Lumias outshipped iPhone, Samsung Android phones through first three quarte


Recommended Posts

.

Finally, some good news for Nokia: Lumias outshipped

iPhone, Samsung Android phones through first three quarters

nokia-lumia-800_41.jpg

Nokia (NOK) has hit a bit of a rough patch lately, having

just reported its third consecutive billion-dollar quarterly loss

earlier this week. Of course, investors saw some promise

in Nokia?s earnings report, and it turns out there may be

even more cause for optimism than they initially thought.

According to market research firm Strategy Analytics,

Nokia?s Windows Phone efforts are off to a better start

than Apple?s (AAPL) iPhone or Samsung?s (005930KS)

Android smartphones at this point in their respective product

cycles.

SA-WP-Nokia-07-2012.png

?We estimate Nokia shipped 6.9 million Lumia smartphones

with the Microsoft (MSFT) Windows Phone operating system

cumulatively worldwide during the first three quarters after

commercial launch, from Q4 2011 to Q2 2012,? Neil Shah, a

senior analyst at Strategy Analytics, said in a statement. ?This

compares with 3.7 million units of the Apple iPhone family in

its first three quarters during 2007, and 1.3 million units for

the Samsung Android family in its first three quarters during

2009. It is an encouraging start for Nokia and Microsoft.?

Shah?s colleague Neil Mawtson added, ?Based on historical

shipment benchmarks, Nokia?s new Lumia portfolio is

performing reasonably well. Some of the pessimism

surrounding Nokia and Microsoft?s emerging partnership

so far may be misplaced. However, Nokia and Microsoft

are clearly not out of the woods yet. With a new Apple

iPhone 5 expected on the horizon, and Samsung?s Galaxy

S3 selling in huge quantities, Nokia will need to pull

something impressive out of the bag for the next-generation

Windows Phone 8 launch later this year to sustain its

tentative early momentum.?

Of course, there?s one important caveat to Strategy Analytics?s

report: When Apple?s iPhone and Samsung?s Android

smartphones launched, the smartphone market paled

in comparison to today?s market. Comparing smartphone

shipments in 2012 to smartphone shipments in 2007 or

2009 is like comparing modern-day salaries to salaries

in the 1960s without accounting for inflation.

...

Shipped != Sold sadly sure there is a correlation but, I could ship 10 million items and sell 1 million....

Agreed.

Atari shipped a bunch of E.T. carts also. But they ended up in a landfill in the end

You also have to compare how many markets each was for sale in, i.e. the first quarter I think the iPhone was US only. If they can hit 10 million first year then I think they will have done ok.

I've never been a fan of using shipping statistics as a metric of market performance, shipping doesn't represent a sale. If anything this is further evidence of how badly Nokia gambled on the success of WP.

I've never been a fan of using shipping statistics as a metric of market performance, shipping doesn't represent a sale. If anything this is further evidence of how badly Nokia gambled on the success of WP.

I thought shipping represented a sale for the OEM. As opposed to a sale to the public.

Units shipped, Nokia has had to write a large chunk of them off, and also the market is much bigger than when the other two started, flawed much xD

Really? Did everyone here miss some piece of news that only you got access too?

  • Like 2

I thought shipping represented a sale for the OEM. As opposed to a sale to the public.

Not really sure but i would be surprised if that were the case

Units shipped, Nokia has had to write a large chunk of them off,

Source?

That's what I thought, you're full of it. If you're referring to the Lumia 900 data issue, that affected maybe, at most, 100,000 phones, a tiny percentage of phones shipped.

Units shipped, Nokia has had to write a large chunk of them off, and also the market is much bigger than when the other two started, flawed much xD

Um all three (iPhone, Samsung and Nokia) are units shipped, so you can compare them.

