Recommended Posts

Karl Tricamo has gardened off and on since he was a child. He says he's had about six or seven seasons in which to hone his "green thumb." Earlier this year, his concerns about GMOs and the use of pesticides and herbicides in industrial farming prompted the stay-at-home dad to convert his front lawn into a vegetable garden. His plant list included 55 heirloom varieties of plants like, tomatoes, peppers, squash, eggplant and various ornamental plants.

Before starting his garden he reviewed the city?s ordinances to ensure that he was following all the necessary rules in regards to front yard landscaping.

Ferguson, Missouri, city officials were not as impressed with Karl?s due diligence and his desire to feed his family with food he sustainably grew in his front yard.

His landlord (his fiancee's brother) was cited for ?Failure to meet the minimum standards of the City of Ferguson exterior appearance code" when Tricamo tore up the front lawn and converted it into an heirloom veggie garden.

"He is in support of the garden, which is solely my endeavor," say Tricamo, 29. "But he was the one facing any legal repercussions such as fines, court, etc. I just faced losing the garden itself."

It's not clear if his garden was targeted because of any complaints, but at least one neighbor was on Team Karl. "My immediate neighbor even let me put two tomato bushes in her front yard planter box, as a show of solidarity," Tricamo informs me.

He says that last year he had a front yard 15' x 20' vegetable garden just a few blocks from the current garden that has caused a stir. But imagines that the garden wasn't detected by city officials because it was partially obscured from the street by a hedge.

On his blog, Vegetable Yarden, Tricamo documented his experience once he received the citation for his current garden. Along with listing ordinances that supported his case, he documents what seems like intimidation by code enforcement that routinely drove by or sat in front of his house as he disregarded their orders to remove the vegetable garden and plant grass.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that last week Tricamo?s months long feud with the city ended when the city?s Board of Adjustment voted 4-1 to throw out the citation against his garden. Tricamo and his future brother-in-lawn were represented by Dave Roland, a lawyer with the Libertarian group Freedom Center of Missouri.

The lone vote against Tricamo?s garden came from board chairman, Joe Schroeder, who doesn?t seem too happy about the law being in Tricamo?s favor.

"The board felt that, technically, he had the law in his favor," Schroeder told the Post-Dispatch. "But I think that all of us on the board agreed that the garden is an eyesore. It goes against common sense, really, to put a garden in the front yard instead of the back."

Missouri-Front-Yard-Veggie-Garden.png.492x0_q85_crop-smart.jpg

more

How ridiculous that this is against some law. FFS, I'll have whatever plants I want in my front yard. How out of touch with nature do you have to be to consider than an "eyesore"? People just... I just... :no:

Front yards do generally have much more sun than back yards. I see the laws on such things being challenged more and more as food prices go up and up. Not many remember the days of the 'Victory Gardens', so it's a similar concept, just no need for war involved. Other than the war on inflated food prices and low income, of course.

That doesn't look nearly as bad as it surely does now. I've grown tomatoes for years, and they tend to be unruly and aren't too attractive as the summer draws on. The garden in the photo is certainly not an eyesore, but it's still not something that's traditionally appropriate for a front yard.

How ridiculous that this is against some law. FFS, I'll have whatever plants I want in my front yard. How out of touch with nature do you have to be to consider than an "eyesore"? People just... I just... :no:

Quite so, it doesn't hurt anybody.

Why on earth does he even have to fight to have a vegetable garden in his front yard? He owns the property, he should be able to do whatever he likes with it, within reason (health and safety) - I don't see how anyone could claim a vegetable garden is a problem in either of those criteria.

Crazy, crazy housing laws.

its an eye sore as most would agree... lets say you were trying to sell your house that you owned next to him... would make it hard to sell to most, i know i wouldn't buy next to that. Not saying i thinks its wrong, just not for me is all.

Why on earth does he even have to fight to have a vegetable garden in his front yard? He owns the property, he should be able to do whatever he likes with it, within reason (health and safety) - I don't see how anyone could claim a vegetable garden is a problem in either of those criteria.

Crazy, crazy housing laws.

same reason he can't put an amusement park ride , or tribute to Hitler, or a big 20'X20' black box... when you buy into a property there is rules and regulations that come with it at time of purchase. Fine print.

Why on earth does he even have to fight to have a vegetable garden in his front yard? He owns the property, he should be able to do whatever he likes with it ...

Haha -- you never really 'own' your property. :laugh:

same reason he can't put an amusement park ride , or tribute to Hitler, or a big 20'X20' black box... when you buy into a property there is rules and regulations that come with it at time of purchase. Fine print.

You have some issues if you think a vegetable garden is comparable to any of those.

I also don't understand why people think that's ugly - it's functional and beautiful in that it's healthy vegetation. What is he supposed to have? Artificially managed 0.5" high grass with a picket fence? So glad I don't have to live in America and deal with that ridiculous idea - "you can have a beautiful house, but it has to be OUR idea of beautiful!"

Wow that's amazing, so they're against you growing stuff you can eat in your garden and are only happy if you have the biggest weed in the entire world growing there, grass. (Not pot)

That's a bit harsh - you can eat grass. But still, I understand the point you're making. Growing edible stuff in a garden is unsightly :D It should be encouraged ffs, not outlawed. Ridiculous neighbourhood is ridiculous.

.... and since when does neighborhoods have "landlords?"

I thought that landlords are for apartment complexes.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Glad im on the right boat. Tidal has lots of issues in terms of app and music mix, its worst than spot but its honest. Spot algo is very tendentious and they pess less to artists, so im comfortable with the tidal errors, for now.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says by David Uzondu Image via Tidal Tidal has announced an AI policy aimed at protecting artists and their crafts, as AI music generation tools continue to improve both in speed and quality. According to the music streaming platform, AI-generated music will be accepted, but these tracks will be held to a "higher standard" of content integrity. Next month, the company plans to auto-identify and tag these uploads. Listeners will spot a special icon next to content that algorithms flag as 100% AI-generated starting mid-July, and the platform hopes to expand this tag to partially generated songs as detection tech improves. Any AI music that exploits an artist's voice or likeness will be taken down, and Tidal will immediately block tracks associated with fraudulent activity, which includes artificial streaming and deceptive content that interferes with real creators. And finally, music that's 100% AI-generated will not be monetized. Tidal said there is "ongoing debate" about whether certain licensed synthetic models deserve payouts, so it's possible that this part will change in the future. Streaming platforms are absolutely getting flooded with AI-generated music because of how easy it is to pump out endless tracks every minute. To give you an idea of how "bad" it is, Deezer alone reported that synthetic uploads now make up about 44% of its daily intake, which translates to roughly 75,000 automated tracks hitting its servers every single day. Interestingly, Deezer found most people cannot tell the difference between human and machine creations, with an Ipsos study revealing that 97% of listeners failed to spot the AI-generated tracks. Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music. The Swedish platform partnered with Universal Music Group to test "legal and controlled" generative AI tools that let subscribers remix songs with AI.
    • According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!