iPhone 5 opening weekend sales worse than expected


Recommended Posts

Apple sold 5 million iPhone 5s over the opening weekend, the company announced this morning.

This is well below what Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster was calling for. He predicted 6-10 million for the opening weekend.

In fact, Munster called 6 million a "worst case scenario." So, this is worse than a worst case scenario.

The stock is down 2% in pre-market trading.

Last year Apple sold 4 million iPhone 4Ss during the opening weekend. The iPhone 5 was a major redesign, and lines were supposedly longer, so people expected bigger sales.

Analysts like Munster expected Apple to deliver huge opening weekend sales after the company announced 2 million iPhone 5 pre-orders on opening day. That was double what Apple saw for iPhone 4S pre-orders. Obviously, the weekend sales didn't follow the same pattern as the pre-orders.

We won't know the full story of iPhone 5 sales until January when Apple reports results for the holiday quarter. However, today's announcement, coupled with last quarter's earnings, suggests that the days of mega-growth for the iPhone are over.

http://www.sfgate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/IPHONE-5-OPENING-WEEKEND-SALES-COME-IN-WORSE-THAN-3889202.php#page-1

Only 5 million, huh? :/

Only 5 million which is only 1 million more than the last iPhone 4S sold. Only :/. Lol. I call BS article is BS. Some analyst predicted something and it didn't come true. That's what the headline should read. But, nope, got to spin it just right so that the 2% drop in pre-market trading is correlated.

Considering that at least couple of hundred thousand developers bought iPhone 5 due to different resolutions and need to have the new phone for testing, the sales show a trend that Apple's growth is gone.

It's not gone, but it is leveling off. Competition is rising... both WP and Android. That doesn't mean people are throwing away their iPhones left and right, it means people have choices now. Sorry to burst your bubble but the iPhone has a large platform of mobile users and isn't going away anytime soon, and just like every other iPhone generation will become a very popular option for consumers... I mean there's already 5 million + 2(?) million pre orders being shipped. 7 million iPhone 5's being purchased in less than a month and apple shattering it's earnings every quarter shows the growth isn't gone.

Considering that at least couple of hundred thousand developers bought iPhone 5 due to different resolutions and need to have the new phone for testing, the sales show a trend that Apple's growth is gone.

What do you base that assumption on? That's basically the same as saying in order to develop for Android you need every possible hardware configuration. That's just sillyness. I'm sure that a lot of developers upgraded to the new iPhone (or *GASP* the new iPod since the screen resolution is the same). But many rely on the emulator that comes with xcode.

  • Like 3

keep it up boz...at some point in the next 10 years you'll be right, then you can scream out and say "i told you so", today isn't it.

Um.. it's obvious where Apple will end up.. I said the same thing with Android and Apple fanboys said "OMG Android will never come close to iPhone".. and we see how that ended up.

Face it.. Apple has been milking the same phone for 5 years.. they are are not innovating anything, they have a stale OS and it's inevitable.

Consumers will eventually wake up and realize "Damn, I'm buying the same thing over and over again".. unfortunately consumers are slow to realize that, and that's why Apple gets away with mediocrity and marginal improvements.

  • Like 2

Everybody knows it's time for Lumia 920.

We shall see, for a phone that's not out yet I don't hedge my bets. I would like to see it come true, and every thing I've heard so far is pretty positive. A full in depth review is required before I purchase...

Eventually at some point their sales will hit a plateau, but given sales figures are up from the previous generation it's a bit premature to spin this as a failure.

Consumers will eventually wake up and realize "Damn, I'm buying the same thing over and over again".. unfortunately consumers are slow to realize that, and that's why Apple gets away with mediocrity and marginal improvements.

Though a considerable number of consumers deem the iPhone as sufficient for their needs. Naturally they'll switch away when their demands are no longer being met. Seems like that hasn't happened yet else we'd see much more dismal sales figures. Making assumptions that people's requirements are the same as yours is the classic "solution looking for a problem" scenario.

We shall see, for a phone that's not out yet I don't hedge my bets. I would like to see it come true, and every thing I've heard so far is pretty positive. A full in depth review is required before I purchase...

As long as you're not reading a review on the Verge, you'll probably hear good things.

No, the article does have a point. The iPhone 4S was a small upgrade, and more for people who hadn't bought the iPhone 4 yet, or for those who REALLY have to have the very latest. Most iPhone 4 users didn't buy an iPhone 4S. The iPhone 5 though was the big redesign which should have gotten a lot more of the iPhone 4 users (2 years from last release, thus lands perfectly for those on contract), the new iPhone users, the people who upgrade every single time, etc. It should have done a lot better than 1 million more than the small refresh before it did. I think a lot of people are becoming wise to the iPhone game. The majority of people that I know who like iPhones and are knowledgeable about phones have been disappointed by the iPhone 5. There's definitely a growing group of their user base that's getting annoyed that the iPhone doesn't have features that all other phones have had for a year or more now. I suspect they're close to due to see a decline myself. To me they are starting to get that Blackberry feel where they had tons of loyal users, but they just weren't cutting it and weren't keeping the phones up to date with everything else on the market. You saw how fast Blackberry died off. If Apple doesn't do more to keep their users happy and not just give users that THEY decide they should have, it'll happen to Apple too.