The other thing you pointed out, when the iPhone came out it had pretty much no competition. When Android (in the case of Samsung) came out it only had to compete against the iPhone and like the 2 phones HTC had on sale. When the lumia came out it has to compete against two very well established competitors (iOS and the 6 billion different android handsets on sale) as well as HTC / Samsung / LG in the WP arena.

Yea, they shipped a lot in hopes of selling a lot but their goal has fallen way short.

I thought Nokia's goal was 10 million Lumia's sold in 2012? They sold 4 million this last quarter, 2 million last quarter. With two quarters to go it looks like they may infact reach that goal.

I thought Nokia's goal was 10 million Lumia's sold in 2012? They sold 4 million this last quarter, 2 million last quarter. With two quarters to go it looks like they may infact reach that goal.

Sorry, was talking mainly about the US sales and just didnt state that.

And out of curiosity, you have a link that shows how many Lumias were sold world wide?

I think it's wrong to compare the Lumia to the iPhone or Android at this time in their development because the market today is completely different now than it was then.

Why do you think it's wrong? The comparison wasn't made to show the superiority of Lumia shipments. It was made to show the comparison between numbers. It's just raw data. How is data "wrong"?

And while it doesn't show that the Lumia series is superior to either Apple or Samsung, it does show that media claims that WP is "dead" are ridiculous, even more so when you realize that the media said the exact same thing about Android during its infancy. What magical number, exactly, does Nokia need to hit before the tech media can get over its sensationalist, clickbaiting headlines?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.
    • Aren`t "security features" and "AI model that can see your screen" a tad diametric!
    • Samsung, Amazon extend 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD deal beyond Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen Recently, we had Amazon's Prime Day 2026 sales wherein there were several great deals including on SSDs. One of those discounted components was the Samsung 990 PRO SSD as the 2TB variant of it was selling for $370, a very good price after a long time. Although that deal was supposed to expire today, Amazon has now extended that sale further (purchase link under the specs table down below). The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $400. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The technical specs of the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 NAND Flash Samsung V-NAND TLC Controller Samsung In-house Controller Cache Memory Samsung 2GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM Sequential Read Speed Up to 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS Random Read (4KB, QD1) Up to 22,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD1) Up to 80,000 IOPS Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Reliability (MTBF) 1.5 Million Hours Endurance 1,200 TBW (Total Bytes Written) Get it at the link below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB NVMe SSD (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Glad im on the right boat. Tidal has lots of issues in terms of app and music mix, its worst than spot but its honest. Spot algo is very tendentious and they pess less to artists, so im comfortable with the tidal errors, for now.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says by David Uzondu Image via Tidal Tidal has announced an AI policy aimed at protecting artists and their crafts, as AI music generation tools continue to improve both in speed and quality. According to the music streaming platform, AI-generated music will be accepted, but these tracks will be held to a "higher standard" of content integrity. Next month, the company plans to auto-identify and tag these uploads. Listeners will spot a special icon next to content that algorithms flag as 100% AI-generated starting mid-July, and the platform hopes to expand this tag to partially generated songs as detection tech improves. Any AI music that exploits an artist's voice or likeness will be taken down, and Tidal will immediately block tracks associated with fraudulent activity, which includes artificial streaming and deceptive content that interferes with real creators. And finally, music that's 100% AI-generated will not be monetized. Tidal said there is "ongoing debate" about whether certain licensed synthetic models deserve payouts, so it's possible that this part will change in the future. Streaming platforms are absolutely getting flooded with AI-generated music because of how easy it is to pump out endless tracks every minute. To give you an idea of how "bad" it is, Deezer alone reported that synthetic uploads now make up about 44% of its daily intake, which translates to roughly 75,000 automated tracks hitting its servers every single day. Interestingly, Deezer found most people cannot tell the difference between human and machine creations, with an Ipsos study revealing that 97% of listeners failed to spot the AI-generated tracks. Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music. The Swedish platform partnered with Universal Music Group to test "legal and controlled" generative AI tools that let subscribers remix songs with AI.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      541
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      270
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!