iPhone 5 opening weekend sales worse than expected


Recommended Posts

Maybe. Just maybe it is a sign that iPhone users have gotten smart instead of wasting truckloads of money breaking their contracts year after year.

Honestly I think that in the big picture those who upgrade their device every year are very much in the minority. Apple would be foolish to count on yearly upgrades for the bulk of its sales. Even among previous iPhone owners I would expect the majority to be upgrading from the 3GS or 4.

Maybe during the first week or weekend there will be a large proportion of people upgrading from the iPhone 4S, but over the course of a year or two of sales for a particular model the vast majority probably come from people who never owned an iPhone before.

Weird Wall St. Journal is saying different ( kinda )

Apple Inc. sold more than five million units of the iPhone 5 during its first three days in stores, a new record that still undershot some analysts' estimates because of supply constraints.

The company has sold out of its initial inventory
, Chief Executive Tim Cook said in a statement Monday, though most customers who pre-ordered their iPhones had their devices shipped already.

"Demand for iPhone 5 has been incredible, and we are working hard to get an iPhone 5 into the hands of every customer who wants one as quickly as possible," Mr. Cook said. "While we have sold out ...

i think Boz just does random doom and gloom searches for iPhone / Apple. in my mind i picture him with the sandwich sign saying the end is near, repent, just with an Apple logo circled with a line through it

What do you base that assumption on? That's basically the same as saying in order to develop for Android you need every possible hardware configuration. That's just sillyness. I'm sure that a lot of developers upgraded to the new iPhone (or *GASP* the new iPod since the screen resolution is the same). But many rely on the emulator that comes with xcode.

Boz is rationalizing standing in line for a new iPhone,, because " its for work "

  • Like 3

Weird Wall St. Journal is saying different ( kinda )

[/size][/size][/font][/color][/indent]

i think Boz just does random doom and gloom searches for iPhone / Apple. in my mind i picture him with the sandwich sign saying the end is near, repent, just with an Apple logo circled with a line through it

Supply doesn't affect pre-orders, only how fast they ship. That's just Apple trying to trick people into thinking there's a reason why it didn't meet some analysts' estimates. You can still order now, it just won't ship for quite a while. Did the website ever say it was actually sold out? I honestly never saw because I never paid attention, but doesn't Apple just push the wait time on shipping when they start to run out of supplies rather than stopping preorders?

Supply doesn't affect pre-orders, only how fast they ship. That's just Apple trying to trick dumb people into thinking there's a reason why it didn't meet some analysts' estimates.

analyst's estimates....

so people that have no idea the internal workings of apple's supply, and going just off past history like it doesn't change at all.

Supply doesn't affect pre-orders, only how fast they ship. That's just Apple trying to trick people into thinking there's a reason why it didn't meet some analysts' estimates. You can still order now, it just won't ship for quite a while. Did the website ever say it was actually sold out? I honestly never saw because I never paid attention, but doesn't Apple just push the wait time on shipping when they start to run out of supplies rather than stopping preorders?

As far as I know Apple does not count phones ordered but not yet shipped in their sales numbers. That's why the number was so high when they announced the preorders placed in the first 24 hours (2 million) compared to the actual sales numbers we see here for the first weekend.

So when Apple's next earnings report comes in, and they show they shattered earning records, Boz will come in and say that Apple is doomed.

Yup, it was hilarious 5 years ago and its still hilarious now.

  • Like 3

FYI, iPhone 4 first weekend sales were 1.7 million. iPhone 4S was roughly what? 4 million. iPhone 5 is being reported as roughly 5 million.

I'm not sure where the logic is coming from that Apple somehow has done worse with the iPhone 5 than previous iPhones. The data certainly doesn't support it. Maybe it is based on an emerging anti-Apple ideology. Ideologies don't need supporting information.

not saying they have done worse compared to previous iPhones sales. Boz is saying that its doom and gloom because its done worse then Some person not on apples payroll said it would do

So the 4S was a major success when it sold 4millions but the 5 is a failure because it only sold 5 millions? :/

well its a tricky thing, because people were expecting alot more people to upgrade due to being out of Contract Term for the 3G and iPhone 4, they are calling it a failure because the numbers expected were based on the people upgrading from a 3G, 3 and 4 ( not 4S ).

the problem lies on the production run, and if the people that wanted to upgrade would. because of being sold out they couldn't even if they wanted to, or wanted to and couldn't. is not considered. also iOS 6 was underwelming, and didnt bring anything new from my personal standpoint, let alone the Backlash from Maps, which may also be a cause of people holding off on the new iPhone so they dont have to deal with iOS6 Maps

IMO and this is pure IMO if i had an iPhone i would probably skip it ( iPhone 5 ), because a couple additional inches of screen space for a phone is not important to me in comparison. now i do own an iPad, i use to one a 1st gen and skipped the 2nd Gen because i didnt care about a camera and a little speed bump. but i got the 3rd gen, because of a combination of all the upgrades compared to a iPad 1G it actually was worth an upgrade. and like i said in https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106591-ios-6-worth-the-update/ iOS6 isnt anything impressive

now its a garentee that when the iPhone comes back in stock, it will still sell like hotcakes. and people that wanted to upgrade will. and on same token people that don't think its a value enough wont.

