Recommended Posts

I'm really disappointed in how Beast looks in this film. He looked way better in X-Men: First Class.

Beast.png

He actually looks like a beast and not a human with a blue skin. And the fact that they've changed him into a different version of the Hulk is kinda lame too. Not sure if anyone knows this already, but the reason why Beast switches between human-form and his Beast-form is because he experimented some more with his mutation. In this film, whenever he feels an animal instinct or urge, he changes into his Beast-form.

Also:

Screenshot-on-2014-02-22-at-10.58.16.png

He looks like a bridge to the present day Beast. But yeah, pretty bad compared to FC version. All in all, this movie seems to be visually pretty crap, which is too bad since I really enjoyed FC. Let's hope the story delivers.

Yep! The suits from First Class also looked loads better. Looks like Bryan Singer wants to use anything but the classic colours.

  • 2 weeks later...

Josh Helman Speaks On The Juggernaut Being Replaced In X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST

IGN visited the set of X-men: Days of future Past and talked with Josh Helman about him being replaced by quicksilver in the film.?I originally got hired on a different role, which is no longer in the script -- it was going to be young Juggernaut, So I was like, ?Oh, s#!t. I?ve got to put on like 30 pounds!? So I was training for like four weeks," He Then added "And then I got a phone call saying, ?Good news and bad news. Bad news first: Juggernaut?s no longer in the script. Good news: They?re having trouble with another role and they want to see you for it.??I feel very fortunate that it worked out this way, because Stryker is an amazing character,?

Meanwhile, on the work front, a source who was on the set of ?X Men: Days of Future Past,? tells us Berry, who plays Storm, was cut out of every scene but one in post-production. - New York Daily News

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!