Apple targets more Samsung products in patent suit


Recommended Posts

http://www.reuters.c...E88001020120901

(Reuters) - Seeking to capitalize on a major legal victory over its rival Samsung Electronics Ltd, Apple Inc has asked a federal court in a separate case to find that four additional Samsung products, including the Galaxy S III, infringe Apple's patents.

In February, Apple alleged that at least 17 Samsung products infringe its patents. In a court filing made in San Jose federal court on Friday, Apple added four more products to the list of allegedly infringing products that have been released beginning in August 2011 and continuing through this month.

Apple won a major victory over Samsung last Friday in a separate case when a jury found that the South Korean company had copied critical features of the hugely popular iPhone and iPad and awarded the U.S. company $1.05 billion in damages.

Samsung representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The case is U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, Apple Inc v. Samsung Electronics Ltd, et al 12-00630.

(Reporting by Andrew Longstreth; Editing by Richard Chang)

ibet i know one that they are going after

http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/1329077/261.pdf

here we go again. i wonder if they will make a person with no idea of what prior art really means, it doesn't mean that the software from the old equipment must be able to run on the new item and vise versa for the prior art to be valid, which seems to be the case with the last trial, forman interview BBC website http://www.bbc.co.uk...nology-19425052

Prior art was considered.

But the stipulation under the law is for the prior art to be sufficient to negate or invalidate Apple's patents in this case, it had to be sufficiently similar or, more importantly, it had to be interchangeable.

And in example after example, when we put it to the test, the older prior art was just that. Not that there's anything [wrong] with older prior art - but the key was that the hardware was different, the software was an entirely different methodology, and the more modern software could not be loaded onto the older example and be run without error.

So we all will see what cr@p the lawyers come out with this time and as usual the only people to benefit will be the lawyers.

Also worth a look http://nipclaw.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/31/3284223/apple-accuses-four-more-samsung-devices-infringement

  • Galaxy S III
  • Galaxy S III (Verizon)
  • Galaxy Note
  • Galaxy S II Skyrocket
  • Galaxy S II Epic 4G Touch
  • Galaxy S II
  • Galaxy S II (T-Mobile)
  • Galaxy S II (AT&T)
  • Galaxy Nexus,
  • Illusion
  • Captivate Glide
  • Exhibit II 4G
  • Stratosphere
  • Transform Ultra
  • Admire
  • Conquer 4G
  • Dart
  • Galaxy Player 4.0
  • Galaxy Player 5.0
  • Galaxy Note 10.1
  • Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus
  • Galaxy Tab 8.9

Looks like Google may be getting involved. Depending on how much they had to do with the Galaxy Nexus design...which looks NOTHING like the iPhone.

Looks like Google may be getting involved. Depending on how much they had to do with the Galaxy Nexus design...which looks NOTHING like the iPhone.

Agreed about the looks. Me thinks it not about that, though. But if it is, they're dumb.

I guess someone at Apple realized that they got a bunch of Samsung devices in the hot seat that were fading away from existence, and they were like, "OH SHEET!"

http://www.appleinsi..._complaint.html

The four new patents Apple is leveraging against Samsung include the '647 "Data Detectors" patent, the '721 "Slide-to-unlock" property, the '172 "Word completion" invention and the '604 "Universal search" patent. The Cupertino tech giant successfully wielded the '721 "Data Detectors" patent to obtain an ITC sales ban against certain Android-based HTC handsets in December, however Google continued to implement the feature in its mobile operating system despite the suit's outcome.

Slide to unlock looks WAY different. I knew this would just open Apple up for more lawsuits and patent trolling. Just waiting on them to go after other companies now since the same slide to unlock feature is available on all androids.

Agreed about the looks. Me thinks it not about that, though. But if it is, they're dumb.

I guess someone at Apple realized that they got a bunch of Samsung devices in the hot seat that were fading away from existence, and they were like, "OH SHEET!"

This one doesnt appear to be about trade dress.

I can't help but laugh at the irony of this though, Samsung designed the S3 [best they could] to avoid Apple patent lawsuits, including reworking the TouchWiz UI. Yet, Apple still sues....to me this has nothing todo with patents and is personal. Apple wants Samsung out the picture, permanently. That is my take.

I can't help but laugh at the irony of this though, Samsung designed the S3 [best they could] to avoid Apple patent lawsuits, including reworking the TouchWiz UI. Yet, Apple still sues....to me this has nothing todo with patents and is personal. Apple wants Samsung out the picture, permanently. That is my take.

Its not so much about the hardware design as it is the software. AT least thats what I read on a couple sites. And now they are attacking the GNEX which is a Google phone so you can bet Google will be getting involved if their current talks do not work out.

Slide to unlock looks WAY different. I knew this would just open Apple up for more lawsuits and patent trolling. Just waiting on them to go after other companies now since the same slide to unlock feature is available on all androids.

