Lumias outshipped iPhone, Samsung Android phones through first three quarte


Recommended Posts

.

Finally, some good news for Nokia: Lumias outshipped

iPhone, Samsung Android phones through first three quarters

nokia-lumia-800_41.jpg

Nokia (NOK) has hit a bit of a rough patch lately, having

just reported its third consecutive billion-dollar quarterly loss

earlier this week. Of course, investors saw some promise

in Nokia?s earnings report, and it turns out there may be

even more cause for optimism than they initially thought.

According to market research firm Strategy Analytics,

Nokia?s Windows Phone efforts are off to a better start

than Apple?s (AAPL) iPhone or Samsung?s (005930KS)

Android smartphones at this point in their respective product

cycles.

SA-WP-Nokia-07-2012.png

?We estimate Nokia shipped 6.9 million Lumia smartphones

with the Microsoft (MSFT) Windows Phone operating system

cumulatively worldwide during the first three quarters after

commercial launch, from Q4 2011 to Q2 2012,? Neil Shah, a

senior analyst at Strategy Analytics, said in a statement. ?This

compares with 3.7 million units of the Apple iPhone family in

its first three quarters during 2007, and 1.3 million units for

the Samsung Android family in its first three quarters during

2009. It is an encouraging start for Nokia and Microsoft.?

Shah?s colleague Neil Mawtson added, ?Based on historical

shipment benchmarks, Nokia?s new Lumia portfolio is

performing reasonably well. Some of the pessimism

surrounding Nokia and Microsoft?s emerging partnership

so far may be misplaced. However, Nokia and Microsoft

are clearly not out of the woods yet. With a new Apple

iPhone 5 expected on the horizon, and Samsung?s Galaxy

S3 selling in huge quantities, Nokia will need to pull

something impressive out of the bag for the next-generation

Windows Phone 8 launch later this year to sustain its

tentative early momentum.?

Of course, there?s one important caveat to Strategy Analytics?s

report: When Apple?s iPhone and Samsung?s Android

smartphones launched, the smartphone market paled

in comparison to today?s market. Comparing smartphone

shipments in 2012 to smartphone shipments in 2007 or

2009 is like comparing modern-day salaries to salaries

in the 1960s without accounting for inflation.

...

Shipped != Sold sadly sure there is a correlation but, I could ship 10 million items and sell 1 million....

Agreed.

Atari shipped a bunch of E.T. carts also. But they ended up in a landfill in the end

You also have to compare how many markets each was for sale in, i.e. the first quarter I think the iPhone was US only. If they can hit 10 million first year then I think they will have done ok.

I've never been a fan of using shipping statistics as a metric of market performance, shipping doesn't represent a sale. If anything this is further evidence of how badly Nokia gambled on the success of WP.

I've never been a fan of using shipping statistics as a metric of market performance, shipping doesn't represent a sale. If anything this is further evidence of how badly Nokia gambled on the success of WP.

I thought shipping represented a sale for the OEM. As opposed to a sale to the public.

Units shipped, Nokia has had to write a large chunk of them off, and also the market is much bigger than when the other two started, flawed much xD

Really? Did everyone here miss some piece of news that only you got access too?

  • Like 2

I thought shipping represented a sale for the OEM. As opposed to a sale to the public.

Not really sure but i would be surprised if that were the case

Units shipped, Nokia has had to write a large chunk of them off,

Source?

That's what I thought, you're full of it. If you're referring to the Lumia 900 data issue, that affected maybe, at most, 100,000 phones, a tiny percentage of phones shipped.

Units shipped, Nokia has had to write a large chunk of them off, and also the market is much bigger than when the other two started, flawed much xD

Um all three (iPhone, Samsung and Nokia) are units shipped, so you can compare them.

The other thing you pointed out, when the iPhone came out it had pretty much no competition. When Android (in the case of Samsung) came out it only had to compete against the iPhone and like the 2 phones HTC had on sale. When the lumia came out it has to compete against two very well established competitors (iOS and the 6 billion different android handsets on sale) as well as HTC / Samsung / LG in the WP arena.

Yea, they shipped a lot in hopes of selling a lot but their goal has fallen way short.

I thought Nokia's goal was 10 million Lumia's sold in 2012? They sold 4 million this last quarter, 2 million last quarter. With two quarters to go it looks like they may infact reach that goal.

I thought Nokia's goal was 10 million Lumia's sold in 2012? They sold 4 million this last quarter, 2 million last quarter. With two quarters to go it looks like they may infact reach that goal.

Sorry, was talking mainly about the US sales and just didnt state that.

And out of curiosity, you have a link that shows how many Lumias were sold world wide?

I think it's wrong to compare the Lumia to the iPhone or Android at this time in their development because the market today is completely different now than it was then.

Why do you think it's wrong? The comparison wasn't made to show the superiority of Lumia shipments. It was made to show the comparison between numbers. It's just raw data. How is data "wrong"?

And while it doesn't show that the Lumia series is superior to either Apple or Samsung, it does show that media claims that WP is "dead" are ridiculous, even more so when you realize that the media said the exact same thing about Android during its infancy. What magical number, exactly, does Nokia need to hit before the tech media can get over its sensationalist, clickbaiting headlines?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The fact that memory in general is so high I have to take a loan out to build a computer now is just beyond stupid. Who's really to blame here? Low supply or high demand?
    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!