ComScore: Apple & Google Up, Microsoft Down in US smartphone MarketShar


Recommended Posts

This was the last comscore data article from Neowin https://www.neowin.net/news/comscore-microsofts-us-smartphone-share-rises-slightly

Apple is now over 33%

RIM down to 9.5

Microsoft Down to 3.6

The latest data from online analytics companycomScore shows that Apple?s share of the U.S. smartphone market has grown to just over 33%. That?s up 2% since April 2012. The study, which surveyed over 30,000 U.S. mobile phone subscribers, unsurprisingly found that Google?s Android continues to lead among smartphone platforms with over 52% market share, an increase of 1.4% since April.

APPLE AND GOOGLE UP, RIM AND MICROSOFT DOWN

The biggest loser among smartphone platforms is RIM, which also doesn?t come as a surprise. RIM is now ranked third with 9.5% share. Microsoft?s efforts in the mobile space aren?t exactly panning out either, though. Instead of gaining market share in the last few months, Microsoft?s smartphone platform was actually down 0.4% and now commands just 3.6% of the market.

smartphone-platforms-comscore-september-12.png?w=640

As for manufacturers, Samsung continues to lead among smartphone and non-smartphone OEMs, with 25.6% of the market (down 0.3% since April), followed by LG (18.4%) and Apple (16.3% and up 1.9% since April).

smartphone-non-smartphone-oem-share-9-12.png?w=640

Users are also starting to make more use of their phone?s capabilities. According to comScore?s data, the number of mobile phone owners (including those without smartphones) who use text messaging, download apps, access social networking sites and used a mobile browser are all up since April.

comscore-mobile-content-usage-0-12.png?w=640

http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/04/comscore-apples-share-of-u-s-smartphone-market-now-over-33-rim-drops-to-under-10/

This will all change soon as it always does. Especially with WP8, and the iPhone always sells well

Something the pro Microsoft crowd have been telling us for the last 2 years, yet their loss of WM customers still outweighs their gain in WP customers... apparently. I've seen nothing in WP8 that shows me Microsoft are suddenly onto the killer formula.

Something the pro Microsoft crowd have been telling us for the last 2 years, yet their loss of WM customers still outweighs their gain in WP customers... apparently. I've seen nothing in WP8 that shows me Microsoft are suddenly onto the killer formula.

and the funny part about WM+Wp market share is when it goes Up fans say WM share is literally 0 and its only wp

when it goes down fans say its the wm market share which goes down and wp is still going up.

Dont know when they are going to stop pulling this wm card.

  • Like 3

and the funny part about WM+Wp market share is when it goes Up fans say WM share is literally 0 and its only wp

when it goes down fans say its the wm market share which goes down and wp is still going up.

Dont know when they are going to stop pulling this wm card.

Actually that card was only played until the numbers stabilized for a while. Once it hit that point it was obvious that WM share no longer mattered in the scores.

However, the other phone platform fans love to trot this out and act like it still happens on a regular basis.

One thing to point out is that share has dropped because no one wants to pick up a WP7 device with WP8 just around the corner. Sales were still up while speculation on whether or not current phones could upgrade to WP8 was in the air. Now that it's clearly defined people are waiting.

It really is as simple as that.

To me it just sounds like a matter of following one excuse with another. Overall, Microsoft's share has continued to drop despite the introduction of WP. Overall, customers just aren't that interested in it.

I just don't like Windows Phone. I think its UI is not that great. I actually prefer the icon centric approach to the live tiles so to me this market share thing is no surprise. If its market share was going up then I'd have cause for concern as I'd be out of touch with public opinion :p

I just don't like Windows Phone. I think its UI is not that great. I actually prefer the icon centric approach to the live tiles so to me this market share thing is no surprise. If its market share was going up then I'd have cause for concern as I'd be out of touch with public opinion :p

I'm largely the same, but I don't really like Metro full stop to be honest, I just find it to be a horrible design paradigm.

Actually that card was only played until the numbers stabilized for a while. Once it hit that point it was obvious that WM share no longer mattered in the scores.

However, the other phone platform fans love to trot this out and act like it still happens on a regular basis.

