[BREAKING] Apple V. Samsung Jury reaches verdict.


Recommended Posts

I can practically guarantee that if it was the other way around, that there were suspicions of the jury being rigged in favor of Samsung that Apple haters would call the jury fair and there was nothing wrong with it. Samsung could have filed a complained about the jury when jurors were being picked out. They settled with the current jury so they have nothing to complain about.

The jury was 100% fair anyway, they didn't award Apple even half of what they wanted (2.5 billion). Samsung violated some of Apple's patents, that just the truth of it. The evidence is right in front your face. Whether you believe so or not you cant possibly tell me Samsung is 100% innocent here.

I can practically guarantee that if it was the other way around, that there were suspicions of the jury being rigged in favor of Samsung that Apple haters would call the jury fair and there was nothing wrong with it. Samsung could have filed a complained about the jury when jurors were being picked out. They settled with the current jury so they have nothing to complain about.

The jury was 100% fair anyway, they didn't award Apple even half of what they wanted (2.5 billion). Samsung violated some of Apple's patents, that just the truth of it. The evidence is right in front your face. Whether you believe so or not you cant possibly tell me Samsung is 100% innocent here.

It's not about suspicions of rigging, it's about reports on inconsistencies, conflict of insterests and duty shirking, all of those based not on wild assumptions from a verdict you don't agree with but on factual errors and the comments by the very members of the jury.

Samsung being guilty wouldn't change that the trial was, from the look of all the issues raised, flawed.

Selective quoting the biased stuff that doesn't make sense while completely ignoring every other single point that does, right? ;)

If you wan't to avoid Boz's bias you can go straight here, read the trial issues and discuss.

I was JUST about to post that link man...

Apple v. Samsung juror Manuel Ilagan said the nine-person jury that heard the patent infringement case between the companies knew after the first day that it believed Samsung had wronged Apple....

The decision was very one-sided, but Ilagan said it wasn't clear the jurors were largely in agreement until after the first day of deliberations.

"It didn't dawn on us [that we agreed that Samsung had infringed] on the first day," Ilagan said. "We were debating heavily, especially about the patents on bounce back and pinch-to-zoom. Apple said they owned patents, but we were debating about the prior art [about the same technology that Samsung said existed before the iPhone debuted]. [Velvin Hogan] was jury foreman. He had experience. He owned patents himself. In the beginning the debate was heated, but it was still civil. Hogan holds patents, so he took us through his experience. After that it was easier. After we debated that first patent -- what was prior art --because we had a hard time believing there was no prior art, that there wasn't something out there before Apple.

"In fact we skipped that one," Ilagan continued, "so we could go on faster. It was bogging us down." ...

"Once you determine that Samsung violated the patents," Ilagan said, "it's easy to just go down those different [samsung] products because it was all the same. Like the trade dress, once you determine Samsung violated the trade dress, the flatscreen with the Bezel...then you go down the products to see if it had a bezel. "

Wow.. just wow... they skipped prior art arguments cause it was "bogging them down" and then when they decided after the first day Apple won they just went through devices and checkmarked them as they were "all the same". Wow..

thumb_550_ip4-vs-captivate.jpg

Clearly this phone totally infringes on Apple. This is one of many the jury just checkmarked off and gave it to Apple..

Indeed...saying they used if the item had a bezel and screen to be the deciding factor is troublesome.

Heck my Dell monitor that came with my Dell PC has a rectangular shape with rounded corners, a screen, and a bezel...oh crap...

Also finding out that the foreman is a 'junk' patent holder who instructed the jury to ignore the instructions and to skip questions of prior art based on his supposed legal knowledge is very troublesome.

Apple really needs to stop this anti-competitive strong arming, unfortunately people are too stupid to NOT buy from Apple, when their products are ****, their business practices are ****, and they overcharge for their ****.

you do realise motorala sued first?

oh no you probs dont in a flood of fanboyishm

Apple really needs to stop this anti-competitive strong arming, unfortunately people are too stupid to NOT buy from Apple, when their products are ****, their business practices are ****, and they overcharge for their ****.

Blind hatred is just as stupid as blind love. While there are people who buy Apple products just for the name, there are many who actually use it because they find it better whether you like it or not.

  • Like 2

Wow.. just wow... they skipped prior art arguments cause it was "bogging them down" and then when they decided after the first day Apple won they just went through devices and checkmarked them as they were "all the same". Wow..

If that really is the case, then that should be enough for at least someone looking in to the jury/decision. Prior art is a biggie when it comes to patents.

