Recommended Posts

Karl Tricamo has gardened off and on since he was a child. He says he's had about six or seven seasons in which to hone his "green thumb." Earlier this year, his concerns about GMOs and the use of pesticides and herbicides in industrial farming prompted the stay-at-home dad to convert his front lawn into a vegetable garden. His plant list included 55 heirloom varieties of plants like, tomatoes, peppers, squash, eggplant and various ornamental plants.

Before starting his garden he reviewed the city?s ordinances to ensure that he was following all the necessary rules in regards to front yard landscaping.

Ferguson, Missouri, city officials were not as impressed with Karl?s due diligence and his desire to feed his family with food he sustainably grew in his front yard.

His landlord (his fiancee's brother) was cited for ?Failure to meet the minimum standards of the City of Ferguson exterior appearance code" when Tricamo tore up the front lawn and converted it into an heirloom veggie garden.

"He is in support of the garden, which is solely my endeavor," say Tricamo, 29. "But he was the one facing any legal repercussions such as fines, court, etc. I just faced losing the garden itself."

It's not clear if his garden was targeted because of any complaints, but at least one neighbor was on Team Karl. "My immediate neighbor even let me put two tomato bushes in her front yard planter box, as a show of solidarity," Tricamo informs me.

He says that last year he had a front yard 15' x 20' vegetable garden just a few blocks from the current garden that has caused a stir. But imagines that the garden wasn't detected by city officials because it was partially obscured from the street by a hedge.

On his blog, Vegetable Yarden, Tricamo documented his experience once he received the citation for his current garden. Along with listing ordinances that supported his case, he documents what seems like intimidation by code enforcement that routinely drove by or sat in front of his house as he disregarded their orders to remove the vegetable garden and plant grass.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports that last week Tricamo?s months long feud with the city ended when the city?s Board of Adjustment voted 4-1 to throw out the citation against his garden. Tricamo and his future brother-in-lawn were represented by Dave Roland, a lawyer with the Libertarian group Freedom Center of Missouri.

The lone vote against Tricamo?s garden came from board chairman, Joe Schroeder, who doesn?t seem too happy about the law being in Tricamo?s favor.

"The board felt that, technically, he had the law in his favor," Schroeder told the Post-Dispatch. "But I think that all of us on the board agreed that the garden is an eyesore. It goes against common sense, really, to put a garden in the front yard instead of the back."

Missouri-Front-Yard-Veggie-Garden.png.492x0_q85_crop-smart.jpg

more

How ridiculous that this is against some law. FFS, I'll have whatever plants I want in my front yard. How out of touch with nature do you have to be to consider than an "eyesore"? People just... I just... :no:

Front yards do generally have much more sun than back yards. I see the laws on such things being challenged more and more as food prices go up and up. Not many remember the days of the 'Victory Gardens', so it's a similar concept, just no need for war involved. Other than the war on inflated food prices and low income, of course.

That doesn't look nearly as bad as it surely does now. I've grown tomatoes for years, and they tend to be unruly and aren't too attractive as the summer draws on. The garden in the photo is certainly not an eyesore, but it's still not something that's traditionally appropriate for a front yard.

How ridiculous that this is against some law. FFS, I'll have whatever plants I want in my front yard. How out of touch with nature do you have to be to consider than an "eyesore"? People just... I just... :no:

Quite so, it doesn't hurt anybody.

Why on earth does he even have to fight to have a vegetable garden in his front yard? He owns the property, he should be able to do whatever he likes with it, within reason (health and safety) - I don't see how anyone could claim a vegetable garden is a problem in either of those criteria.

Crazy, crazy housing laws.

its an eye sore as most would agree... lets say you were trying to sell your house that you owned next to him... would make it hard to sell to most, i know i wouldn't buy next to that. Not saying i thinks its wrong, just not for me is all.

Why on earth does he even have to fight to have a vegetable garden in his front yard? He owns the property, he should be able to do whatever he likes with it, within reason (health and safety) - I don't see how anyone could claim a vegetable garden is a problem in either of those criteria.

Crazy, crazy housing laws.

same reason he can't put an amusement park ride , or tribute to Hitler, or a big 20'X20' black box... when you buy into a property there is rules and regulations that come with it at time of purchase. Fine print.

Why on earth does he even have to fight to have a vegetable garden in his front yard? He owns the property, he should be able to do whatever he likes with it ...

Haha -- you never really 'own' your property. :laugh:

same reason he can't put an amusement park ride , or tribute to Hitler, or a big 20'X20' black box... when you buy into a property there is rules and regulations that come with it at time of purchase. Fine print.

You have some issues if you think a vegetable garden is comparable to any of those.

I also don't understand why people think that's ugly - it's functional and beautiful in that it's healthy vegetation. What is he supposed to have? Artificially managed 0.5" high grass with a picket fence? So glad I don't have to live in America and deal with that ridiculous idea - "you can have a beautiful house, but it has to be OUR idea of beautiful!"

Wow that's amazing, so they're against you growing stuff you can eat in your garden and are only happy if you have the biggest weed in the entire world growing there, grass. (Not pot)

That's a bit harsh - you can eat grass. But still, I understand the point you're making. Growing edible stuff in a garden is unsightly :D It should be encouraged ffs, not outlawed. Ridiculous neighbourhood is ridiculous.

.... and since when does neighborhoods have "landlords?"

I thought that landlords are for apartment complexes.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!