[BREAKING] Apple V. Samsung Jury reaches verdict.


Recommended Posts

I can practically guarantee that if it was the other way around, that there were suspicions of the jury being rigged in favor of Samsung that Apple haters would call the jury fair and there was nothing wrong with it. Samsung could have filed a complained about the jury when jurors were being picked out. They settled with the current jury so they have nothing to complain about.

The jury was 100% fair anyway, they didn't award Apple even half of what they wanted (2.5 billion). Samsung violated some of Apple's patents, that just the truth of it. The evidence is right in front your face. Whether you believe so or not you cant possibly tell me Samsung is 100% innocent here.

I can practically guarantee that if it was the other way around, that there were suspicions of the jury being rigged in favor of Samsung that Apple haters would call the jury fair and there was nothing wrong with it. Samsung could have filed a complained about the jury when jurors were being picked out. They settled with the current jury so they have nothing to complain about.

The jury was 100% fair anyway, they didn't award Apple even half of what they wanted (2.5 billion). Samsung violated some of Apple's patents, that just the truth of it. The evidence is right in front your face. Whether you believe so or not you cant possibly tell me Samsung is 100% innocent here.

It's not about suspicions of rigging, it's about reports on inconsistencies, conflict of insterests and duty shirking, all of those based not on wild assumptions from a verdict you don't agree with but on factual errors and the comments by the very members of the jury.

Samsung being guilty wouldn't change that the trial was, from the look of all the issues raised, flawed.

Selective quoting the biased stuff that doesn't make sense while completely ignoring every other single point that does, right? ;)

If you wan't to avoid Boz's bias you can go straight here, read the trial issues and discuss.

I was JUST about to post that link man...

Apple v. Samsung juror Manuel Ilagan said the nine-person jury that heard the patent infringement case between the companies knew after the first day that it believed Samsung had wronged Apple....

The decision was very one-sided, but Ilagan said it wasn't clear the jurors were largely in agreement until after the first day of deliberations.

"It didn't dawn on us [that we agreed that Samsung had infringed] on the first day," Ilagan said. "We were debating heavily, especially about the patents on bounce back and pinch-to-zoom. Apple said they owned patents, but we were debating about the prior art [about the same technology that Samsung said existed before the iPhone debuted]. [Velvin Hogan] was jury foreman. He had experience. He owned patents himself. In the beginning the debate was heated, but it was still civil. Hogan holds patents, so he took us through his experience. After that it was easier. After we debated that first patent -- what was prior art --because we had a hard time believing there was no prior art, that there wasn't something out there before Apple.

"In fact we skipped that one," Ilagan continued, "so we could go on faster. It was bogging us down." ...

"Once you determine that Samsung violated the patents," Ilagan said, "it's easy to just go down those different [samsung] products because it was all the same. Like the trade dress, once you determine Samsung violated the trade dress, the flatscreen with the Bezel...then you go down the products to see if it had a bezel. "

Wow.. just wow... they skipped prior art arguments cause it was "bogging them down" and then when they decided after the first day Apple won they just went through devices and checkmarked them as they were "all the same". Wow..

thumb_550_ip4-vs-captivate.jpg

Clearly this phone totally infringes on Apple. This is one of many the jury just checkmarked off and gave it to Apple..

Indeed...saying they used if the item had a bezel and screen to be the deciding factor is troublesome.

Heck my Dell monitor that came with my Dell PC has a rectangular shape with rounded corners, a screen, and a bezel...oh crap...

Also finding out that the foreman is a 'junk' patent holder who instructed the jury to ignore the instructions and to skip questions of prior art based on his supposed legal knowledge is very troublesome.

Apple really needs to stop this anti-competitive strong arming, unfortunately people are too stupid to NOT buy from Apple, when their products are ****, their business practices are ****, and they overcharge for their ****.

you do realise motorala sued first?

oh no you probs dont in a flood of fanboyishm

Apple really needs to stop this anti-competitive strong arming, unfortunately people are too stupid to NOT buy from Apple, when their products are ****, their business practices are ****, and they overcharge for their ****.

Blind hatred is just as stupid as blind love. While there are people who buy Apple products just for the name, there are many who actually use it because they find it better whether you like it or not.

  • Like 2

Wow.. just wow... they skipped prior art arguments cause it was "bogging them down" and then when they decided after the first day Apple won they just went through devices and checkmarked them as they were "all the same". Wow..

If that really is the case, then that should be enough for at least someone looking in to the jury/decision. Prior art is a biggie when it comes to patents.

But either way, Samsung will rebound and continue to do well...and if not, then someone else will step up and claim the title as the #1 android maker. It was HTC first, then Samsung and who knows who else.

Clearly this phone totally infringes on Apple. This is one of many the jury just checkmarked off and gave it to Apple..

To be fare, there are a lot of other things that were sued over besides just the physical look of the phone...and what you cannot see in the pic you posted.

Indeed...saying they used if the item had a bezel and screen to be the deciding factor is troublesome.

Heck my Dell monitor that came with my Dell PC has a rectangular shape with rounded corners, a screen, and a bezel...oh crap...

Also finding out that the foreman is a 'junk' patent holder who instructed the jury to ignore the instructions and to skip questions of prior art based on his supposed legal knowledge is very troublesome.

Guess this infringes -- right-- based on the check marks then- and this is a slate tablet (also the screen worked without the pen too)

Round corners-- and Grey bezel

img_touch-k_general.jpg

No wait that can't-- be--

This came out about 5 years before the Ipad and about 2 years before the iPhone was even shown to the public. It was demoed middle of the year 2005 and the first production went out in late 2006.

