ComScore: Apple & Google Up, Microsoft Down in US smartphone MarketShar


Recommended Posts

US market is Apple territory, but the rest of the world is Nokia land.

Windows Phone market share is up most places in the world and has now overtaken BlackBerry.

http://wmpoweruser.com/kantar-windows-phone-has-overtaken-rim-market-share-in-usa-key-8-countries/

kantar-august-2012-market-share.jpg

The US market isn't everything.

In Europe US combined both iPhone and BlackBerry have lost 5% market share year-over-year, while Windows Phone gained 1.5%. Windows Phone has passed BlackBerry market share worldwide and in about 2 years they will pass iPhone market share worldwide.

So the only way is to make claims without proof, even against someone who knows better due to first-hand experience working there?

Like I said, I have actual working knowledge of this, and you have failed to provide any evidence that states my first-hand knowledge is incorrect.

Lesson? No one should pay attention to what you're saying since it's obviously wrong.

Nope the only way to show people who are blinded by MS is to do the way i did.

so u have first hand experience lol.... :rofl: like Apple genius?? we know how that works

Simple. I know the facts behind what is going on here. You're the only on here making things up. Since I prefer to deal in facts I don't qualify. It makes me a rather unpopular person, since I don't play by politics. I tell it exactly how it is with little or no regard for consequences.

My guiding principle is that if people can't handle truth that's not my problem. I won't cater. It makes for lots of time alone, but allows me to live with myself without ever feeling shame.

wonder when wp8 is abandoned. haha.. poor wp users

This has been and will continue to be the biggest thorn in Microsoft's side. They are trying to make a foothold for themselves in a space where customer loyalty matters and they consistently show they have no way of staying loyal to those customers. Unless Microsoft gets the memo they have no hope of succeeding in the mobile space.

Microsoft lost a lot of customers to Android when they dumped Windows Mobile with no upgrade path at all for them. At the time this painful break was accepted by those customers who stayed due to the benefits Microsoft touted with its Chassis Specifications, namely Apple like Updates without one OEM locking you. Microsoft has now gone and done the same thing 2 years later and will lose more customers as a result. They are banking on it being a net positive due to the influx of new users, but historically those users haven't materialized.

We will see where Microsoft goes with this, but I know a good number of Windows Phone owners (~10) and every last one of them have committed to dumping WP on their next upgrade over the whole WP 7.8 update. Maybe there will be enough new users to make it not matter, but Microsoft really needs to stop rebooting their platforms and brands every couple of years and dumping customers in the middle.

I used to have a lot of faith that WP would be a success, but now I don't think it will do that well at all. The only hope they have is Apple succeeding in suing Android into oblivion. As they don't have the respect for their users that the marketplace now demands from them.

^ Exactly. To have loyal customers you have to be loyal to them. That has never been Microsoft's strong suit.

I would agree & disagree. While in certain circumstances Microsoft hasn't been loyal there are a lot of areas where they have been.

Windows Mobile kept going for years, and many of the phones were able to upgrade to newer versions easily.

Zune users were given updates for quite some time, including updates that added & changed a lot of functionality for the better over time.

The KIN I will admit was a complete cluster, but I put most of that blame on Verizon almost immediately dumping all support for the phone. :(

Xbox is an area where Microsoft has kept innovating. A lot of my older Xbox games work on the 360 (alas not all of them) and the 360 has seen constant

revision and updates. Xbox itself even has what is called a Customer Advocacy & Exceptions Management team that is responsible for customer loyalty in support situations. They are usually the team that handles cases that have been escalated due to low customer satisfaction with prior support experiences.

Windows is an area where Microsoft has since 1994 has tried to make sure that the OS remains fairly consistent so that users wouldn't get lost easily in newer versions. This is really their first huge change to the usability of the OS since Windows 95. Other steps have been fairly evolutionary.

When Windows Phone came out they kept support up for Windows Mobile for almost an additional 2 years. There were actually some new phones that came out running Windows Mobile even after Windows Phone debuted. The marketplace for Windows Mobile just shutdown a couple months ago.

So to say they don't understand user loyalty and its place is something that just seems odd for me to hear since I've worked directly on teams that dealt with customer loyalty and customer satisfaction.

^ Exactly. To have loyal customers you have to be loyal to them. That has never been Microsoft's strong suit.

Most Android OEMs manage just fine with ****ing on their users with regards to updates, I don't think loyalty comes into play here.

I would agree & disagree. While in certain circumstances Microsoft hasn't been loyal there are a lot of areas where they have been.

Windows Mobile kept going for years, and many of the phones were able to upgrade to newer versions easily.

... (snipped for space, refer to the quoted post for the rest)

Microsoft may have customer advocacy teams and whatever other bureaucratic structures make them look like they are customer focused, but they obviously are failing in the arena consistently. So, either those teams have no authority, and as such as useless, or they don't actually represent the users they claim to represent. The reality is shown clearly with how fast and hard Microsoft is failing lately.

Microsoft from inception to fairly recently has been a corporate focused company. The dynamics of the corporate world are a lot different than those of the consumer world. That's why Apple has caught Microsoft with their pants down, so to speak, and have ran past them in profits and market cap. In the corporate world dropping support for a product and telling your customers to buy something else isn't catastrophic. Corporate users buy based on what they perceive as offering value at that time with no regard for the past or the future, only the present, and they value the choice purely in ROI. Consumers are not the same.

