iPhone 5 opening weekend sales worse than expected


Recommended Posts

Maybe. Just maybe it is a sign that iPhone users have gotten smart instead of wasting truckloads of money breaking their contracts year after year.

Honestly I think that in the big picture those who upgrade their device every year are very much in the minority. Apple would be foolish to count on yearly upgrades for the bulk of its sales. Even among previous iPhone owners I would expect the majority to be upgrading from the 3GS or 4.

Maybe during the first week or weekend there will be a large proportion of people upgrading from the iPhone 4S, but over the course of a year or two of sales for a particular model the vast majority probably come from people who never owned an iPhone before.

Weird Wall St. Journal is saying different ( kinda )

Apple Inc. sold more than five million units of the iPhone 5 during its first three days in stores, a new record that still undershot some analysts' estimates because of supply constraints.

The company has sold out of its initial inventory
, Chief Executive Tim Cook said in a statement Monday, though most customers who pre-ordered their iPhones had their devices shipped already.

"Demand for iPhone 5 has been incredible, and we are working hard to get an iPhone 5 into the hands of every customer who wants one as quickly as possible," Mr. Cook said. "While we have sold out ...

i think Boz just does random doom and gloom searches for iPhone / Apple. in my mind i picture him with the sandwich sign saying the end is near, repent, just with an Apple logo circled with a line through it

What do you base that assumption on? That's basically the same as saying in order to develop for Android you need every possible hardware configuration. That's just sillyness. I'm sure that a lot of developers upgraded to the new iPhone (or *GASP* the new iPod since the screen resolution is the same). But many rely on the emulator that comes with xcode.

Boz is rationalizing standing in line for a new iPhone,, because " its for work "

  • Like 3

Weird Wall St. Journal is saying different ( kinda )

[/size][/size][/font][/color][/indent]

i think Boz just does random doom and gloom searches for iPhone / Apple. in my mind i picture him with the sandwich sign saying the end is near, repent, just with an Apple logo circled with a line through it

Supply doesn't affect pre-orders, only how fast they ship. That's just Apple trying to trick people into thinking there's a reason why it didn't meet some analysts' estimates. You can still order now, it just won't ship for quite a while. Did the website ever say it was actually sold out? I honestly never saw because I never paid attention, but doesn't Apple just push the wait time on shipping when they start to run out of supplies rather than stopping preorders?

Supply doesn't affect pre-orders, only how fast they ship. That's just Apple trying to trick dumb people into thinking there's a reason why it didn't meet some analysts' estimates.

analyst's estimates....

so people that have no idea the internal workings of apple's supply, and going just off past history like it doesn't change at all.

Supply doesn't affect pre-orders, only how fast they ship. That's just Apple trying to trick people into thinking there's a reason why it didn't meet some analysts' estimates. You can still order now, it just won't ship for quite a while. Did the website ever say it was actually sold out? I honestly never saw because I never paid attention, but doesn't Apple just push the wait time on shipping when they start to run out of supplies rather than stopping preorders?

As far as I know Apple does not count phones ordered but not yet shipped in their sales numbers. That's why the number was so high when they announced the preorders placed in the first 24 hours (2 million) compared to the actual sales numbers we see here for the first weekend.

So when Apple's next earnings report comes in, and they show they shattered earning records, Boz will come in and say that Apple is doomed.

Yup, it was hilarious 5 years ago and its still hilarious now.

  • Like 3

FYI, iPhone 4 first weekend sales were 1.7 million. iPhone 4S was roughly what? 4 million. iPhone 5 is being reported as roughly 5 million.

I'm not sure where the logic is coming from that Apple somehow has done worse with the iPhone 5 than previous iPhones. The data certainly doesn't support it. Maybe it is based on an emerging anti-Apple ideology. Ideologies don't need supporting information.

not saying they have done worse compared to previous iPhones sales. Boz is saying that its doom and gloom because its done worse then Some person not on apples payroll said it would do

So the 4S was a major success when it sold 4millions but the 5 is a failure because it only sold 5 millions? :/

well its a tricky thing, because people were expecting alot more people to upgrade due to being out of Contract Term for the 3G and iPhone 4, they are calling it a failure because the numbers expected were based on the people upgrading from a 3G, 3 and 4 ( not 4S ).

the problem lies on the production run, and if the people that wanted to upgrade would. because of being sold out they couldn't even if they wanted to, or wanted to and couldn't. is not considered. also iOS 6 was underwelming, and didnt bring anything new from my personal standpoint, let alone the Backlash from Maps, which may also be a cause of people holding off on the new iPhone so they dont have to deal with iOS6 Maps

IMO and this is pure IMO if i had an iPhone i would probably skip it ( iPhone 5 ), because a couple additional inches of screen space for a phone is not important to me in comparison. now i do own an iPad, i use to one a 1st gen and skipped the 2nd Gen because i didnt care about a camera and a little speed bump. but i got the 3rd gen, because of a combination of all the upgrades compared to a iPad 1G it actually was worth an upgrade. and like i said in https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106591-ios-6-worth-the-update/ iOS6 isnt anything impressive

now its a garentee that when the iPhone comes back in stock, it will still sell like hotcakes. and people that wanted to upgrade will. and on same token people that don't think its a value enough wont.

