SAS hero jailed: Sergeant sentenced to two years after gun found


Recommended Posts

You can actually own a tank in the UK :)

And in the US, in some states you can own rocket launchers, howitzers, etc.. That's just nuts..

In Canada we have no real issues with you own rifles and shotguns for hunting.. [ and defense of Person.. not property, insurance covers that ].. so long as you get licensed [ we are sure you aren't nuts ], and secure the weapons property.

You can even own handguns if you are willing to go through the process..

Gun Control, not Gun Banning..

Who has rocket launchers lol? Howitzers sure but again as I said does the average joe have the money to afford them? No, hell it took me a while to save up for my ar-15 that's in my sig. was $973 before all the stuff I did to it with all the stuff i did to it its pushing $1,700. To me that's a lot of money now imagine a tank lol unreachable.

Who has rocket launchers lol? Howitzers sure but again as I said does the average joe have the money to afford them? No, hell it took me a while to save up for my ar-15 that's in my sig. was $973 before all the stuff I did to it. To me that's a lot of money now imagine a tank lol unreachable.

I've seen stories about them.. scares the **** about of me lol.

Oh, and as for who knows they can own a tank in the UK, that would be everyone who watches Top Gear.. which is, I hope, everyone :D

You can here too but come on now does the average joe own a tank? Nope does a millionair/billionair own tanks, yep. Hardly the average joe. The average joe here has to save up to buy a gun so having a tank is way out of reach and even then the action which makes the tank actually fire has to be demilled I believe. I don't know i'm just an average joe I have no experience with tanks lol.

http://www.mortarinvestments.eu/products/tanks-2/t-72-42#currency=GBP there you go a T-72 for almost half what a BMW M5 goes for.

As a responsible gun owner, with a licence and several shotguns and hunting rifles, i stay out of these threads.

But this one has given me a right chuckle.

As many have stated, the guy broke the law. It doesn't matter what he does for a living, whether he was a lollipop man or an SAS soldier, he broke the law AND he knew better than most the sentence that would be imposed on him if he got caught. He did indeed get caught and sentenced accordingly.

:rolleyes:

To be fair, I googled it myself :p The name wouldn't, to me, seem out of place in the UK..

That said, they said secret operations.. so I googled the name when I saw it :)

For someone who said Britain obviously doesn't care about its soldiers its a bit rich considering they don't even know where Helmand Province is. Its one of the most dangerous places in Afghanistan that the UK forces were stationed in for years and relatively recently handed over to US forces.

For someone who said Britain obviously doesn't care about its soldiers its a bit rich considering they don't even know where Helmand Province is. Its one of the most dangerous places in Afghanistan that the UK forces were stationed in for years and relatively recently handed over to US forces.

I was thinking exactly this.

It's all very well been proud of the job 'your boys' do on the battlefield but at least understand where that battlefield is ffs!

He has been tried and convicted under Military Law, not Civilian Law. However, the conviction he has been convicted of in Military terms, now carries over to Civilian life, and remains on his Nationally held Criminal record.

It is amusing reading these threads full of whirlpools, and USian outrage. Specially when USAians claim that "OMG, country XYZ doesn't care about their military!!1". Because we all know that their veteran stereotypes are all lies, eh?

Law is the law. Don't really see the outrage here.

Glad to see another gun thread though as it doesn't get discussed nearly enough. :rolleyes:

Shame I don't see many threads being posted like this - Man convicted of Briton gun murder - http://www.walesonli...91466-31548411/ but I guess that doesn't support having guns, hey KingCracker?

The law is the law - however, based on the information contained in the original post - this soldier was dealt with by way of a courts martial. To get to this stage he would have had a preliminary hearing, and as the punishment at the previous hearing would have affected his pay (ie possible jail time) it would then have been automatically passed up the line for a Courts Martial. If my memory seves me correctly (as i had to help in a few courts martials as an ex service-man) the CM board would have comprised of several senior officer, plus a civillian judge to act as the legal advisor to the board.

