Recommended Posts

I'm really disappointed in how Beast looks in this film. He looked way better in X-Men: First Class.

Beast.png

He actually looks like a beast and not a human with a blue skin. And the fact that they've changed him into a different version of the Hulk is kinda lame too. Not sure if anyone knows this already, but the reason why Beast switches between human-form and his Beast-form is because he experimented some more with his mutation. In this film, whenever he feels an animal instinct or urge, he changes into his Beast-form.

Also:

Screenshot-on-2014-02-22-at-10.58.16.png

He looks like a bridge to the present day Beast. But yeah, pretty bad compared to FC version. All in all, this movie seems to be visually pretty crap, which is too bad since I really enjoyed FC. Let's hope the story delivers.

Yep! The suits from First Class also looked loads better. Looks like Bryan Singer wants to use anything but the classic colours.

  • 2 weeks later...

Josh Helman Speaks On The Juggernaut Being Replaced In X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST

IGN visited the set of X-men: Days of future Past and talked with Josh Helman about him being replaced by quicksilver in the film.?I originally got hired on a different role, which is no longer in the script -- it was going to be young Juggernaut, So I was like, ?Oh, s#!t. I?ve got to put on like 30 pounds!? So I was training for like four weeks," He Then added "And then I got a phone call saying, ?Good news and bad news. Bad news first: Juggernaut?s no longer in the script. Good news: They?re having trouble with another role and they want to see you for it.??I feel very fortunate that it worked out this way, because Stryker is an amazing character,?

Meanwhile, on the work front, a source who was on the set of ?X Men: Days of Future Past,? tells us Berry, who plays Storm, was cut out of every scene but one in post-production. - New York Daily News

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      571
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!