Windows 8 is the first OS that made me downgrade


Recommended Posts

Once it has proper full driver support I'm sure alot of people will go to it.

The problem is not driver support so I highly doubt it. The OS is butt ugly and completely unusable. That's the problem. This is probably the worst thing Microsoft has done. Ever.

As I had said before, the OS is a testament to the fact that Microsoft is so behind on the next generation that they wanted to try to to catch up by trying to force everyone to use this half baked new Metro style that is completely unsuitable for desktops and have made UI elements bigger for desktop making them absolutely disgusting because they needed to make it easier to touch so they could try to catch up to tablet and smartphone markets. In the process they really didn't think about users as all and everyone who depends on their OS. They thought about how to use their monopoly to try to make themselves relevant in this new age where they are so late it's not even funny.

And you know what, it's not going to work. Because you can't sit on your ass for 5 years and then try to make an OS that is a hybrid that doesn't do any one thing great.

To be perfectly honest, Apple's approach is FAR smarter and better. They are slowly but surely introducing mobile features into their OS without alienating the main thing. Their users. And this is coming from someone like me who is a huge critic of Apple and their business practices overall. Some things they do right and this is one of them.

Microsoft deserves to crash and burn. I don't think anyone in their sane mind (except for the biggest fans) will use Windows 8. It's infuriatingly stupid. And I'm talking for people who used Windows from the very beginning. I can't even imagine how someone who is in their 60s will find their way in this abomination of an OS.

The problem is not driver support so I highly doubt it. The OS is butt ugly and completely unusable. That's the problem. This is probably the worst thing Microsoft has done. Ever.

Completely unusable? The desktop experience is virtually the same Windows 7, only with hot-corners and a new start screen - neither of which are "unusable". WinRT apps are a different matter but they are completely optional. Cut back on the hyperbole.

  • Like 3

Not to mention all the default wallpapers are still only 1920 x 1200 (or 1920 x 1200 dual). My god Microsoft, it's 2012 for crying out loud. Is it really that hard to take into account some of us have displays with higher resolutions that that?

Not to mention all the default wallpapers are still only 1920 x 1200 (or 1920 x 1200 dual). My god Microsoft, it's 2012 crying out loud. Is it really that hard to take into account some of us have displays with higher resolutions that that?

"some" being the operative word so they don't focus on it, but I agree that they should include default wallpapers for higher resolutions just to cover all bases. :)

My mother is close to her 60's and up until last year; never used a computer in her life. I bought a used Thinkpad and installed Windows 7. After a few weeks of "How do I..." phone calls she figured most it out.

Last week; I showed her my laptop running Windows 8 and now that she had some experience under her belt; and giving her a brief explanation on how to maneuver in Windows 8 she says "So besides this new screen; it looks the same". (I'm paraphrasing because she's not too technical and English isn't her first language)

I think it's harder to adjust for us because we've been so used to doing things a certain way. I don't really miss the old start menu but it is a shift in thinking. I'm still adjusting but before I know it; it will become second nature to me.

Completely unusable? The desktop experience is virtually the same Windows 7, only with hot-corners and a new start screen - neither of which are "unusable".

IT is absolutely unusable. For every OS function like control panels and other things i have to aim for the corner to get a charm menu and then from there I need to open a control panel and then I have to hunt down things. Where is the run menu (oh, you've hidden it by having me hover the corner and wait and then I have to get another screen and then type the command)? How is removing all this functionality from easy access and replacing it with corner hotspots that I have to wait a second to show up more intuitive?

They basically replaced almost all instantly accessible things with hotspots and 3 click access. It's an example of total lack of usability. Makes you wonder, who sat there and sad "Oh yeah, this is MUCH better than what we had before". I just don't get it.

It's completely ridiculous. And I'm not even going into the actual appearance of the OS. That thing is absolutely atrocious.

IT is absolutely unusable. For every OS function like control panels and other things i have to aim for the corner to get a charm menu and then from there I need to open a control panel and then I have to hunt down things. Where is the run menu (oh, you've hidden it by having me hover the corner and wait and then I have to get another screen and then type the command)? How is removing all this functionality from easy access and replacing it with corner hotspots that I have to wait a second to show up more intuitive?

It's completely ridiculous. And I'm not even going into the actual appearance of the OS. That thing is absolutely atrocious.

Getting to the control panel:

Windows 7 (Move mouse to lower left-hand corner, click orb, click control panel)

Windows 8 (Move mouse to lower left-hand corner, click control panel)

Getting "Run" command:

Windows 7 (Windows Key + R)

Windows 8 (Windows Key + R)

Getting to the control panel:

Windows 7 (Move mouse to lower left-hand corner, click orb, click control panel)

Windows 8 (Move mouse to lower left-hand corner, click control panel)

Getting "Run" command:

Windows 7 (Windows Key + R)

Windows 8 (Windows Key + R)

This!