Kingcracker, we have laws in this land for a reason, gun crime is very very low in this country. PLease do not put American values on British culture and our way of life. Most people in this country only see guns on the news or in museums. We dont have any 2nd amendments giving the right to bear arms! A very select few of British Police are armed and even fewer of them are armed on a regular basis. Any weapons that these officers use are kept in secure armouries unless required - NO officer is allowed to keep them at home with them. Likewise, any weapons issued to our armed forces are issed as and when required, they are never allowed to leave their bases unless it is for a prescribed parade (eg Trooping of the Colour), or they are on exercise in a designated exercise area (eg Salisbury plain). They do not keep their weapons at home. Again they are kept in a secure armoury on base. So please, keep your gun culture in America, we are proud that our police do not have to carry weapons on a daily basis to carry out their job. I would also like to point out that he has been sent to "The Glasshouse"! or to give it its proper name, Military Corrective Training Centre Colchester (MCTC). Based on the news report, he has not been discharged and sent to prison. Military Law is quite clear on this. If he was to be sentenced to a period of imprisonment, he would have been discharged from service, and sent to a civilian prison. Service men & women are NOT allowed to spend a period of imprisonment and remain in the services. However, he has been sentenced to a period of detention, which is being served at MCTC Colchester. Whilst he will not have the same freedom as you or i have, he will have a lot more freedom than a civillian prisoner will have! As the name suggests, it is Military Corrective Training - ie to make a soldier a better soldier. A lot of junior ranks who spend a period of detention in colchester, on release actually get promotion quicker due to the type of trining they receive at Colchester. And no, i never spent time their - part of my job when i was in the armed forces was to supervise RAF service detainees.

The law is the law - however, based on the information contained in the original post - this soldier was dealt with by way of a courts martial. To get to this stage he would have had a preliminary hearing, and as the punishment at the previous hearing would have affected his pay (ie possible jail time) it would then have been automatically passed up the line for a Courts Martial. If my memory seves me correctly (as i had to help in a few courts martials as an ex service-man) the CM board would have comprised of several senior officer, plus a civillian judge to act as the legal advisor to the board.

Kingcracker, we have laws in this land for a reason, gun crime is very very low in this country. PLease do not put American values on British culture and our way of life. Most people in this country only see guns on the news or in museums. We dont have any 2nd amendments giving the right to bear arms! A very select few of British Police are armed and even fewer of them are armed on a regular basis. Any weapons that these officers use are kept in secure armouries unless required - NO officer is allowed to keep them at home with them. Likewise, any weapons issued to our armed forces are issed as and when required, they are never allowed to leave their bases unless it is for a prescribed parade (eg Trooping of the Colour), or they are on exercise in a designated exercise area (eg Salisbury plain). They do not keep their weapons at home. Again they are kept in a secure armoury on base. So please, keep your gun culture in America, we are proud that our police do not have to carry weapons on a daily basis to carry out their job. I would also like to point out that he has been sent to "The Glasshouse"! or to give it its proper name, Military Corrective Training Centre Colchester (MCTC). Based on the news report, he has not been discharged and sent to prison. Military Law is quite clear on this. If he was to be sentenced to a period of imprisonment, he would have been discharged from service, and sent to a civilian prison. Service men & women are NOT allowed to spend a period of imprisonment and remain in the services. However, he has been sentenced to a period of detention, which is being served at MCTC Colchester. Whilst he will not have the same freedom as you or i have, he will have a lot more freedom than a civillian prisoner will have! As the name suggests, it is Military Corrective Training - ie to make a soldier a better soldier. A lot of junior ranks who spend a period of detention in colchester, on release actually get promotion quicker due to the type of trining they receive at Colchester. And no, i never spent time their - part of my job when i was in the armed forces was to supervise RAF service detainees.

"Don't try to put American values on British culture", oh I see so its ok for the British to put their values on American culture is it? Because I've seen it enough on this forum. Didn't see you trying to stop them. Secondly yes you guys have strict gun laws but like so many British that tried to force their values on American culture i'm voicing my opinion. You don't have to tell me who owns guns and who doesn't. Some civilians own guns, i'm surprised shotguns aren't banned yet since that shooting in England that killed several people a year or two ago. I've made it clear that I don't like a protectionist culture were everyone is babied for their own good :rolleyes:. My parents taught me right from wrong when I was growing up I don't need the government telling me things are bad and shouldn't be touched, i'll decide that for myself. He broke the law and has to do the crime of course but to me its till F'd up that he has to time for something as simple as that.