This one doesnt appear to be about trade dress.

Patent 172 is utter crap, Apple invented T9? are you kidding me??

And speaking of slide to unlock....love how now iOS 5 you can access the camera from swiping to the right from the lock screen. Something that has been part of Android for years.

and the notification system as well. like many said Apple can copy and it's fine but when other do? sue them!

Its not so much about the hardware design as it is the software. AT least thats what I read on a couple sites. And now they are attacking the GNEX which is a Google phone so you can bet Google will be getting involved if their current talks do not work out.

Ah ok. Google are getting involved, they are preparing a lawsuit of their own directly against Apple. Apple wants "thermonuclear war" with Google? well Google are arming their nukes...

Patent 172 is utter crap, Apple invented T9? are you kidding me??

and the notification system as well. like many said Apple can copy and it's fine but when other do? sue them!

But since Android is open source Apple can steal whatever they want?

But since Android is open source Apple can steal whatever they want?

The problem is worse then that. The problem is the other companies are not smart enough to patent their own ideas (because at the time they didn't see the potential) and Apple roll by, steal it and patent it as their own, suing anyone (including the original owner) for using it. Apple get away with it because they a) own the patent and b) were allowed to patent it. That is overly simplified of cause but my take on it (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong).

  • Like 1

If for some crazy reason Apple wins this, this will make it so Apple can go after every maker of Android. Some of these patents they are suing over are present in all Android devices.

Really hope the new iPhone has LTE and Samsung finds a way to fight back. This clearly isnt about protecting ones property like many claim, including Apple. It is about suing the competition. Apple is not hurting one bit, but they play the victim well. I am sure they will wine and cry FRAND this and FRAND that...but again, Apple plays the victim well. As long as they get what they want, they are fine. Like a spoiled kid.

And people like competition. This is proven every day. If Android wasnt around, then some other device would be around giving Apple a run for their money. Imagine if there was only Apple. They could charge you what they want, with as many features as they want, and you would have to accept it.

Apple has legitimate claims in many cases, but leave the silly/petty **** out of it.

Ah ok. Google are getting involved, they are preparing a lawsuit of their own directly against Apple.

Is Google suing currently or talking/trying to work it out with Apple. Last time I saw they were meeting with Apple to try and resolve their issues.

I can't help but laugh at the irony of this though, Samsung designed the S3 [best they could] to avoid Apple patent lawsuits, including reworking the TouchWiz UI. Yet, Apple still sues....to me this has nothing todo with patents and is personal. Apple wants Samsung out the picture, permanently. That is my take.

They probably are allowing Steve Jobs to still influence them too much. It was personal to Jobs.

If for some crazy reason Apple wins this, this will make it so Apple can go after every maker of Android. Some of these patents they are suing over are present in all Android devices.

Really hope the new iPhone has LTE and Samsung finds a way to fight back. This clearly isnt about protecting ones property like many claim, including Apple. It is about suing the competition. Apple is not hurting one bit, but they play the victim well. I am sure they will wine and cry FRAND this and FRAND that...but again, Apple plays the victim well. As long as they get what they want, they are fine. Like a spoiled kid.

And people like competition. This is proven every day. If Android wasnt around, then some other device would be around giving Apple a run for their money. Imagine if there was only Apple. They could charge you what they want, with as many features as they want, and you would have to accept it.

Apple has legitimate claims in many cases, but leave the silly/petty **** out of it.

Is Google suing currently or talking/trying to work it out with Apple. Last time I saw they were meeting with Apple to try and resolve their issues.

Yes, currently it's just talks at this stage. However, I have little faith at this stage of it ending amicably...

Why is this happening? Apple should just be laughed out of court.

Because the notion is that Apple is a GREAT American company that is the mother of all modern computer innovations (delusional), but mostly because Apple stock at the moment is very influential over the state of NASDAQ so A LOT of people including the justice system will lean Apple's way.

Ironic though, cause Samsung is more of an American company today considering they have manufacturing in US than Apple. Apple is an American company only on paper, their practices, production and money all basically go out of US.

I really wish Samsung would tell Apple to **** off and find someone else to manufacture parts for them, I know Samsung would lose money but it's the only way that Apple will learn. As someone else has already said, this isn't about Apple protecting their IP any more they want Samsung gone, out of the market permanently. If this isn't anti-competitive I don't know what is.

It would be hilarious if the phones of both companies end up being banned.

If I remember correctly they did in South Korea, didn't they?

I really wish Samsung would tell Apple to **** off and find someone else to manufacture parts for them, I know Samsung would lose money but it's the only way that Apple will learn. As someone else has already said, this isn't about Apple protecting their IP any more they want Samsung gone, out of the market permanently. If this isn't anti-competitive I don't know what is.

Investors would then tell Samsung to "**** off" themselves. Apple moves on to other manufacturers, something they're already in process of doing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!