Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.

By Rappy
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Anyone else excited to find out

what the Kree writing means.

I kinda hope they do something with Guardians of the Galaxy with the show too :D

Yeah I hope we know more about Kree, they might be root to next year with the Inhumans

Rising Star

ShadowMajestic

Posted
Posted

I'm sure Fury will wrangle his way back to Director status once The Avengers 2 comes along! Gonna be interesting to see how they react once they realise Coulson is alive again!

I'm really hoping they combine the story lines more. Bringing back old memories. Where it was normal that Spider-man appeared in the Xmen, or fantastic four or any other and vice versa.

 

And last episode was very good. Not the cliffhanger many shows give us. They closed the story properly, gave us Fury :) (I was like ###### YEAH FURY! when he came to the rescue).

And opened up a whole new one.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

Awesome last ep, and finally a series that shows you can end each season of a series without a huge un answered cliff hanger.

Btw the kree "language"is at least partly just a flow chart, it's the ovals that make it not so much, but stretch it out so they become circles or wide ovals and it's a flowchart proper.

Also I though Jackson had 7 movies left on his contract after avengers, that leaves quite a few movies still.

  • 1 month later...
Experienced

Zlain

Posted
Posted

Honestly thought that it was average. Yes, got better later on, but it just drags on and on. The characters are forgettable, you just don't care as much about them as with the films. Can't remember most of their names except Coulson, Skye and Ward. 

 

Having said that, it isn't terrible and I am willing to let it evolve and see what it can become. 

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Honestly thought that it was average. Yes, got better later on, but it just drags on and on. The characters are forgettable, you just don't care as much about them as with the films. Can't remember most of their names except Coulson, Skye and Ward. 

 

Having said that, it isn't terrible and I am willing to let it evolve and see what it can become.

Did you really forget the names Fitz and Simmons? They were in all the episodes just like Coulson, Skye and Ward :p

Experienced

Zlain

Posted
Posted

Did you really forget the names Fitz and Simmons? They were in all the episodes just like Coulson, Skye and Ward :p

 

Yes, did you not read my entire post? The characters are forgettable, not to mention those two are cringeworthy. Must we always go through the same ###### with hollywood/ American TV shows where the geeks are stereotyped as always talking about science and sharing scientific jokes...

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Yes, did you not read my entire post? The characters are forgettable, not to mention those two are cringeworthy. Must we always go through the same ###### with hollywood/ American TV shows where the geeks are stereotyped as always talking about science and sharing scientific jokes...

I did, that's why I asked because I found it odd that you forgot about them while they're in each episode. It fitted the show and the characters tbh, stereotypical or not.

Experienced

Zlain

Posted
Posted

I did, that's why I asked because I found it odd that you forgot about them while they're in each episode. It fitted the show and the characters tbh, stereotypical or not.

 

 

That's the very definition of forgettable. Sigh....

I don't think it did fit the show. They could have been sleek agents like in Spooks. In all the films, the agents looked sleek with a touch of humour (that agent playing that game in the avengers). I just think it suits the general populous because that is what they associate with being intelligent. 

 

Well, they kinda do in real life. Seems pretty accurate to me.

 

No, it doesn't fit into real life. At all. Don't know what planet you've been living on. No pun intended. 

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

That's the very definition of forgettable. Sigh....

I don't think it did fit the show. They could have been sleek agents like in Spooks. In all the films, the agents looked sleek with a touch of humour (that agent playing that game in the avengers). I just think it suits the general populous because that is what they associate with being intelligent. 

 

 

No, it doesn't fit into real life. At all. Don't know what planet you've been living on. No pun intended.

Right. Well, again, I asked because to me they weren't forgettable and I was wondering why they were for you. But I guess this show just isn't for you then? Either way, a whole lot of things could've been different but it is what it is. I think the 2 characters did fit the series and the overall cinematic-universe that Marvel is going for. You must also remember that they catered this series for a different audience than Spooks; fans of the comic books/films by Marvel Comics.

Mentor

Skin

Posted
Posted

 

No, it doesn't fit into real life. At all. Don't know what planet you've been living on. No pun intended. 

 

 

So, geeks aren't always talking about science and sharing scientific jokes??? You might like to think that isn't true for the majority, but it is. Hence, the stereotyping. It kinda speaks for itself as to why the caricature sticks in most region's TV and radio broadcasting.

Experienced

Zlain

Posted
Posted

So, geeks aren't always talking about science and sharing scientific jokes??? You might like to think that isn't true for the majority, but it is. Hence, the stereotyping. It kinda speaks for itself as to why the caricature sticks in most region's TV and radio broadcasting.

 

No, it really isn't. You're just incredibly narrow minded. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Acronyms....

      By WiltshireHam · Posted

      Lilly-Livered American Media Are Scared
    • Nothing kills CMF Phone 2 Pro's successor due to rising memory prices

      By Fleet Command · Posted

      Really? Despite the memory price rises, nothing can kill it? I thought something would.
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release

      By xillibit · Posted

      I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote

      By LoneWolfSL · Posted

      Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Nothing kills CMF Phone 2 Pro's successor due to rising memory prices

      By Lamp0 · Posted

      It was always going to be nothing.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!