Clearly it is just way too difficult to understand the difference between windows 7 and 8 lol /sarcasm

IT is absolutely unusable. For every OS function like control panels and other things i have to aim for the corner to get a charm menu and then from there I need to open a control panel and then I have to hunt down things. Where is the run menu (oh, you've hidden it by having me hover the corner and wait and then I have to get another screen and then type the command)? How is removing all this functionality from easy access and replacing it with corner hotspots that I have to wait a second to show up more intuitive?

They basically replaced almost all instantly accessible things with hotspots and 3 click access. It's an example of total lack of usability. Makes you wonder, who sat there and sad "Oh yeah, this is MUCH better than what we had before". I just don't get it.

It's completely ridiculous. And I'm not even going into the actual appearance of the OS. That thing is absolutely atrocious.

Run and Control panel are one right-click in the lower left corner away. You don't need to aim for corners for anything unless they are shared corners. I just lazily throw my cursor in the corners and get it to trigger whatever I want.

This is a a great post on Windows 8 awfulness.

http://draginol.joeu..._a_UI_nightmare

I can't agree more.

Most of his points (if not all) are stupid.

IT is absolutely unusable. For every OS function like control panels and other things i have to aim for the corner to get a charm menu and then from there I need to open a control panel and then I have to hunt down things. Where is the run menu (oh, you've hidden it by having me hover the corner and wait and then I have to get another screen and then type the command)? How is removing all this functionality from easy access and replacing it with corner hotspots that I have to wait a second to show up more intuitive?

They basically replaced almost all instantly accessible things with hotspots and 3 click access. It's an example of total lack of usability. Makes you wonder, who sat there and sad "Oh yeah, this is MUCH better than what we had before". I just don't get it.

It's completely ridiculous. And I'm not even going into the actual appearance of the OS. That thing is absolutely atrocious.

Have you ever heard of the Windows key? This page might help you:

http://www.thewindowsclub.com/windows-8-keyboard-shortcuts-global-list

Honestly there's nothing wrong with Windows 8, the users are just too dumb/stubborn/ignorant to figure it out.

Well, I wont be downgrading because I'm never gonna install Win8 on my PC. I've been using it on my laptop since the first preview (YES, I've been using it for more than 5 mins thank you), and I don't like it. I can understand the many improvement inside, I know it feels faster than Win7, boot quicker, shutdown faster, it's just more snappy than Win7 overall.

But, all in all, my laptop is going back to Win7 and my main PC will never be upgraded. I simply don't like the start screen, I don't like the "simplicity" of the built-in Metro apps, they seem unfinished. I don't like the 25%/75% split screen, and I don't like how it handle multi-display.

I don't enjoy the "Tablet" experience on my desktop and even on a tablet, it's going to be a hard sell because many features or settings throws you back to the desktop or a window setting where it's far from touch friendly. Even the "tablet" part of Win8 is unfinished and will enrage some users.

And, it's just MY OPINION. I know some of you LOVE Win8, but not everybody has to like it.

I agree, Windows 8 is a big mess and that's coming from someone who has been using Windows since version 3.1.

I understand that some people are happy with the Metro interface and want to use it. That's fine, especially if one is planing to buy one of those Win8 tablets. Cool with me but why force this gimmick UI one people who want to use Windows efficiently. The Metro UI is completely unusable for business oriented or professional users who need to do serious work on their PCs. Metro is purely for the normal consumer who needs basic applications and functions... or tablet users.

Since I'm not a tablet user and actually do some work on my PC, I will not and cannot upgrade to Win8.

What MS needs to do and I hope by all means, that they will be forced to do this with Win9 after Win8 fails epically, start the Windows experience with the classic Windows desktop and offer the Metro interface or whatever they will call it, as an option. NOT they other way around. If they had done this already with Win8, they would have only gotten half the hatred they get now.

and please bring back the start button in Win9, thanks

Who else thinks it's funny how the Metro haters like to tell everybody they have been using Windows or DOS since year blabla and somehow this is proof that they know for a fact that Win8 is bad and will fail to no extend. The others must just be fanboys!

It makes me giggle

  • Like 2

I agree, Windows 8 is a big mess and that's coming from someone who has been using Windows since version 3.1.

...

Since I'm not a tablet user and actually do some work on my PC, I will not and cannot upgrade to Win8.

...

I've used Windows since 3.1 as well and I don't think Windows 8 is a big mess.

I too am not a tablet user and actually do work on my PC and that's not preventing me from upgrading to Windows 8.

  • Like 2

Have you ever heard of the Windows key? This page might help you:

http://www.thewindow...uts-global-list

Honestly there's nothing wrong with Windows 8, the users are just too dumb/stubborn/ignorant to figure it out.

boy are you ignorant. did it ever occur to you that some people just think it's plain ugly and the fact they made it worse?

I have been using MS since the early versions of MSDOS. I try thinking about it this way:

Many people are still using Windows XP very happily and it works for them. The OS is 10 years old. There have been two new Operating Systems since XP, but XP users prefer what they are already using. No doubt they will continue to use XP for years to come.