Microsoft nuked the Zune and make a fatal mistake IMHO in doing so, as they continue to do lately. Apple didn't stop making iPods when they released the iPhone and they continue to sell them to date. A smarter choice for Microsoft would have been to continue making Zune devices with the only major change being ensuring they run "Windows Phone" sans the phone. Allowing consumers to experience Windows Phone without having to jump ecosystems and helping to keep themselves at the center of the media experience story. Today you're selling ecosystems not devices and they were too short sighted to see the Zune as anything more than a device.

Them dropping Windows Mobile was something to be forgiven. The realities weren't the same when Windows Mobile was on the market, business focus not consumer, but they are the same for Windows Phone 7 and Windows Phone 8. The biggest problem Microsoft has to break is perception and they aren't helping themselves here. They are essentially trying to lie to the majority of their Windows Phone customers with 7.8 and those who are knowledgeable are angry that their 6 month old device will be treated like Android devices. The damage to their brand could be extensive or it could blow over. Time will tell...

This has gotten too long and I seem to have to step away so I'll expand upon it if needed.

Microsoft may have customer advocacy teams and whatever other bureaucratic structures make them look like they are customer focused, but they obviously are failing in the arena consistently. So, either those teams have no authority, and as such as useless, or they don't actually represent the users they claim to represent. The reality is shown clearly with how fast and hard Microsoft is failing lately.

Microsoft from inception to fairly recently has been a corporate focused company. The dynamics of the corporate world are a lot different than those of the consumer world. That's why Apple has caught Microsoft with their pants down, so to speak, and have ran past them in profits and market cap. In the corporate world dropping support for a product and telling your customers to buy something else isn't catastrophic. Corporate users buy based on what they perceive as offering value at that time with no regard for the past or the future, only the present, and they value the choice purely in ROI. Consumers are not the same.

Microsoft nuked the Zune and make a fatal mistake IMHO in doing so, as they continue to do lately. Apple didn't stop making iPods when they released the iPhone and they continue to sell them to date. A smarter choice for Microsoft would have been to continue making Zune devices with the only major change being ensuring they run "Windows Phone" sans the phone. Allowing consumers to experience Windows Phone without having to jump ecosystems and helping to keep themselves at the center of the media experience story. Today you're selling ecosystems not devices and they were too short sighted to see the Zune as anything more than a device.

Them dropping Windows Mobile was something to be forgiven. The realities weren't the same when Windows Mobile was on the market, business focus not consumer, but they are the same for Windows Phone 7 and Windows Phone 8. The biggest problem Microsoft has to break is perception and they aren't helping themselves here. They are essentially trying to lie to the majority of their Windows Phone customers with 7.8 and those who are knowledgeable are angry that their 6 month old device will be treated like Android devices. The damage to their brand could be extensive or it could blow over. Time will tell...

This has gotten too long and I seem to have to step away so I'll expand upon it if needed.

1. The customer advocacy teams I'm referring to are not encumbered by red tape. They are literally the top tier of support in each division, and contact customers directly. They listen to the customers issue and make their decision based entirely upon the circumstances. The person handling that particular customers issue has the authority to make whatever call they need to make.

2. If you think Apple is a customer friendly company all I need point out is the, "You're holding it wrong,' debacle. That's not the only time that Apple has been blatantly rude to customers and told customers that they know best. So to say that the reason Apple wins is because of how they treat the customer isn't really much of a valid point.

3. The Zune line wasn't dropped because of Windows Phone. That was a decision actually made separate from Windows Phone. If the plans were to totally drop the Zune brand then they would have already had another name in place at the launch of Windows Phone for the music hub. They specifically chose to still keep the Zune name at that point. Devices were also still sold for about a year after the launch of Windows Phone. It was in October of 2011 that the final decision was made to axe the Zune line.

4. Regarding ecosystem, actually Microsoft saw Zune as more of an ecosystem than a device...that's why the branding has stuck around...and only soon is about to change. Zune was about both devices & services with the hardware playing a smaller part of that story than the services.

5. Oddly enough Windows Phone was very consumer focused, even to the point of leaving out highly requested enterprise features in order to focus more on conquering the consumer space first. What they found is that the consumers that often pick up smartphones also want the enterprise security features as well. They were bashed hard for not focusing more on the corporate story. That's what they are fixing with Windows Phone 8.

Sorry to put it in bullet-points. I know some people take that as being rude or being aggressive. I do it only to point out things in a clear manner so that the points I'm refuting can be more easily read.

MS Needs to release WPs that even the dirt poor can buy then we will see the numbers go up. That's the one thing android has over all the others. I was taking my friend to the welfare office cause they have a service where they print your resume and help you find work and there was a flyer up that if you can prove your broke you get a free android phone to use for emergencies. If google got rid of the cheap phones and only had phones around the same price as iPhone and WP the numbers would drop dramatically.

in response to your claim that u r MS expert.

You might want to ask around before saying I'm not. I worked on a AAA title at MGS and spent the last few years working on campus on various LIVE and support & support analysis teams, including one that dealt directly with Windows Phone. So yes this is a case where I do know what I'm talking about.

There is more to loyalty than just updates.

Yeah ofcourse there is, but the entire post about loyalty brought up by member "Frazell Thomas" was based entirely on the lack of update and nothing else, hence my point is valid.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!