indication of a socialist drive.

what do I mean more clearly? this woman thinks Obama's going to put gas in her car, pay for her mortgage http://www.washingto...e-any-time.html

And 7 obama lies in 2 minutes

  • Like 1

Before the industrial revolution it was common for communities to band together and help each other out. Now, capitalism seems to be turning people into selfish jackasses. You so much as talk about helping out a poor person in America these days and you get called a socialist and get accused of being evil and anti-american.

  • Like 2

1. obama will not allow anyone to physically see his original birth certificate.

2. the deputy attorney general is refusing to say whether it is his birth certificate.

3. the hospital name was not that name until years after obama was born.

4. "african american" was not used at that time "negro" was used.

5. the woman who signed the birth certificate said that the numbers on the birth certificate are forged, she is 95yrs old now.

6. obama has spent millions in court trying to stop states and counties from requiring him to authenticate his birth certificate.

7. the democratic party just weeks ago removed the requirement of being born in america to get the democratic nomination.

8. he took years to release his so-called birth certificate even though people had asked for it for ages.

9. his lawyer won't give his original birth certificate to arizona because he isn't the democratic nomination officially yet.

If you think all these are co-incidences then you are missing a few screws. Use logic not emotion and quit labelled anyone who disagrees with obama as racist as YOU are racist!

1. He doesn't need to, nor has any other POTUS before him needed to go through this ringer of a circus.

2. Who exactly? The Hawaiian attorney general has verified it, the one person who is tasked for that job.

3. From snopes, which has yet to be proven wrong..

"The former Kapi'olani Maternity Home became the Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital (where Barack Obama was born) in 1931, and it retained that appellation until 1971, when its name was shortened to Kapi'olani Hospital. The Kauikeolani Children's Hospital (where Barack Obama was <U>not</U> born) was a separate entity which merged with the Kapi'olani Hospital in 1978 to become the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children."
Moreover, a copy of a birth certificate issued to a child born in Honolulu one day after Barack Obama also shows "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital" listed in the "Name of Hospital" field.

4. "African American" does not appear on the BC

5. First Iv heard of this and cant not find any info on it. At 95, most people at that age don't have the best judgement on something so old about such finite details. Specially concerning details of a BC that had no personal value to her at the time.

6. Maybe because others keep bringing up law suits which force Obama to send lawyers to court. Nothing has ever been proven to proceed further along.

7. False, it's a Constitutional requirement to qualify as POTUS. No one side can just say, we change who can be POTUS

8. Again, Obama meet the requirements and was verified through the appropriate means. No other POTUS has gone through this.

9. Again false information, it's not his lawyer but the Hawaiian attorney general who has stated they need to see the legal requirements to release said document.

Hawaii?s attorney general has apparently given a response, according to KTVK-TV:

The Hawaii attorney general?s office has reportedly told Bennett that there are steps he needs to take in order to confirm President Obama?s birth records.

Those steps include Bennett proving that he legitimately needs confirmation in order to update the records at his office.

Talk about total misinformation.

  • Like 3

The fact that this birth certificate crap won't go away highlights 3 things. How deluded a large segment of the right wing is, how desperate some people are to hate Obama, and how much racism is still part of right wing thinking.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!