Exactly. However, that doesn't make nearly as spectacular of a news story title.

Yeah, the REAL title for this article should be "Apple can't keep up with demand for iPhone 5!". But of course, that wouldn't make any sense to our resident anti-Apple trolls.

I think the thing to take away from this is the analyst don't know diddly! In good times or bad analyst say things for them to make money not consumers. They predicted 8 million and the stock jumped. They manipulate or at least try to manipulate prices.

Perhaps the reason for this is that they can't meet the demand. There have been rumours of supply issues.

That could be the case but I have not heard of anyone anywhere not being able to buy the new iPhone. Have there been reports of people going into stores and being told they were out?

I think the thing to take away from this is the analyst don't know diddly! In good times or bad analyst say things for them to make money not consumers. They predicted 8 million and the stock jumped. They manipulate or at least try to manipulate prices.

That could be the case but I have not heard of anyone anywhere not being able to buy the new iPhone. Have there been reports of people going into stores and being told they were out?

Apple dedicated a certain percentage of their stock to the stores. If a particular store doesn't sell all of theirs they don't go back into the pool. Lots of people who ordered online are still waiting for their orders to ship, so overall supply has not caught up yet.

As much as I dislike the iPhone (love the hardware, hate the software), I can't deny the numbers. The demand for the iPhone 5 has exceeded the supply and 5 million is a very impressive number for smartphones sold. I think it's safe to assume they would've sold more if the supply was there. What would have been worrying is if they sold less than 4 million iPhone 5s.

  • Like 2

Typical Boz. Spinning something good into bad because there's an Apple logo on it.

I understand that what goes up must come down, but it's not that time yet. Articles like these remind me of the articles that come out after Apple's quarterly announcements saying how the company is on the decline because they didn't hit some pie in the sky mark set by some random analysis, when I reality, they beat the record they set the previous year while other companies are slipping.

It also reminds me of all the articles that came out last year about the, "underwhelming," iPhone 4s, and we all know how that panned out...

Eventually at some point their sales will hit a plateau, but given sales figures are up from the previous generation it's a bit premature to spin this as a failure.

Though a considerable number of consumers deem the iPhone as sufficient for their needs. Naturally they'll switch away when their demands are no longer being met. Seems like that hasn't happened yet else we'd see much more dismal sales figures. Making assumptions that people's requirements are the same as yours is the classic "solution looking for a problem" scenario.

(Y)

The most well reasoned post on Neowin.

That could be the case but I have not heard of anyone anywhere not being able to buy the new iPhone. Have there been reports of people going into stores and being told they were out?

The AT&T Corporate store in my area sold out of the 70 iPhone or so iPhone 5s, and I saw people being turned away. The 3rd party AT&T store that I got mine from only got 4 (2 16GB and 2 32GB) and they were gone soon after the UPS man dropped them off...naturally...

Really? I expect to sell 10 computers. I sold 5. Yep, everything went as expected. :rolleyes:

Spin that story to meet your preconceived notion of what Apple is.

But Apple did not "expect to sell 10 computers" in your analogy. Let's try this:

I expect to sell a lot of computers. I make as many as I can ahead of time. I get 2 pre-orders before they even go on sale. I get 5 made before launch day.

Because of the 2 pre-orders, some analysts who don't work for me report that I should sell at least 10 computers in the first weekend.

When the launch day comes around, I sell all 5 of the computers I made within 3 days. I take orders for more and will get them to customers as soon as I can.

The analysts who expected that I would sell the 10 computers I didn't have built yet then post articles about how I missed their expectations and make profits from the page views.

That's how it seems to me, unless you can somehow account for several million iPhones sitting ready in a warehouse somewhere that for some reason Apple isn't shipping out to people who have ordered them.

But Apple did not "expect to sell 10 computers" in your analogy. Let's try this:

I expect to sell a lot of computers. I make as many as I can ahead of time. I get 2 pre-orders before they even go on sale. I get 5 made before launch day.

Because of the 2 pre-orders, some analysts who don't work for me report that I should sell at least 10 computers in the first weekend.

When the launch day comes around, I sell all 5 of the computers I made within 3 days. I take orders for more and will get them to customers as soon as I can.

The analysts who expected that I would sell the 10 computers I didn't have built yet then post articles about how I missed their expectations and make profits from the page views.

That's how it seems to me, unless you can somehow account for several million iPhones sitting ready in a warehouse somewhere that for some reason Apple isn't shipping out to people who have ordered them.

best analogy so far :)

also the leap from 4 to 5 was expected to be bigger; remember that there was lot of fuss when 4S was released (it was percieved as as minor update) so it was expected that the sales for the iPhone 5 were going to be better then the 4S because of that; so yeah it's selling as Apple expected but the percieved demand should be much bigger.