But either way, Samsung will rebound and continue to do well...and if not, then someone else will step up and claim the title as the #1 android maker. It was HTC first, then Samsung and who knows who else.

Clearly this phone totally infringes on Apple. This is one of many the jury just checkmarked off and gave it to Apple..

To be fare, there are a lot of other things that were sued over besides just the physical look of the phone...and what you cannot see in the pic you posted.

Indeed...saying they used if the item had a bezel and screen to be the deciding factor is troublesome.

Heck my Dell monitor that came with my Dell PC has a rectangular shape with rounded corners, a screen, and a bezel...oh crap...

Also finding out that the foreman is a 'junk' patent holder who instructed the jury to ignore the instructions and to skip questions of prior art based on his supposed legal knowledge is very troublesome.

Guess this infringes -- right-- based on the check marks then- and this is a slate tablet (also the screen worked without the pen too)

Round corners-- and Grey bezel

img_touch-k_general.jpg

No wait that can't-- be--

This came out about 5 years before the Ipad and about 2 years before the iPhone was even shown to the public. It was demoed middle of the year 2005 and the first production went out in late 2006.

What I find troubling even more-- is that the judge didn't ask to get reassigned.... there in itself is something Samsung should request a mistrial on.

The judge worked on patents for a Law Firm that was employed by Apple and her company filed applied and received same said patents for Apple.

In other words.... she in essence worked (even if not now) for the Prosecution.

That is what I find troubling in the most.....That for me does not even go into the Jury in itself..

That would be like a guy on trial for murder and the judge is related to the prosecuting attorney

  • Like 3

The judge worked on patents for a Law Firm that was employed by Apple and her company filed applied and received same said patents for Apple.

wow, surprised no one caught that O.O

source?

I glad Apple won the case and Samung have to pay Apple 1 billion in damage, Apple is my most Favorite Company I just <3 Apple.

/s?

wow, surprised no one caught that O.O

source?

You might say these lawyers can get downright technical. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (WSGR) is one of the largest law firms in the US specializing in representing high-tech corporations. Its client roster has included several big Silicon Valley names, such as Apple Computer, Hewlett-Packard, and Sun Microsystems. WSGR has advised hundreds of clients on their IPOs and has been involved in more than 700 merger and acquisition transactions (valued at more than $300 billion) in the last five years. The firm has hundreds of lawyers working across seven offices in the US and one in Shanghai. It was founded in 1961.

Read more: http://www.answers.c...i#ixzz24iNZA9Xg

From 2000 until 2002, she worked as a Senior Associate at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, a Palo Alto, California law firm.

/s? They also deal in intellectual property patents as well

Then she also worked for McDermott Will & Emery which also did patents for Apple.

And no one has pieced that together.

Oh and here is a flash from the past...

Vector Icon set from 2004 that was available for download for Corel Draw and the icons can be reversed as well

phone-icons-prev1204270247GNdQ11.jpg

Oh and the settings came from KDE -- I leave you with this proof... In linux there has been a cog with square teeth and not triangle teeth prior to the Iphone-Ipad-OSX this example came out in 2000

Which I guess the Jury never saw this as well.

200_slides.jpg

Oh Apple I am afraid that KDE wants you to stop using the Cog in your Icons- (lol but that would be weird if it were true)

listen.. I'm 36 (you are younger judging from your profile so it's ironic you teaching me anything)

And this is why your posts and your personality is a joke: You actually believe you cant learn from someone younger. Talk about arrogance.

  • Like 2

Wow.. just wow... they skipped prior art arguments cause it was "bogging them down" and then when they decided after the first day Apple won they just went through devices and checkmarked them as they were "all the same". Wow..

thumb_550_ip4-vs-captivate.jpg

Clearly this phone totally infringes on Apple. This is one of many the jury just checkmarked off and gave it to Apple..

Why is any of what you posted shocking to you? The Jury is made up of everyday people who aren't lawyers, geeks, or patent experts. They will rule in the best manner they can using their own diverse backgrounds to draw on while making that decision. Having a juror who had patents helped them be capable of digesting some parts and sounds like more of an asset than a hindrance (as without it they would understand the patents even less...).

Samsung had a chance to reject jurors it saw as unfit before the trial...

The jury system has its flaws, but it is our system for a reason.

Having a juror who had patents helped them be capable of digesting some parts and sounds like more of an asset than a hindrance (as without it they would understand the patents even less...).

That guy apparently had a personal interest in defending the validity of Apple patents, since he had "reinvented" and patented Tivo himself.