One thing to point out is that share has dropped because no one wants to pick up a WP7 device with WP8 just around the corner. Sales were still up while speculation on whether or not current phones could upgrade to WP8 was in the air. Now that it's clearly defined people are waiting.

It really is as simple as that.

look at the 2 comment on last comscore data which was posted 1 and half months ago.. they are still pulling that card.

As usual trying to find excuses to make them self feel better. its simple as that.

To me it just sounds like a matter of following one excuse with another. Overall, Microsoft's share has continued to drop despite the introduction of WP. Overall, customers just aren't that interested in it.

Actually it stabilized and rose, then started dropping again...that was the point I was making.

If it's started dropping that doesn't indicate that people are waiting for WP8, it indicates that they're dumping it for another platform. If they were waiting for WP8, they'd just keep their current WP7 handsets until the WP8 ones arrive.

If it's started dropping that doesn't indicate that people are waiting for WP8, it indicates that they're dumping it for another platform. If they were waiting for WP8, they'd just keep their current WP7 handsets until the WP8 ones arrive.

Actually that's not what the charts mean. You do know that this isn't a measure of a static number right? It's a measure of growth. If another platform grows while another stays fairly static then the number will drop on the platform that stayed static.

So let's look at it this way. Let's say there are 100 phones in the whole world, and that Microsoft has sold 4. Well then that accounts for 4% of the market with all of the other companies having sold 96 phones total.

Now let's say that later on down the road there are now 1000 phones out there and Microsoft has sold 36 while all of the competition has sold a total of 964. Microsoft didn't lose any phones that were already sold. In fact they added 32 new phones to their subscriber base, but lost market share percentage. They went from 4% to 3.6%

So while the 100% is a definable mark, the number of phones in the market is in flux. This means percentages go up and down based not solely on whether or not a platform lost customers, but if other companies outsold them in terms of new customers.

Outselling affects the percentage just as much, if not more than customer shrink.

This is what I've done for a living as a support analyst. I know how the numbers work. Shrink in percentage does not always equal abandonment, but can indicate a loss in momentum. Usually that happens when a new platform is about to launch. People (especially in the enthusiast segment of the market) wait if a launch is around the corner.

Actually that's not what the charts mean. You do know that this isn't a measure of a static number right? It's a measure of growth. If another platform grows while another stays fairly static then the number will drop on the platform that stayed static.

So let's look at it this way. Let's say there are 100 phones in the whole world, and that Microsoft has sold 4. Well then that accounts for 4% of the market with all of the other companies having sold 96 phones total.

Now let's say that later on down the road there are now 1000 phones out there and Microsoft has sold 36 while all of the competition has sold a total of 964. Microsoft didn't lose any phones that were already sold. In fact they added 32 new phones to their subscriber base, but lost market share percentage. They went from 4% to 3.6%

So while the 100% is a definable mark, the number of phones in the market is in flux. This means percentages go up and down based not solely on whether or not a platform lost customers, but if other companies outsold them in terms of new customers.

Outselling affects the percentage just as much, if not more than customer shrink.

This is what I've done for a living as a support analyst. I know how the numbers work. Shrink in percentage does not always equal abandonment, but can indicate a loss in momentum. Usually that happens when a new platform is about to launch. People (especially in the enthusiast segment of the market) wait if a launch is around the corner.

Rubbish, garbage whatever way you look at it, market stats tell us that consumers just aren't interested in Windows Phone. That's really what the bottom line is. Android and iOS were both exploding into growth within 2 years of their release, and Windows Phone is growing marketshare at about the same rate as Linux in the desktop arena. How long does their growth have to continue to suck before Windows Phone is seen as a failure? Will you still be making the same excuses if these numbers are similar after 5 years? 10? 20?

  • Like 1

I do believe I'm exiting this conversation as it has exited reality.

When someone who knows what the charts mean because this is what they do for a living is ignored it's obvious that people do not want to deal in facts.

Rubbish, garbage whatever way you look at it, market stats tell us that consumers just aren't interested in Windows Phone. That's really what the bottom line is. Android and iOS were both exploding into growth within 2 years of their release, and Windows Phone is growing marketshare at about the same rate as Linux in the desktop arena. How long does their growth have to continue to suck before Windows Phone is seen as a failure? Will you still be making the same excuses if these numbers are similar after 5 years? 10? 20?