If you expect the ridiculous you're bound to be disappointed. Doesn't matter how Boz tries to spin this one around, at the end of the day Apple still sold a million more iPhone 5 units compared to the iPhone 4S last year in the same timeframe. That's excluding pre-orders that haven't arrived yet.

Analyst Says Perhaps Millions of iPhone 5 Pre-Orders Still in Transit, Not Included in Announced Sales

http://www.macrumors...nnounced-sales/

  • Like 2

Um.. it's obvious where Apple will end up.. I said the same thing with Android and Apple fanboys said "OMG Android will never come close to iPhone".. and we see how that ended up.

Face it.. Apple has been milking the same phone for 5 years.. they are are not innovating anything, they have a stale OS and it's inevitable.

Consumers will eventually wake up and realize "Damn, I'm buying the same thing over and over again".. unfortunately consumers are slow to realize that, and that's why Apple gets away with mediocrity and marginal improvements.

Face it. OSX has had the same interface for past 10 years and yet it's become more popular than ever. Not just for individual buyers, but for corporations as well. Ever thought about why or do you figure that if you find the interface stale, everybody else is going to follow suit? I get that you don't like Apple, but the rationale behind your opinions of how the company is going down doesn't make a lot of sense. Let's break this down for you:

1. Estimates were set by Wall Street analysts, they all have their varying ranges from very conservative to very optimistic. The company doesn't strive to break analysts targets, it strives to break its own.

2. Apple sold 5 million iPhones on their opening weekend. That's 25% more than its predecessor. In an environment where there are countless alternatives by numerous companies which are cheaper or at the same price point.

3. The new iPhones cost $40 MORE than the predecessor and still sold 25% more. You would think people would know better than to pay more for something they find stale and old, right? Don't worry, here's some consolation for you. Apple didn't make more profit per phone because they incurred more material costs that was passed to the customer. "That's because they're all iSheep." (s) Yes - millions of customers and enterprises are all sheep because you managed to show a video of 5~6 people who couldn't tell the difference between 4S and 5. (/s)

4. Apple makes more profit per phone that's sold than all your other counterparts. Having 99% of market share by volume means doesn't mean much if you're profits shrink as a result.

Now let's look at why this stale interface works.

5. Apple's approach has been to make user interface INTUITIVE for the average retail user. For better or worse, it's why they have promoted a closed walled-garden since the beginning. The average user prefers familiarity and doesn't want/care to learn new things that is outside of their comfort zone. The way average users define 'simple' is very different from how technical folks define it. For you it's easy enough to swipe a finger or pull down a menu to change settings in Android but if you give it to someone new and ask them to figure the device out, it would take them a lot longer compared to an iPhone.

5b. People are comfortable with what is familiar to them unless there is a compelling reason to change. The interface maybe stale for you but it works for the masses who know exactly where to go and what to do when they get another device or software upgrade. They don't have to spend time figuring it out. I can give my grandma an iPad and she can figure out how to use it for her purposes without teaching her anything and she can barely read/write in English (she does have one and uses it). This again is entirely subject to people's preference.

5c. Why do you think increasing number of businesses are testing iPhones and iPads now? If there is one thing businesses feel comfortable with, it is consistency. They don't have the time to keep installing and trying different interfaces. They find what works and use it for as long as possible. If they get this level of consistency from Apple, you think they are just going to drop the devices because the interface is stale? Why don't you ask Microsoft how Windows 95/XP/7 fares for them? I'd love to find out how many companies are comfortable having Android devices on their network to be used for business related uses (not being sarcastic, really would like to know).

I'm not a "fanboy" simply because of Apple's marketing tactics. I've followed the company's products, services, business practices, design ethos stock since 2004 as closely as I could have. Their screw-ups aside (MobileMe, Antennagate, hockey puck mouse, issues at Foxconn, Maps, etc etc), their market position is justified.

I've not read the whole thread, but when reading other topics regarding this "news" most people (and news articles) seem to ignore the actual growth of the smartphone market (soemthing which the Analysts did include and why they were expecting more than 5 million sales). 5 million sales now is a smaller amount of the whole market than 4 million sales at the last iPhone launch.

Therefore in real terms there are more people buying iPhones, but less of the market are buying iPhones, and therefore you could anticipate good sales for Android and WP8 in the future, or otherwise people are simply holding onto their phones for longer.

I've not read the whole thread, but when reading other topics regarding this "news" most people (and news articles) seem to ignore the actual growth of the smartphone market (soemthing which the Analysts did include and why they were expecting more than 5 million sales). 5 million sales now is a smaller amount of the whole market than 4 million sales at the last iPhone launch.

Therefore in real terms there are more people buying iPhones, but less of the market are buying iPhones, and therefore you could anticipate good sales for Android and WP8 in the future, or otherwise people are simply holding onto their phones for longer.

this is a great point.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!