Exactly. However, that doesn't make nearly as spectacular of a news story title.

Yeah, the REAL title for this article should be "Apple can't keep up with demand for iPhone 5!". But of course, that wouldn't make any sense to our resident anti-Apple trolls.

I think the thing to take away from this is the analyst don't know diddly! In good times or bad analyst say things for them to make money not consumers. They predicted 8 million and the stock jumped. They manipulate or at least try to manipulate prices.

Perhaps the reason for this is that they can't meet the demand. There have been rumours of supply issues.

That could be the case but I have not heard of anyone anywhere not being able to buy the new iPhone. Have there been reports of people going into stores and being told they were out?

I think the thing to take away from this is the analyst don't know diddly! In good times or bad analyst say things for them to make money not consumers. They predicted 8 million and the stock jumped. They manipulate or at least try to manipulate prices.

That could be the case but I have not heard of anyone anywhere not being able to buy the new iPhone. Have there been reports of people going into stores and being told they were out?

Apple dedicated a certain percentage of their stock to the stores. If a particular store doesn't sell all of theirs they don't go back into the pool. Lots of people who ordered online are still waiting for their orders to ship, so overall supply has not caught up yet.

As much as I dislike the iPhone (love the hardware, hate the software), I can't deny the numbers. The demand for the iPhone 5 has exceeded the supply and 5 million is a very impressive number for smartphones sold. I think it's safe to assume they would've sold more if the supply was there. What would have been worrying is if they sold less than 4 million iPhone 5s.

  • Like 2

Typical Boz. Spinning something good into bad because there's an Apple logo on it.

I understand that what goes up must come down, but it's not that time yet. Articles like these remind me of the articles that come out after Apple's quarterly announcements saying how the company is on the decline because they didn't hit some pie in the sky mark set by some random analysis, when I reality, they beat the record they set the previous year while other companies are slipping.

It also reminds me of all the articles that came out last year about the, "underwhelming," iPhone 4s, and we all know how that panned out...

Eventually at some point their sales will hit a plateau, but given sales figures are up from the previous generation it's a bit premature to spin this as a failure.

Though a considerable number of consumers deem the iPhone as sufficient for their needs. Naturally they'll switch away when their demands are no longer being met. Seems like that hasn't happened yet else we'd see much more dismal sales figures. Making assumptions that people's requirements are the same as yours is the classic "solution looking for a problem" scenario.

(Y)

The most well reasoned post on Neowin.

That could be the case but I have not heard of anyone anywhere not being able to buy the new iPhone. Have there been reports of people going into stores and being told they were out?

The AT&T Corporate store in my area sold out of the 70 iPhone or so iPhone 5s, and I saw people being turned away. The 3rd party AT&T store that I got mine from only got 4 (2 16GB and 2 32GB) and they were gone soon after the UPS man dropped them off...naturally...

Really? I expect to sell 10 computers. I sold 5. Yep, everything went as expected. :rolleyes:

Spin that story to meet your preconceived notion of what Apple is.

But Apple did not "expect to sell 10 computers" in your analogy. Let's try this:

I expect to sell a lot of computers. I make as many as I can ahead of time. I get 2 pre-orders before they even go on sale. I get 5 made before launch day.

Because of the 2 pre-orders, some analysts who don't work for me report that I should sell at least 10 computers in the first weekend.

When the launch day comes around, I sell all 5 of the computers I made within 3 days. I take orders for more and will get them to customers as soon as I can.

The analysts who expected that I would sell the 10 computers I didn't have built yet then post articles about how I missed their expectations and make profits from the page views.

That's how it seems to me, unless you can somehow account for several million iPhones sitting ready in a warehouse somewhere that for some reason Apple isn't shipping out to people who have ordered them.

But Apple did not "expect to sell 10 computers" in your analogy. Let's try this:

I expect to sell a lot of computers. I make as many as I can ahead of time. I get 2 pre-orders before they even go on sale. I get 5 made before launch day.

Because of the 2 pre-orders, some analysts who don't work for me report that I should sell at least 10 computers in the first weekend.

When the launch day comes around, I sell all 5 of the computers I made within 3 days. I take orders for more and will get them to customers as soon as I can.

The analysts who expected that I would sell the 10 computers I didn't have built yet then post articles about how I missed their expectations and make profits from the page views.

That's how it seems to me, unless you can somehow account for several million iPhones sitting ready in a warehouse somewhere that for some reason Apple isn't shipping out to people who have ordered them.

best analogy so far :)

also the leap from 4 to 5 was expected to be bigger; remember that there was lot of fuss when 4S was released (it was percieved as as minor update) so it was expected that the sales for the iPhone 5 were going to be better then the 4S because of that; so yeah it's selling as Apple expected but the percieved demand should be much bigger.