Yep.. it looks like in US it will be stabilize in the end at around 60% Android, 30% iOS and the rest split between everything else. It's really going to be 2 platforms Android and iOS.

On a global scale, Android will most likely take 70-75%, iOS will take between 15-20% and the rest will be split among all other platforms. Again, 2 platforms is what will be in the end.

Something the pro Microsoft crowd have been telling us for the last 2 years, yet their loss of WM customers still outweighs their gain in WP customers... apparently. I've seen nothing in WP8 that shows me Microsoft are suddenly onto the killer formula.

But two years ago with didnt have what we do now. I think MS is betting on the tabs/PCs/phones sales to increase since it now be pretty much consistent on all devices. Whether or not that will happen, we will see. But cannot compare 2 years ago from now. Its not like Apple where they can release minor hardware/software changes and people will flock to the device. With MS, people tend to be more cautious and MS either does really well on their new products, or really bad.

Yep.. it looks like in US it will be stabilize in the end at around 60% Android, 30% iOS and the rest split between everything else. It's really going to be 2 platforms Android and iOS.

On a global scale, Android will most likely take 70-75%, iOS will take between 15-20% and the rest will be split among all other platforms. Again, 2 platforms is what will be in the end.

Think you may be surprised and I am betting WP will eat up more market share than people think. I thin BB will never gain to much traction tho. With Apple/Android already dominating and with WP8 coming out soon, next year will be to late for BB.

Rubbish, garbage whatever way you look at it, market stats tell us that consumers just aren't interested in Windows Phone. That's really what the bottom line is. Android and iOS were both exploding into growth within 2 years of their release, and Windows Phone is growing marketshare at about the same rate as Linux in the desktop arena. How long does their growth have to continue to suck before Windows Phone is seen as a failure? Will you still be making the same excuses if these numbers are similar after 5 years? 10? 20?

Yeah, people haven't gotten excited about WP yet. Personally, I can't stand the metro interface. Apparently I'm not alone.

One thing to point out is that share has dropped because no one wants to pick up a WP7 device with WP8 just around the corner. Sales were still up while speculation on whether or not current phones could upgrade to WP8 was in the air. Now that it's clearly defined people are waiting.

Where MS screwed up. They should of allowed existing WP phones an upgrade to WP8. Then sales would of been much better than they are now. Who wants to buy a phone knowing full well ahead of time it will never get the newest OS. Yea, Android has its problems as well but normally if you are smart on the phone you get, then it will be supported for a few years after. Like the Nexus devices and the current high end HTC/Samsung.

Where MS screwed up. They should of allowed existing WP phones an upgrade to WP8. Then sales would of been much better than they are now. Who wants to buy a phone knowing full well ahead of time it will never get the newest OS. Yea, Android has its problems as well but normally if you are smart on the phone you get, then it will be supported for a few years after. Like the Nexus devices and the current high end HTC/Samsung.

That I completely agree with. I understand why they made the break though. They wanted 8 to be fully compliant with all sorts of security standards in order to ensure better enterprise adoption. I'm just hoping that with 7.8 they bring over as much as possible that doesn't depend on the hardware. If it were a case of just the new start screen & nothing else new being ported over they could have released that already. So the fact that they are holding off on releasing 7.8 tells me more is going into it.

Thanks for being reasonable at least and willing to discuss the points without going all weird on it.

Where MS screwed up. They should of allowed existing WP phones an upgrade to WP8. Then sales would of been much better than they are now. Who wants to buy a phone knowing full well ahead of time it will never get the newest OS. Yea, Android has its problems as well but normally if you are smart on the phone you get, then it will be supported for a few years after. Like the Nexus devices and the current high end HTC/Samsung.

which makes me wonder when they are going to abandon wp8. they did it with wm and wp7

which makes me wonder when they are going to abandon wp8. they did it with wm and wp7

They did? I remember Windows Mobile being around for more than a decade.

WP7 is also going to see Conti ued support for a while as evidenced by the upcoming release of 7.8 and Nokia specifically stating they will make sure WP7 devices get fresh content. Sorry, can't help letting those pesky little facts get in the way. ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!