Considering that at least couple of hundred thousand developers bought iPhone 5 due to different resolutions and need to have the new phone for testing, the sales show a trend that Apple's growth is gone.

Developers have no software solution to emulate the new iPhone 5? Honestly? Guess that explains why the same app is $9.99 on Google Play but its $15 on iTunes (songsterr for example)

LTE which don't have good saturation right now and a tiny bit bigger screen isn't worth the additional $200 for most. a 4S will suffice as iOS has no iPhone5 specific software or hardware features (aside from res and LTE)

Plus apple ****ed off a lot of folk who had a bunch of adapters they had to buy adapters for. Plus, although very miniscule, the 5 isn't jailbroken.. which may be a deal breaker for 300,000 potential buyers.

Um.. it's obvious where Apple will end up.. I said the same thing with Android and Apple fanboys said "OMG Android will never come close to iPhone".. and we see how that ended up.

Face it.. Apple has been milking the same phone for 5 years.. they are are not innovating anything, they have a stale OS and it's inevitable.

Consumers will eventually wake up and realize "Damn, I'm buying the same thing over and over again".. unfortunately consumers are slow to realize that, and that's why Apple gets away with mediocrity and marginal improvements.

Perhaps, and I believe your correct on the 2nd point.

There is no denying that over time, companies will innovate to iron out their issues with the OS. However, I think it's been a painful process for both Windows and Android users as they phones are kind of 'left in the dust' of new releases. Uncertainty over upgrades in Android's case (e.g. When/if my phone is getting ICS/Jelly Bean) or an entirely new OS for Windows users which locks them out of the new store.

I hope they offer greater continuity between devices in future to provide a better experience for those who don't buy a new device every 2 years.

No, the article does have a point. The iPhone 4S was a small upgrade, and more for people who hadn't bought the iPhone 4 yet, or for those who REALLY have to have the very latest. Most iPhone 4 users didn't buy an iPhone 4S. The iPhone 5 though was the big redesign which should have gotten a lot more of the iPhone 4 users (2 years from last release, thus lands perfectly for those on contract), the new iPhone users, the people who upgrade every single time, etc. It should have done a lot better than 1 million more than the small refresh before it did. I think a lot of people are becoming wise to the iPhone game. The majority of people that I know who like iPhones and are knowledgeable about phones have been disappointed by the iPhone 5. There's definitely a growing group of their user base that's getting annoyed that the iPhone doesn't have features that all other phones have had for a year or more now. I suspect they're close to due to see a decline myself. To me they are starting to get that Blackberry feel where they had tons of loyal users, but they just weren't cutting it and weren't keeping the phones up to date with everything else on the market. You saw how fast Blackberry died off. If Apple doesn't do more to keep their users happy and not just give users that THEY decide they should have, it'll happen to Apple too.

FYI, iPhone 4 first weekend sales were 1.7 million. iPhone 4S was roughly what? 4 million. iPhone 5 is being reported as roughly 5 million.

I'm not sure where the logic is coming from that Apple somehow has done worse with the iPhone 5 than previous iPhones. The data certainly doesn't support it. Maybe it is based on an emerging anti-Apple ideology. Ideologies don't need supporting information.

FYI, iPhone 4 first weekend sales were 1.7 million. iPhone 4S was roughly what? 4 million. iPhone 5 is being reported as roughly 5 million.

I'm not sure where the logic is coming from that Apple somehow has done worse with the iPhone 5 than previous iPhones. The data certainly doesn't support it. Maybe it is based on an emerging anti-Apple ideology. Ideologies don't need supporting information.

Oh, weird. I didn't know the iPhone 4 was only 1.7. The article omitted that part, haha. That's weird then that the 4S was 4 million. I would have expected to see the 4 be much higher. I guess that throws my logic out the window. There has been a massive trend towards smartphones in the past year or two though, so that would definitely help sales.

Personally I'm kind of surprised by the sales of the iPhone 5, even if it's lower than some analysts' predictions. I heard a lot of people show disinterest in the 5, so I expected sales would be slower. Just goes to show that a lot of people really will buy anything Apple puts out, haha.

If the sales were so poor, then why are there people with preorders that won't ship until October? It would be in Apple's interest to ship those people an iPhone and charge their credit card for it if they just had them sitting around. As far as I know the phones that are ordered but haven't been delivered do not count in these sales numbers.

The reality is that they have sold pretty much all that they could make for the opening weekend. Some individual stores may have some stock but it isn't like there are millions sitting in warehouses waiting for people to order them.

If Apple could have made and shipped more they would have sold more. What an absolutely terrible position to be in, poor Apple.

The whole reporting-on-Apple situation is really weird these days. People are disappointed when a new device "Doesn't live up to the hype", or when sales or profits "miss analyst expectations".

All Apple does is announce products when they're ready to go on sale and then ship them to those that order them.

Most of the hype about new products comes from gadget blogs and news sites. The same sites that report on every iPhone ribbon cable that leaks out of China but are then "disappointed" when there's no surprise left at the announcement.

Most of the high expectations for sales and profits come from the same analysts who will report the real results as disappointing a few weeks later.

Meanwhile Apple continues on making products and selling them to those who want them.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!