"Don't try to put American values on British culture", oh I see so its ok for the British to put their values on American culture is it? Because I've seen it enough on this forum. Didn't see you trying to stop them. Secondly yes you guys have strict gun laws but like so many British that tried to force their values on American culture i'm voicing my opinion. You don't have to tell me who owns guns and who doesn't. Some civilians own guns, i'm surprised shotguns aren't banned yet since that shooting in England that killed several people a year or two ago. I've made it clear that I don't like a protectionist culture were everyone is babied for their own good :rolleyes:. My parents taught me right from wrong when I was growing up I don't need the government telling me things are bad and shouldn't be touched, i'll decide that for myself. He broke the law and has to do the crime of course but to me its till F'd up that he has to time for something as simple as that.

Not really.. he broke the law so he faces the penalty. It's odd you consider people following the law to be 'babied'

Yeah I guess the British don't care one bit about their men in uniform. He probably nearly died several times but yep law is law who cares! :rolleyes:

So you are saying he should be above the law and we should allow him to do whatever he wants?

So you are saying he should be above the law and we should allow him to do whatever he wants?

No. Its a stupid law to begin with. serve your country probably almost die then go to jail for something like this is stupid.

Not really.. he broke the law so he faces the penalty. It's odd you consider people following the law to be 'babied'

Lol no they follow the law because its the law the government put the laws in place because the government babies its citizens better not touch that its and evil killing machine! Ban it!

No. Its a stupid law to begin with. serve your country probably almost die then go to jail for something like this is stupid.

Lol no they follow the law because its the law the government put the laws in place because the government babies its citizens better not touch that its and evil killing machine! Ban it!

There's just no need for them here. It's not really treating people like babies. It's weird you keep trying to promote owning a gun though..

No. Its a stupid law to begin with. serve your country probably almost die then go to jail for something like this is stupid.

Lol no they follow the law because its the law the government put the laws in place because the government babies its citizens better not touch that its and evil killing machine! Ban it!

I hate to say it, but you are as bad as some of the UK people on this bored calling America stupid for its gun laws.

No. Its a stupid law to begin with. serve your country probably almost die then go to jail for something like this is stupid.

And who exactly chooses what laws are "stupid"?

You cannot pick and choose what laws you follow.

There's just no need for them here. It's not really treating people like babies. It's weird you keep trying to promote owning a gun though..

Where do you live Flinty? You don't have to own a gun for self defense, seems like a lot of people seem to think guns are only used for one purpose which isn't true. Do people only use computers to hack and send virus's? No.

I know right! While I was in Afghanistan they found the briefcase full of Cocaine under my bed! And now I'm going to prison! I deserve special treatment because I volunteered for the Armed Forces!

Where do you live Flinty? You don't have to own a gun for self defense, seems like a lot of people seem to think guns are only used for one purpose which isn't true. Do people only use computers to hack and send virus's? No.

I live in England. Never wanted a gun and never seen the need for a gun.

I'll just leave this here for all the Americans and how many are saved by their guns.. http://news.national...-world-graphic/

Regardless the US is a lost cause.

It would take all the armies of a world searching for a year to find all the guns in the US.. Not to mention generations of education to remove the deep seeded cultural paranoia so many Americans seem to have to anyone having authority.. Honestly don't know how a country can survive when so many of it's people don't respect or trust their own government, police, armies, doctors, scientists, etc..

Get your facts straight before talking out of your ass and stop generalizing

Where do you live Flinty? You don't have to own a gun for self defense, seems like a lot of people seem to think guns are only used for one purpose which isn't true. Do people only use computers to hack and send virus's? No.

Don't sugarcoat it, as a Conceal Carry holder, I don't lie to myself, a gun is for killing period. We practice our skills to improve our ability to kill. The difference between me and you is that I am willing to recognize why I own a gun and even though some people from the UK disrespect us American gun owners, I wont do the same. Let them do as they want and be the bigger person.

Don't sugarcoat it, as a Conceal Carry holder, I don't lie to myself, a gun is for killing period. We practice our skills to improve our ability to kill. The difference between me and you is that I am willing to recognize why I own a gun and even though some people from the UK disrespect us American gun owners, I wont do the same. Let them do as they want and be the bigger person.

I don't go to the range and shoot my Saiga 7.62x39 or my savage 308 to practice to kill someone.. If you're practicing with weapons like that to kill someone then there might be something wrong. If you're shooting 100+ yards practicing to kill someone then you need checked out.I can't think of a self defense situation where you would need to engage someone from 100 yards out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!