Arpaio Obama Probe Finds 'national security threat'


Recommended Posts

The fact that this birth certificate crap won't go away highlights 3 things. How deluded a large segment of the right wing is, how desperate some people are to hate Obama, and how much racism is still part of right wing thinking.

Well. It is Joe Arpaio. Well known racist.

  • Like 2

isn't he like the head of Maricopa prison? I think I watched a Lockup episode on Maricopa, and they showed a protest against him...

Honestly not sure, someone here will probably know though

so obama's parents took advantage of a revision done in 1982, when obama was born in 1961

HOLY CRAP OBAMA IS A TIME TRAVELER

*Edit - guess people will look for anything and ignore obvious things, lol

lol

Who's Joe Arpaio?

Another person I want to tell to his face that he's a ****ing moron.

Before the industrial revolution it was common for communities to band together and help each other out. Now, capitalism seems to be turning people into selfish jackasses. You so much as talk about helping out a poor person in America these days and you get called a socialist and get accused of being evil and anti-american.

This is not true at all...

When a politician talks about using other peoples money to help the poor they are a called socialist (most of the time it's to earn votes). I haven't heard anybody call Bill Gates or numerous Pro Althletes that donate time and $$$ a socialist.

  • 2 weeks later...

What a despicable thing to say.

Don't you just love how loving and not hateful Libs are when they think the opposition isn't around, their true colors show

What people forget is that Washington has been "investigating" Arpaio for years now trying desperately to find anything to pin on him, and haven't, this started in retribution to the, and interestingly found a real issue in the way HI deals with Birth Certificates, that is a serious issue that of course most Libs will ignore because it's not a convenient issue to deal with at the moment, in nowhere other than explaining what prompted the investigation does this become a "birther" issue, it's done and over, even if Obama's birth certificate turns out to be fake, nothing will come of it, other than the Democrats needing to find a candidate at the last second, but like said in the article it is a national security issue that needs fixed yesterday

  • Like 1

So you can only know a person is racist if you know them personally?

There isn't anything he could have done to prove this already?

Well if he's a member of the KKK, then chances are he's a racist... but I haven't seen that report come out. If he's done something other than investing Obama, let me know.

Well if he's a member of the KKK, then chances are he's a racist... but I haven't seen that report come out. If he's done something other than investing Obama, let me know.

I never said it was because he was investigating Obama.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/12/15/20111215feds-detail-pattern-discrimination-by-arpaio.html

and on your KKK reference

I never said it was because he was investigating Obama.

http://www.azcentral...-by-arpaio.html

and on your KKK reference

He still has a job so apparently the justice department hasn't found that he did anything wrong...

KKK reference: are you kidding me? That's your proof?

even if Obama's birth certificate turns out to be fake, nothing will come of it, other than the Democrats needing to find a candidate at the last second, but like said in the article it is a national security issue that needs fixed yesterday

Where do you crazy people come from. :wacko:

If it was fake, he wouldn't be President, that's a pretty clear requirement. It's only whack-jobs like you that think this doesn't get checked out before the elections.

....And sorry, whether you like it or not accusing someone of not being a US citizen is a form of racism.

What planet are you on?

If I accused Theyarecomingforyou of being British (not a US Citizen) that would make me racist?

I think your bigotry is shining through with that comment.

  • Like 1

Regardless of the technicalities of Obama's birth certificate - though the doubt is entirely manufactured - is there really any compelling reason not to allow somebody born outside of the US to run for President? It's not like people are going to vote in a Chinese national as President. And it's not as if it's to protect the integrity of the system, as there simply isn't any when Presidential candidates are funded by an elite minority of billionaires and influential corporations.

The birther movement - like the smear campaign alleging that he's Muslim - is inherently racist and it's inconceivable that the same sort of attacks would have been used had he been white. The US is still an incredibly racist country.

We do have a Constitutuion that staes it cleary. The Constitution is the law. That is my issue with anyone who runs for POTUS. Unless that part of the document is ratified then it stands.

We do have a Constitutuion that staes it cleary. The Constitution is the law. That is my issue with anyone who runs for POTUS. Unless that part of the document is ratified then it stands.

And a good reason for the existence of that law is that the President needs to have the interest of Americans, and no one else, in mind. Allowing someone who has ties to another nation to be President opens the office up to foreign influence - it has nothing to do with race, it's just a matter of nationality and political interest, and it seems to be a pretty smart clause to me. As Judge St. George Tucker put it, "The admission of foreigners into our councils, consequently, cannot be too much guarded against."

What planet are you on?

If I accused Theyarecomingforyou of being British (not a US Citizen) that would make me racist?

I think your bigotry is shining through with that comment.

No, but if you accused a black person of being African and asking for their papers. Then yes.

Or if you question the validity of the birth certificate of your now black president. Yes. That would make you a racist.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!