What I find troubling even more-- is that the judge didn't ask to get reassigned.... there in itself is something Samsung should request a mistrial on.

The judge worked on patents for a Law Firm that was employed by Apple and her company filed applied and received same said patents for Apple.

In other words.... she in essence worked (even if not now) for the Prosecution.

That is what I find troubling in the most.....That for me does not even go into the Jury in itself..

That would be like a guy on trial for murder and the judge is related to the prosecuting attorney

  • Like 3

The judge worked on patents for a Law Firm that was employed by Apple and her company filed applied and received same said patents for Apple.

wow, surprised no one caught that O.O

source?

I glad Apple won the case and Samung have to pay Apple 1 billion in damage, Apple is my most Favorite Company I just <3 Apple.

/s?

wow, surprised no one caught that O.O

source?

You might say these lawyers can get downright technical. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (WSGR) is one of the largest law firms in the US specializing in representing high-tech corporations. Its client roster has included several big Silicon Valley names, such as Apple Computer, Hewlett-Packard, and Sun Microsystems. WSGR has advised hundreds of clients on their IPOs and has been involved in more than 700 merger and acquisition transactions (valued at more than $300 billion) in the last five years. The firm has hundreds of lawyers working across seven offices in the US and one in Shanghai. It was founded in 1961.

Read more: http://www.answers.c...i#ixzz24iNZA9Xg

From 2000 until 2002, she worked as a Senior Associate at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, a Palo Alto, California law firm.

/s? They also deal in intellectual property patents as well

Then she also worked for McDermott Will & Emery which also did patents for Apple.

And no one has pieced that together.

Oh and here is a flash from the past...

Vector Icon set from 2004 that was available for download for Corel Draw and the icons can be reversed as well

phone-icons-prev1204270247GNdQ11.jpg

Oh and the settings came from KDE -- I leave you with this proof... In linux there has been a cog with square teeth and not triangle teeth prior to the Iphone-Ipad-OSX this example came out in 2000

Which I guess the Jury never saw this as well.

200_slides.jpg

Oh Apple I am afraid that KDE wants you to stop using the Cog in your Icons- (lol but that would be weird if it were true)

listen.. I'm 36 (you are younger judging from your profile so it's ironic you teaching me anything)

And this is why your posts and your personality is a joke: You actually believe you cant learn from someone younger. Talk about arrogance.

  • Like 2

Wow.. just wow... they skipped prior art arguments cause it was "bogging them down" and then when they decided after the first day Apple won they just went through devices and checkmarked them as they were "all the same". Wow..

thumb_550_ip4-vs-captivate.jpg

Clearly this phone totally infringes on Apple. This is one of many the jury just checkmarked off and gave it to Apple..

Why is any of what you posted shocking to you? The Jury is made up of everyday people who aren't lawyers, geeks, or patent experts. They will rule in the best manner they can using their own diverse backgrounds to draw on while making that decision. Having a juror who had patents helped them be capable of digesting some parts and sounds like more of an asset than a hindrance (as without it they would understand the patents even less...).

Samsung had a chance to reject jurors it saw as unfit before the trial...

The jury system has its flaws, but it is our system for a reason.

Having a juror who had patents helped them be capable of digesting some parts and sounds like more of an asset than a hindrance (as without it they would understand the patents even less...).

That guy apparently had a personal interest in defending the validity of Apple patents, since he had "reinvented" and patented Tivo himself.

As he explained after the trial:

?When I got in this case and I started looking at these patents I considered: ?If this was my patent and I was accused, could I defend it??? Hogan explained. On the night of Aug. 22, after closing arguments, ?a light bulb went on in my head,? he said. ?I thought, I need to do this for all of them.?

By defending Apple's patents he was intending to set a precedent just in case he ever had to defend his own patent.

Conflict of interests much?

Samsung had a chance to reject jurors it saw as unfit before the trial...

I don't know how that works exactly but I'd guess you can't just reject every juror you don't like, else both parties would never reach an agreement about the jury members. Maybe there were other candidates that could be more likely to side with Apple.

Also Samsung's lawyers made quite a few mistakes (like being late submiting evidences). Not foreseeing that Vervin Hogan's vested interest could drive jury's approach to the validity of patents (along with the fact that he was the only juror that had some expertise about patents and hence his opinion could likely prevail) might have been one of them.

You might say these lawyers can get downright technical. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (WSGR) is one of the largest law firms in the US specializing in representing high-tech corporations. Its client roster has included several big Silicon Valley names, such as Apple Computer, Hewlett-Packard, and Sun Microsystems. WSGR has advised hundreds of clients on their IPOs and has been involved in more than 700 merger and acquisition transactions (valued at more than $300 billion) in the last five years. The firm has hundreds of lawyers working across seven offices in the US and one in Shanghai. It was founded in 1961.

Read more: http://www.answers.c...i#ixzz24iNZA9Xg

From 2000 until 2002, she worked as a Senior Associate at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, a Palo Alto, California law firm.

/s? They also deal in intellectual property patents as well

Then she also worked for McDermott Will & Emery which also did patents for Apple.

And no one has pieced that together.

Oh and here is a flash from the past...

Vector Icon set from 2004 that was available for download for Corel Draw and the icons can be reversed as well

So? Just because you work for a major law firm that had Apple as a client doesn't mean you worked with Apple. She could have just as easily been with the law firm's other clients. Hell both the PS3 and Xbox processors were designed at IBM, in the same building by two different teams that had no idea what the other was doing.

You work at a big and successful enough law firm, guess what's going to happen? Big and successful companies are going to want you to represent them. And WSGR's client / attorney list is huge.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!