As he explained after the trial:

?When I got in this case and I started looking at these patents I considered: ?If this was my patent and I was accused, could I defend it??? Hogan explained. On the night of Aug. 22, after closing arguments, ?a light bulb went on in my head,? he said. ?I thought, I need to do this for all of them.?

By defending Apple's patents he was intending to set a precedent just in case he ever had to defend his own patent.

Conflict of interests much?

Samsung had a chance to reject jurors it saw as unfit before the trial...

I don't know how that works exactly but I'd guess you can't just reject every juror you don't like, else both parties would never reach an agreement about the jury members. Maybe there were other candidates that could be more likely to side with Apple.

Also Samsung's lawyers made quite a few mistakes (like being late submiting evidences). Not foreseeing that Vervin Hogan's vested interest could drive jury's approach to the validity of patents (along with the fact that he was the only juror that had some expertise about patents and hence his opinion could likely prevail) might have been one of them.

You might say these lawyers can get downright technical. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (WSGR) is one of the largest law firms in the US specializing in representing high-tech corporations. Its client roster has included several big Silicon Valley names, such as Apple Computer, Hewlett-Packard, and Sun Microsystems. WSGR has advised hundreds of clients on their IPOs and has been involved in more than 700 merger and acquisition transactions (valued at more than $300 billion) in the last five years. The firm has hundreds of lawyers working across seven offices in the US and one in Shanghai. It was founded in 1961.

Read more: http://www.answers.c...i#ixzz24iNZA9Xg

From 2000 until 2002, she worked as a Senior Associate at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, a Palo Alto, California law firm.

/s? They also deal in intellectual property patents as well

Then she also worked for McDermott Will & Emery which also did patents for Apple.

And no one has pieced that together.

Oh and here is a flash from the past...

Vector Icon set from 2004 that was available for download for Corel Draw and the icons can be reversed as well

So? Just because you work for a major law firm that had Apple as a client doesn't mean you worked with Apple. She could have just as easily been with the law firm's other clients. Hell both the PS3 and Xbox processors were designed at IBM, in the same building by two different teams that had no idea what the other was doing.

You work at a big and successful enough law firm, guess what's going to happen? Big and successful companies are going to want you to represent them. And WSGR's client / attorney list is huge.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I am not a US citizen nor a Trump fan. Respect to both left and right. But I will, for the sake of fun, predict something for my own. There will come a day when the US and China will collide like titans ( over Taiwan or anything else ). Then, on that day, some people in this comment section will realize how good an idea it was to become independent in areas like that. ( Or atleast try )
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen by Usama Jawad Microsoft Edge may not be the most popular browser out there, but it does receive quite frequent updates that sometimes bring surprising new features and axe others that are not as popular. Now, Microsoft has detailed some of the new security enhancements that it has introduced in Edge for Business, typically used by commercial customers. Microsoft has emphasized that security features are baked into Edge for Business and offer native integration with security and governance tools like Defender and Purview. Browser sessions are governed by default on managed devices but can also be governed through dedicated work profiles on unmanaged devices. An important aspect in this area is controlling the use of shadow AI. We have talked about this before, but it essentially restricts employees from using unsanctioned AI apps through data loss prevention (DLP) policies, with Edge redirecting them to trusted AI services like Microsoft 365 Copilot. This feature, available as a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) license, ensures that confidential data never exits AI boundaries set by your organization in Purview. Additionally, Microsoft also has strong DLP policies for contractors. Contractors leveraging a Entra ID-joined work profile provisioned by their contracting company on a device managed by their actual employer can be restricted from downloading files locally. In such scenarios, the file is saved on the contracting firm's OneDrive rather than being downloaded locally. Another useful Edge security feature disallows copying and pasting from unmanaged locations and apps. Similarly, DLP policies can be configured at a granular level to restrict screenshots or downloading of files from certain locations. In the same vein, IT admins can block the installation of extensions, hosted apps, themes and scripts, and control if users can install extensions from external locations. They can also enable the installation of specific extensions and allow users to request access to certain extensions, so that they can be managed on a case-by-case basis. Finally, Edge for Business now has an on-device AI model that uses computer vision to see what's on your screen and block potentially malicious content immediately. This does not rely on site reputation, as it simply monitors what is being displayed on your screen, which means that it is effective against malicious content that takes over your screen and employs scareware tactics. Since this is an on-device AI model, it does use your system's resources, so it's enabled by default only on devices with at least 2GB of RAM and four CPU cores. You can find more details in the Microsoft Mechanics video here.
    • Could you come up with a slightly less depressing background for Tux instead of that gray gradient? Doesn't have to be cheerful, just less of a downer...
    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Zeynel earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      248
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!