Those who have found equal satisfaction using Windows 7 will likewise be able to continue using it for perhaps a decade, until some revolutionary new hardware comes along, that they have just gotta have, that won't run on Windows 7.

And in a decade, who knows what great new OS might come along? When we look back ten years from now we may well see Windows 8 bracketed with Me as one of the less successful revisions, and we won't care because we will be using such a great new OS that does everything we dreamed.

Getting to the control panel:

Windows 7 (Move mouse to lower left-hand corner, click orb, click control panel)

Windows 8 (Move mouse to lower left-hand corner, click control panel)

Getting "Run" command:

Windows 7 (Windows Key + R)

Windows 8 (Windows Key + R)

No. Back when I tried WIndows 8 you had to RIGHT CLICK at the bottom left. Not Left Click - Control Panel. Who (besides us from experience) will try to right click?

Why are there two control panels?

Why is the volume mini window aero, but the network view takes 100% of my vertical view to just display one connection?

This OS is completely horrible on the desktop. It is so inconsistent it is not even funny.

Back when I tried it, I had to basically have my mouse at the very bottom left corner in order for the little start screen icon to appear. What happened to the same clickable area as in Windows 7? If you are going to make invisible menus, you need to make it a large hover/click area instead of just 10 pixels. Also, if my mouse moves just outside the charms bar, it would disappear. Is there a way to make it stay there until I close it? If I am not used to a mouse sensitivity setting, it takes me several tries to click an icon in the charms bar because it disappears when I accidentally move my mouse over too far.

Microsoft should have enabled a check when windows first starts up. Is it a touch-enabled computer? Metro is enabled by default. Is it a desktop computer with keyboard and mouse? Desktop starts by default.

THIS makes BOTH groups happy. If you want to use the new UI in a desktop environment, you still have a choice.

I honestly hope this version of Windows fails ON THE DESKTOP. I have said it numerous times. Windows 8 is awesome on tablets. I hate it on the destop. And no it is not just because "I hate change". I have always upgraded to the latest OS of Windows, OS X, AND Ubuntu. Not only that, I almost ALWAYS upgraded the WEEK it was available in stores/online. I NEVER waited for a patch or a service pack to upgrade. Every upgrade I welcomed the changes the brought in. They were changes for the better.

I do not want all of these live tiles. It drives me crazy having dozens of different things moving around on the screen at once. There is absolutely NO advantage to live tiles. Email? Outlook as provided me with instant notifications for YEARS at the bottom right hand corner of the screen. Facebook/social media instant notifications? I am sorry, I use my computers mostly for work and gaming. I do not need instant notifications that somebody liked my photo. Weather? We have a widget in Windows Vista and 7 that did just that. Or if I want to have instant weather, there is a thing called a window in my house and I can see if it is raining or not.

So there were technical reasons why the start menu had to be removed? Then fix them, not completely remove the feature. I absolutely do not need my entire 30" display FILLED up when I want to open an application that is not on my taskbar. I have said it before, I have too many applications that I use to pin everything on my taskbar. I cannot make the taskbar bigger because I lose vertical screen estate. As a heavy photoshop and after effects user, I need every pixel as I can to make my job a lot easier.

I can delete the metro stuff? That is great, but why am I still thrown into it when I need to open a program?

These are valid complaints. And again, read what I said above. I ALWAYS keep an open mind when a OS changes. But when it makes life harder for me, I do not blindly accept it just because it is the latest.

Also, Microsoft is expecting people to learn the new UI and the new way of doing things, while STILL knowing the old way of doing things for when they are at work. That will just confuse a lot of people.

I agree, Windows 8 is a big mess and that's coming from someone who has been using Windows since version 3.1.

I understand that some people are happy with the Metro interface and want to use it. That's fine, especially if one is planing to buy one of those Win8 tablets. Cool with me but why force this gimmick UI one people who want to use Windows efficiently. The Metro UI is completely unusable for business oriented or professional users who need to do serious work on their PCs. Metro is purely for the normal consumer who needs basic applications and functions... or tablet users.

Since I'm not a tablet user and actually do some work on my PC, I will not and cannot upgrade to Win8.

What MS needs to do and I hope by all means, that they will be forced to do this with Win9 after Win8 fails epically, start the Windows experience with the classic Windows desktop and offer the Metro interface or whatever they will call it, as an option. NOT they other way around. If they had done this already with Win8, they would have only gotten half the hatred they get now.

and please bring back the start button in Win9, thanks

What can't you do on Windows 8 that you can do now?

Windows 8 is the first OS that made me think about buying a tablet/convertible ultrabook. Also Windows 8 is the first OS that made me think about using multiple monitors. I've also been using Windows since 3.11 and I don't think it's a mess, it's different and rough around the edges.... but It doesn't impact my desktop experience and work. Not everyone is the same, if you don't like it fine, if you like it fine as well, but there's no need to think your way is correct and everyone else is just a hater or a fanboy who doesn't agree.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!