If you expect the ridiculous you're bound to be disappointed. Doesn't matter how Boz tries to spin this one around, at the end of the day Apple still sold a million more iPhone 5 units compared to the iPhone 4S last year in the same timeframe. That's excluding pre-orders that haven't arrived yet.

Analyst Says Perhaps Millions of iPhone 5 Pre-Orders Still in Transit, Not Included in Announced Sales

http://www.macrumors...nnounced-sales/

  • Like 2

Um.. it's obvious where Apple will end up.. I said the same thing with Android and Apple fanboys said "OMG Android will never come close to iPhone".. and we see how that ended up.

Face it.. Apple has been milking the same phone for 5 years.. they are are not innovating anything, they have a stale OS and it's inevitable.

Consumers will eventually wake up and realize "Damn, I'm buying the same thing over and over again".. unfortunately consumers are slow to realize that, and that's why Apple gets away with mediocrity and marginal improvements.

Face it. OSX has had the same interface for past 10 years and yet it's become more popular than ever. Not just for individual buyers, but for corporations as well. Ever thought about why or do you figure that if you find the interface stale, everybody else is going to follow suit? I get that you don't like Apple, but the rationale behind your opinions of how the company is going down doesn't make a lot of sense. Let's break this down for you:

1. Estimates were set by Wall Street analysts, they all have their varying ranges from very conservative to very optimistic. The company doesn't strive to break analysts targets, it strives to break its own.

2. Apple sold 5 million iPhones on their opening weekend. That's 25% more than its predecessor. In an environment where there are countless alternatives by numerous companies which are cheaper or at the same price point.

3. The new iPhones cost $40 MORE than the predecessor and still sold 25% more. You would think people would know better than to pay more for something they find stale and old, right? Don't worry, here's some consolation for you. Apple didn't make more profit per phone because they incurred more material costs that was passed to the customer. "That's because they're all iSheep." (s) Yes - millions of customers and enterprises are all sheep because you managed to show a video of 5~6 people who couldn't tell the difference between 4S and 5. (/s)

4. Apple makes more profit per phone that's sold than all your other counterparts. Having 99% of market share by volume means doesn't mean much if you're profits shrink as a result.

Now let's look at why this stale interface works.

5. Apple's approach has been to make user interface INTUITIVE for the average retail user. For better or worse, it's why they have promoted a closed walled-garden since the beginning. The average user prefers familiarity and doesn't want/care to learn new things that is outside of their comfort zone. The way average users define 'simple' is very different from how technical folks define it. For you it's easy enough to swipe a finger or pull down a menu to change settings in Android but if you give it to someone new and ask them to figure the device out, it would take them a lot longer compared to an iPhone.

5b. People are comfortable with what is familiar to them unless there is a compelling reason to change. The interface maybe stale for you but it works for the masses who know exactly where to go and what to do when they get another device or software upgrade. They don't have to spend time figuring it out. I can give my grandma an iPad and she can figure out how to use it for her purposes without teaching her anything and she can barely read/write in English (she does have one and uses it). This again is entirely subject to people's preference.

5c. Why do you think increasing number of businesses are testing iPhones and iPads now? If there is one thing businesses feel comfortable with, it is consistency. They don't have the time to keep installing and trying different interfaces. They find what works and use it for as long as possible. If they get this level of consistency from Apple, you think they are just going to drop the devices because the interface is stale? Why don't you ask Microsoft how Windows 95/XP/7 fares for them? I'd love to find out how many companies are comfortable having Android devices on their network to be used for business related uses (not being sarcastic, really would like to know).

I'm not a "fanboy" simply because of Apple's marketing tactics. I've followed the company's products, services, business practices, design ethos stock since 2004 as closely as I could have. Their screw-ups aside (MobileMe, Antennagate, hockey puck mouse, issues at Foxconn, Maps, etc etc), their market position is justified.

I've not read the whole thread, but when reading other topics regarding this "news" most people (and news articles) seem to ignore the actual growth of the smartphone market (soemthing which the Analysts did include and why they were expecting more than 5 million sales). 5 million sales now is a smaller amount of the whole market than 4 million sales at the last iPhone launch.

Therefore in real terms there are more people buying iPhones, but less of the market are buying iPhones, and therefore you could anticipate good sales for Android and WP8 in the future, or otherwise people are simply holding onto their phones for longer.

I've not read the whole thread, but when reading other topics regarding this "news" most people (and news articles) seem to ignore the actual growth of the smartphone market (soemthing which the Analysts did include and why they were expecting more than 5 million sales). 5 million sales now is a smaller amount of the whole market than 4 million sales at the last iPhone launch.

Therefore in real terms there are more people buying iPhones, but less of the market are buying iPhones, and therefore you could anticipate good sales for Android and WP8 in the future, or otherwise people are simply holding onto their phones for longer.

this is a great point.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!