Google acquires Sparrow (Email client for OS X and iOS)


Recommended Posts

Google acquires Sparrow

Third-party email app maker Sparrow just announced that it's been purchased by Google. This morning, Dom Leca posted on the Sparrow blog that the company has been acquired by Google, and that they're joining the Gmail team to "accomplish a bigger vision." The Gmail experience on iOS has been troubled with a rough launch, a limited feature set weaker than its Android brethren, and continued lack of support for multiple accounts, which opened up a space that the Sparrow team took advantage with its excellent iOS app. We've reached out to Google and Sparrow for comment.

capture.png

tumblr_m7gv4fCKQS1qbptnpo1_500_medium.png

Developing...

Source: The Verge

April's Fools.

No. Check the Sparrow website: http://sparrowmailapp.com/

Quote from the announcement on the website: 'Now we're joining the Gmail team to accomplish a bigger vision ? one that we think we can better achieve with Google.'

They stated in an updated email sent out a few moments ago, "However, as we?ll be busy with new projects at Google, we do not plan to release new features for the Sparrow apps."

This sucks. Sparrow was a great email app, it was beautiful and, as a Gmail user, it worked perfectly with Gmail. I'm sorry, but these guys appear, to me at least, as sell outs. Google will either ruin this app or bury it. Sparrow doesn't even work with iOS 6 and they promised early last month a fix for it and that's yet to happen, not I wonder if it ever will.

Wow the Google haters are out in force already

I am not a Google hater.. Actually I LOVE Google, but whats being said is true, now granted we don't know for sure whats going to happen to the app, but you can pretty much bet that if anything, some of the features will be added into the default Gmail client or something, which still means iOS and OSX users are left without a good replacement mail client. Considering the gmail app for iOS is horrible as well.

No. Check the Sparrow website: http://sparrowmailapp.com/

Quote from the announcement on the website: 'Now we're joining the Gmail team to accomplish a bigger vision ? one that we think we can better achieve with Google.'

I think its pretty clear its not April too?

They stated in an updated email sent out a few moments ago, "However, as we?ll be busy with new projects at Google, we do not plan to release new features for the Sparrow apps."

This sucks. Sparrow was a great email app, it was beautiful and, as a Gmail user, it worked perfectly with Gmail. I'm sorry, but these guys appear, to me at least, as sell outs. Google will either ruin this app or bury it. Sparrow doesn't even work with iOS 6 and they promised early last month a fix for it and that's yet to happen, not I wonder if it ever will.

While I don't use it, I won't expect anything less than a forced G+ integration :p in an email client.

Wow the Google haters are out in force already

Well read the writing on the wall. The developers themselves said they're moving onto other projects. "... we do not plan to release new features for the Sparrow apps."

It isn't about hate, heck, I use Gmail, Google Calendar, Google+, etc. I don't hate Google, but I'm being a realist here.

Nothing really new there. They theorize that there may be a rebranding of sorts of Sparrow to the official Gmail Client, or that Google may force them to focus entirely on Android. Either way, in Google's hands, I have the sinking feeling that the app will suck big fat harry monkey balls. But I hope I'm wrong.

Some additional information about the acquisition:

Sources: Google's Sparrow purchase cost under $25 million, will bring 'beauty' to Gmail

Today, Sparrow's Dom Leca announced that his third party email client company had been purchased by Google, and we just talked to sources familiar with the situation. The talks have been ongoing for a while; Sparrow was well known, and our sources say Google recognized that the five-person-team had a "lot of expertise in how to make mail communication really simple." While we couldn't get an exact number, we're told that Sparrow was acquired for under $25 million, and that there wasn't a bidding war surrounding the purchase. While our source couldn't specify a timeline, the goal is to get the Paris-based Sparrow team in-house on the main Mountain View campus in California.

In an email to users, Dom Leca explained that Sparrow products won't be receiving new features, and the team will be joining the Gmail team. While some of the work that Sparrow has done on its native iPad app may be seen in future releases from the Gmail team, it's safe to assume that the app won't be released in its Sparrow-branded form. Still, the Sparrow iOS and Mac apps will continue to be available from Apple's App Stores. As far as when we'll start to see some of the Sparrow DNA integrated into Google's products, there's no timeline yet.

Of course, Sparrow is also known first for its Mac client, and the Google purchase makes a native Mac Gmail client more of a reality. We heard that the acquisition is less about "building for a specific platform," and that Sparrow's experience at building simple and powerful email clients will be helpful in bringing consistency to the Gmail ecosystem. Our sources also noted that Google isn't ruling out native Gmail clients for platforms beyond iOS and Android, and emphasized that Google wants to bring polish, "beauty," and ease of use to all of its Gmail experiences across platforms (a suggestion that a native client for Mac and PC might be in the offing). Sparrow, apparently, is a way to get there.

Source: The Verge

you know what I just thought of... Kevin Rose was hired as a venture partner at Google, which means he helps Google buy up things that are up and coming right? Rose also LOVES his Apple hardware and always uses macbooks, iphones, etc. I be this was his doing!!! LOL

I think you don't understand what April Fool's day is.

Or when..

I hope it's the beginning of a Google version of Outlook.. I don't see them buying the whole company, just to have them basically consult on the UI for GMail..

Or when..

I hope it's the beginning of a Google version of Outlook.. I don't see them buying the whole company, just to have them basically consult on the UI for GMail..

What do you mean? Google has acquired the entire company. They're even moving from Paris to Mountain View to be at the Google HQ.

Google wouldn't pay nearly $25 million for a team of 5 to "consult" on Gmail.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 by Razvan Serea Hasleo Disk Clone is a free and all-in-one disk cloning software for Windows 11/10/8/7/Vista and Windows Server that can help you migrate Windows OS to another disk, clone one disk to another disk or clone one partition to another location quickly and efficiently. Completely Free Windows Migration and Disk/Partition Cloning Software Migrate Windows from one disk to another without reinstalling Windows, apps. Clone one disk to another and makes the data on 2 disks are exactly the same. Clone a partition to another location without losing any data. Easily adjust the size and location of the destination partition. Convert MBR to GPT or convert GPT to MBR by cloning. Creation of Windows PE emergency disk. Extremely fast cloning speed and multi-language support. Supported OS: Windows Vista/Server 2008 or later, fully compatible with GPT and UEFI. Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 changelog: Fixed an issue that caused disk enumeration to fail Fixed an issue where WinPE created under Windows ARM64 26H1 did not work properly Download: Hasleo Disk Clone 5.8.2.1 | 32.3 MB (Freeware) Link: Hasleo Disk Clone Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      558
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!