Recommended Posts

This. Are you running it on a 3GS like me ?

No. On the original iPad. Such a simple app should really be running much better on a two year old device. :pinch:

Agreed. Microsoft needs to take more control of the hardware part like Apple does. I wish Microsoft would make their own hardware and drivers.

So really, you have it backwards. Apple would be a mere shell of itself without their software and it is a major aspect of what users find delightful about their products. If anything, Apple is a software company that saw it fit to design their own hardware to deliver the best overall package. Admittedly, they've gotten very good at designing hardware but what makes Apple Apple is the close integration of hardware with (usually) excellent software.

Agreed. Microsoft needs to take more control of the hardware part like Apple does. I wish Microsoft would make their own hardware and drivers.

That probably will not happen. OEMs will go on a monopoly rant. Let's wait and see with MS Surface. If Surface is successful without alienating OEM manufacturers too much, perhaps MS would get more involved in hardware. And if Surface fails, perhaps MS should just stick to mice and keyboards.

Two sides of the same coin. Apple's designs are over-done, Microsoft's belong in the last century.

Such a shame too, Microsoft were close to finding a nice middleground between minimalism and polish, and then they throw away all that progress for a gimmick. Sad.

Metro isn't the worst UI I've used, it's not bad at all but I just have a bit of an issue with the mouse hover when I try to get to the charm bar. Sometimes it just doesn't register my gesture and as a result slows me down in multitasking.

Two sides of the same coin. Apple's designs are over-done, Microsoft's belong in the last century.

Such a shame too, Microsoft were close to finding a nice middleground between minimalism and polish, and then they throw away all that progress for a gimmick. Sad.

Agreed here too. I think Windows 7 is a great OS. Hardly any flaws in it and it simply works. The UI is great and now MS is going to tarnish all that with that Fisher Price interface called Metro. Bad, bad move. What they should have done is improve Windows 7, polish it more and make it better, not change everything. Change is not always good and you know what they say:

"If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Strange that this comes about now. I think the design of Windows 7 was more "tasteful" than what they are focusing on now with Metro (or, as I like to call it, the Fisher-Price UI).

Personally i'd argue that XP's front end UI is better (Explorer is better in 7 and 8 than XP but I find XP to be better than Metro). At least they had silver, which was a bit less repulsive than the blue, and the beautiful Royale theme :D

Agreed here too. I think Windows 7 is a great OS. Hardly any flaws in it and it simply works. The UI is great and now MS is going to tarnish all that with that Fisher Price interface called Metro. Bad, bad move. What they should have done is improve Windows 7, polish it more and make it better, not change everything. Change is not always good and you know what they say:

"If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Microsoft is after the potential profits in the tablet market by appealing to the masses with Metro. Their methodology of thinking is to kill two birds with one stone and release a single UI that will encompass both non touch devices and tablets.

This. Are you running it on a 3GS like me ? It feels like they?re giving us treats by still supporting our phone for a fourth year (seriously, a 4th year of support for a cellphone ! which company has done this in the past ?), but for me it?s more of a reason to buy the upcoming iPhone right on release day.

They support it because they still sell it. Apple's whole business model is based on planned hardware obsolescence but Android forced their hands to have a cheap iPhone out there and 3GS is exactly that.

Agreed here too. I think Windows 7 is a great OS. Hardly any flaws in it and it simply works. The UI is great and now MS is going to tarnish all that with that Fisher Price interface called Metro. Bad, bad move. What they should have done is improve Windows 7, polish it more and make it better, not change everything. Change is not always good and you know what they say:

"If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Just a note: Metro is actually exact opposite of "Fisher Price" interface.

They support it because they still sell it.

I know. That?s what I said. Not only do they still sell it, they still keep it up to date.

Apple's whole business model is based on planned hardware obsolescence [?]

Psychological product obsolescence. Apple products rarely break per se after a strategic amount of time. What they do instead is roll out new designs and new features so that your Apple product sounds as if it were imported from the last decade. As technology advances, they won?t be able to do this for a long time anymore though.

Well in that case it means I hate Microsoft, I hate Apple, I hate everyone. :)

I don't. I appreciate things that are done right and criticize things that are not done right. Saying Microsoft has taste is just wrong IMO.

eh don't listen to them, people on here have marked me as anti-apple, because I disagreed with Jobs... and branded me Pro MS because I liked Windows, now I am "anti-Microsoft" because I don't like Metro..... never got how I could be anti-everything.... almost like you can't have a time relevant opinion anymore

Time will tell how Windows 8 products are received by common people. I for one, also hate the ultra simplistic Metro UI. Coloring it with pink/teal/lime green makes matters even worse.

I like the simplicity of Metro. What i don't like about it is the flatness. When there's not too much info on the screen it works relatively well. But as soon as the screen is filled with too much information (and it doesn't take a lot of it) the lack of deep make it hard to distinguish between the different part of the UI.

I think some light shadow and subtle lighting can definately help.

Metro, in its essence, is quite beautiful. However, it also seems incredibly limited. I haven't seen an information-dense UI yet that looks good in Metro. Case in point: Outlook 2013. Its UI is a total mess.

Skeuomorphism is also limiting, but at least it's possible to denote content priority with something other than font size/weight. Gradients and depth are important.

I agree, skeumorphism is cheesy. The author of the article I think gets a little lost in his reasoning why, though, arguing that its only cheesy because of why people do it, ie to make inexpensive things look expensive. In this case, Apple thinks its adding "humanity" to its OS, as one of the commenters said, which is a different motive entirely. It doesn't change the situation though, because "humanity" doesn't make an interface better or look nicer. Its substituting sentimentalism for aesthetics, which has more to do with craft, as he points out. The whole idea of "kitsch" are things that are meant to make a sentimental appeal to what people's ideas of what beauty is ("humanity" being one example), but aren't really beautiful.

That doesn't automatically make Metro good, although I personally like Metro.

Also this isn't the only case in which Apple has shown bad taste imo. I think pinstripes are bad, as are gel buttons, as are bouncing dock icons, as are a lot of animations in their OS, as was the original fruit colored iMac, as were the clamshell iMac notebooks. I'd argue the idea that Apple has more taste in general is just a myth.

Apple is a hardware company. Software is not their strength, although they are doing a good job with the few apps they have made. No matter what Apple haters and fan boys say, the truth is Apple makes unique hardware devices and gadgets. No company out there has been able to come close, not even Samsung (yes, I said it. Not even Samsung). The iPad, the Iphone, the Apple TV, the iMac - all excellent machines that do what they are designed to do with hardly any flaws (they are not perfect, but they are better than the alternatives out there). I have had my iMac for 3 years now. I have never, and I mean never, had any issues with it whatsoever...None.

Software is a huge strength at Apple. You clearly have no idea what UX is ... Apple do. Sometimes they go off base a little. But for the most part, they're influencing a lot of designers around the world with their software and user experiences.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!